How The BP Disaster Could Kill Millions

edited January 1970 in News
How The BP Disaster Could Kill Millions
2010 06 19
By Terrence Aym | rense.com

11433disaster.jpg

Disturbing evidence is mounting that something frightening is happening deep under the waters of the Gulf of Mexico-something far worse than theBP oil gusher.

Warnings were raised as long as a year before the Deepwater Horizondisaster that the area of seabed chosen by the BP geologists might be unstable, or worse, inherently dangerous.

What makes the location that Transocean chose potentially far riskier than other potential oil deposits located at other regions of the Gulf? It can be summed up with two words: methane gas.

The same methane that makes coal mining operations hazardous and leads to horrendous mining accidents deep under the earth also can present a high level of danger to certain oil exploration ventures.


Location of Deepwater Horizon oil rig was criticized

More than 12 months ago some geologists rang the warning bell that the Deepwater Horizon exploratory rig might have been erected directly over a huge underground reservoir of methane.

Documents from several years ago indicate that the subterranean geologic formation may contain the presence of a huge methane deposit.

None other than the engineer who helped lead the team to snuff the Gulf oilfires set by Saddam Hussein to slow the advance of American troops has stated that a huge underground lake of methane gas-compressed by a pressure of 100,000 pounds per square inch (psi)-could be released by BP's drilling effort to obtain the oil deposit.

Current engineering technology cannot contain gas that is pressurized to 100,000 psi.

By some geologists' estimates the methane could be a massive 15 to 20 mile toxic and explosive bubble trapped for eons under the Gulf sea floor. In their opinion, the explosive destruction of the Deepwater Horizon wellhead was an accident just waiting to happen.

Yet the disaster that followed the loss of the rig pales by comparison to the apocalyptic disaster that may come.


A cascading catastrophe

According to worried geologists, the first signs that the methane may burst its way through the bottom of the ocean would be fissures or cracks appearing on the ocean floor near the damaged well head.

Evidence of fissures opening up on the seabed have been captured by the robotic submersibles working to repair and contain the ruptured well. Smaller, independent plumes have also appeared outside the nearby radius of the bore hole itself.

According to some geological experts, BP's operations set into motion a series of events that may be irreversible. Step-by-step the drilling team committed one error after another.

Congressmen Henry Waxman, D-CA, and Bart Stupak, D-MI, in a letter sent to BP CEO Tony Hayward, identified 5 missteps made by BP during the period culminating with the explosion.

Waxman, chair of the Congressional energy panel and Stupak, the head of the subcommittee on oversight and investigations, said, "The common feature of these five decisions is that they posed a trade-off between cost and well safety."

The two Representatives also stated in the 14-page letter to Hayward that "Time after time, it appears that BP made decisions that increased the risk of a blowout to save the company time or expense."

Called by some insiders investigating the ongoing disaster a "perfect storm of catastrophe," the wellhead blew on the sea floor catapulting a stream of mud, oil and gas upwards at the speed of sound.

In describing the events-that transpired in a matter of seconds-they note that immediately following the rupture the borehole pipe's casing blew away exposing a straight line 8 miles deep for the pressurized gas to escape. The result was cavitation, an irregular pressure variance sometimes experience by deep diving vessels such as nuclear submarines. This cavitation created a supersonic bubble of explosive methane gas that resulted in a supersonic explosion killing 11 men and completely annihilating the drilling platform.


Death from the depths

With the emerging evidence of fissures, the quiet fear now is the methane bubble rupturing the seabed and exploding into the Gulf waters. If the bubble escapes, every ship, drilling rig and structure within the region of the bubble will instantaneously sink. All the workers, engineers, Coast Guard personnel and marine biologists measuring the oil plumes' advance will instantly perish.

As horrible as that is, what would follow is an event so potentially horrific that it equals in its fury the Indonesian tsunami that killed more than 600,000, or the destruction of Pompeii by Mt. Vesuvius.

The ultimate Gulf disaster, however, would make even those historical horrors pale by comparison. If the huge methane bubble breaches the seabed, it will erupt with an explosive fury similar to that experienced during the eruption of Mt. Saint Helens in the Pacific Northwest. A gas gusher will surge upwards through miles of ancient sedimentary rock-layer after layer-past the oil reservoir. It will explode upwards propelled by 50 tons psi, burst through the cracks and fissures of the compromised sea floor, and rupture miles of ocean bottom with one titanic explosion.

