Dr. Adams - Murray is lying
QuirkyDiana
Posts: 386
From the affidavit;
Murray also recounted how sometime between March and April of this year, Jackson called him in Las Vegas and asked him to call Dr. David Adams and arrange for Dr. Adams to give Jackson propofol. Murray did as Jackson asked and arranged for Dr. Adams to treat Jackson. Murray was present at a third party cosmetologist's office where Dr. Adams sedated Jackson with propofol. Murray stated this was around the time that Jackson requested him to be his personal physician on the European tour.
Dr. Adams denies this. This was reported on Aug 27th, but wasn't picked up on.
<!-- m -->http://www.clipsyndicate.com/video/play ... e&wpid=311<!-- m -->
Murray also recounted how sometime between March and April of this year, Jackson called him in Las Vegas and asked him to call Dr. David Adams and arrange for Dr. Adams to give Jackson propofol. Murray did as Jackson asked and arranged for Dr. Adams to treat Jackson. Murray was present at a third party cosmetologist's office where Dr. Adams sedated Jackson with propofol. Murray stated this was around the time that Jackson requested him to be his personal physician on the European tour.
Dr. Adams denies this. This was reported on Aug 27th, but wasn't picked up on.
<!-- m -->http://www.clipsyndicate.com/video/play ... e&wpid=311<!-- m -->
Comments
BUT da troot will prevail
Killing someone is allowed in CA if it is out of selfdefence, to protect your own life or that of your family, but also your property.
However killing if you only suspect your life or property will be in danger is not enough, you need to have substantial evidence to proof your life was really in danger.
The probable crimes are summed up in the affidavit as codes, they are easily overlooked. The description of the codes themselves can be found on the internet.
In the affidavit codes were mentioned for "selfdefence" as well as "selfdefence with only suspecting" as the probable crime.
Oh yes, but at the same time I am afraid, the whole emotions come back! This will be a hard time again.
What...where did you find this info? Link please, I will try to understand
It's in one of the search warrant affidavits. I do not have a link, but I will try and find in which searchwarrant the info is so you may try and find it
In the report about Murray's car, in the box "Probable crime", it is mentioned "PC198", meaning penal code 198.
Description of the code:
<!-- m -->http://law.onecle.com/california/penal/198.html<!-- m -->
Okay, thank you very much for doing that research again.
<!-- s
(like this: '...you kno' and den he attack mee. aand ai had tu administa de propofol, you kno...and den he drop ded on mee...but ai just wanted hiim to let goo off mee...so it wos self dafense, you kno...')
no offense, i know this is a serious subject, but that's just so ridiculous. this is 'the people against michael joe jackson' reloaded, just now mj is the one constructing the case. and they are on it like flies on sh!t, trying to make something up from nothing to construct their case. and mj is sitting somewhere getting cramps from laughing so hard... <!-- s
Perhaps an explanation for this code may be that Murray felt threatened by a third person that possibly threatened his life and/or family and/or property. Meaning, Murray could have been forced into doing this making him into a fall guy...
Recap:
In the report about Murray's car, in the box "Probable crime", it is mentioned "PC198", meaning penal code 198.
Description of the code:
<!-- m -->http://law.onecle.com/california/penal/198.html<!-- m -->
"Probable crime" code mentioned on the search warrant report of the MJJ Estate itself is "PC187":
<!-- m -->http://law.onecle.com/california/penal/187.html<!-- m -->
that was exactly my point: how in the world is 'threatened' gonna be explained? a verbal threat does not justify killing out of self-defense if there is no 'point blank' involved, meaning any kind of physical threat. plus, the difference in size does indeed matter here. how is a 200 pound guy gonna feel 'threatened' and feels he has to kill another person out of self-defense without any weapon involved, especially when that person is 40 pounds lighter and a head shorter? i'm waiting on that explanation, so i can get a real good laugh out of that! anything else i would consider premaditated murder. cuz you're killing someone for other reasons that feeling threatened. it's just all BS, no matter how you turn it. <!-- s
my take on this is: nobody is gonna be able to construct a case out of all those contradictions, neither defense or prosecution. there is no solid (or fake/missing) evidence for anything that happened on june 25, 2009 or ever since then, so murray's gonna walk out a free man.
Else I can not imagine how anyone could call this a selfdefence
Michael was 136 lbs.
that is still at least 60 pounds less than murray, i think i even read he was 220 pounds. that would even keep it at an 80 pounds difference between the two.
okay, then i'll wait to see when and how that 'third party' comes in... <!-- s
You got that right! <!-- s