News of the World Jacko killed by 'Mr X' not doc
finfin
Posts: 648
This is the link, but you may not be able to view
<!-- m -->http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/notw/_n ... iller.html<!-- m -->
Jacko killed by 'Mr X' not doc
Mystery fingerprints found on death syringe
Accused's lawyer says he can't be convicted
Death scene... syringe and Jacko's bedroomExclusive by James Desborough, US Editor
April 17, 2011
THE fingerprints on the syringe that killed Michael Jackson are NOT his doctor's, we can reveal.
The bombshell new evidence means Dr Conrad Murray could walk free from his trial for involuntary manslaughter, which starts in just three weeks.
Jacko... on stage HO/AFP/Getty Images
And it supports his theory that a "Mr X" injected Jacko with a lethal dose of Propofol - before stealing more than a million dollars of his cash and fleeing.
Police will not be able to disprove Murray easily because in another twist they have LOST 24 hours of CCTV footage from Jacko's mansion that would have shown exactly who was inside when he died.
A source close to the case told the News of the World: "The mystery fingerprints are the biggest breakthrough for Murray so far. If it is handled right it would mean a jury cannot convict him.
"Murray and Michael were the only ones supposedly at the house at the time. And all the syringes were vacuum-packed and sterile before use.
"The fingerprints point to someone else being there and using the fatal syringe."
Murray's lawyer Ed Chernoff has now adopted the catchphrase: "If the print doesn't fit, you must acquit."
It comes from OJ Simpson's lawyer Johnnie Cochran - who said, "If it doesn't fit, you must acquit" about a glove OJ was supposedly wearing when he allegedly murdered his wife. The jury found him not guilty.
The fingerprints on Jacko's syringe do not belong to any of his family or staff - and no one knows whose they are.
I never wanted him to die - he was my friend
They were found by Murray's legal team after they asked the Los Angeles Police Department for the coroners' "evidence box". Inside it were several syringes from Jacko's bedroom - including the one doctors said killed him - plus pills, drips, oxygen tanks and his clothes.
Murray's lawyers had them dusted for prints. Jackson, 50, overdosed on the powerful sedative Propofol in June 2009. Cardiologist Murray, who was paid £90,000 a month by the singer to be his personal doctor, is accused of negligently administering the drug.
He denies the charge, and faces up to four years in jail if found guilty. His lawyers will argue someone else gave Jacko the drug through a drip into his leg. They believe the mystery killer is the same person who swiped huge wads of cash lying around the mansion Jackson was renting in LA.
Murray... May trial AP/Jason Redmond
The "Mr X" defence ties into our exclusive story on how the Jackson family frantically called staff to try to find a massive sum of missing money in the hours after Jacko died. His children Paris, 12, and Prince, 13, sister LaToya and mum Katherine are all expected to testify at the trial that Jacko had bundles of $100 notes which vanished.
Our source said: "The missing CCTV tape also helps the theory.
"Bodyguards say they handed over 24 hours-worth of footage from the day, which showed everyone who came and went.
"Chernoff's been told it is no longer available. Somehow only a few minutes of the footage is left."
The twists could mean Murray, 56, may not even have to speak at the trial. He doesn't want to take the stand - and his team plan to submit a statement saying: "I didn't do it, and I don't know how it happened. I am deeply sorry for Michael's death. I never wanted him to die - he was my friend."
His lawyers will also point out he would be mad to kill his employer, who paid him more than a million dollars a year.
But even if Murray is cleared of manslaughter, he will face a battle to clear his name.
Last week court papers showed he was making flirty texts and calls to three women while Jacko lay dying. And we previously revealed he failed to administer proper CPR, refused to tell doctors about injecting Propofol and hid details of Jacko's pill use.
Jury selection starts this week and the prosecution's opening statements begin on May 9.
Yesterday the LA District Attorney's office and Murray's spokesman refused to comment.
But a Jackson family spokesman said: "They are concerned about all the matters around the death. They are unsure Conrad Murray will ever go to prison."
<!-- m -->http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/notw/_n ... iller.html<!-- m -->
Jacko killed by 'Mr X' not doc
Mystery fingerprints found on death syringe
Accused's lawyer says he can't be convicted
Death scene... syringe and Jacko's bedroomExclusive by James Desborough, US Editor
April 17, 2011
THE fingerprints on the syringe that killed Michael Jackson are NOT his doctor's, we can reveal.
