William Wagener INDICTMENT of Tom Sneddon

I found news about William Wagener on the vindicatemj blog. Maybe this has already been posted on another thread: <br /><br />
[size=12pt]William Wagener, CEO of MJJIFF, has turned up the HEAT[/size].<br />A new documentary about the 2005 child molestation trial of The King of Pop, Michael Jackson, is slated to begin production sometimes before the end of this year.<br /><br />Producer William Wagener announces that award-winning documentary filmmaker Bill Still, has been selected to direct the upcoming documentary film about the 2005 trial of legendary entertainer, Michael Jackson. <br /><br />The letter of intent was signed on July 12, 2012 by William Wagener and Bill Still.<br /><br />William Wagener will also present to the County Supervisors of Santa Barbara, for the first time, ever, an Affidavit of Criminal conduct by Tom Sneddon, former District Attorney and demand an independent investigation and INDICTMENT of Tom SNEDDON for committing THREE felonies during the Michael Jackson TRIAL in 2005. <br /><br />http://www.blogtalkradio.com/cadeflaw/2012/07/24/whats-going-on-heat-has-been-turned-up
<br /><br />
On August 14th, at 9:00 am on the Betteravia Government center, in Santa Maria, Ca. Addressing the monthly meeting of the County S.B. Supervisors, I shall give the supervisors official notice by affidavit that Sneddon committed 3 felonies in the trial, of MJ in 2005.<br />William Wagener will present to the County Supervisors of Santa Barbara, for the 1st time, ever, An Affidavit of Criminal conduct by Tom Sneddon, former Dictrict Atty. and demand a independent investigation and INDICTMENT of Tom SNEDDON for committing THREE felonies during the Michael Jackson TRIAL in 2005. Specifically to get Michael Jackson convicted false evidence was presented at court and caught by the Defense Atty.s Thomas Mesereau and Susan YU.<br />William Wagener invites all those who love justice or Michael Jackson to come and add 1 minute speeches after William Wagener’s presentment. And demand, like Mr. Wagener, that a special Prosecution of Thomas Sneddon be started by hiring a Special Prosecutor from outside Santa Barbara or even outside California, to investigate and Prosecute Thomas Sneddon.<br />Once this is done, the FRAUD is exposed and the statue of Limitations starts to run out. FRAUD by the Santa Barbara Dist. Atty. OFFICE “on the court”un-identified, and Uncorrected for the past 7 Years has prevented the Statute of Limitations from running out.<br />If you are coming to California anyway in August and can be there. Please be there. Show up for Michael’s sake. 9 am 1st Floor in the BetteraviaGovernmentCenter in Santa Maria, August 14th.<br />- William J. Wagener –<br /><br />Each of the above three felonies is about fraud upon the court which is so severe a crime that fortunately it is not subject to any statute of limitation. Mary Brookins, one of the coordinators of the project, explains:<br />In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to court so that the court is impaired in the impartial performance of its legal task, the act, known as “fraud upon the court”, is a crime deemed so severe and fundamentally opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statute of limitation.<br />Officers of the court include: lawyers, judges, referees, and those appointed; guardian ad litem, parenting time expeditors, mediators, rule 114 neutrals, evaluators, administrators, special appointees, and any others whose influence are part of the judicial mechanism.<br />“Fraud upon the court” has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to “embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication”.<br />In Bullock v. United States, (10th Cir. 1985), the court stated “Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury. … It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function — thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.” Source: Wiki<br />http://vindicatemj.wordpress.com/<br />
<br /><br />L.O.V.E.
«13

Comments

  • Everlasting_Love MJ - THANK YOU SOOO MUCH!<br /><br />I have followed Mr Wegener and truly believe his intentions are pure even though many think he's out for recognition and money. I don't feel that at all and have given towards the cause. However, recently when I went to the website it was down and it made me wonder if he wasn't able to collect enough money for the project. He's also become quiet on social media whereas he used to be very vocal. Maybe it's just that I'm not in the right circles, IDK.<br /><br />However, this gives me great joy to see. Thank you so much!!! I wonder if this will be televised or at least documented by Mr. Wegener and his staff. August 14 - is there anything else special about that date?<br /><br />This truly has made my day. Blessings to you all!
