Janet Jackson Still Fighting To Change Michael Jackson's Will

darkchild

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/20/janet-jackson-michael-jackson-will_n_1812157.html<br /><br /><br />Janet Jackson Still Fighting To Change Michael Jackson's Will<br /><br />Posted: 08/20/2012 3:17 pm<br /><br />Janet Jackson's management team has made it clear in a new statement that the singer is still questioning the “veracity” of brother Michael Jackson’s will. But why is Janet now saying something is wrong now, three years after the will was probated?<br /><br />“No one can understand why she is doing this,” a Jackson insider tells me. “Even if Janet got the executors fired and new ones instated, all the money would still go to Michael’s three children, Prince, Paris and Blanket. The executors took the estate, crippled in debt, and have made a fortune for the children. It almost seems that she's trying to take the money away from his kids."<br /><br />And that is exactly what several Hollywood insiders have said is at the root of all these problems: Are the three kids really Michael's and if they are not, should they be getting the King of Pop's millions?<br /><br />A statement posted on her website says Janet has nothing to gain financially by finding the will to be invalid. Confirming that Michael’s children are the beneficiaries of his estate, the statement says the people who have the most to lose are “the executors and those on the executors' payroll.”

MaryK

::) I don´t understand some people....it´s completely irrelevant if the children are biologically his or not. <br />None of their business and irrelevant regarding the will. <br />They are his children and he decided to have them and raise them and he wants them to be his heirs. End of story. <br /><br />Maybe people should start connecting the dots and finally they might see what the only logical reason for contesting the will and asking the executors to step down might be  :icon_e_wink:

2good2btrue

And that is exactly what several Hollywood insiders have said is at the root of all these problems: Are the three kids really Michael's and if they are not, should they be getting the King of Pop's millions?<br /><br />Just exactly "who" are these hollywood insiders??  The biological aspect of his children should have nothing to do with it...Even if they were adopted by MJ, they are still legally his children.  As far as the courts are concerned, MJ has left a will, and in that will it clearly states who he wants the money to go to...<br /><br />I call BS...Just some more controversy and keeping MJ's name in the spotlight..

emulik

on 1345703030:

<br /> ::) I don´t understand some people....it´s completely irrelevant if the children are biologically his or not. <br />None of their business and irrelevant regarding the will. <br />They are his children and he decided to have them and raise them and he wants them to be his heirs. End of story. <br /><br />Maybe people should start connecting the dots and finally they might see what the only logical reason for contesting the will and asking the executors to step down might be  :icon_e_wink:<br />

<br />I share your opinion Mary! it is none of their business to questioning the kids..even if they are not biological his, that absolutely does not matter, he raised them better than any other parent! <br />so much legal documents speak in news lately...there must be a reason for that.

blankie

on 1345711237:

<br />

on 1345703030:

<br /> ::) I don´t understand some people....it´s completely irrelevant if the children are biologically his or not. <br />None of their business and irrelevant regarding the will. <br />They are his children and he decided to have them and raise them and he wants them to be his heirs. End of story. <br /><br />Maybe people should start connecting the dots and finally they might see what the only logical reason for contesting the will and asking the executors to step down might be  :icon_e_wink:<br />

<br />I share your opinion Mary! it is none of their business to questioning the kids..even if they are not biological his, that absolutely does not matter, he raised them better than any other parent! <br />so much legal documents speak in news lately...there must be a reason for that.<br />

<br /><br /><br />Agree totally with you and  I think we have to remember what Michael has always said about  the media... :michael-jackson: Is the tabloid junkle!!  :computer-losy-smiley: :Crash:

ilovemjforever

on 1345717846:

<br />

on 1345711237:

<br />

on 1345703030:

<br /> ::) I don´t understand some people....it´s completely irrelevant if the children are biologically his or not. <br />None of their business and irrelevant regarding the will. <br />They are his children and he decided to have them and raise them and he wants them to be his heirs. End of story. <br /><br />Maybe people should start connecting the dots and finally they might see what the only logical reason for contesting the will and asking the executors to step down might be  :icon_e_wink:<br />

<br />I share your opinion Mary! it is none of their business to questioning the kids..even if they are not biological his, that absolutely does not matter, he raised them better than any other parent! <br />so much legal documents speak in news lately...there must be a reason for that.<br />

<br /><br /><br />Agree totally with you and  I think we have to remember what Michael has always said about  the media... :michael-jackson: Is the tabloid junkle!!  :computer-losy-smiley: :Crash:<br />

I agree with the sentiment that if those are Michael s kids biologically or adopted,they should receive all of his assets.On the other hand what if those kids were forced on Michael by the PTB,or another theory what if those are not Michael s kids at all.Remember he always keep their faces covered up,then after June 25,2009 they were unmasked.How can we be 100% certain that we are seeing the real Paris,Prince and Blanket.Sometimes what you think you see,is not what your seeing at all.Im trying to look at this from all angles.I will keep an open mind,and watch this thing play out.Every thing that is happening within this hoax,keeps reminding me of the strong delusion mentioned in the Bible.Is God getting us prepared for what lies ahead.