The bombshell new evidence means Dr Conrad Murray could walk free from his trial for involuntary manslaughter, which starts in just three weeks.
Jacko... on stage HO/AFP/Getty Images
And it supports his theory that a "Mr X" injected Jacko with a lethal dose of Propofol - before stealing more than a million dollars of his cash and fleeing.
Police will not be able to disprove Murray easily because in another twist they have LOST 24 hours of CCTV footage from Jacko's mansion that would have shown exactly who was inside when he died.
A source close to the case told the News of the World: "The mystery fingerprints are the biggest breakthrough for Murray so far. If it is handled right it would mean a jury cannot convict him.
"Murray and Michael were the only ones supposedly at the house at the time. And all the syringes were vacuum-packed and sterile before use.
"The fingerprints point to someone else being there and using the fatal syringe."
Murray's lawyer Ed Chernoff has now adopted the catchphrase: "If the print doesn't fit, you must acquit."
It comes from OJ Simpson's lawyer Johnnie Cochran - who said, "If it doesn't fit, you must acquit" about a glove OJ was supposedly wearing when he allegedly murdered his wife. The jury found him not guilty.
The fingerprints on Jacko's syringe do not belong to any of his family or staff - and no one knows whose they are.
I never wanted him to die - he was my friend
They were found by Murray's legal team after they asked the Los Angeles Police Department for the coroners' "evidence box". Inside it were several syringes from Jacko's bedroom - including the one doctors said killed him - plus pills, drips, oxygen tanks and his clothes.
Murray's lawyers had them dusted for prints. Jackson, 50, overdosed on the powerful sedative Propofol in June 2009. Cardiologist Murray, who was paid £90,000 a month by the singer to be his personal doctor, is accused of negligently administering the drug.
He denies the charge, and faces up to four years in jail if found guilty. His lawyers will argue someone else gave Jacko the drug through a drip into his leg. They believe the mystery killer is the same person who swiped huge wads of cash lying around the mansion Jackson was renting in LA.
Murray... May trial AP/Jason Redmond
The "Mr X" defence ties into our exclusive story on how the Jackson family frantically called staff to try to find a massive sum of missing money in the hours after Jacko died. His children Paris, 12, and Prince, 13, sister LaToya and mum Katherine are all expected to testify at the trial that Jacko had bundles of $100 notes which vanished.
Our source said: "The missing CCTV tape also helps the theory.
"Bodyguards say they handed over 24 hours-worth of footage from the day, which showed everyone who came and went.
"Chernoff's been told it is no longer available. Somehow only a few minutes of the footage is left."
The twists could mean Murray, 56, may not even have to speak at the trial. He doesn't want to take the stand - and his team plan to submit a statement saying: "I didn't do it, and I don't know how it happened. I am deeply sorry for Michael's death. I never wanted him to die - he was my friend."
His lawyers will also point out he would be mad to kill his employer, who paid him more than a million dollars a year.
But even if Murray is cleared of manslaughter, he will face a battle to clear his name.
Last week court papers showed he was making flirty texts and calls to three women while Jacko lay dying. And we previously revealed he failed to administer proper CPR, refused to tell doctors about injecting Propofol and hid details of Jacko's pill use.
Jury selection starts this week and the prosecution's opening statements begin on May 9.
Yesterday the LA District Attorney's office and Murray's spokesman refused to comment.
But a Jackson family spokesman said: "They are concerned about all the matters around the death. They are unsure Conrad Murray will ever go to prison."
Comments
I said this was going to happen MONTHS AGO!!!! I knew the fingerprints wouldnt match Murray or Michael.
OH MY BLOODY GOD!!!!!!!! Why the hell wasnt this done on day ONE!!!!
I need time for this to sink in because i said this months ago and now its become the reality.
So they revealed that the fingerprints on the syringe do not belong to the doctor but they didn't write that they do not belong to Michael either.
That is exactly what's going to happen.
First of, I HATE it when they use Jacko! And second of all we're having a new theory here that a "very mysterious" person got into the house that "nobody" saw and he "killed" the one who was already sleeping to get his money. <!-- s
If the fingerprints do not belong to Murray then they have to be Michael's.
There has to be mystery everywhere. <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D --> Guess who this mysterious person is?
Of course no family or staff coz they belong to Michael himself duh.