  • on 1343600210:
    <br />I found news about William Wagener on the vindicatemj blog. Maybe this has already been posted on another thread: <br /><br />
    [size=12pt]William Wagener, CEO of MJJIFF, has turned up the HEAT[/size].<br />A new documentary about the 2005 child molestation trial of The King of Pop, Michael Jackson, is slated to begin production sometimes before the end of this year.<br /><br />Producer William Wagener announces that award-winning documentary filmmaker Bill Still, has been selected to direct the upcoming documentary film about the 2005 trial of legendary entertainer, Michael Jackson. <br /><br />The letter of intent was signed on July 12, 2012 by William Wagener and Bill Still.<br /><br />William Wagener will also present to the County Supervisors of Santa Barbara, for the first time, ever, an Affidavit of Criminal conduct by Tom Sneddon, former District Attorney and demand an independent investigation and INDICTMENT of Tom SNEDDON for committing THREE felonies during the Michael Jackson TRIAL in 2005. <br /><br />http://www.blogtalkradio.com/cadeflaw/2012/07/24/whats-going-on-heat-has-been-turned-up
    <br /><br />
    On August 14th, at 9:00 am on the Betteravia Government center, in Santa Maria, Ca. Addressing the monthly meeting of the County S.B. Supervisors, I shall give the supervisors official notice by affidavit that Sneddon committed 3 felonies in the trial, of MJ in 2005.<br />William Wagener will present to the County Supervisors of Santa Barbara, for the 1st time, ever, An Affidavit of Criminal conduct by Tom Sneddon, former Dictrict Atty. and demand a independent investigation and INDICTMENT of Tom SNEDDON for committing THREE felonies during the Michael Jackson TRIAL in 2005. Specifically to get Michael Jackson convicted false evidence was presented at court and caught by the Defense Atty.s Thomas Mesereau and Susan YU.<br />William Wagener invites all those who love justice or Michael Jackson to come and add 1 minute speeches after William Wagener’s presentment. And demand, like Mr. Wagener, that a special Prosecution of Thomas Sneddon be started by hiring a Special Prosecutor from outside Santa Barbara or even outside California, to investigate and Prosecute Thomas Sneddon.<br />Once this is done, the FRAUD is exposed and the statue of Limitations starts to run out. FRAUD by the Santa Barbara Dist. Atty. OFFICE “on the court”un-identified, and Uncorrected for the past 7 Years has prevented the Statute of Limitations from running out.<br />If you are coming to California anyway in August and can be there. Please be there. Show up for Michael’s sake. 9 am 1st Floor in the BetteraviaGovernmentCenter in Santa Maria, August 14th.<br />- William J. Wagener –<br /><br />Each of the above three felonies is about fraud upon the court which is so severe a crime that fortunately it is not subject to any statute of limitation. Mary Brookins, one of the coordinators of the project, explains:<br />In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to court so that the court is impaired in the impartial performance of its legal task, the act, known as “fraud upon the court”, is a crime deemed so severe and fundamentally opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statute of limitation.<br />Officers of the court include: lawyers, judges, referees, and those appointed; guardian ad litem, parenting time expeditors, mediators, rule 114 neutrals, evaluators, administrators, special appointees, and any others whose influence are part of the judicial mechanism.<br />“Fraud upon the court” has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to “embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication”.<br />In Bullock v. United States, (10th Cir. 1985), the court stated “Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury. … It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function — thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.” Source: Wiki<br />http://vindicatemj.wordpress.com/<br />
    <br /><br />L.O.V.E.<br />
    <br /><br />I've been waiting for this to materialize. Finally!<br /><br />Thanks for posting this.<br /><br />Thank you Mr. Wagener.