The burgeoning methane gas cloud will surface, killing everything it touches, and set off a supersonic tsunami with the wave traveling somewhere between 400 to 600 miles per hour.

While the entire Gulf coastline is vulnerable, the state most exposed to the fury of a supersonic wave towering 100 feet or more is Florida. The Sunshine State only averages about 6 inches above sea level. A supersonic tsunami would literally sweep away everything from Miami to the panhandle in a matter of minutes. Loss of human life would be virtually instantaneous and measured in the millions. Of course the states of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and southern region of Georgia-a state with no Gulf coastline-would also experience tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of casualties.

Loss of property is virtually incalculable and the days of the US position as the world's superpower would be literally gone in a flash...of detonating methane.


Richard C. Hoagland on the Spill
[youtube:vmfu5q5x]

Source: <!-- m -->http://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id=11434<!-- m -->



Movie 'Knowing' Predicted Oil Rig Explosion in the Gulf of Mexico 20 April 2010
[youtube:vmfu5q5x]
«1

Comments

  • This is frightening!!!!!! <!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: --> <!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: -->
  • RKRK Posts: 3,019
    Ever since this oil leak started, I have been reminded of a verse I read a long time ago in the Book of Revelations. And it scares me more than words can convey.
    Revelations chapter 8 verse 8
    Then the second angel sounded: and something like a great mountain burning with fire was thrown into the sea, and a third of the sea became blood:
    verse9
    and a third of the living creatures in the sea died, and a third of the ships were destroyed.

    God help us.
  • Now I´m really really scared. And still incredibly angry!! I can´t put my feelings into words, against those ppl who only think about gain and profit, no matter the consequences; the thing that makes me wonder is... don´t they have children, grandchildren, ppl they care about??
  • BP oil spill: leak found in rig weeks before blast

    The Deepwater Horizon rig, which exploded causing the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, had suffered a leak in the weeks leading up to the blast, an employee has claimed.
    Tyrone Benton told the BBC that he identified a leak in the rig's safety equipment weeks before the explosion.

    He claimed that the leak was not fixed at the time. Instead, the faulty device was shut down, forcing the rig to rely on a second one.

    GULF-OIL_1661968c.jpg

    "We saw a leak on the pod, so by seeing the leak we informed the company men," Mr Benton said. "They have a control room where they could turn off that pod and turn on the other one, so that they don't have to stop production."

    The pods control the blowout preventer, the most important piece of safety equipment on the rig, and contain both electronics and hydraulics. This is where Mr Benton said the problem was found.

    The blowout preventer failed when the rig exploded on April 20. The device, designed to avert disasters just like the devastating oil spill, is equipped with large shears which can seal off the well's main pipe.

    Professor Tad Patzek, petroleum expert at the University of Texas, told the BBC: "That is unacceptable. If you see any evidence of the blowout preventer not functioning properly, you should fix it by whatever means possible."

    Mr Benton said his supervisor emailed both BP and Transocean about the leaks when they were discovered. He did not known if the pod had been turned back on before the rig exploded.

    BP said rig owners Transocean were responsible for the operation and maintenance of that piece of equipment.

    <!-- m -->http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/news ... blast.html<!-- m -->
  • nefarinefari Posts: 1,227
    This is starting to make me think 2012......*the 4 years to save the planet*......holy crap what if this is what Michael knew about going to happen....BP....sunflower emblem...kabloowy!
  • SangreSangre Posts: 648
    This is starting to make me think 2012......*the 4 years to save the planet*......holy crap what if this is what Michael knew about going to happen....BP....sunflower emblem...kabloowy!

    The 2012 came from the Mayan calendar, but the thing with the calender is that it doesn't predict the end of the world (opposite to common knowledge). There are 10 calendars in total, the 2012 thing is 4th or 5th calendar. It means there will be a lot of changes and there will be a new era, a more perfect era than the last ones.

    (I read this in an Estonian paranormal investigation and conspiracy site, I could get links or something.)
  • terror2k9terror2k9 Posts: 75
    Methane levels 40% instead of normal 5% in Gulf - Scientists are Worried

    A new article out today might inadvertently add some weight to Richard Hoagland's claim /theory/rumour of a methane bubble under the sea waiting to explode on some Armegeddon -type level. ...?

