The whole 4832 3847 thing on twitter.

dexemberdexember Posts: 94
edited January 1970 in General Hoax Investigation
The whole "text message code number" thing came from one account <!-- m -->http://twitter.com/84265968<!-- m -->
All of a sudden I've been reading about other accounts doing it. As you can see, the original "text" starter, doesn't message very often. But I have been analyzing the text when he does. (with some help from going through old forums)

Here is what I have come up with

#1 - Today I watched the sun rise with the most beautiful, amazing, wondrous people in the world. My closest friends and family. 4 5683 968 6673.
7:47 AM Sep 8th from web

- Day after the burial

#2 - My heart is warm again, 84265968!
10:50 PM Oct 27th from web

- The day this is it came out (I think? Please correct me if I am wrong)

#3 - Good morning. My dear friend is helping me with Twitter. Thank you for the wonderful "Tweets", God Bless You
7:43 AM Oct 30th from web

- Not sure about this one ? but Elizabeth Taylor tweets too??

#4 - Keep smilin' <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
8:40 AM Nov 27th from web

- A few days ago after thanksgiving. I read somewhere that there was a post about their thanksgiving that was later taken off. (Perhaps too obvious after the photos of the kids came out??)

JUST MY THOUGHTS <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
add to if you'd like
I'm very skeptical about this, and not once does the person say they have anything to do with MJ, but IMO it wouldn't hurt keeping an eye on it. Something tells me if they wanted to play games they would be back more often. Just the fact that Liz Taylor has a twitter makes me think that he might have one, (I also believe that he is with Liz Taylor. She has always been very very trustworthy, and remember that visit the kids took to her house at the early hours of the morning and the paps got them??)

Apart from that, I think all the other ones are not worth paying attention to, or "following". Just because they take time away from focusing on things that could lead us somewhere with their tweets every 2 minutes.

<!-- s:lol: -->:lol:<!-- s:lol: -->

Anyway, I think the other people speaking in this text message form are probably trying to mess with us, for the simple fact that they've picked it up off this account :S also, they are tweeting very often, which in my opinion is not very reliable. I think it may be somebody, trying to waste our time by writing ENTIRE PARAGRAPHS they want us to decode lol.

Just because someone speaks like this - 34958 59073 5923 34001 39432 - Doesn't mean anything <!-- s:-) -->:-)<!-- s:-) -->!


I'd like to hear your opinions on these twitter accounts.
I personally dont think they are anyone special.
«1

Comments

  • <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? --> <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
  • ScreamScream Posts: 203
    I don't think the numbers are relevant to the hoax and I think it's something that we aren't supposed to figure out.

    It obviously has personal significance to her and likely to certain people in her life.

    I don't think it's something we should be concerned about and her privacy should be respected.
  • The whole "text message code number" thing came from one account <!-- m -->http://twitter.com/84265968<!-- m -->
    All of a sudden I've been reading about other accounts doing it. As you can see, the original "text" starter, doesn't message very often. But I have been analyzing the text when he does. (with some help from going through old forums)

    Here is what I have come up with

    #1 - Today I watched the sun rise with the most beautiful, amazing, wondrous people in the world. My closest friends and family. 4 5683 968 6673.
    7:47 AM Sep 8th from web

    - Day after the burial

    #2 - My heart is warm again, 84265968!
    10:50 PM Oct 27th from web

    - The day this is it came out (I think? Please correct me if I am wrong)

    #3 - Good morning. My dear friend is helping me with Twitter. Thank you for the wonderful "Tweets", God Bless You
    7:43 AM Oct 30th from web

    - Not sure about this one ? but Elizabeth Taylor tweets too??

    #4 - Keep smilin' <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
    8:40 AM Nov 27th from web

    - A few days ago after thanksgiving. I read somewhere that there was a post about their thanksgiving that was later taken off. (Perhaps too obvious after the photos of the kids came out??)

    JUST MY THOUGHTS <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
    add to if you'd like
    I'm very skeptical about this, and not once does the person say they have anything to do with MJ, but IMO it wouldn't hurt keeping an eye on it. Something tells me if they wanted to play games they would be back more often. Just the fact that Liz Taylor has a twitter makes me think that he might have one, (I also believe that he is with Liz Taylor. She has always been very very trustworthy, and remember that visit the kids took to her house at the early hours of the morning and the paps got them??)