  • Sandal8259Sandal8259 Posts: 95
    Guys, do you remember awhile back when it was stated that there were a post it on the mirror in Michael's bathroom that stated that children are innocent. Do you think he was talking about Jordan.  Another thing, correct me if I am wrong on this, but was there not a recording of a phone conversation between Mr. Evan Chandler and I do not know if this was his  pyschiatrist(sp) in which he stated that he was going to take Michael down. I think that there is a transcript out there some where on this conversation.
  • @Sandal - you are correct. There is an audio tape where Jordan's dad was talking about taking MJ down and something to the effect of "he won't see what's hit him" or something like that.<br /><br />Your thought on the Post-It not is worth thinking about - maybe a double meaning? Michael likes to plant seeds into people's minds and this could be one of them.<br /><br />Glad to have you here - welcome :)<br /><br />Blessings
  • Sandal8259Sandal8259 Posts: 95
    Guys, I got a Duh! moment. I did not put it together until just now after I wrote the previous post.  Book on Tapes= Transcripts of conversations ie interviews as well as copies of phone conversations with all of the involved parties. Dated and time stamped so that no one can say that the documents were altered. Now wonder if all of the allegations and the court apperance of Michael Jackson would be erase from the Justice System Database.
  • on 1343609510:
    <br />Guys, do you remember awhile back when it was stated that there were a post it on the mirror in Michael's bathroom that stated that children are innocent. Do you think he was talking about Jordan.  Another thing, correct me if I am wrong on this, but was there not a recording of a phone conversation between Mr. Evan Chandler and I do not know if this was his  pyschiatrist(sp) in which he stated that he was going to take Michael down. I think that there is a transcript out there some where on this conversation.<br />
    <br /><br />Here is the phone call between Evan Chandler and Dave Schwartz (Jordy's stepfather):<br /><br />
  • on 1343600210:
    <br />I found news about William Wagener on the vindicatemj blog. Maybe this has already been posted on another thread: <br /><br />
    [size=12pt]William Wagener, CEO of MJJIFF, has turned up the HEAT[/size].<br />A new documentary about the 2005 child molestation trial of The King of Pop, Michael Jackson, is slated to begin production sometimes before the end of this year.<br /><br />Producer William Wagener announces that award-winning documentary filmmaker Bill Still, has been selected to direct the upcoming documentary film about the 2005 trial of legendary entertainer, Michael Jackson. <br /><br />The letter of intent was signed on July 12, 2012 by William Wagener and Bill Still.<br /><br />William Wagener will also present to the County Supervisors of Santa Barbara, for the first time, ever, an Affidavit of Criminal conduct by Tom Sneddon, former District Attorney and demand an independent investigation and INDICTMENT of Tom SNEDDON for committing THREE felonies during the Michael Jackson TRIAL in 2005. <br /><br />http://www.blogtalkradio.com/cadeflaw/2012/07/24/whats-going-on-heat-has-been-turned-up
    <br /><br />
    On August 14th, at 9:00 am on the Betteravia Government center, in Santa Maria, Ca. Addressing the monthly meeting of the County S.B. Supervisors, I shall give the supervisors official notice by affidavit that Sneddon committed 3 felonies in the trial, of MJ in 2005.<br />William Wagener will present to the County Supervisors of Santa Barbara, for the 1st time, ever, An Affidavit of Criminal conduct by Tom Sneddon, former Dictrict Atty. and demand a independent investigation and INDICTMENT of Tom SNEDDON for committing THREE felonies during the Michael Jackson TRIAL in 2005. Specifically to get Michael Jackson convicted false evidence was presented at court and caught by the Defense Atty.s Thomas Mesereau and Susan YU.<br />William Wagener invites all those who love justice or Michael Jackson to come and add 1 minute speeches after William Wagener’s presentment. And demand, like Mr. Wagener, that a special Prosecution of Thomas Sneddon be started by hiring a Special Prosecutor from outside Santa Barbara or even outside California, to investigate and Prosecute Thomas Sneddon.<br />Once this is done, the FRAUD is exposed and the statue of Limitations starts to run out. FRAUD by the Santa Barbara Dist. Atty. OFFICE “on the court”un-identified, and Uncorrected for the past 7 Years has prevented the Statute of Limitations from running out.