Michael Jackson spent $35 million to cover up molestations of 24 boys: report

Thriller4ever · June 2013

[size=14pt]Michael Jackson spent $35 million to cover up molestations of 24 boys: report [/size] The King of Pop hired a private investigator to collect all the skeletons in his closet and bury them, according to an explosive report in London's Sunday People. But now a former associate of the investigator is talking. Michael Jackson spent nearly $35 million in a desperate bid to cover up his crimes after he molested at least 24 boys, according to an explosive report published Saturday. London’s Sunday People tabloid says it obtained “secret FBI files” full of stomach-churning details about the late King of Pop’s seamy past. Jackson allegedly was once caught groping a famous child star and watching pornographic films while molesting another boy. He allegedly fondled a third boy in his private theater as the victim’s clueless mother sat only a few rows away, according to the purported FBI files. The documents – identified as case numbers CADCE MJ-02463 and CR 01046 — were apparently never turned over to prosecutors in the sensational 2005 trial that cleared Jackson of molestation charges. In a twist, the bombshell files dating to 1989 were assembled by private eye Anthony Pellicano, who Jackson hired to make sure the skeletons in his closet stayed out of the spotlight. Pellicano is now in prison, serving a 15-year sentence for racketeering and wiretapping in an unrelated case — but one of his ex-associates opened up to Sunday People. “I was hired by him to find out where the fires needed putting out and, in this case, where allegations would be coming from,” the unidentified sleuth said. “But I have never worked on a case with as many potential claimants as the Jackson case.” The Daily News obtained FBI files on Jackson in 2009 under the Freedom of Information Act. Those files contained no mention of the sordid documents obtained by Sunday People. Calls to the FBI on Saturday went unreturned. The Pellicano files identify a total of 17 boys — including five child actors and two dancers — that Jackson is said to have preyed upon. Jackson’s other alleged victims include a European boy and the sons of a screenwriter. At least three boys got hush money, the Pellicano investigator said. The family of one of them, a well-known young actor, received nearly $600,000 “to refrain from any and all contact with media and communications, newspapers, television, radio, film and books,” the newspaper reported. The files also include interviews with former Jackson aides who claim the pop king was obsessed with child porn. “Our reports painted the picture that Jackson was a serial child predator,” the Pellicano associate said. The $35 million payout includes a nearly $20 million settlement to the family of Jordan Chandler, a 13-year-old boy the singer had befriended. Word of the massive payout comes days after one of Jackson’s longtime defenders, Wade Robson, filed a lawsuit against the singer’s estate that claims he was molested as well. A former child pal of Jackson’s and now a choreographer to the stars, the 30-year-old Robson says he was repeatedly abused during visits to the Neverland Ranch during the 1990s. The abuse started when Robson was 7 and continued until he was 14, the paper reported. The fresh accusations have emerged during a dark period for the Jackson clan. Michael’s 15-year-old daughter, Paris, was hospitalized early this month after a botched suicide attempt. And a wrongful-death trial in Los Angeles pitting Jackson’s mother, Katherine, against concert giant AEG Live has forced Jacko’s family to relive the day he was found dead of a drug overdose in June 2009. More Links: i]I'm sorry if this has been posted before. I have been very busy, so if I've repeated the post, please delete it[/i

marumjj · June 2013

this is crap, we all know of the indictment did Jordan Chandler and was settled out of court (MJ was badly advised by his lawyers), but think that the FBI has evidence of other actual charges and does not take action? I think not.

Datroot · June 2013

This is all doing my head in - it's sooo obviously BS

iloveyoumore · June 2013

iloveyoumore · June 2013

I'm really getting tired of this shit. to all the lying assholes :images: :images: :images: with love.

RK · June 2013

Why is all this bullshit being thrown now? Is it to keep MJ from coming back.....intimidate him into staying 'dead'? Are AEG behind this as well as Wade's claim? It makes me feel like throwing up. Just vile and nasty .