I dont read the article like that. I read it that the fingerprints do not match Murray, Michael or any other known person. They would have checked the prints against Michaels.
There was a thread about this a while ago, when the defence were talking about this syringe and asking for MJs fingerprints to compare. Its in that thread that i said i bet the fingerprints will match a mysterious third person.
i was right about the CCTV being written over and i know im right about this. Call it instinct.
It was just a matter of time before this "revelation" would be revealed.
What i dont understand is why no-one is now questioning the initial police investigation. Fingerprinting a syringe found in the room would be basic detective work and basic scene of crime procedure. Instead they choose to do this WEEKS before a murder trial?????? MAKES NO SENSE.
Mystery fingerprints found on death syringe
Accused's lawyer says he can't be convicted
But now they are saying KILLED..........this court case was not about a murder, it was manslaughter.
So how can this newspaper make an assumption that it is MURDER !!!
This is crucial evidence that will aquit the doctor, but no-one else was in the room or house at the time.
This is fantastic news, as we already knew there would be an aquittal, as MJ would not let an innocent man go to jail !!Thanks for sharing this ....
And we have another Lindsay Lohan connection.. <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
Manslaughter IS murder... its just a different level of mens rea involved. It is still killing someone!!!!!
i think because if it wasn't murry then it wasn't something that would be negligent but intentional perhaps even pre-meditated wouldn't ? seems like at this point someone needs to be looking for someone else to charge if it isn't bs.
"the Jackson family frantically called staff to try to find a massive sum of missing money in the hours after Jacko died"
But the staff were dismissed,while the ambulance was there.........unless they mean the "bodyguards".
MJ would have needed that $$$$$$$ in cash so he wouldn't be traced to his whereabouts.
The only thing that really worries me, is if this is really a murder case, and someone is walking free at the moment.
Syringes are supposed to be sterile, as stated, but is it possible that someone from the family, LaToya planted it there and they are her fingerprints ???? Sounds more realistic than someone who murdered MJ, was STUPID enough to leave fingerprints on a syringe to be found.......
Definitely planted there to help Murray get off... <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) --> <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
But how would they know that??? Did they have all the family give their fingerprints when they are not even suspects??
Doesn't match any of them huh? Even Blanket? Did they fingerprint Blanket to compare? How about Tito's sons? Jermaine's boys? How about Katherine. Did the fingerprint Katherine just to be sure? They must have, the article says it doesn't match any of the Jackson Family.
Come to think of it, never mind the Jackson family, none of them were at the scene at the time anyway. How about the Bodyguards? Did they check the Bodyguards prints? Maybe it's one of them.
This is such BS.
Yes, they could have given prints to help the investigation. Its not uncommon.
For example.. if your house gets burgled, the cops will take your prints in order to discount them from any they find at the scene.
It's not porn.. its a UK tabloid. Our newspapers have lots of pictures of nakes ladies in them. Page 3 has topless lady on daily.
Im not sure why... must be British men for you!!! <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D -->
http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/notw/_news/1273373/Dr-Murray-not-Jacksons-killer.html
<!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? --> What more can I say? When will we be able to see the movie in widescreen? <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: --> Certainly this is what we’re being prepped for.
<!-- m -->http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FwW5gU7r ... rofilepage<!-- m -->
[youtube:37qw2fzn]
No, because its an exclusive to them.
I do not buy all this crap. Maybe that is the reason why I took the article like the way I wrote. I do not believe there is a third person because I am sure that Michael is alive. <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) --> So no need to panic over this BS. Like you wrote in your last paragraph, nothing makes sense in this so called investigation. Everyday we hear a new story. So no need to get excited about these.
This doesn’t fit what was reported. There were others there. They were sent home after the paramedics arrived. Am I correct or am I missing something? Please correct me if I’m wrong. Possibly they are referring to the hours when the injections supposedly happened. At that hour, I guess they were the only ones in that room, but certainly not the only ones in the home. Wouldn’t it be a twist if the next revelation was that maybe, just maybe one of Murrays hos did it <!-- s
If we think the 911 call was made by Alverez, there's at least one more person at home. Ahh but plus I do remember that the cook was downstairs with the kids. And yes, the house staff like maids and bodyguards were there too. All of these contradictions tell how fake the story is. And I'm not talking about this article only, I'm talking about the entire "death" story. <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
On a different note: if Murray is just a character in the play, no wonder the fingerprints do not much. Dr.Murray does not exits <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->