That's not Michael at TMZ

Sternschen87

I do not see any coloration of his nails... do we have other pictures of this date?
I haven't found them. I thought it was a trial...

Victor

<!-- s --><!-- s -->

SEHF

<!-- s --><!-- s -->

Sternschen87

what do you think?

tabloidburn

look harder. you can see a slight discoloration at the tips of the nails. it's mike, imo.

<!-- s --><!-- s -->

GirlInTheMirror

when you look at the left picture, the finger at his lips...there the nail is discolorated imo.

Hazzely

You are really on a roll with these double theories aren't you? <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->

Michael 100%

ForstAMoon

same day pictures





All Michael IMO

Sternschen87

I cannot see any coloration...
do we have any other photo?

Mj5StarChick

Lols <!-- s --><!-- s --> Ummm I think that's Mike all the way I think this pic here is from the same day at least think <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->http://m.yahoo.com/w/ygo-mail/message/getattachment.bp%3B_ylt=A2KIPnfnslFMLXoAqgNG9tw4?url=http%3A%2F%2Ff463.mail.yahoo.com%2Fya%2Fdownload%3Fmid%3D1_80028_ALDHtEQAAMNnTFGyKQfV6Tj12Z0%26fid%3DInbox%26pid%3D2&op=attachment&.ts=1280422631&.tsrc=yahoo&.intl=US&.lang=en

Sternschen87

Thank you for clearing this..... <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->

Mj5StarChick

No problem anything 2 help <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->

Kirsche

I can see clearly discolorations on his fingernails..... It is MIchael, 100 %!

AgentBJ

So many Michaels... <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->

MJonmind

Not so many, so MUCH gorgeous Michael, enough for all of us. <!-- s:oops: -->:oops:<!-- s:oops: -->

AnaMarcia

Hi guys ...
This theory of frequent use of doubles seems without unfounded.
I believe there was a double in place of Michael in some parts of "This Is It" and some appearances with a mask.
The appearance of Michael ever changed a lot ... sometimes he appeared wonderful, sometimes less so, for example at this stage of the photo. In 2001 he was very different from the 90s, but was he all the time, simply by way of him dancing and moving.
His appearance in 2009, to me, seems very similar to that of 2005, except for the hair, of course!
Anyway, Michael is always beautiful, elegant and one of the most charming men! <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: -->

Unknown

I can say with absolute certainty, that's Michael.

He didn't use doubles anywhere near as much as you'd think, and only then for purposes regarding his safety.

new tiux

<!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) --> it's Michael. Just look at handlines you can see - all the same <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) --> I'm always doing a second search if I doubt if it's him or not - I look ears or handlines or neck...if it's possible of course <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D -->

Sangre

Hon, this is Michael.