RK · June 2013

SUNDAY, 30 JUNE 2013 by Charles Thomson The Mirror, the People, and the settlement that never was... It's a funny thing. Ever since the high-profile Michael Jackson death trial started going pear-shaped for promoter AEG Live, a lot of newspapers which carry prominent and lucrative advertising for its events have become more intent on smearing Michael Jackson than ever. Leading the way has been The Mirror in the UK. A few weeks ago, contemporaneous emails presented at trial showed that AEG boss Randy Phillips had 'slapped' Michael Jackson because he was scared about attending a press conference. Slapped him and screamed at him 'so loud the walls shook'. The shocking revelation was widely ignored by the press. Several days after the evidence was heard in open court, only one outlet had summoned the courage to publish the evidence. AP did not include the testimony in its daily missive from the courtroom. The wire's reporter claimed on twitter he had been out of the courtroom sending emails when the testimony occurred. It was only when fans started making noise about the 'cover-up' on sites like Twitter that other media companies grudgingly published the comments. AEG-sponsored newspapers like the Mirror, though, bizarrely tried to paint Michael Jackson as the bad guy. According to the first line of the Mirror's story, Jackson 'needed to be slapped'. Interestingly, the Mirror was a lot faster to publish a story last year accusing Janet Jackson of slapping a minor. A story which turned out to be a lie. This weekend - days after Jackson's son took the stand and testified that he saw Phillips in his home while his father was not there, behaving 'aggressively' towards Jackson's doctor - the Mirror's Sunday edition, called the People, is at it again. It has published a highly misleading story about some 'FBI files' which allegedly show Michael Jackson was witnessed molesting children by multiple Neverland employees. The 'FBI files' also detail a supposed settlement with a young accuser in 1992 - before the Jordy Chandler case. In reality, the story is a nonsense; a birds nest of mangled and misstated accusations which are neither 'new' nor 'exclusive', despite the People's repeated claims that they are. In fact, the documents are not 'FBI files' at all. This is a flat-out lie. Moreover, the claims have all been in the public domain for a very long time, some having been discredited two decades ago. Of course, most readers won't bother to fact-check the story. Why would they? The newspaper is supposed to do that before publishing it. Sadly, it seems other media outlets can't be bothered either. Britain's Mail newspaper has already rehashed the story, evidently making no attempt to investigate its veracity before doing so. I could go into a whole lot of detail about the claims made by the People - and the various lazy journalists who will copy and paste its story hundreds, or perhaps thousands of times onto their own websites and into their own newspapers in the coming days. But what is the point? The info is already in the public domain. Those who hate Jackson will adopt the People's story as evidence for their case. Those with an interest in hearing both sides of Jackson's case will already know that these claims were debunked a long time ago. Nobody else will even bother to research the story. The People's readers buy the newspaper because they like and trust it. They, as intended, will believe this story and will not question it. Briefly, however, for the record: 1) The 'FBI files' are not FBI files. They are transcripts of interviews compiled by a tabloid journalist who paid his sources - including one who turned out not to exist.They were acquired by a PI who worked for Jackson's defence team. A decade later, he was prosecuted for tapping phones. The FBI seized all of his files, of which these tabloid interviews formed a miniscule part. 2) The allegations of Jackson being caught by multiple employees do not, as the People infers, come from a host of different documents. They all come from one document - a transcript of an interview with a couple called the LeMarques, who worked at Neverland in the late 80s and early 90s. The People intentionally does not state that all of these uncorroborated accusations come from just one of the documents, instead purposely misleading readers and suggesting that they're taken from a cache of evidence. The LeMarques never contacted police about the abuse they claimed to have witnessed, instead opting to negotiate deals with tabloid newspapers - including the Mirror. Their claims were investigated by cops probing Jackson, who found the couple had agreed to add increasingly graphic details to their interviews for more and more money. Investigators concluded in the 90s that the pair had no credibility and possessed no evidence of any genuine abuse. They were called on out of desperation to testify in Jackson's 2005 trial after prosecutors watched their case begin to disintegrate, but were destroyed under cross-examination. Jurors rejected their testimony and acquitted Jackson, unanimously. 3) The supposed 'settlement' in 1992 was detailed to a tabloid reporter, for money, by a female source who claimed to work for Jordan Chandler's legal firm. She never showed the reporter a document - she simply 'read it out' over the phone. A police investigation into the claim found that the boy named in the settlement did not exist, there was no record of any settlement ever being paid, and the female source had never worked for the legal firm and in fact did not exist. She was never heard of again. This leaves one element of the People's story standing; that Jackson 'allegedly' - what a convenient little word that is - paid $35million to two-dozen young accusers. The newspaper presents no evidence to corroborate this claim. Just a note in the tabloid reporter's documents, which the People intentionally misrepresents as an 'FBI file'. Contrary to the People's claim, investigators knew about and investigated these tapes as part of their probe into Jackson in 2003/4, in which they were assisted by the FBI. Despite all of their resources, neither the Californian police nor the FBI was ever able to locate any evidence that any child besides Jordan Chandler or Jason Francia ever received a settlement. POSTED BY CHARLES THOMSON AT 13:43 LABELS: ABUSE, AEG, ALLEGATIONS, JACKSON, LEMARQUE, LEMARQUES, MICHAEL, MIRROR, PEOPLE, TABLOID, TRIAL

