TIAI November 16
wishingstar
Posts: 2,927
<!-- m -->http://www.probatelawyerblog.com/2010/1 ... ution.html<!-- m -->
*notice on the right side of categories this page link:
<!-- m -->http://www.probatelawyerblog.com/michael-jackson/<!-- m -->
*notice on the right side of categories this page link:
<!-- m -->http://www.probatelawyerblog.com/michael-jackson/<!-- m -->
Comments
Eliza Presley case on track and moving towards resolution
Trying to prove that you are the secret daughter of Vernon Presley, and half-sister to Elvis Presley, is no simple task. It's much more complicated when the DNA proof that demonstrates this also establishes that Elvis Presley is alive.
[If you haven't read my prior articles about the Eliza Presley case, you can here to catch up http://www.probatelawyerblog.com/elvis-presley/]
If you stop and think about it, the task is so daunting to almost be insurmountable. Eliza Presley and her lawyer are trying to convince a judge to accept evidence and issue an order that would mean what the world believed to be fact, for more than 30 years, was actually fiction.
This mission is the culmination of Eliza's quest which started almost 20 years ago -- when she had no idea that her search to find her biological father would lead her to this.
Eliza has faced roadblocks, delays, complications and many enemies. The reality is that there are people making a lot of money from the fact that Elvis is dead, and they sure don't want that fact to be changed. There are others still who want the truth to come out -- but they want to expose it (and profit from it). None of these people want Eliza's case to interfere with their agendas.
With the long and difficult path Eliza has traveled, there is no telling for certain when she'll reach the end of the road. But it's coming. It could even be as soon as a month away.
Her court case is now set for a Scheduling Conference on December 14, 2010. Scheduling conferences are typically used so attorneys can update courts about the status of the proceedings, set deadlines for preliminary matters to occur, such as the "discovery" deadline (discovery is the process that parties to lawsuits use to uncover relevant information through depositions, subpoenas, etc.) and ultimately get the case ready for trial.
In this case, the Scheduling Conference will be more important than in most cases because it will be the first time that Eliza's attorney is able to personally address the court about the issue of whether Lisa Marie Presley-Lockwood hired the lawyer who is opposing Eliza's lawsuit.
As I detailed in my last article, it appears this lawyer may not actually represent Lisa Marie. In fact, Eliza believes (for good reason) that Lisa Marie doesn't oppose her lawsuit or her quest to expose the truth. Instead, Eliza and her attorney believe that this lawyer, who claims to represent Lisa Marie, isn't being honest about it. If they are correct, it means he had no right to file anything in the case, much less contest Eliza's claim.
To get to the bottom of this, Eliza's lawyer sent him a letter asking for proof that he really does represent Lisa Marie. He hasn't provided anything in response, and instead told Eliza's lawyer that he won't do so.
I also emailed him directly and offered him for a chance to respond to the last article I wrote on this topic. He wrote me back and politely declined to do so, without explanation.
The question of whether he does or does not represent Lisa Marie will be addressed, and quite possibly resolved, at the December 14th Conference. If the Chancellor (which is what judges in Chancery Court in Tennessee are called) determines that Lisa Marie never authorized this lawyer to act on her behalf, then the opposition he filed to Eliza's claims will be stricken and Eliza's claim will proceed to final judgment, unopposed.
But it is also possible that there will be more delays. The Chancellor may not be ready to resolve that issue on the 14th. Or there could be other factors that play into it. For example, a family member of Eliza has a serious illness (which already caused a two-week postponement of the Conference date). That could cause further delays.
Again, Eliza's monumental journey has encountered far too many bumps in the road to expect that it will be smooth at this point.
Unless, of course, the Chancellor throws this lawyer's defense out of court. Then it would just about be time to start rewriting the history books.
Eliza has told me that, despite all the hurdles being placed in her way, she will see this case through to the end. She has the support of her brother and she will only stop if he asks her to do so.
Posted by: Author and probate attorney Andrew W. Mayoras, co-author of Trial & Heirs: Famous Fortune Fights! and co-founder and shareholder of The Center for Probate Litigation and The Center for Elder Law in metro-Detroit, Michigan, which concentrate in probate litigation, estate planning, and elder law.
From Linda website:
When Hinton came under investigation Jesse wrote a letter to the Attorney General supporting the doctor and refuting the fraud claims. he wrote:
Do you really think that he gave his approval to use his DNA and to reveal to the world that he is alive...?
Who's Linda?
<!-- m -->http://lindahoodsigmontruth.com/<!-- m -->
The woman in touch with Elvis/Jesse
“Linda Hood Sigmund's website update” : <!-- l -->viewtopic.php?f=10&t=15574&start=0<!-- l -->
Yes I know what you mean, I mentioned the coincidence last week in another thread (which one ? <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? --> ) about the date and the "time" also <!-- s
Its just such a "huge" coincidence" dont you think <!-- s8-) -->8-)<!-- s8-) -->
Watching and waiting <!-- s
Love to all!
<!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D -->
Absolutely, it seems the piece by piece unfolding is getting faster in the past weeks too <!-- s:P -->:P<!-- s:P -->
Finally we will know.