    Hoagland warns of Gas Bubble and Tsunami of Biblical Proportions

    According to oceanographer John Kessler the methane levels in the oil coming from the sea floor now are at 40 % compared to the normal 5% found in typical oil deposits.


    Here's the full article , which doesn't talk about what Hoagland does but discusses another potential doom scenario ...

    _______________________________________________________________

    Associated Press Writers= NEW ORLEANS (AP) — It is an overlooked danger in oil spill crisis: The crude gushing from the well contains vast amounts of natural gas that could pose a serious threat to the Gulf of Mexico's fragile ecosystem.

    The oil emanating from the seafloor contains about 40 percent methane, compared with about 5 percent found in typical oil deposits, said John Kessler, a Texas A&M University oceanographer who is studying the impact of methane from the spill.

    That means huge quantities of methane have entered the Gulf, scientists say, potentially suffocating marine life and creating "dead zones" where oxygen is so depleted that nothing lives.

    "This is the most vigorous methane eruption in modern human history," Kessler said. source


    As you can imagine this is being discussed on many forums, and on one I found a post from someone who put together a list of methane-connected events occuring in the past two months alone. Here is what they wrote :


    Gulf disaster- METHANE


    Columbia mine disaster- METHANE
    link

    W. VA Massey Mine explosion- METHANE
    link

    Mexico explosion cause mile-long crack- METHANE
    translate.google.com... =en


    CT Kleen Energy massive explosion, killing many- METHANE
    link


    Texas natural gas refinery explosion - METHANE
    link

    There are more examples from the last 8 weeks or so, but you get the idea. Is it any surprise that one of the original apocalypse movies featured METHANE? "Mad Max" Thunderdome" lol. I never forgot that. Methane. It all comes down to that.
  • This is very scary! <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? --> <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? --> <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? --> <!-- s:( -->:(<!-- s:( -->
  • mjaliveomgmjaliveomg Posts: 178
    This is starting to make me think 2012......*the 4 years to save the planet*......holy crap what if this is what Michael knew about going to happen....BP....sunflower emblem...kabloowy!

    The 2012 came from the Mayan calendar, but the thing with the calender is that it doesn't predict the end of the world (opposite to common knowledge). There are 10 calendars in total, the 2012 thing is 4th or 5th calendar. It means there will be a lot of changes and there will be a new era, a more perfect era than the last ones.

    (I read this in an Estonian paranormal investigation and conspiracy site, I could get links or something.)

    I read about this at Project Camelot web site..it doesn't predict the end , but predict a evolutionary era..
    Dont know if u guys already heard about this site, it have alot of information about 9/11 , NWO, Illuminatis, 2012...
    <!-- m -->http://projectcamelotportal.com/<!-- m -->
  • This is starting to make me think 2012......*the 4 years to save the planet*......holy crap what if this is what Michael knew about going to happen....BP....sunflower emblem...kabloowy!

    The 2012 came from the Mayan calendar, but the thing with the calender is that it doesn't predict the end of the world (opposite to common knowledge). There are 10 calendars in total, the 2012 thing is 4th or 5th calendar. It means there will be a lot of changes and there will be a new era, a more perfect era than the last ones.

    (I read this in an Estonian paranormal investigation and conspiracy site, I could get links or something.)


    omg... BP did have a sunflower emblem didn't they?! I never thought of that before. Wow.
  • GlindaGlinda Posts: 658
    28taogx.jpg
  • Excellent Information Mo..........just plain Excellent........

    You come up with the Best Stuff............
  • InfinityladyInfinitylady Posts: 1,006
    Ever since this oil leak started, I have been reminded of a verse I read a long time ago in the Book of Revelations. And it scares me more than words can convey.
    Revelations chapter 8 verse 8
    Then the second angel sounded: and something like a great mountain burning with fire was thrown into the sea, and a third of the sea became blood:
    verse9
    and a third of the living creatures in the sea died, and a third of the ships were destroyed.

    God help us.

    PREACH IT!!!

