brain tissue

edited January 1970 in Medical Discussion
{i admit i have not read the autopsy}

with all the talk of doubles and mike being alive

we are going to hear a lot during the trial - toxicology records, drug history {official] etc

but was it mike's brain tissue if not then who

what did the brain tissue establish?

Comments

  • its strange that we have no clues on this one


    i welcome your thoughts
  • mirandacncmirandacnc Posts: 405
    but did that even happen?? the brain thing? i dont see in the autopsy report where its even addressed...that has to be documented and the results discussed right?? so where is the info???
  • but did that even happen?? the brain thing? i dont see in the autopsy report where its even addressed...that has to be documented and the results discussed right?? so where is the info???

    i thought they said that they had taken his brain out to do test samples?
  • mjj29081958mjj29081958 Posts: 451
    Aparently, they made a macroscopical examination (visual description) of the Nervous Central System, included the Brain.

    Then, the brain was sent to Neuropathology, were they selected areas to take the samples for the histological examination. Neuropathology states:

    .Mild cerebral vascular congestion;
    .Mild diffuse brain swelling without herniation syndrom;
    .Mild basal ganglia calcification.

    After that, the "Residual brain" was released to the mortuary on 07-08-09.

    Brain tissue is not in the list of samples sent to Toxicology.
  • mirandacncmirandacnc Posts: 405
    Aparently, they made a macroscopical examination (visual description) of the Nervous Central System, included the Brain.

    Then, the brain was sent to Neuropathology, were they selected areas to take the samples for the histological examination. Neuropathology states:

    .Mild cerebral vascular congestion;
    .Mild diffuse brain swelling without herniation syndrom;
    .Mild basal ganglia calcification.

    After that, the "Residual brain" was released to the mortuary on 07-08-09.

    Brain tissue is not in the list of samples sent to Toxicology.


    so what does this mean??
  • paula-cpaula-c Posts: 7,221
    mirandacnc, I think we should add to the list of things "rare."
    At one time it said and now it appears in the report <!-- s8-) -->8-)<!-- s8-) -->
  • mjj29081958mjj29081958 Posts: 451
    Aparently, they made a macroscopical examination (visual description) of the Nervous Central System, included the Brain.

    Then, the brain was sent to Neuropathology, were they selected areas to take the samples for the histological examination. Neuropathology states:

    .Mild cerebral vascular congestion;
    .Mild diffuse brain swelling without herniation syndrom;
    .Mild basal ganglia calcification.

    After that, the "Residual brain" was released to the mortuary on 07-08-09.

    Brain tissue is not in the list of samples sent to Toxicology.


    so what does this mean??

    Sorry, I don't know what to say... I guess nothing by itself... I'm not sure why the OP requested info about brain tissue in particular. I just wanted to help him/her out, since not everyone wanted to read the report.

    I did read the whole report and to be honest, I don't find it weird in its content nor the procedure, but it's just my opinion. I did search for my local Autopsy Protocols, and of course it's very similar.

    I'm not able to state an opinion regarding its legal aspects, since they are very individual from place to place.
  • GraceGrace Posts: 2,864
    There is only one association to me:

    who's brain has been taken out (and dissected) must 100% for sure have lost his mind.


    (translates among others into: is not functional thus not dangerous anymore, became crazy, is out of way)

    Oh and didn't we dissect his mind, intention, purpose, thoughts, potential implications, reasons why?
    We did. We always asked for answers. We always got them so far, didn't we?

    The coroner's report says: minor calcification.
    It does not say: complete Parkinson symptoms.

    To me the result translates into:
    he does exactly know what he is doing and full master of his actions.
    Nothing more nothing less.
  • they worked on someone?
  • GraceGrace Posts: 2,864
    the report was not a real true one.
    if they worked on someone it may have been whoever.
    maybe a donation body from UCLA.
    maybe the double.
    but the report was not a true one.
Sign In or Register to comment.