Thriller4ever · June 2013

When I read this news for the first time it was alarmingly shocking as to why in the world are they trying to resurface the molestation claims. It worries me because this news is going to be published in the national dailies across the world. This is harming Michael's image. The Wade Robson thing was different to me because it involved some hints that Michael could be behind it and I believe he is but what the heck is this!

bec · June 2013

Sick. But it's got his mark:

$35 million to cover up molestations of 24 boys

=7 so we better buckle up cuz this ain't over yet.

Faithad777@gmail.com · June 2013

From the article RK posted: AEG-sponsored newspapers like the Mirror, though, bizarrely tried to paint Michael Jackson as the bad guy. http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/forum/index.php?action=post;topic=23980.0;last_msg=443820 This weekend - days after Jackson's son took the stand and testified that he saw Phillips in his home while his father was not there, behaving 'aggressively' towards Jackson's doctor - the Mirror's Sunday edition, called the People, is at it again http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/forum/index.php?action=post;topic=23980.0;last_msg=443820 This, and the fact that all of these started after the trial, is enough to prove and strengthen my belief as to who's behind these fabrications and tabloid garbage.

MJLoyalFan · June 2013

on 1372599476:

 SUNDAY, 30 JUNE 2013 by Charles Thomson The Mirror, the People, and the settlement that never was... It's a funny thing. Ever since the high-profile Michael Jackson death trial started going pear-shaped for promoter AEG Live, a lot of newspapers which carry prominent and lucrative advertising for its events have become more intent on smearing Michael Jackson than ever.

Thank you CHARLES THOMSON I APPLAUD YOU :th_bravo:

bec · June 2013

Have faith in MJ. This is a wrongful DEATH trial brought by Ms. Katherine Jackson. MJ isn't dead. Ms. Katherine Jackson knows that. I don't believe MJ would ask his mother to file a fraudulent suit. Therefore, I believe the trial is bogus.

Faithad777@gmail.com · June 2013

on 1372604678:

 Have faith in MJ. This is a wrongful DEATH trial brought by Ms. Katherine Jackson. MJ isn't dead. Ms. Katherine Jackson knows that. I don't believe MJ would ask his mother to file a fraudulent suit. Therefore, I believe the trial is bogus.

Bec, the trial may be bogus as far as the Jacksons are concerned, but I believe that AEG is in the dark, and for them it is extremely serious. They are very concerned about losing a lot of money and their reputation that's why we are seeing all these trash and false allegations against Michael.

Thriller4ever · June 2013

@Bec how did u get the 7? @Faithad777 , I've never been able to convince myself about AEG being the bad guys, they were very much involved with the 'This is it' Rehearsals, and that movie is all about clues and hints re: death hoax. Or it might be possible that very few people were in the know. But i believe it's not a big deal for the rest of the AEG i]yes, the bad ones[/i to extract the information and know it themselves. So, in some way or the other, AEG would be knowing i][u]even from this very forum they can know, if they really wanted to[/u][/i. so what's the purpose of this trial?

