TIAI May 8
Redirected to : <!-- l -->viewtopic.php?f=72&t=8199&start=0#p134380<!-- l -->
MJJSmile wrote:
TMZ ... 4/4/ at 4am
last TS's update 4.44
<!-- s --><!-- s --> I love him !!! <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D -->
Comments
and your Post at the 8th May at 8:08 !
Greetings ! <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
My reply there 4/4: <!-- l -->viewtopic.php?f=72&t=8199&start=25#p137839<!-- l -->
Following the 04/04 original link I went to TMZ again "Celebrity Justice"
CONRAD MURRAY subject already posted by MO today on TMZ TOPIC:
<!-- l -->viewtopic.php?f=50&t=9562#p159982<!-- l -->
Read more: <!-- m -->http://www.tmz.com/#ixzz0nLVYJtmn<!-- m -->
Conrad Murray Supporters Plan Demonstration
Interesting to pay attention....TMZ...Conrad Murray...press ???? <!-- s:!: -->:!:<!-- s:!: --> <!-- s:?: -->:?:<!-- s:?: -->
I'll do...but very tired today! <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
Remembering Michael words:
"IF WE CAN DREAM IT, WE CAN DO IT"
L.O.V.E. FOR ALL BELIEVERS! <!-- s --><!-- s -->
I've also asked this question before. It's getting a little frustrating trying to figure out how everyone connects. I can't believe that TMZ would post an article and misspell a word (propfol), but they did. I wonder if they did that on purpose.
TMZ does everything by the way, if you misspelled something propofol will ... <!-- s8-) -->8-)<!-- s8-) -->
I'm sorry, I don't understand what you are trying to say? I was just curious if there was a hidden reason why they misspelled propofol (they spelled it propfol). I suppose I'm reading too much into it.
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
I was thinking about Souza's post of 4th april....
Now, if I look on TMZ page there is a new about Murrsy' s supporters that was posted at 1:00 AM... and others news posted at 8:15 AM, 7:15 AM and 6:47 AM... but TMZ keeps the articles about Murray on top.... such us he said before TMZ posted other news!!!!
I believe so... If Michael trusted Harvey enough to let him have such a key role in this hoax, I'd say they must have gone a long way back.
Well it’s very possible that Harvey Levin and Michael Jackson go back to the early 2000’s
Harvey Levin served as creator and executive producer for Celebrity Justice from 2002-2005. (Interesting how TMZ has it’s Celebrity Justice tag referencing MJ and Conrad Murray so much…)
While working with Celebrity Justice, Harvey was sought out to comment on the Jackson molestation case numerous times by shows like CNN.com and Larry King Live. He was very familiar with the case… apparently he was one of MJ’s harshest critics. However, is it possible that he had a change of heart and he saw first-hand the injustice being done to Michael?
Is it a stretch to think that Michael may have brought Harvey on (to the hoax crew) to fight with him for justice?
If I, as a lawyer/reporter whatever, saw an injustice being done to a man… and then, hypothetically that man devised a master plan and painted a vision to educate people on what was happening not only in media but in the world… I would 100% help him out.
That’s what lawyers fight for…. Justice!
Then right after that TMZ.com came on the scene… interesting.
I believe this is all connected… Harvey, TMZ, TS… and I believe that this is going to be deemed as the Greatest Show in History!
Up to minute 1:50
[youtube:2l1j66by]
From minute 8:20, Harvey´s response makes me think that the death of MJ is a hoax. Harvey speaks of a legal document as a means of credibility for its articles.
[youtube:2l1j66by]
I get the feeling that according to TMZ we must judge after investigating since nothing makes sense, the will, the documents, the LAPD investigation, Murray´s case ....
What do we do? Should we rely on TMZ?
I think they are involved in this as a project, I now seriously do. Their aim?, I am not sure yet if they are checking up how gulligable we can be, or if they want to make a pay per click profit on us, but to me also seems like they are too deep in to MJ invstigation as well.
What do you think? <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->