OMG!!! If this is true, then MICHAEL is really dead

ShoutShout Posts: 560
edited January 2010 in Medical Discussion
This is really a sad day!!!

I have found this site on which is written that Michaels name and an epitaph will be added soon on his crypt.
I have reflected everything surrounding Michaels death and it gets harder and harder to believe. I am searching for the truth and I think, yes, Michael Jackson is maybe dead...


Here is the saddest link which I have ever put on this side. As I have seen this picture it felt heavy on my heart and still is. I am very sorry that I have to put it here right now (please forgive me but I am searching for the truth and still hope that this is not real):

<!-- m -->http://www.seeing-stars.com/Buried2/For ... ale5.shtml<!-- m -->
«1345

Comments

  • It doesn't say that it will be added soon, it says "no doubt it will be added soon". The writer of this is speculating that this is going to happen IMO.
  • angelshadowangelshadow Posts: 8,257
    I know this web page .... sometimes seerauchen_002.gif
  • I think this might be old. I remember someone posted a link to the same website back in September or I ran across it while searching? The family specifically said that they will not put Michael's name on the crypt, so I doubt one will be added. I wouldn't get upset over this, it probably doesn't mean anything. Keep the faith!! <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
  • ShoutShout Posts: 560
    It doesn't say that it will be added soon, it says "no doubt it will be added soon". The writer of this is speculating that this is going to happen IMO.

    I hope you are right. Right now I cannot think in a positive way (maybe I am pessimistic and do not see "clear") but to me it sounds not that way you have interpret it. But you are right it is possible that the writer meant it that way.
  • It also states "a photo of the crypt was distributed by the park to the press back in the 1950's, when the Holly Terrace first opened. Click here to see it."

    Now if you click that link it opens a picture very much the same as we have been shown lately. I just find it hard to imagine that there are not any noticeable changes to this location after 59 years but that may be JMO.
  • ShoutShout Posts: 560
    It also states "a photo of the crypt was distributed by the park to the press back in the 1950's, when the Holly Terrace first opened. Click here to see it."

    Now if you click that link it opens a picture very much the same as we have been shown lately. I just find it hard to imagine that there are not any noticeable changes to this location after 59 years but that may be JMO.

    here is the WHOLE article:

    Quote: "With a very high price, this valuable location waited five decades for the right tenant."

  • simonsimon Posts: 18
    It doesn't say that it will be added soon, it says "no doubt it will be added soon". The writer of this is speculating that this is going to happen IMO.

    I agree. it's strange a tomb with no epitaph, the writer can explain this fact telling that there is "no doubt it will be added soon". it doesn't mean anything.
  • mjfullmjfull Posts: 91
    It doesn't say that it will be added soon, it says "no doubt it will be added soon". The writer of this is speculating that this is going to happen IMO.

    I hope you are right. Right now I cannot think in a positive way (maybe I am pessimistic and do not see "clear") but to me it sounds not that way you have interpret it. But you are right it is possible that the writer meant it that way.

    It has been 4 months since the...burial and the crypt doesn't yet bear Michael's name!
  • ShoutShout Posts: 560
    "Michael Jackson, the "King of Pop", was buried in the Great Mausoleum in July of 2009."
    July 2009?
    I don't think we should worry, it's just a tourist guide.

    We should really worry about that, do you know why???? because the DC says that Michael was buried on 7.7.2009 take a look. So the "mediahoax" will be that the family has fooled us, because they pretend that they have buried Michael on 3rd September! Before that public memorial service they were at Forest Lawn.
  • Michael is gone forever. I am the first who wants him to be alive but we have to accept it. He went forever last 25th june. It is better to admit it. He gave us a lot, maybe it is the time for enjoying every song, every video, every interview, every pic....and let him rest forever. Everybody, you and me have to die someday, he was 50 years and a cardiac arrest is not so unusual.

    Do not hate me and do not tell me I must go another site because it is not fair. Inside me there still live a hope, and I visit you everyday trying to find news clues....but I found nothing logic for months....

    And supossing he is alive, if he is hidden or have decided he want or need another life, why dont we let him be happy? if he has to reappear he will do, and if we find some clue maybe we hurt him. I wish he will be healthy and happy, but I have to respect his decision for going...or his death.

    Sorry very much.
  • I made an error in my previous post regarding the pictures of the crypt. Apparently there have been some changes such as a more modern floor and the addition of the gate since the original 1950's photo. I apologize for my error.

    As another note, someone just pointed out that it says he was placed there in July of 2009 but that can't be possible since the family had not even picked out the final resting place at that time and the funeral wasn't until September.
  • ShoutShout Posts: 560
    @MJfull

    Yes I totaly agree with you that there is no name on this since all know that Michael is supposedly there.
  • ShoutShout Posts: 560
    I made an error in my previous post regarding the pictures of the crypt. Apparently there have been some changes such as a more modern floor and the addition of the gate since the original 1950's photo. I apologize for my error.

    As another note, someone just pointed out that it says he was placed there in July of 2009 but that can't be possible since the family had not even picked out the final resting place at that time and the funeral wasn't until September.