Sandal8259 · June 2013

But don't AEG know that they can get into a lot of trouble for lying about the FBI Files. If the FBI gets involve they are going to be in big trouble. The information that was printed in the paper that they owned is not true. This means that a lot of people are going to be put in jail. And to blatantly state that the FBI with held crucial information is very out there. I do not think that these people know who they are going up against. If AEG is doing this then they are very desperate and they better pray that the big Guns the FBI do not get involve with this because that will be the end. And this bit of information about the FBI Files coming up is pretty interesting. Because it was Mr. Sneddon that was the one that started the whole thing with the FBI regarding searching different countries trying to find some evidence against Michael. And if this was true then Michael would have not be acquitted of all charges. Someone is being paid to lie to the tabloids and I believe this is something very big. A lot of people are going to be in some serious trouble.

RK · June 2013

Roger Friedman's turn now..... Michael Jackson: Neverland Kid Told Me in 2005 “Nothing Happened” to Him or to Wade Robson Michael Jackson: Neverland Kid Told Me in 2005 “Nothing Happened” to Him or to Wade Robson 06/30/13 11:09amRoger Friedman0 Wade Robson is the young man who is now suing Michael Jackson’s estate. He claims Jackson molested him from age 7 to 14. Thanks to the re-surfacing of old “files” from the old “National Enquirer” in the British press today, I had go to back and look through my files from 2005. And what I found is pretty interesting. I met with a young man named Bobby Newt, a kid from the files whom National Enquirer reporter Jim Mitteager targeted as a Michael Jackson “victim.” By 2005 he was an adult, and I met with him. He told me nothing happened to him. He also added that nothing happened to Wade Robson, who was then going to be a witness in the trial. Bobby Newt and his two brothers, who wanted to be the next Jackson 5, spent two weeks with Michael at his Hayvenhurst house in Encino (this was before Neverland). This is what I wrote: “…nothing about what Bobby Newt hears now about himself or others makes sense. “I don’t know what to believe. He had prime time with me and my brother in the guest room for two weeks,” he said. “And he didn’t try anything.” As a footnote to all of this: In the small world of the Los Angeles music business, Bobby Newt recently worked with choreographer and alleged Jackson “victim” Wade Robson on tracks for his first album, a potential hit compendium of original R&B ballads. “Wade is straight as they come. He’s getting married. And nothing ever happened to him, either,” Newt said. Published April 7, 2005 Former Protege Vouches for Jackson No matter who testifies next in Michael Jackson‘s alleged “prior acts” of sexual abuse mini-trial, the prosecution will have to deal with the fact that only one boy will show up to say he was molested many years ago by the pop star. Now comes Robert Newt, 30, long a “Holy Grail” for The National Enquirer from its investigation into Jackson circa 1993. Newt and his twin brother Ronald Newt Jr. (now deceased) were aspiring performers and spent two weeks as guests in the Jackson family home in Encino, Calif., around 1985. They were about 11 years old. This all occurred before Neverland was completed. Michael, Janet Jackson and LaToya Jackson were all there, as well as the Jackson parents. Fast-forward to December 1993. The National Enquirer, desperate to get a scoop that Jackson has abused children, heard that the Newt kids once spent time with Jackson. The tabloid offered the Newts’ father, Ronald Newt Sr., $200,000 to say that something happened between his kids and Jackson. Newt, a San Francisco “character” and filmmaker whose past includes pimping and jail time, considered the offer. A contract was drawn up, signed by Enquirer editor David Perel. Enquirer reporter Jim Mitteager, who is also now deceased, met with Newt and his son at the Marriott hotel in downtown San Francisco. It seemed that all systems were go. But the Newts declined the offer at the last minute. Ron Newt Sr., to whom $200,000 would have seemed like the world on a silver platter, wrote “No good sucker” where his signature was supposed to go. The reason: Nothing ever happened between Jackson and the Newt boys. Indeed, no kids, no matter how much money was dangled by the tabloids, ever showed up to trade stories of Jackson malfeasance for big lumps of cash after the first scandal broke in 1993. “Maybe there aren’t any other kids,” a current Enquirer editor conceded. I met Bobby Newt yesterday near the office where he works as a mortgage broker in suburban Los Angeles. Just as his dad promised me a few days earlier, he’s a good-looking kid. He’s half black and half Chinese. Robert and his twin brother were likely very cute kids. They have the same features as other boys advertised as alleged Neverland “victims.” But all Bobby Newt remembers of his encounter with