    Excuse me ya'll. But right about now I feel like Peter, ready to pull out the sword and go the swinging. Just keeping it real right now. I am so disgusted and angry right now! My God! My God!! <!-- s:twisted: -->:twisted:<!-- s:twisted: --> <!-- s:twisted: -->:twisted:<!-- s:twisted: --> <!-- s:twisted: -->:twisted:<!-- s:twisted: --> <!-- s:twisted: -->:twisted:<!-- s:twisted: --> <!-- s:twisted: -->:twisted:<!-- s:twisted: -->
  • Why Has Barack Obama Refused To Accept International Help To Clean Up The Oil Spill In The Gulf Of Mexico?

    The Economic Collapse
    June 22, 2010

    As the crisis in the Gulf of Mexico enters a third month, many are now asking how in the world Barack Obama can keep refusing offers from other countries to help clean up the oil spill. The truth is that cleaning up oil spills is not rocket science. There have been massive oil spills in other areas of the world before and there are some folks that have some real expertise when it comes to cleaning them up. But Barack Obama and BP have been stumbling around as if they are trying to reinvent the wheel. So exactly what in the world is going on here? When it comes to Obama’s approach to this crisis, there are really two options. Either this is one of the most extreme examples of presidential incompetence in modern American history, or Barack Obama is using this crisis for a particular purpose (such as advancing a particular agenda). In either event, Obama’s actions during this crisis have been completely and totally unconscionable.

    The truth is that 13 different countries have offered to help clean up the oil in the Gulf of Mexico.

    Barack Obama turned all 13 of them down.

    So let’s get this straight….

    We are dealing with the greatest environmental disaster in U.S. history by far, and yet we completely refuse any assistance?

    What kind of insanity is that?

    In fact, it is being reported that just three days after the Deepwater Horizon sank to the floor of the Gulf of Mexico the Dutch government contacted Barack Obama and offered to loan BP ships outfitted with special oil-skimming booms. In addition, the Dutch had a plan to quickly build sand barriers to protect the vulnerable marshlands along the Louisiana coast.

    Needless to say, those plans were not implemented.

    According to one Dutch newspaper, the European oil companies that offered to help said that they could have completely cleaned all of the oil from the Gulf of Mexico in just four months.

    But now Obama is telling us that the crisis in the Gulf of Mexico could last for years.

    So what would keep Barack Obama from accepting international offers of help?

    Well, Obama is using something called “the Jones Act” as an excuse.

    Howard Portnoy recently described what is going on this way….

    In order to accept the offers, which have come from Belgian, Dutch, and Norwegian firms that claim to possess some of the world’s most advanced oil skimming ships, Obama would need to waive the Merchant Marine Act of 1920 (P.L. 66-261). Also known as the Jones Act, the law requires essentially that all commercial acts conducted in U.S.-controlled waters be performed by “U.S.-flag ships, constructed in the United States, owned by U.S. citizens, and crewed by U.S. citizens and U.S. permanent residents.”

    So why not simply waive the act? Other presidents have under similar circumstances. George W. Bush waived the Jones Act following Hurricane Katrina, allowing foreign ships into Gulf waters to aid in the relief effort.

    Why Has Barack Obama Refused To Accept International Help To Clean Up The Oil Spill In The Gulf Of Mexico? 140410banner4

    The truth is that the Jones Act is not a barrier to receiving assistance at all and Barack Obama knows this.

    There would be absolutely no problem with waiving the Jones Act in these circumstances.

    So Barack Obama has no excuse.

    Either he is completely and totally incompetent or he has been trying to make this crisis worse than it should be.

    You see, this is not the first catastrophic oil spill in the history of the world. There have been others, and we have learned quite a bit about cleaning up oil from those events. Anthony G. Martin recently described what happened during one particularly brutal oil spill in 1993 and 1994….

    In 1993 and ‘94 the Saudis faced an oil spill of historic proportions in the Arabian Gulf as four leaking tankers and two oil gushers threatened to spur a catastrophic event that was 65 times worse than the Exxon-Valdez spill.

    An American engineer, Nick Pozzi, was part of a task force charged with developing a solution to the looming disaster.

    Pozzi had used various methods to clean up oil spills prior to this event. However, the time was short, and an effective solution was needed post-haste.

    That’s when Pozzi decided that the huge, empty oil tankers, sitting in the dock, could be used to simply vacuum up the oil right off of the top of the water.

    The result was that 85% of the oil was recovered.