<br />If you are coming to California anyway in August and can be there. Please be there. Show up for Michael’s sake. 9 am 1st Floor in the BetteraviaGovernmentCenter in Santa Maria, August 14th.<br />- William J. Wagener –<br /><br />Each of the above three felonies is about fraud upon the court which is so severe a crime that fortunately it is not subject to any statute of limitation. Mary Brookins, one of the coordinators of the project, explains:<br />In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to court so that the court is impaired in the impartial performance of its legal task, the act, known as “fraud upon the court”, is a crime deemed so severe and fundamentally opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statute of limitation.<br />Officers of the court include: lawyers, judges, referees, and those appointed; guardian ad litem, parenting time expeditors, mediators, rule 114 neutrals, evaluators, administrators, special appointees, and any others whose influence are part of the judicial mechanism.<br />“Fraud upon the court” has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to “embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication”.<br />In Bullock v. United States, (10th Cir. 1985), the court stated “Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury. … It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function — thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.” Source: Wiki<br />http://vindicatemj.wordpress.com/<br />
    <br /><br />L.O.V.E.<br />
    <br /><br /> :michael_jackson-1135:      :abouttime:  :th_bravo:
  • AdiAdi Posts: 1,834
    on 1343588985:
    <br />Me too, MJonmind. <br /><br />The prophecy states that this has already occurred, but not yet been made public; "has already, years ago, righted the wrong behind the scenes". <br /><br />T-M mentioned in the prophecy can refer to Thomas Mesereau, especially when connected to JJ's statement to MJJC that Mesereau was "going to prove it anyway". <br /><br />"Books on tape" can mean a lot of things but my first instinct was to believe Jordy recants in detail ("books"=an entire novel series?) on a recorded statement.<br /><br />Video statements have become wildly popular throughout this hoax. They allow the public to hear statements made directly by the source, allow the viewer to observe body language, and even allow the videographer to insert visual suggestions and subconscious messages (through use of background set and prop design) to the viewer. All these elements allow the viewer to make a more informed and educated impression of the message then the use of text, audio, or image alone.<br /><br />I connect those dots to form a theory that in MJ's possession there exists a video statement of Jordy recanting the allegations and probably also exposing his father's role in the conspiracy to destroy Michael Jackson.<br /><br />I take Front's statement: <br />
    This vision is VERY applicable and has increased with CLARITY. Blurry? Absolutely not! it's clear---as CRYSTAL. <br /><br />& that "crystal ball" hasn't fully dropped…..YET.
    <br /><br />as indicating that this information going public is in store for the future.<br />
    <br /><br />Lines up with the statements from the family (I have heard Katherine and Jermaine say this in interviews) that the "boy" has already admitted Michael never did anything to him, that it was all lies. <br /><br />The general public has not seen this admission "books on tape"  from Jordy yet - but I bet the family has.
  • rachel1018rachel1018 Posts: 121
    this is what this means IMO, he wont comeback until jordan chandler has said that it was all a lie, that he was never abused.........and its about time, bc jordan is more than old enough now........it is the right thing for him to do..........
  • http://www.blogtalkradio.com/cadeflaw/2012/07/24/whats-going-on-heat-has-been-turned-up<br /><br />Waggener talks about malicious prosecution that he thinks to bring against Sneddon.<br /> BUT, statute of  limitation is 1 year.
  • SouzaSouza Posts: 9,400
    on 1343624575:
    <br />http://www.blogtalkradio.com/cadeflaw/2012/07/24/whats-going-on-heat-has-been-turned-up<br /><br />Waggener talks about malicious prosecution that he thinks to bring against Sneddon.<br /> BUT, statute of  limitation is 1 year.<br />
    <br /><br /><br />As far as I get it, the accusation is fraud upon court, which doesn't have a statue of limitation. But what I don't get is why they mention a 7-year statue of limitations:<br /><br />
    Once this is done, the FRAUD is exposed and the statue of Limitations starts to run out. FRAUD by the Santa Barbara Dist. Atty. OFFICE “on the court”un-identified, and Uncorrected for the past 7 Years has prevented the Statute of Limitations from running out.