Loveunited

Let's not sink into distraction about the children. Let's focus on the real issue "Confirming that Michael’s children are the beneficiaries of his estate, the statement says [size=18pt]the people who have the most to lose are “the executors and those on the executors' payroll.”[/size]

SimPattyK

on 1345729647:

Let's not sink into distraction about the children. Let's focus on the real issue "Confirming that Michael’s children are the beneficiaries of his estate, the statement says [size=18pt]the people who have the most to lose are “the executors and those on the executors' payroll.”[/size]

<br />YEP!! That's IT !!! <br /><br />That goes exactly in the same line with what I already posted here : http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/forum/index.php/topic,13838.msg422516.html#msg422516 Actually I will quote you in that thread, @LoveUnited!  :icon_e_wink:

Sarahli

on 1345729074:

<br />or another theory what if those are not Michael s kids at all.Remember he always keep their faces covered up,then after June 25,2009 they were unmasked.How can we be 100% certain that we are seeing the real Paris,Prince and Blanket.<br />

<br /><br />We actually saw the kids without masks before June 25:<br /><br /><br /><br />

hesouttamylife

:ghsdf:  I agree on that quote 100%.  They are the ONLY ones with something to lose.

everlastinglove_MJ

on 1345729647:

<br />Let's not sink into distraction about the children. Let's focus on the real issue "Confirming that Michael’s children are the beneficiaries of his estate, the statement says [size=18pt]the people who have the most to lose are “the executors and those on the executors' payroll.”[/size]<br />

<br /><br />Exactly!<br />Here's some more news: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20120823/us-michael-jackson-executor/<br /><br />I think the executors aren't so cool as they seem or let us believe with some help of the media.. Truth will prevail, I'll keep watchin' :icon_e_geek:

ilovemjforever

on 1345738723:

<br />

on 1345729647:

Let's not sink into distraction about the children. Let's focus on the real issue "Confirming that Michael’s children are the beneficiaries of his estate, the statement says [size=18pt]the people who have the most to lose are “the executors and those on the executors' payroll.”[/size]

<br />YEP!! That's IT !!! <br /><br />That goes exactly in the same line with what I already posted here : http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/forum/index.php/topic,13838.msg422516.html#msg422516 Actually I will quote you in that thread, @LoveUnited!  :icon_e_wink:<br />

O.k. I stand corrected but my point is,for the most part,the kids were never truly exposed to the public.The point i am trying to make is,how can we be absolutely certain that the real Paris,Prince and Blanket,are not being faked,like they did with Michael.Why all of a sudden do the kids go from behind the spotlight to in front of the spotlight.Same thing is happening to Whitney's daughter,soon as her mother is removed,she is becoming a public figure,constantly in the news/tabloids.Who is behind this orchestration,the good guys,or the bad guys?

reveron1958

on 1345761196:

<br />The point i am trying to make is,how can we be absolutely certain that the real Paris,Prince and Blanket,are not being faked,like they did with Michael.<br />

<br /><br />Am I reading this wrong?    Are you saying someone faked Michael? <br /><br />

ilovemjforever

on 1345761626:

<br />

on 1345761196:

<br />The point i am trying to make is,how can we be absolutely certain that the real Paris,Prince and Blanket,are not being faked,like they did with Michael.<br />

<br /><br />Am I reading this wrong?    Are you saying someone faked Michael? <br /><br /><br />

I don't want to stir up controversy on this subject,but i think it is pretty obvious that Michael had doubles.In a few of his songs he talked about them faking him.To what extinct i don't know.Imo,its not so farfetched that the kids are being manipulated and controlled,and possibly have doubles as well.I am confused as well,but i am searching for answers,and i am not ruling out any possibilities.We must use discernment about everything regarding this hoax.

reveron1958

on 1345762735:

<br />

on 1345761626:

<br />

on 1345761196:

<br />The point i am trying to make is,how can we be absolutely certain that the real Paris,Prince and Blanket,are not being faked,like they did with Michael.<br />

<br /><br />Am I reading this wrong?    Are you saying someone faked Michael? <br /><br /><br />

I don't want to stir up controversy on this subject,but i think it is pretty obvious that Michael had doubles.In a few of his songs he talked about them faking him.To what extinct i don't know.Imo,its not so farfetched that the kids are being manipulated and controlled,and possibly have doubles as well.I am confused as well,but i am searching for answers,and i am not ruling out any possibilities.We must use discernment about everything regarding this hoax.<br />

<br /><br />Being entirely 'faked' and having 'doubles' as occasional decoys is an entirely different concept. I have never seen a 'double' that looks enough like Michael in all ways to fool at close up.  :icon_e_confused:<br /><br />A 'fake' Michael would have to be the spitting image. How? by surgery? Where would they get such a person? and why would the person leave their normal life to live as a 'fake' MJ? <br /><br />I really can't see this at all.  :suspect: <br /><br />As for 'fake' children, who the hell is going to let their children be taken and made into 'copies' of Prince, Paris and Blanket.  :Pulling_hair:<br /><br />Sorry but I think that theory is just not viable.<br /><br />I have read a very similar theory on a blog somewhere....  :icon_e_ugeek:

hesouttamylife

Janet is a very strong woman and it is possible that she is determined to follow through on this on principle alone.  There have been a  few occasions over the years since 6/25/09 that Branca has been at times a bit disrespectful or brash to Katherine Jackson.  Maybe Janet just doesn’t like it and is determined to be the one in the family to not back down simply because they are powerful.  If she feels 100% in her heart that the will bears a fraudulent signature then this just might be a fight to the finish.  Take it to court and get it resolved.  I don’t believe it will change anything as far as the children are concerned and I don’t believe the executorship will change because of it.  But possibly just to get a solid explanation of how that will got signed on the date it did and to present the “letter” which no one has seen, of Branca being re-hired by Michael 8 days before June 25 might be enough to satisfy her.  So far, the executors have left it to the court of public opinion and let them fight the battle amongst themselves, refusing to even acknowledge it.  Janet obviously wants them to answer for the discrepancy or at least give a viable explanation.  I can understand that.  What I don’t understand is the public way they decided to go about this.  Take it to court. That’s what they are there for. Get a ruling and then go on about your biz.