Jackson is good times. And all he remembers about the man from The National Enquirer is that he wanted Bobby, then 18, to lie. “He said, ‘Say he grabbed you on the butt. Say he grabbed you and touched you in any kind of way,’” Newt said. “He told us he took all these people down. Now he was going to take Michael down. That he would really destroy him. He told us he took all these other famous people down. All the major people that had scandals against them. He said, ‘We take these people down. That’s what we do.’” Prior to Bobby’s meeting with Mitteager, Bobby’s father met with him and brought along an intermediary, San Francisco politician, businessman and fellow jailbird Charlie Walker. Walker is infamous in San Francisco circles for being “hooked up” to anything interesting cooking on the West Coast. “My dad said these dudes are offering this money to take Michael Jackson down. And the guy [Mitteager] said, ‘Say he touched you. All you have to do is say it. But you might have to take the stand. You might have to go on ‘Oprah’ in front of all these people. You have to be prepared for this thing. Just say it. And we’ll give you money,’” Newt said. Two pieces of evidence confirm the Newts’ story. One is the actual contract proffered by the Enquirer and signed by Perel, who declined to comment for this story. The contract, written as a letter, says it’s an agreement between the tabloid and the Newts for their exclusive story regarding “your relationship with and knowledge of Michael Jackson, and his sexuality, your knowledge of Michael Jackson’s sexual contact and attempts at sexual contact with Robert Newt and others.” Mitteager expected them to sign, even though it was completely untrue and there was, in fact, no story. He knew you were lying, I reminded Bobby Newt. “Exactly! And he didn’t care! He was like, ‘Just say it and we’ll give you the money.’ And I was like, ‘He [Jackson] never touched me!” Newt said. “He [Mitteager] was really fishing and really digging. Think about it — most people you say it to, ‘We’ll give you this money,’ even [if it's not true]. And they’d take it.” Bobby Newt recalled more details of the 30-minute meeting with The National Enquirer’s reporter: “He was trying to coach me — if I decided to take the money, what would happen. He said ‘You know, it’s going to be a huge scandal. You’ll probably have a lot of people not liking you. You’re going to be famous!’ But to me, you’d be ruined. And the truth is Michael didn’t do anything even close to trying to molest us.” Ironically, the second piece of evidence also backs up the Newts’ story. Unbeknownst to them, they were taped by Mitteager. I told you last week that Mitteager did more surreptitious taping than Richard Nixon. When he died, the tapes were left to Hollywood investigator Paul Barresi. His dozens of hours of tapes include a conversation between Mitteager, Ron Newt Sr. and Charlie Walker. When I read some of the transcript back to Newt the other day, he was shocked. “I said all that,” he observed, surprised to have his memory prodded some 12 years later. Back in the mid-’80s, Ron Newt Sr. put his three sons together as a singing group much as Joseph Jackson did. He called them The Newtrons. After much pushing, he got the attention of Joe Jackson, who agreed to manage the group. Joe Jackson got the Newtrons a showcase at the Roxy in West Hollywood. Michael showed up and loved them. The result was a two-week stay for the boys at the Encino house on Hayvenhurst Ave., where they were supposed to work on their music. “We would see Michael in passing. We didn’t see him, maybe, because he was working on an album. We saw him downstairs in the kitchen and we talked to him,” he said. The Newtrons eventually got a record contract and recorded the Jackson 5 hit “I Want You Back” at Hayvenhurst. They also spent the night at Tito Jackson‘s house. But nothing about what Bobby Newt hears now about himself or others makes sense. “I don’t know what to believe. He had prime time with me and my brother in the guest room for two weeks,” he said. “And he didn’t try anything.” As a footnote to all of this: In the small world of the Los Angeles music business, Bobby Newt recently worked with choreographer and alleged Jackson “victim” Wade Robson on tracks for his first album, a potential hit compendium of original R&B ballads. Jackson’s former maid Blanca Francia implicated Robson in the case during Monday’s testimony. Robson is not testifying for the prosecution. “Wade is straight as they come. He’s getting married. And nothing ever happened to him, either,” Newt said. He shakes his head, thinking about those who have made claims against Jackson. “You have to look at these people, go back and see when their relationship with Michael fractured. The calls stopped coming,” he said. And Newt should know. After the adventure in 1985, the Newts never saw Jackson again. It didn’t bother them, Bobby says, as much as it might have others. “They probably didn’t like it. And this is their way of getting back at him,” he said. Read more: /> Roger Friedman

