Japan Tsunami caused by HAARP?
diggyon
Posts: 1,376
Hi everyone,
well, first when I heard about the Japan Tsunami I got suspicious. And whenever I hear about an earthquake I think about HAARP. So I decided to dig for more information about that case. Then i came across this site:
<!-- m -->http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2011 ... haarp.html<!-- m -->
Check it out. I guess I found the answer there.
By the way: the date of that earthquake is suspicious as well
11.3.11
Got what I mean???????????????
well, first when I heard about the Japan Tsunami I got suspicious. And whenever I hear about an earthquake I think about HAARP. So I decided to dig for more information about that case. Then i came across this site:
<!-- m -->http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2011 ... haarp.html<!-- m -->
Check it out. I guess I found the answer there.
By the way: the date of that earthquake is suspicious as well
11.3.11
Got what I mean???????????????
Comments
The date is rearly suspicious.
When i think at the Twin Towers.
11.September 2001
and now
11.March 2011
some are destroyed by flood, some by riots, some by earthquakes, and some by killing the president and the whole elite of the country in a plane crash... <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
I really wish someone could do something about them! But the only person powerful enough is God.. <!-- s:( -->:(<!-- s:( -->
They say it is the supermoon who was at fault. please read.
The tragic earthquake and tsunami in Japan Friday (March 11) set the Internet abuzz with the idea that the moon, which will be at its fullest of the year on March 19, played a role in the devastating natural disaster.
The seed for the idea was planted by an astrologer, who contended that this large full moon – a so-called "supermoon"– would touch off natural disasters like the Japan earthquake since the moon would make its closest approach to Earth in 18 years. Scientists, however, dismissed the notion entirely and now a top NASA scientist is weighing in. [Japan Earthquake and Tsunami in Pictures]
In a statement released Friday, noted NASA scientist Jim Garvin explains the mechanics behind the moon's phases and the causes of the supermoon. Garvin is the chief scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md.
"'Supermoon' is a situation when the moon is slightly closer to Earth in its orbit than on average, and this effect is most noticeable when it occurs at the same time as a full moon," Garvin wrote in the NASA statement. "So, the moon may seem bigger although the difference in its distance from Earth is only a few percent at such times." [Photos: Our Changing Moon]
The full moon of March will occur next Saturday on March 19, when the moon will be about 221,567 miles (356,577 kilometers) away from Earth. The average distance between the Earth and the moon is about 238.000 miles (382.900 km).
"It is called a supermoon because this is a very noticeable alignment that at first glance would seem to have an effect," Garvin explained. "The 'super' in supermoon is really just the appearance of being closer, but unless we were measuring the Earth-Moon distance by laser rangefinders (as we do to track the LRO [Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter] spacecraft in low lunar orbit and to watch the Earth-Moon distance over years), there is really no difference."
It was astrologer Richard Nolle who linked the full moon of March 19 to natural disasters. He claimed that this "supermoon" would trigger massive earthquakes, volcanoes and powerful storms when it arrived. But scientists assure that this is not the case.
Garvin, for example, said the moon's effects on Earth have been the subject of extensive studies.
"The effects on Earth from a supermoon are minor, and according to the most detailed studies by terrestrial seismologists and volcanologists, the combination of the moon being at its closest to Earth in its orbit, and being in its 'full moon' configuration (relative to the Earth and sun), should not affect the internal energy balance of the Earth since there are lunar tides every day," Garvin wrote.
But while the moon helps drive Earth's tides, it is not capable of triggering devastating earthquakes.
"The Earth has stored a tremendous amount of internal energy within its thin outer shell or crust, and the small differences in the tidal forces exerted by the moon (and sun) are not enough to fundamentally overcome the much larger forces within the planet due to convection (and other aspects of the internal energy balance that drives plate tectonics)," Garvin explained.
Well, I cannot! And as I say believe whatever you like!
I personally think the bad guys did it!
Check the internet... try to find out the truth.......
Well....it's now full of that issue.....
period
[youtube:1doxjx23]
Card Game of the New World Order and the fun of some
but maybe it was HAARP in 1896 as well... <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: -->
IAEA: Did not take sufficient measures to prevent nuclear accident
Fukushima started pouring thousands of tons of radioactive water into the sea
Fails second attempt to try to seal leakage of radioactive water
The Japanese company TEPCO, operator of the nuclear power plant in Fukushima, began to pour 11,500 tons of radioactive water from the central Pacific Ocean.
Tokyo Electric Power (TEPCO) says that the concentration of radioactivity in water is one hundred times the legal limit. According to the Japanese press, the radioactive water comes from special deposits of the nuclear power plant.
The objective is to enable space at these locations to be able to move there the water with an even higher radioactivity, which floods the turbines of the reactors 1, 2 and 3 buildings, and seriously hindering the work of the operators of TEPCO to cool them.
What does this imply?
The effects on the environment are undeniable, but, as does not know with certainty the substances released into the sea, only you can talk about assumptions.
At the core of a nuclear reactor there are more than 60 radioactive contaminants from the fission of uranium, some of very long life and other very short-lived.
Among these pollutants, which would have major consequences for the environment would be iodine, strontium 90 and caesium (C-137). "Iodine affected immediately and stop mutations in the genes, from which it can then develop thyroid cancer."
Meanwhile, the strontium is accumulated in bones at least 30 years, as if it were calcium, and for years still radiating the Agency; "while the caesium is deposited in the muscles".
"Long-term nuclear contamination is deposited on the ground and at sea, and is incorporated into the food chain of fish, which are the basis of the diet in Japan, from the rest of animals, the plants"", fruit, vegetables", spoke.
"This process will be bioacumulando, i.e. it is passing an if I live to another and it is going to get worse." "An example of this is that of the thousands of reindeer that had to be sacrificed in the Arctic after Chernobyl, because they were absolutely contaminated through the lichens that had eaten"
It should be noted that another element that can be released in a nuclear accident is uranium. The isotope 234, one of three that can be found in a natural way, has a half-life of 247,000 years.
In addition, forms 238 and 235 of the uranium, which are used as fuel in the majority of the reactors in the world, have a length of 4.5 billion years and 710 million years, respectively.
and I think,... AND THE WATER IN SEAS AND RIVERS ARE EVAPORATED, IS CONDENSES AND IS TRANSFORMED IN RAIN.
THE WINDS ARE CLOUDS....
RADIOACTIVE RAIN...
DOES THE CHAIN OF FOOD TO WHERE IT CAN POLLUTE?...
OR WE JOIN OR US EXTERMINATED.