Resuming every big subject in only one topic.

GrenatGrenat Posts: 279
Hello everyone , did you have a good day ?

That's just a suggestion/proposition
Someone could make a big topic for every big subject like <!-- s:( -->:(<!-- s:( --> Dr Conrad Murray, The ambulance photo , The Memorial )and edit it everytime we learn something worthy ,
We would post the big facts ,the photos,videos, and our theories concerning the subject at this point.
this way news members wouldn't lose themselves in reading every topic (there are at least 3 differents topics just only for the ambulance photo and not located in the same category , it's really hard to keep up sometimes)
There would be little topics where we post what we found and the big topic with everything is resumed , what do you think ?

Comments

  • Yep. We should have one that can search and put interesting information on the topic.
  • We've tried doing this a few times before, but it hasn't worked. But by all means please go ahead...I think it's a good idea.
  • GrenatGrenat Posts: 279
    We've tried doing this a few times before, but it hasn't worked. But by all means please go ahead...I think it's a good idea

    I see...I understand I'll try , if it doesn't work as you say, I'll just give up and everyone would just have to jungle between the differents topics I guess <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D -->
    By the way your signature is really nice, where did you get this pic ?
    There is a lot of people wich have really beautiful pics as signature here , I try to search for nice one too but it's quite hard in fact.
    Yep. We should have one that can search and put interesting information on the topic.

    Yeah we need someone with time too, and patience to search everything related to the subject
    (I'm not really patient usually but I'll transform myself in Super Patien-woman this time) <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D -->
  • I think Souza and Mo have a blog that summarizes the whole plot from the beginning. But it's a good idea if they kept adding the new information if possible?

    Edit** Yes, click on the index...it has the most popular theories.
  • GrenatGrenat Posts: 279
    Sorry for the double post , I had problems posting yesterday so I guess it posted twice in a row...
    I know there are post-it for major theories
    What I wanted to do is to regroup every big subject (like the ambulance scene)
    Look for example ,Recently we discovered Dr Conrad Murray wasn't his original name
    Someone brought it up the 8th of January
    Since then there is at least 5 differents topics about this,all learning us something,but about the same subject !
    "FILES FOR CONRAD ROBERT MURRAY & BONNICK MURRAY"
    "Hey someone posted this to my forum"
    "Who is Robert Earl Carter Dr. Conrad r. Murray ??!!!"
    "Dr Conrad Murray - New Identity Information "
    "i found this link with a conrad murray and a bonnick name"
    I'm sorry but it doesn't even make sense...It's confusing on top of this...
    Because people mentions things in one of these topics , then another one bring another thing in another one topic...
    We should try to make this as easy as possible..
  • Should be one BIG topic for Murray.. And first post should update to other conclusion and correct facts.
  • GrenatGrenat Posts: 279
    Should be one BIG topic for Murray.. And first post should update to other conclusion and correct facts.

    I have to get up early tomorrow so I'll take my leave but tomorrow I'll try to rearange everything and to put up the Biggie Topic for Murray <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D -->
    He is one of the leading roles after all .
    What are your suggestions for the next Biggies Topic ?
    For myself I would suggest :
    -Ambulance (including the two footages of it , the photos ,the important opinions of it)
    -Conrad Murray of course
    -The helicopter
    - maybe all the people we've suspected to be MJ until now
    -Maybe one topic with all the "proof" they've given us that he was dead like : death certificate , coroner's statement, about the funeral....
    What do you think ?
This discussion has been closed.