MURRAY'S VANISHED....!..AGAIN!.... WHERES THE HYPE?
Doctor Death
Posts: 484
I have no idea. Does anybody have any idea where Murray is?
It seems like he's played his part and gone hiding again jst like he went missing after June the 25th.....and showed up only four months later.
And no no one can get to him..right? Not even a paparazzi......Not even a single photo...Just like the months following June 25.
A man cant remain THIS secure and comfy and unquestioned unless someone is protecting him.....No prizes for guessing who that someone is.
Plus, I think that as the days go by.....The DEA theory is proving to be a strong contender. Because the Conrad Murray case has hardly received the kind of attention that the 2005 child abuse trials did........One cant compare the hooplah surrounding this trials to this case...
Because the media isnt creating the kind of frenzy they did back in 2005.
In this case the media really didnt crucify Murray or really didnt show that kinda hunger to get a piece of him like they did to MJ in 2005.They didnt mock him, jeer him.....Just went about all the info they kept receiving from "unnamed sources" . So the purpose of the hoax IMO is hugely related to DEA......Which, in turn, will indirectly prove the media wrong.....The people will understand and know, That, by assisting in a really good cause, Micahel Jakcson is REALLY a good human being...not a monster as porttrayed by the media. He is not a hypocrite as they think him to be.
But the media bashing is IMO a secondary consequence of the hoax. To me right now thw DEA stuff is getting more real.
It seems like he's played his part and gone hiding again jst like he went missing after June the 25th.....and showed up only four months later.
And no no one can get to him..right? Not even a paparazzi......Not even a single photo...Just like the months following June 25.
A man cant remain THIS secure and comfy and unquestioned unless someone is protecting him.....No prizes for guessing who that someone is.
Plus, I think that as the days go by.....The DEA theory is proving to be a strong contender. Because the Conrad Murray case has hardly received the kind of attention that the 2005 child abuse trials did........One cant compare the hooplah surrounding this trials to this case...
Because the media isnt creating the kind of frenzy they did back in 2005.
In this case the media really didnt crucify Murray or really didnt show that kinda hunger to get a piece of him like they did to MJ in 2005.They didnt mock him, jeer him.....Just went about all the info they kept receiving from "unnamed sources" . So the purpose of the hoax IMO is hugely related to DEA......Which, in turn, will indirectly prove the media wrong.....The people will understand and know, That, by assisting in a really good cause, Micahel Jakcson is REALLY a good human being...not a monster as porttrayed by the media. He is not a hypocrite as they think him to be.
But the media bashing is IMO a secondary consequence of the hoax. To me right now thw DEA stuff is getting more real.
Comments
The media covered the 2005 trial out of morbid curiosity to see what would be the outcome of the case i.e. what would happen to Michael. They think that they know the outcome of this 2010 case because as far as they are concerned what happened to MJ is that he's "dead". As far as they are concerned...end of story. Murray is accused of killing a celebrity. That's his claim to fame however he isn't a celebrity. He hasn't been elevated to the level of one regarding the amount of media coverage...yet.
Plus, the way that MJs death was reported is playing a huge role in the lack of coverage. There would be greater interest if Michael had been shot or stabbed by Conrad Murray. Celebrities who are believed to have died from drugs is old news and a yawner for the media. The drug story has many in the media believing that MJ had a role in his own "death".
In my country I hardly hear any news of mj. The fake 911 tape was on a news site a few days ago, but this site seems to be following tmz alot. And the trial was also on tv news, but anything else nothing, nada.
If they acknowledge that he's vanished then they would also have to acknowledge that according to other sources, he was only released on 2/25, and that they were WRONG when they said he had been released and went back to work.
And they still don't acknowledge how wrong they were in villifying Michael and calling him a paedophile, which will keep them from hyping up catching and convicting his "killer."
It's all BS. <!-- s:evil: -->:evil:<!-- s:evil: -->
IMO TMZ knowingly lied when they reported Murray was released on bail & went back to work on 2-10.
Did TMZ lie to protect Murray? to protect the Hoax? to protect MJ?
My question is why did TMZ miss lead the public?
IMO TMZ has lost all credibility. TMZ & media are controling what the public learns about MJ & will only tell what they are allowed or told to tell.
IMO we have no other choice but to allow the truth to unfold, prevail.
Yes I was thinking the samething!! I also went over her audtopsy report and it lists ALL the names that she had been known as from her life!!! In the case of MJ total opposite <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
I send an email to TMZ yesterday asking that very question - WHY did they run that story about Murray going back to work straight after he was charged on 8th Feb when obviously if he was only released on 25th Feb it was not possible.
I am still waiting for a reply but doubt I will get one!
You keep dreaming...they might as well never send a response....or maybe they will blame another of their infinite "SOURCES" !! <!-- s
Maybe he's supposed to be covering for Michael, making distractions and whatnot. But he's just been really awkward recently. Especially the " <!-- s:( -->:(<!-- s:( --> " pictures outside of Forest Lawn.
<!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: -->