    <br /><br />Anyone familiar with Californian law who can explain that?

    "For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."

  • SouzaSouza Posts: 9,400
    I split the topic because this was now buried in the Front thread.

    "For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."

  • YoungMackYoungMack Posts: 347
    Damn I hope they throw the book at his ass!!!! What a piece of shit that<br />dude is...... LETS GO WW get em man!!!!!! We all have your back RIGHtlT AUSSIE??<br />Hahahahahaah seriously I hope you take him DOWN ww!!!!!!      YM
  • 2good2btrue2good2btrue Posts: 4,210
    If you are coming to California anyway in August and can be there. Please be there. Show up for Michael’s sake. 9 am 1st Floor in the BetteraviaGovernmentCenter in Santa Maria, August 14th.<br />- William J. Wagener –<br /><br />What a shame I can't be there..........Are there any members that live close to the location?  It would be fantastic to show your support for MJ and William...<br /><br />@ Souza...Its been 7 years since the 2005 trial...2005 + 7 = 2012.  Perhaps William Wagener means that???<br /><br />This is terrific news....Time to clear a clean path for the return/ressurection of Michael Jackson... :multiplespotting: :multiplespotting: :multiplespotting:
  • This is Huge<br />This is Awesome<br />This is Justice (the beginning of)<br /><br />Bout' bloody time! (Sorry that must sound so aussie! LOL)<br /><br />On this petition site there are 928 signatures in support of the affadavit. The goal is to collect 1000 signatures in support. Just putting the link here, not saying what you should and shouldnt do re: leaving your full name and location on the public petition, but just thought I'd share it for those interested.<br /><br />http://www.thepetitionsite.com/662/053/218/support-of-affidavit-concerning-criminal-conduct-of-tom-sneddon-2005-michael-jackson-trial/<br /><br /><br />
  • Have just seen that you can check a box that hides your name from the display, for those who are inclined to sign. Please do your research first.<br /><br />#petition<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Also, just thinking out loud, will be interesting to see when  / after all this happens if slimey TS names names or at least illudes to others above him who may have been involved or assigned TS to be the grotesque puppet for this task...  <br /><br />I'd so LOOOVE for the whole truth to come out!<br /><br /><br /><br />
  • hesouttamylifehesouttamylife Posts: 5,393
    Geraldine Hughes "Redemption" movie is in production and should be ready by August 2013.
  • This was on my Facebook page:<br /><br />http://www.facebook.com/william.j.wagener/posts/342444285837066<br /><br /><br />William J. Wagener<br />Friday at 10:01 near Santa Maria, CA ·<br /><br />    A FAN ASKED ME TODAY. How is the Documentary going? Good Question. Here is my answer.<br /><br />    That is the precise reason after years of being quiet since 2005, and stimulated by Dee Pfeiffer in UK request, I realized that being the only non-MJ fan who was in the Media Pool in 2005, with access to be in and I was in the courtroom every day for 5 torturous months, ... I realized I could predict with absolute certainty that M.J. was innocent of any wrong doing to any of the Arvizos, because I could connect the dots of last weeks to next weeks testimony. FANS did not care, they knew he was "innocent" because they knew his spirit of his music. Non fans only heard the Media twisted insinuations and distortions, and the accusations but the Media never clearly said , "Hey, every accuser was proven a liar with their own words".<br /><br />    Once that sank in, about 2008, I expected MJ to sue, once he recovered from the emotional beating of 5 months staring at life in prison for something he did not do, I expected MJ to sue for Malicious prosecution. Then the 02 deal, then dead too soon, and I was in shock. Then Diana Delusional Dimond and others started with their lies and Dee Pfeiffer called me, emailed me etc. and after about 8 months of thought, created a CHARITY, MJJIFF, MJJ Innocent Forever Foundation, to keep giving to the children MJ had. Except it had no million $<br />    start up money. so I proposed to Michelle Jackson, Michael's favorite aunt who lives close to Neverland, and is on the Board of Directors of MJJIFF, that we do the Documentary and put it on TV locally and globally and show the world on the same TV sets that dirtied up M.J. that it was all a lie, and more importantly a pre-medicated malicious lie with MEDIA networks looking to cash in on a GUILTY verdict. AND THE MJJIFF would own the Film Rights, and profit form the DvD and annual release of the Film, funding it so it can give to the Children of the world, and start MJ plan to "Heal the World", no small task.