    That is what they have told us. Look to the DC it mentiones something else.
  • ShoutShout Posts: 560
    The DC says that Michael was buried on 7.7.2009. If you do not except the dates compare it please with murphys DC.

    I am really, really sorry, but I think we are here because we want the truth and maybe this is the truth. There are more things which explain that Michael is gone, more than the "proofs" that he is alive.

    I am really sorry and sad, but I think this is unfortunately the truth.
  • ShoutShout Posts: 560
    I think we should start to see what proves that Michael is gone. I am sure that we will find more evidence that he is not here anymore than that he is alive.
  • Then who was in the casket that was at the funeral if Michael was already buried? I am trying to think of any question possible to explain the discrepancies of the dates regarding his burial. Also, if he was already buried then why did the family bother doing the "private" funeral which ended up being aired to the world until the casket arrived and then the feed was cut?

    I also read on another thread that the family would not be putting his name on the crypt because they wanted to ensure his safety. I don't understand this either since he is in the more secure of places. What happens in 100 years or more when noone from now is still here? What if something happens to the mausoleum? How will they identify him if there is not a marker?

    Like I said before, I am just trying to think of anything possible to explain the behaviors of all involved in this. Maybe I am grasping at straws per se but IMO if I don't look at the most improbabilities then I am leaving stones unturned which could have answers.
  • ShoutShout Posts: 560
    Here is the DC of Michael Jackson, oh my god


    <!-- m -->http://www2.tbo.com/exposure/full/2009/ ... ficate.jpg<!-- m -->
  • angelshadowangelshadow Posts: 8,257
    The death certificate is signed and dated it after the time of death and
  • ShoutShout Posts: 560
    Then who was in the casket that was at the funeral if Michael was already buried? I am trying to think of any question possible to explain the discrepancies of the dates regarding his burial. Also, if he was already buried then why did the family bother doing the "private" funeral which ended up being aired to the world until the casket arrived and then the feed was cut?

    I also read on another thread that the family would not be putting his name on the crypt because they wanted to ensure his safety. I don't understand this either since he is in the more secure of places. What happens in 100 years or more when noone from now is still here? What if something happens to the mausoleum? How will they identify him if there is not a marker?

    Like I said before, I am just trying to think of anything possible to explain the behaviors of all involved in this. Maybe I am grasping at straws per se but IMO if I don't look at the most improbabilities then I am leaving stones unturned which could have answers.


    Wasn´t it said that Michael was not (by the way) in the casket? I think yes, so maybe they have buried him before or after the public memorial service (if he was in the casket, I do not think so). This both positions are quite possible.
  • ShoutShout Posts: 560
    The death certificate is signed and dated it after the time of death and

    Okay, so here is a comparison. Watch the DC of Brittany Murphy. There are different dates too

    <!-- m -->http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/newsdesk/tm ... te_TMZ.pdf<!-- m -->

    Just compare the two DC

    Brittany Murphy:

    Died: 20.12.2009
    Buried: 24.12.2009
    Date Issued: 29.12.2009
  • angelshadowangelshadow Posts: 8,257
    @ Shout
    Thanks
  • Really!?! I had not heard that he wasn't in the casket. Well if that is true do you have any idea why the family would have used another $25,000 casket just for show? This is all starting to become more and more confusing and frustrating. And, why would they have his children go through with placing the crown on the casket if it was for nothing more than show? Haven't the children been through enough? They could have easily just stated that they had had a small family gathering to inter Michael and then let it be finished instead of making another public spectacle of themselves by having the elaborate funeral that they were over 90 minutes late for. Can you even begin to imagine how Michael, if he is gone, would be feeling over the disrespect shown to his guests, especially Elizabeth Taylor by making her wait out in the miserable heat for that long given her current health conditions.
  • ShoutShout Posts: 560
    Really!?! I had not heard that he wasn't in the casket. Well if that is true do you have any idea why the family would have used another $25,000 casket just for show? This is all starting to become more and more confusing and frustrating. And, why would they have his children go through with placing the crown on the casket if it was for nothing more than show? Haven't the children been through enough? They could have easily just stated that they had had a small family gathering to inter Michael and then let it be finished instead of making another public spectacle of themselves by having the elaborate funeral that they were over 90 minutes late for. Can you even begin to imagine how Michael, if he is gone, would be feeling over the disrespect shown to his guests, especially Elizabeth Taylor by making her wait out in the miserable heat for that long given her current health conditions.


    I think, sadly they want the money and the showbis is very, very hard and corrupt there are no angels there! And think about Joe how he has treated his children. Do you think his character has really changed, although I try to understand peoples behaviour, I do not believe that Joe has changed his character. <!-- s:cry: -->:cry:<!-- s:cry: -->
  • farhatmjjfarhatmjj Posts: 570
    @Shout, i think you are thinking way too negative. Seems like next you are going to say his family killed him for money. Sorry if that hurt you but i just needed to give an example. Just because an article said "there's no doubt it will be added soon" and the DC says he was buried on july 7th doesn't prove he's dead. I too sometimes feel we're living in denial but this does not make sense. What about all the other clues then?
Sign In or Register to comment.