    Apart from that, I think all the other ones are not worth paying attention to, or "following". Just because they take time away from focusing on things that could lead us somewhere with their tweets every 2 minutes.

    <!-- s:lol: -->:lol:<!-- s:lol: -->

    Anyway, I think the other people speaking in this text message form are probably trying to mess with us, for the simple fact that they've picked it up off this account :S also, they are tweeting very often, which in my opinion is not very reliable. I think it may be somebody, trying to waste our time by writing ENTIRE PARAGRAPHS they want us to decode lol.

    Just because someone speaks like this - 34958 59073 5923 34001 39432 - Doesn't mean anything <!-- s:-) -->:-)<!-- s:-) -->!


    I'd like to hear your opinions on these twitter accounts.
    I personally dont think they are anyone special.
    i agree this is the one to watch i think all the others just want attention well spotted
  • WildyWildy Posts: 274
    I agree with you dexember but I'll keep an eye on this twitter accounts too because I think they may be have good reasons to twits with numbers.
    When I look at the meaning (thanks to the ones who decode them by the way, I'm so lost with them <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) --> ) of this numbers, it's mystic and ''may be" have something to do with mj or maybe they know the truth, who knows?

  • #3 - Good morning. My dear friend is helping me with Twitter. Thank you for the wonderful "Tweets", God Bless You
    7:43 AM Oct 30th from web

    - Not sure about this one ? but Elizabeth Taylor tweets too??

    Did you notice that Lizzie stopt twitting after she saw This is it? (26th of October) and suddenly 30th of October this "michael person" says a friend is helping him with twitter... makes you think doesn't it <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
  • Eva REva R Posts: 1,217

    #3 - Good morning. My dear friend is helping me with Twitter. Thank you for the wonderful "Tweets", God Bless You
    7:43 AM Oct 30th from web

    - Not sure about this one ? but Elizabeth Taylor tweets too??

    Did you notice that Lizzie stopt twitting after she saw This is it? (26th of October) and suddenly 30th of October this "michael person" says a friend is helping him with twitter... makes you think doesn't it <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->

    yeah exactly, And isn't it weird that all the verified accounts of the Jackson are not talking about Michael ? <!-- s:P -->:P<!-- s:P -->
  • The numbers 84865968 mean "thankyou"..
  • The numbers 84865968 mean "thankyou"..

    True, and the numbers at Real name say Michael <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
  • The numbers 84865968 mean "thankyou"..

    True, and the numbers at Real name say Michael <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
    Do you think it´s someone messing around?
  • The numbers 84865968 mean "thankyou"..

    True, and the numbers at Real name say Michael <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
    Do you think it´s someone messing around?

    I really have no idea I've got some sort of "Those who know don't speak those who speak don't know" atitude right now, but I will keep an open mind though <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
  • True, and the numbers at Real name say Michael <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->[/quote]
    Do you think it´s someone messing around?[/quote]

    I really have no idea I've got some sort of "Those who know don't speak those who speak don't know" atitude right now, but I will keep an open mind though <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->[/quote]
    oh my god you have just repeated what was said on the lkl blog <!-- s:o -->:o<!-- s:o -->
  • I wish Michael would just give us a clue we can all understand, to put us out of our misery! LOLL!
    I don't want to know where he is, i just want to know that he is OK <!-- s8-) -->8-)<!-- s8-) -->
  • True, and the numbers at Real name say Michael <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
    Do you think it´s someone messing around?[/quote]

    I really have no idea I've got some sort of "Those who know don't speak those who speak don't know" atitude right now, but I will keep an open mind though <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->[/quote]
    oh my god you have just repeated what was said on the lkl blog <!-- s:o -->:o<!-- s:o -->[/quote]