<br /><br />    Now two ways to finance it. 1) have Fans of MJ or Justice donate small amounts, but a million donations add up. and do NOT have to be repaid, so the FILM RIGHTS are not liened against. 2) Get a Hollywood person to finance it and they would, but they would want generous "return" on their "investment" and in so doing, if they perceive the Truth is not juicy enough, they would insist on "revisions" that deviate from the truth and have more "sale-ability" ... and so I opt for #1 methode.<br /><br />    Besides I think the MJ Fans deserve to be able to say when its all done and seen around the world. "HEY, I donated, my name is in the credits at the end, I helped HEAL THE WORLD".<br /><br />    The Truth of how the prosecutors conspired to fake the evidence long before trial and how they tried to get police to lie<br />    on the witness stand and failed in open court is amazing by itself, but there is much more, and It would take hours to explain it... and I will in the documentary, and Award winning BILL STILL, who won the Documentary Award for "THE<br />    SECRET of OZ" has signed on to do the directing. We are already looking for the screen writters, etc.<br /><br />    WE just need 1 million or so, of the 40 million MJ fans around the world to donate on line at www.MJJIFF.org , but so far only you and about 3000 have even heard of much less gotten the fuller explaination I just gave you. SO, at great inconvenience, I am buying tickets at my expense to go to Europe and talk to the Fans of MJ with Bill Still in September to explain and reach a larger audience and already there is excitement in Europe for my traveling there. Donations have ranged from $3 to $1000 and every thing in between most are $20 or E20, and slow. WE will not hire a publicist or promoter, and its up to the FANS... they can make it happen any week or month they chose... but first they have to HEAR about it,and mostly they haven't and spend all their time chatting and designing new personal web sites and making monuments to M.J. in parks, etc.<br />    The CM trial distracted them for a while, now is time to concentrate on Clearing MJ name on TV where they dirtied up<br />    his reputation for fast bucks. It will take time and perseverence, but I am 66 and retired, mostly. I still do a local TV show at my own expense, with no ads, about Government corruption.<br /><br />    THAT is how it is going my young MJ fan. I again, am NOT a MJ Fanatic, I never splent $100 on a tour ticket, never bought any of his music , until after the trial of 2005, I don't like THRILLER, but I can say with absolute certainty. MJ was and will be forever more INNOCENT, and I said in April of 2005, long before the JURY, because the evidence was so obviously fabricated. I am a fan of truth and Justice. IF M.J. had been the least guilty of something, I would have said so.<br />    He was not. Michael will be innocent of all 14 charges.<br /><br />    The only thing M.J. was guilty of ...was picking sleazy people , like Atty. Marc Schafel to do business with and Gavin Arvizo to help. That is poor judgement, but maybe MJ never had many truly honorable people come through is life to pick from, and if a few did, with his child like mental view of the world, maybe he did not recognize them. But that is NOT a crime, its<br />    bad judgement, and 3 days of his financial disclosure during the trial proved that, but did nothing toward advancing his guilt<br />    of the 10 felonies & 4 mis-demeanor charges added at the end. It was boring and was put on only to drag MJ thru more torture and reveal how vulnerable he was financially, so that the very people who say they "saved" Neverland and M.J. financial butt could deal a more severe "deal" in "helping" Michael. And that is what happened AFTER