Thriller4ever · June 2013

on 1372607671:

 But don't AEG know that they can get into a lot of trouble for lying about the FBI Files. If the FBI gets involve they are going to be in big trouble. The information that was printed in the paper that they owned is not true. This means that a lot of people are going to be put in jail. And to blatantly state that the FBI with held crucial information is very out there. I do not think that these people know who they are going up against. If AEG is doing this then they are very desperate and they better pray that the big Guns the FBI do not get involve with this because that will be the end. And this bit of information about the FBI Files coming up is pretty interesting. Because it was Mr. Sneddon that was the one that started the whole thing with the FBI regarding searching different countries trying to find some evidence against Michael. And if this was true then Michael would have not be acquitted of all charges. Someone is being paid to lie to the tabloids and I believe this is something very big. A lot of people are going to be in some serious trouble.

I think apart from AEG owning The Mirror, there is no proof stating it really was AEG that spread the lies with this news report. And it isn't just the The mirror, there have been many newspapers in the past, and in the present, that lied and continue to lie about Michael's life and character. But still, no department is out to stop this except for those ardent Michael fans who want the BS to be put to rest. Once a top notch celebrity is accused of something, media cooks stories up to sell their product. And this tradition is continuing. I don't know about the other celebrities, but this is definitely the case with Michael. And not to forget, there are people who 'sell' these stories for money. But this story that Michael had molested '24' boys and has covered it up is simply too much. I'm presently at a loss of words to describe the injustice involved in this whole thing. What is happening?

bec · June 2013

on 1372607168:

 @Bec how did u get the 7?

Oops it's 14, not 16, my bad.

iloveyoumore · June 2013

on 1372608525:

 

on 1372607168:

 @Bec how did u get the 7? 

 Oops it's 14, not 16, my bad.

But it's still 7 14 ÷ 2 = 7 :icon_e_biggrin:

Faithad777@gmail.com · June 2013

on 1372607168:

 @Bec how did u get the 7? @Faithad777 , I've never been able to convince myself about AEG being the bad guys, they were very much involved with the 'This is it' Rehearsals, and that movie is all about clues and hints re: death hoax. Or it might be possible that very few people were in the know. But i believe it's not a big deal for the rest of the AEG i]yes, the bad ones[/i to extract the information and know it themselves. So, in some way or the other, AEG would be knowing i][u]even from this very forum they can know, if they really wanted to[/u][/i. so what's the purpose of this trial?

Thriller4ever, I understand what you mean. But I must say that since AEG is all about profits (aren't all the powerful, big companies?) even though they were the ones promoting "This is it", they were at the same time wanting/trying to control Michael, treating him like a "circus animal", "slapping" him and so on...... AEG may not have paid enough attention to really understand the meaning of the movie "Gilda" for example, what I'm trying to say is that they may have been so concerned about recouping the money they had already advanced to Michael and others that they did not care what they were promoting, as long as it was successful and made them money.