    Haha are you serious?
  • missyboy007 i am as serious as a heart attack where did you get that quote from <!-- s:!: -->:!:<!-- s:!: -->
  • missyboy007 i am as serious as a heart attack where did you get that quote from <!-- s:!: -->:!:<!-- s:!: -->
    DID YOU FIND THIS QUOTE SOMEWHERE ON TWITTER <!-- s:?: -->:?:<!-- s:?: -->
  • missyboy007 i am as serious as a heart attack where did you get that quote from <!-- s:!: -->:!:<!-- s:!: -->
    DID YOU FIND THIS QUOTE SOMEWHERE ON TWITTER <!-- s:?: -->:?:<!-- s:?: -->
    No I didn't I was saying it all the time to my boyfriend but since it's Dutch I've translated it best as I could to English <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
  • dyannedyanne Posts: 134
    missyboy007 i am as serious as a heart attack where did you get that quote from <!-- s:!: -->:!:<!-- s:!: -->
    DID YOU FIND THIS QUOTE SOMEWHERE ON TWITTER <!-- s:?: -->:?:<!-- s:?: -->
    No I didn't I was saying it all the time to my boyfriend but since it's Dutch I've translated it best as I could to English <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->

    Someone on LKL blog said those exact words yesterday I think. Was it also you Missy?
  • missyboy007 i am as serious as a heart attack where did you get that quote from <!-- s:!: -->:!:<!-- s:!: -->
    DID YOU FIND THIS QUOTE SOMEWHERE ON TWITTER <!-- s:?: -->:?:<!-- s:?: -->
    No I didn't I was saying it all the time to my boyfriend but since it's Dutch I've translated it best as I could to English <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->[/quote]

    Someone on LKL blog said those exact words yesterday I think. Was it also you Missy?[/quote]
    NO I HEARD THIS WEEKS AGO ON THAT BLOG
  • dyannedyanne Posts: 134
    NO I HEARD THIS WEEKS AGO ON THAT BLOG

    Actually, it was on Nov 30, by ibelieve in reply to *mj*. Not exactly as Missy said it, but still

    <!-- m -->http://larrykinglive.blogs.cnn.com/2009 ... ng-of-pop/<!-- m -->

    ibelieve November 30th, 2009 6:34 pm ET

    @ **mj**
    those who know don't talk, those who talk, don't know....
  • nellyka7nellyka7 Posts: 218
    NO I HEARD THIS WEEKS AGO ON THAT BLOG
    I say that all the time, and I have never really been on the LKL blog
  • dyannedyanne Posts: 134
    Actually, it is a quote from Larry Speakes, who was Ronald Reagan's press secretary around 1985. I think it just came to be used without people knowing where it comes from.

    And Spankkle, you might have seen that written by Makea70 on Twitter on Nov 28th <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
  • MJ-FanMJ-Fan Posts: 234
    It says, 'i love you more' and 'thank you' and if you look at the name on their twitter it says 'michael' in code. Hmm.. ?
  • NO I HEARD THIS WEEKS AGO ON THAT BLOG

    Actually, it was on Nov 30, by ibelieve in reply to *mj*. Not exactly as Missy said it, but still

    <!-- m -->http://larrykinglive.blogs.cnn.com/2009 ... ng-of-pop/<!-- m -->

    ibelieve November 30th, 2009 6:34 pm ET

    @ **mj**
    those who know don't talk, those who talk, don't know....
    NO I NO I LIVE IN A PADDED CELL BUT I MEAN LIKE 3 WEEKS AGO I HAVE BEEN FOLLOWING THAT BLOG FOR WEEKS
  • dyannedyanne Posts: 134
    NO I HEARD THIS WEEKS AGO ON THAT BLOG

    Actually, it was on Nov 30, by ibelieve in reply to *mj*. Not exactly as Missy said it, but still

    <!-- m -->http://larrykinglive.blogs.cnn.com/2009 ... ng-of-pop/<!-- m -->

    ibelieve November 30th, 2009 6:34 pm ET

    @ **mj**
    those who know don't talk, those who talk, don't know....
    NO I NO I LIVE IN A PADDED CELL BUT I MEAN LIKE 3 WEEKS AGO I HAVE BEEN FOLLOWING THAT BLOG FOR WEEKS

    then maybe someone is posting the same thing over nd over <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->. you made me search the blogs and there are a loooot of comments <!-- s:lol: -->:lol:<!-- s:lol: --> . I only resisted to go back till Nov 28th lol
  • It says, 'i love you more' and 'thank you' and if you look at the name on their twitter it says 'michael' in code. Hmm.. ?
    thats whats interesting to me same as liz started twitting again (1 twit) and this persons account has got a new twit too <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
Sign In or Register to comment.