the Jury Verdict. Thomas Mesereau had to wait until last year to collect his last $300,000 in atty. fees from the estate, because MJ was so broke. Neverland is still 50% owned by Tom Baracks investment group and closed to the public, but I still have HOPE, FAITH that after the film is produced and seen world wide it will be a block buster, and every AD agency will want to pay to adverize during the film on TV and the FILM will bring in money steady, and MJJIFF will then help "Heal the World" , maybe build the MJ Childrens Hospital off Hwy 101 near Neverland, buy back Neverland and restore it. Without Hope, it is a dark world. A dreary World. With Hope and Faith, much is possible.<br /><br />    Thanks for your encouragement, I have much to do. I do like a lot of MJ music especially the last stuff, just not THRILLER, but most I love the video and photos of MJ holding sick and suffering children in hospitals and orphanges around<br />    the world. THAT is the M.J. I treasure most. I am a father of 7, and I could not always afford to help my children. What M.J. started his true believers must Finish. Failure is NOT an Option. hope you sign the petition on line to INDICT the prosecutors of 05.<br /><br />    Blessings And Peace to you and all MJ fans and fans of Justice.<br /><br />    William J. WAgener.<br />    MJJ-IFF<br />    www.mjjiff.org<br />    This cause is aimed at supporting Mr. William Wagener in his endeavor to indict Tom Sneddon, the district attorney of Santa Barbara county who filed a criminal suit against our
  • Geraldine Hughes is putting out a movie? Awesome! Thanks for sharing :)
  • mjj4ever777mjj4ever777 Posts: 1,467
    on 1343653985:
    <br />This is Huge<br />This is Awesome<br />This is Justice (the beginning of)<br /><br />Bout' bloody time! (Sorry that must sound so aussie! LOL)<br /><br />On this petition site there are 928 signatures in support of the affadavit. The goal is to collect 1000 signatures in support. Just putting the link here, not saying what you should and shouldnt do re: leaving your full name and location on the public petition, but just thought I'd share it for those interested.<br /><br />http://www.thepetitionsite.com/662/053/218/support-of-affidavit-concerning-criminal-conduct-of-tom-sneddon-2005-michael-jackson-trial/<br />
    <br /><br />Thank you and Bless you Aussie, for sharing this!! I have posted it on my FB page, and signed the petition!<br /><br />I send you all LOVE and Blessings!!  :bearhug:
  • DoDo Posts: 850
    Everlasing, thanks for posting this, I hope and pray this large error in history will be put right. Can't wait for that day.
  • Thanks for sharing Aussie I have just signed the petition and I wrote: how could an angel molest a child?<br />
  • on 1343638238:
    <br />
    on 1343624575:
    <br />http://www.blogtalkradio.com/cadeflaw/2012/07/24/whats-going-on-heat-has-been-turned-up<br /><br />Waggener talks about malicious prosecution that he thinks to bring against Sneddon.<br /> BUT, statute of  limitation is 1 year.<br />
    <br /><br /><br />As far as I get it, the accusation is fraud upon court, which doesn't have a statue of limitation. But what I don't get is why they mention a 7-year statue of limitations:<br /><br />
    Once this is done, the FRAUD is exposed and the statue of Limitations starts to run out. FRAUD by the Santa Barbara Dist. Atty. OFFICE “on the court”un-identified, and Uncorrected for the past 7 Years has prevented the Statute of Limitations from running out.
    <br /><br />Anyone familiar with Californian law who can explain that?<br />
    <br /><br />Overall interpretation is complicated, cannot be discussed in its entirety  in 2 sentences. But in general it will look like this: since statute of limitation for fraud in CA is 3 years,  for malicious prosecution is 1 year.  Wagener first need to prove that there was a fraudulent action, then request court to waive statute of limitation on fraud that was recently discovered,then bring felony charges  against Sneddon for fraud, afterwads maybe also for malicious prosecution if court again waives statute of limitation.
  • hesouttamylifehesouttamylife Posts: 5,393
    There should be a thread about this in the archives with a lot of information.  I remember it well.
Sign In or Register to comment.