Thriller4ever · June 2013

on 1372616614:

 

on 1372607168:

 @Bec how did u get the 7? @Faithad777 , I've never been able to convince myself about AEG being the bad guys, they were very much involved with the 'This is it' Rehearsals, and that movie is all about clues and hints re: death hoax. Or it might be possible that very few people were in the know. But i believe it's not a big deal for the rest of the AEG i]yes, the bad ones[/i to extract the information and know it themselves. So, in some way or the other, AEG would be knowing i][u]even from this very forum they can know, if they really wanted to[/u][/i. so what's the purpose of this trial? 

 Thriller4ever, I understand what you mean. But I must say that since AEG is all about profits (aren't all the powerful, big companies?) even though they were the ones promoting "This is it", they were at the same time wanting/trying to control Michael, treating him like a "circus animal", "slapping" him and so on...... AEG may not have paid enough attention to really understand the meaning of the movie "Gilda" for example, what I'm trying to say is that they may have been so concerned about recouping the money they had already advanced to Michael and others that they did not care what they were promoting, as long as it was successful and made them money.

Because they are a big company, and as you said are all about profits, I believe they can easily find information and get to the truth. Maybe not during the rehearsals but after Michael's supoosed 'death', all this hullabaloo would have definitely let them know MJ's alive and fine. And if they know, what is the purpose of the trial. I strongly feel it is to uncover something or someone. Initially, I had thought it would be the siblings because of the motion that they were in financial difficulties at certain point in their lives. Now i don't know.

on 1372613990:

 

on 1372608525:

 

on 1372607168:

 @Bec how did u get the 7? 

 Oops it's 14, not 16, my bad. 

 But it's still 7 14 ÷ 2 = 7 :icon_e_biggrin:

I think we only add in numerology.

paula-c · June 2013

on 1372599044:

 Why is all this bullshit being thrown now? Is it to keep MJ from coming back.....[size=12pt]intimidate him into staying 'dead'? [/size] [size=12pt]Are AEG behind this as well as Wade's claim? [/size] It makes me feel like throwing up. Just vile and nasty .

blankie · June 2013

on 1372604678:

 Have faith in MJ. This is a wrongful DEATH trial brought by Ms. Katherine Jackson. MJ isn't dead. Ms. Katherine Jackson knows that. I don't believe MJ would ask his mother to file a fraudulent suit. Therefore, I believe the trial is bogus.

:th_bravo: enough is enough :computer-losy-smiley: now we are getting tired with all these lies :Crash: This is the leit motif of the moment of the media :computer-losy-smiley: I think Michael will be felt soon :icon_mrgreen:

iloveyoumore · June 2013

on 1372619392:

 

on 1372613990:

 

on 1372608525:

 

on 1372607168:

 @Bec how did u get the 7? 

 Oops it's 14, not 16, my bad. 

 But it's still 7 14 ÷ 2 = 7 :icon_e_biggrin: 

 I think we only add in numerology.

Yes. It was supposed to be humorous. Sorry.

on 1372599044:

 Is it to keep MJ from coming back.....intimidate him into staying 'dead'?

I think if Michael has planned something this big with a great comeback, he can't be stopped by some lying fools and/or AEG/sony. I believe these people just can't ruin his plans, they can't win Michael. but I hope this is not the case anyways. :icon_e_confused:

Sandal8259 · June 2013

Guys, do you remember way back when on a post that was talking about Book of Tapes. And we all was wondering what that was all about. Is it possible with the help of some people in high places Michael was able to get a hold of the transcripts of all of these illegal transactions that was going on about him. I am still trying to figure out what information Michael have on them that makes them want to silence him forever. And again what does these child molestation allegations got to do with the Wrongful Death of Michael Jackson case. One does not have anything to do with the other.

bec · July 2013

on 1372616614:

 they were at the same time wanting/trying to control Michael, treating him like a "circus animal", "slapping" him and so on......

I do not believe for one minute that MJ would tolerate such treatment. MJ is not a victim nor is he a pathetic wimp.

Michael Jackson spent $35 million to cover up molestations of 24 boys: report

Comments