I guess I am just confused about some things...
If I remember reading this right, wasn't it Elvis/Jessie who wrote that book with Dr. Hinton in the first place? And if so... Elvis/Jessie had to know what could happen as a result of writing that book. Did Elvis/Jessie change his mind about being exposed after that book?
Also, if I remember right, wasn't it also Elvis/Jessie who gave the envelope with DNA on it to someone (Linda, I think) to give to Eliza to prove that he was who he says he is, and for her to prove she is Vernon's daughter? I thought I read that he wanted to help Eliza with her case and prove she was his sister.
And, what is going on with this Linda? She has in the past posted letters and things to prove that Elvis/Jessie is alive and exists, now all of a sudden she is saying that she never puts any thing on her site that points to the fact that this man is indeed Elvis/Jessie? Am I the only one who is confused by all the inconsistencies? Maybe it's a simple as he (Elvis/Jessie) thought he wanted the world to know he was indeed alive but has since changed his mind after the book and now with Eliza's case.
And...it seems fairly obvious to me that this lawyer the no one seems to know who he represents is in fact Elvis/Jessie's lawyer as it seems he does not want to be exposed. So I am not convinced that we might ever know the out come of this case especially if Elvis/Jessie does not want it to happen. I think he will do whatever he can to stop it and make it go away.
Any thoughts? I apologize if things I said were not correct as I didn't go back and read everything, was just trying to draw from memory.
LOVE & Blessings to All!
Keep the Faith <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
Michael....I LOVE You More!!
No, Jesse didn't gave the pink envelope to Linda to give it to Eliza... Here is the pink envelope story:
And please re-read what Linda wrote:
This was discussed in the forum, about the possibility that it might be Priscilla Presley, who hired the lawyer supposedly representing LMP, however have to wait and wish luck to Eliza.
One of the sentence that stands out: "There is something very calculating and manipulative about him..."
What did she think His agenda was? Did she have her own agenda? Was she also hiding things... such as Elvis being alive?
[youtube:u5zcbx9i]
Here we are now 5 years later, discussing this strange synchronicity between Michael and Elvis!
It is mind blowing isn't it!
I cannot help thinking that this Elvis story has got much more in it than the eyes can see:
- Why is Linda constantly repeating that Jessie does not support the court case and that she has removed all relevant information from her website? This feels to me like reverse psychology! Tell them what they shouldn't know so that they go and look for it!
- The reference to a "him" who knows: "As he spoke to me years ago about another situation relating to him being alive "Oh well...no body would believe him anyway." And NO, he was not referring to Dr. Hinton." Could this be a reference to Michael?
- The conscious effort by Linda to refer to ORION in her November update. Orion is a key symbolism in Michael's "Hoax"
- The Eliza case now on the 14th December --- Just by magic!
- If we beLIEve Linda, then the lawyer acting on the behalf of the Presley's is probably mandated by Jessie/Elvis
So what is TRUTH and what is LIE in this amazing drama?
With L.O.V.E
And interesting that suddenly we have Linda appearing to say that Eliza is doing this against the wishes of Jesse.
Plausible.
Regarding the court date of 12-14, I feel, if memory serves, that this was delayed from the original date of 11/30, and recently too...
Do we have proof that the album release date was set (or determined) AFTER this most recent delay, to coincide withe court date?
Because Eliza's case IS real... it can't be scheduled at will. The album can of course.
So until I see proof that the album date was announced AFTER the most recent delay in Eliza's case... this will have to be considered a legitimate coincidence.
We knew about the release date on 5th of November
<!-- l -->viewtopic.php?f=50&t=15425&start=0<!-- l -->
Not until it's proven.
Just because Eliza twittered something doesn't mean that she hadn't know about it already for days...
Memory doesn't always serve and I don't have something in print handy to prove the album release date was set on 11/5 either.
I'd like to see when, exactly, the case was delayed and when exactly the album release date was announced.
As far as I can see, the court hearing was officially rescheduled on the 10th November ---> see court register below, last line:
http://chancerydata.shelbycountytn.gov/pls/chweb/ck_public_qry_doct.cp_dktrpt_frames?backto=P&case_id=CH-09-1696&begin_date=&end_date=
I can accept the occasional coincidence but we are getting far too many of those! Money,connections and knowledge of the court system can probably get you a reasonable chance to get the date you want... or God is directing the Hoax! <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
With L.O.V.E
That just stuck out to me....just a coincidence, I am sure. <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D -->
Too much patience needed here....from a court date to another
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."So we have proof of when Eliza's court date was changed, and it was AFTER the album release date was announced. Is that right? Do we have confirmation that the album release date was definatly announced on 11/5? If so, that's weird.
I don't believe in a god... not even a little bit... so I have to keep looking for another plausible explanation.
To put it bluntly, in my opinion, to attribute it to "god" is to ignore it and walk away. That's like giving up. "Well, I don't know and I don't understand, so it's an act of 'god" and I no longer have to think about it." It's sort of like calling something a coincidence... what did back say? "Coincidence is a lazy place-holder for reasoning", something like that.