    In a recent interview with Esquire, Pozzi explained that cleaning up the oil in the Gulf of Mexico should not be that complicated….

    Keep in mind that what supertankers typically do is they sit in the middle of the ocean waiting for all the traders to come up with the right price. When they feel that the price is right, the tankers that are full, they take off, and they can be anywhere in the world in a few days. Right now there are probably 25 supertankers, waiting for orders, full of oil. So all they got to do is come to Texas, in the Gulf, unload the oil, and then turn around and suck up all this other stuff and pump it onto shore into on-shore storage. It’s not rocket science. It’s so simple.

    So why won’t Barack Obama and BP implement the “supertanker method”?

    When asked about it they just brush it off.

    Are they that incompetent?

    Or is something else going on?

    If this crisis had been handled properly, oil would not currently be blanketing our pristine Gulf coast beaches.

    An increasing number of Gulf coast residents have become so frustrated that they have decided to take it upon themselves to stop the oil that is headed towards their homes and businesses.

    But BP and the Obama administration have been running around trying to keep anyone else other than themselves from doing anything about this oil spill. In fact, Barack Obama has authorized the deployment of more than 17,000 National Guard members along the Gulf coast to be used “as needed” by state governors, and BP is being allowed to use private security contractors to keep the American people away from the oil cleanup sites.

    If they used as much energy cleaning up the oil as they are in keeping the American people away from the spill they might actually be accomplishing something.

    Meanwhile, CBS News is reporting that there could be as much as 1 billion barrels of oil under the damaged BP oil well in the Gulf of Mexico and that it could keep flowing for more than a decade.

    Apparently BP made one of the biggest oil discoveries in history, but the problem is that oil is now coming out of there at such high pressure that we simply do not have the technology to control it.

    In addition, experts have discovered a massive gas bubble which is estimated to be 15 to 20 miles across and “tens of feet high” under the floor of the Gulf of Mexico.

    So what in the world is going to happen if that thing blows?

    Also, there are reports of fissures and cracks appearing on the ocean floor around the damaged wellhead.

    If this thing goes from a “leak” to an “eruption” it could be a catastrophe beyond anything any of us could even imagine.

    So let’s hope that nothing like that happens.

    But there is another very serious threat that we need to keep an eye on.

    Some environmentalists are now warning that North America could be facing years of toxic rain because of the highly toxic chemical dispersants that BP is using to control the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. Because it is so poisonous, the UK’s Marine Management Organization has completely banned Corexit 9500, so if there was a major oil spill in the UK’s North Sea, BP would not be able to use it. So BP really needs to start explaining why they are dumping so much of it into the Gulf of Mexico – especially since so much of it could end up raining down on us.

    Meanwhile, Barack Obama and Joe Biden are busy playing golf and BP chief executive Tony Hayward has been busy watching his yacht race.

    Well, considering the fact that Tony Hayward is set for a massive 10.8 million pound ($16 million) payout if he chooses to step down, perhaps he is not too concerned about exactly how things turn out.

    As for Barack Obama, his main concern in all this seems to be advancing his climate agenda. During a recent interview, Obama directly compared the current crisis in the Gulf to 9/11, and indicated that he believed that it would fundamentally change the way that we all look at energy issues from now on. But the truth is that cleaning up the oil in the Gulf has nothing to do with the “cap and trade” carbon tax scheme that Obama is trying to foist on all of us.

    What Obama needs to do is to accept all the help that is being offered, get everybody working together on cleaning up this mess, and find a way to stop all that oil from coming out of the ground.

    Until he makes some progress on those things, the American people are not likely to want to hear the first thing about all of the new taxes, rules and regulations that he is so eager to impose on all of us.

    The Gulf of Mexico is literally being destroyed, and already this disaster has been so horrific that the effects will be felt for decades. If Barack Obama cares one ounce about the American people he needs to start doing his job instead of playing politics with this crisis.

    <!-- m -->http://www.prisonplanet.com/why-has-bar ... exico.html<!-- m -->
  • reading_onreading_on Posts: 463
    Do you have a source for some of the resources he is quoting in this article?
  • SarahliSarahli Posts: 4,265
    Ok maybe that the seven layers in the title This Is It represent the seven layers of the earth's crust ?

