The timeline of death – the inconsistency and the lies
Alem (Thetruth)
Posts: 372
We find “clues” here and there but fail to realise that the truth may possibly be in front of our eyes. We have to go back, back to the horrific day when all things turned. The world stopped for a few seconds before realizing what had happened. What went wrong on June the 25 th and what actually occurred?
Michael was on the 24 of June at his rehearsals as usual and came home late around midnight. Dr Murray had on the 24 managed to put Michael to sleep without using Propofol and instead experimenting with other sedatives, he wanted Michael off that particular drug.
Here is the timeline according to the affidavit:
-- At about 1:30 a.m., Murray gave Jackson 10 mg of Valium.
-- At about 2 a.m., he injected Jackson with 2 mg of the anti-anxiety drug Ativan. (Lorazepam)
-- At about 3 a.m., Murray then administered 2 mg of the sedative Versed.
-- At about 5 a.m., he administered another 2 mg of Ativan. (Lorazepam)
-- At about 7:30 a.m., Murray gave Jackson yet another 2 mg of Versed while monitoring him with a device that measured the oxygen saturation of his blood.
-- At about 10:40 a.m., "after repeated demands/requests from Jackson," Murray administered 25 mg of Propofol, the document said. Murray gave in…
After this moment things get complex and inconsistence. According to the affidavit Dr Murray went outside the room and came back a couple of minutes after to find that Michael was not breathing at around 11 am (however according to Dr Murray's lawyer, the police made this up). He started to perform CPR on the bed (they didn’t put Michael on a hard surface until the dispatcher told him to hours later). He didn’t get any response. He went outside to make three specific calls, remember this he did not mention to the police. He talked for approximately 50 minutes before calling Prince Jackson and the security staff up to try to revive Jackson. Do I really need to point out the inconsistency?
Anyhow at 12:22 they phoned the 911 and the ambulance arrived at Michael’s house and brought Michael to the hospital 45 minutes after arrival. Remember Dr Murray found Michael not breathing hours ago (according to the affidavit), he would have been dead by now if they didn’t manage to revive him, right? Obviously they succeeded although we are once again hearing contradicting stories from the ambulance attendants who clamis that they weren’t able to recognize him and they thought that the man they were reviving had already passed. That is not true since Michael wasn’t pronounced dead until 2:26 pm and doctors will not revive a dead guy for two hours, they will not do it.
“The Los Angeles coroner has concluded preliminarily that singer Michael Jackson died of an overdose of Propofol, a powerful sedative he was given to help him sleep, according to court documents released Monday. “
<!-- m -->http://edition.cnn.com/2009/SHOWBIZ/Mus ... index.html<!-- m -->
So lets go back to the statement Dr Murray was giving through a spokesperson:
“He neither prescribed nor administered anything to Jackson that should have killed him."
Wow,this might be the biggest contradiction! How on earth can he state that he diding give anything to Michael that would kill him but yet he confess to have injecting him with Propofol which eventually killed him according to coroner. Is he claiming that Michael self-injected himself when he was away? In that case why take the blame for him and second why would they rule it a homicide? No I will rule out the selfinjecting part, but what does he mean by saying that he did not administrate or prescribe anything that should have killed Michael Jackson? It dosent make sence does it...this whole case dosent make any sence actually
Comments
Possible, but why rule the death as Propofol intoxication? That would mean that he died of a lethal level of Propofol which supposedly was found in his body, but 25 mg is a normal amount to administrate
In my opinion is irrelevant.
That drug cocktail could have caused an intoxication leading to a heart failure.
Even a healthy body can be cracked down by that combination of drugs.
Propofol induces amnesia. Who knows? I am more in to the theory (my own )that brain damage can be caused by propofol more than heart failure. But I am not a medical doctor <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
Does anyone else remember hearing that?
Drugs that leave the body can be also found in hair test years after of the comsuption.
You can read more about the side effects Propofol has on this site <!-- m -->http://www.rxlist.com/diprivan-drug.htm<!-- m -->
I can say that its main sideeffects does effect the heart not the brain.
What is your point? what is your opinion about this and what is your conclusion? <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
Most people don't pay close attention to reports, and would never question it. So they would not recognize inconsistencies such as this.[/color]
My conclusion is that propofol was the drop that full the glass, the tip of the iceberg.
Mayb popofol mixed with all the other drugs was a bomb!
Still, nothing has been clear from day one <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: -->
In deed. The usual procedure would have been to suspend his medical license ot at least to suspend his ability to prescribe drugs to patients untill a court case is done according to investigation.
How do we know that the man in not covering is back by saying " hey, I ony gave a little bit".
The toxicology autopsy reports are soupose to be legit, right? In that case, how come that a case like this, rulled as murder, can be handled so lightly?
I agree. Either is hoax or is a mayor corrupt cover up or a proof that the legal and health system in USA has alot of lagoons.
Still MJ is not with us and If he has been murdered I want justice <!-- s:( -->:(<!-- s:( -->
I remember reading 2 different news:
1 said Prince was called to watch his father die that NIGHT
the second said Prince was called to watch his father die that MORNING
<!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: --> Miky Miky, where are you? I wish you to be in heaven, because here is hell for sure.
What does that mean?
I mean, you only say that when you witness something you weren´t supposed to see, or whatever, but not when you (like the guy on the 991 call said) are the only person in that situation and you´re the one that act, the one who gave the prescriptions, the one who handle the whole situation. when you know what i mean.
That´s another thing that screams hoax or coverup!
(Sometimes the whole thing reminds me of the movie "The life of David Gale" just in another way..)
his car driver said he drove him to rehearsel last time 2 days before he died.
So did or didnt he rehearse on the 24th or was he already preparing something else <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
My point exactly, I don’t believe in the "clues" we have been giving and that I think we look too far and with blind eyes if u know what I mean. Therefore point out the inconsistencies is much stronger "proof" of something that isn’t right.
@Xsy
Yes I remember that. Very weird quote and it’s not correct or is it?
@Secret Dove
Thank you for your story. It was said that Michael created an abnormal tolerance to prescription pills owing to the fact that he was talking this for such a long time, idk wheter to believe this or not. Regardless he received plenty of pills that day, too many and unnecessary perhaps.