    Oil Disaster Will Be End Of Life As We Know It
  • hesouttamylifehesouttamylife Posts: 5,393
    2012. <!-- s:( -->:(<!-- s:( --> Not just a prediction anymore. The way the world is falling apart, it's a prophesy.
  • reading_onreading_on Posts: 463
    Sorry this story is totally suspect to me unless I am missing something. I can't see where any real geologist are named and I have done some research on this. There is always methane under the sea floor. In fact they are talking about someday tapping this resource because it burns more efficient.

    Oil rigs burn off methane consistently, so that it does not escape into the air. Methane is a by product of drilling for oil. It just happens.
    Pockets of methane (called bubbles) are the reason the oil rig blew in the first place most likely. It can back up and then blow if there are proper stops in it. California has many methane bubbles off the coast and they can be seen on the ocean floor.

    I hate to say this, but I came here to read and research for facts and truths. I get worried when I see all of these scare tactic conspiracy theories being posted. Because I want this site to be about truth (for me), and not something concocted by someone. I believe in the power of the real die hard fans of MJ to see things about him and be able to say with some confidence, "Yes, that is a picture", "No, he would never do that". I want to believe these same fans are looking for truth, not following doomsday theorists all over the place.

    I appreciate a forum in which I can speak my mind. I hope that MO you do not take offense to this. It is merely my thoughts. I also welcome any facts that support this theory beyond rense,com posting.
  • Sorry this story is totally suspect to me unless I am missing something. I can't see where any real geologist are named and I have done some research on this. There is always methane under the sea floor. In fact they are talking about someday tapping this resource because it burns more efficient.

    Oil rigs burn off methane consistently, so that it does not escape into the air. Methane is a by product of drilling for oil. It just happens.
    Pockets of methane (called bubbles) are the reason the oil rig blew in the first place most likely. It can back up and then blow if there are proper stops in it. California has many methane bubbles off the coast and they can be seen on the ocean floor.

    I hate to say this, but I came here to read and research for facts and truths. I get worried when I see all of these scare tactic conspiracy theories being posted. Because I want this site to be about truth (for me), and not something concocted by someone. I believe in the power of the real die hard fans of MJ to see things about him and be able to say with some confidence, "Yes, that is a picture", "No, he would never do that". I want to believe these same fans are looking for truth, not following doomsday theorists all over the place.

    I appreciate a forum in which I can speak my mind. I hope that MO you do not take offense to this. It is merely my thoughts. I also welcome any facts that support this theory beyond rense,com posting.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dk-matai/gulf-of-mexico-danger-of_b_619095.html
  • reading_onreading_on Posts: 463
    I appreciate the reply but in all honesty this looks like a rewrite of the other article. It is still vague. If this is a real problem, we need hard data so that people's lives can be saved. I am going to talk with the EPA on this subject, that agency was at least named in this document.
  • GlindaGlinda Posts: 658
    <!-- m -->http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/greensp ... icide.html<!-- m --> <!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: -->
  • hesouttamylifehesouttamylife Posts: 5,393
    This discussion should stay at the top of the list. The containment cap has blown now. Burning methane gas is out of control. Florida is now on the hot seat. Another HUMAN ERROR.
  • SarahliSarahli Posts: 4,265
    Here is a interview of Michael Brown, former FEMA Director under Bush's administration (Katrina). I really don't know what to think about the reasons he gives to explain his belief that the Obama administration want to use the crisis caused by the oil spill to stop offshore drilling.

    CNN - Did Obama Want The Oil Spill? Ex-Fema Director Thinks So
    [youtube:3qdtfz8z]

  • So they are starting to commit suicide down there now! What happens when this oil/chemicals get into our Municipal water supply? What happens when it rains greasy acid rain on crops? That stock trade by GS really makes this look like sabotage.
  • airiesladyairieslady Posts: 384
    And now the oil is into Pensacola! This is so sad! And that cap is now off! And the lies and bureaucracy continue! <!-- s:evil: -->:evil:<!-- s:evil: --> I am so distressed right now between this hoax for a year already and now this major disaster happening down here. Please, we need some real help ... for this will be a worldwide disaster before too long! All I Wanna Say Is They Don't Really Care About Us! <!-- s:cry: -->:cry:<!-- s:cry: --> Sorry, but I am deeply upset! <!-- s:cry: -->:cry:<!-- s:cry: -->
Sign In or Register to comment.