Kai Chase - @chefkaichase

melodymelody Posts: 196
edited January 1970 in General Hoax Investigation
In every interview [1] [2] [3] [4], Kai Chase generally gives the same timeline:
(I've decided to add some details from TMZ's timeline of the 911 call indicated by the color red)

- 8:30am Kai Chase gets in
- 9:00 am Starts preparing breakfast
- 10:00-10:30am Dr. Murray usually comes down to fetch Michael's food—that morning he didn't; the children eat.
- 11:54am Dr. Murray leaves Bob Russell a voicemail.
- 12:00pm-ish Kai Chase looks at her cellphone; she starts preparing lunch.
- 12:03pm Dr. Murray calls his girlfriend from Houston
- 12:08pm (5 minutes into the call) Dr. Murray dropped the phone & never came back to continue the conversation.
- 12:10pm-ish Kai Chase sees Dr. Murray running down the stairs yelling for security & Prince.
In a matter of minutes, seemed like seconds, she sees paramedics running up the stairs.
- 12:13 pm the call Murray placed ends.
- 12:21pm 911 call is made.
- 1:30pm Security advises the staff to leave; Kai Chase asks if Michael is ok and they tell her he's being taken to the hospital. An hour or so after this, she finds out Michael is dead.
- 2:26pm Michael is pronounced Dead.

All seems fine and dandy, the times from TMZ mesh well with Kai's account, her estimate of the paramedics arrival is a bit off, but it's a rough estimate.


& then, I chance upon Kai Chase's twitter page:

kaichasetwitter.png

And YES this is with my twitter settings changed to California time (PST / GMT -08:00)
Why is she tweeting as if Michael died around 10 am when he wasn't pronounced dead until 4 hours later ?! Around 10am, in all four interviews, she claims she was preparing breakfast and that nothing seemed out of the ordinary or odd.

What the heck? <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->

Her account isn't verified, but it's the twitter account linked from her official website: (<!-- m -->http://www.kaichase.com<!-- m -->)

Twitter: <!-- m -->http://twitter.com/chefkaichase<!-- m -->

Comments

  • Wow - great find! She wouldn't have an invalid twitter attached to her personal facebook. Unless there is an obvious reason for the time being off (can't think of one myself since you changed your settings) it does look like she got ahead of the game. Unless...there has been talk about Michael's family being alerted in the morning that Michael had died. Is it possible that it really did happen earlier? But why continue the fake story if Michael had died? And is it possible that she's TMZ's informant?
  • melodymelody Posts: 196
    Ah, I see the 10am story you're talking about: <!-- l -->viewtopic.php?f=17&t=12888<!-- l -->
    Well at this point (3am) my brain is fried <!-- s:x -->:x<!-- s:x -->; this isn't making sense.
  • Well there ya go..... nothing matches from ANYONE.....been that way from day one....I say HOAX
  • ForstAMoonForstAMoon Posts: 1,126
    I am afraid, the tweet you see is from June 25, 2010 not 2009

    missu.jpg
  • melodymelody Posts: 196
    I am afraid, the tweet you see is from June 25, 2010 not 2009

    missu.jpg

    Omg, thank you; it was driving me insane!

    The Oops is on my part <!-- s:oops: -->:oops:<!-- s:oops: -->
  • mjboogiemjboogie Posts: 1,067
    Wow. I got all worked up. <!-- s:( -->:(<!-- s:( -->
  • Interesting tweet from Kai.<br /><br />tweet_zps647419de.jpg
  • paula-cpaula-c Posts: 7,221
    rare
  • blankieblankie Posts: 2,350
    :icon_e_surprised: :Michael_Jackson_dancing_smile :omg:
  • marumjjmarumjj Posts: 1,027
    It's good to be back in someone's life that you've lost contact with 3 years ago, then to never, ever have contact again! #LOVE<br /><br />In the life of who? Mmm MJ or family ... be back after three years without contact, if someone other than MJ, I ​​imagine she'd say, or equally the Jackson family, why not say.  :suspect:
  • <br />It's good to be back in someone's life that you've lost contact with 3 years ago, then to never, ever have contact again! #LOVE<br />
    <br /><br />What I don't understand is why she writes "THEN to never, ever have contact again!" The way her sentence reads, it sounds like she's happy that she will never have contact with that person again... But I think she meant that she had no contact with him/her (more likely him!) DURING the 3 years, right?  :o
  • I think she meant "than" instead of "then".  That makes a big difference.
  • @hesouttamylife<;br /><br />Ooooooooooooooooohhhh. You're right, that makes much more sense! Thanks!<br /><br />#BADgrammar  :P
  • SimPattyKSimPattyK Posts: 4,281
    apollo004.jpg<br /><br />Kai Chase : "Michael was getting bathed" (the bathing of Apollo vs. the bathing of Michael) <br />- watch video here ---> Michael Hoax Trials and Tribulations 77 - Michael, healing and drugs part I <br /><br />Apollo & Michael connections - part 1 <br /><br /><br />
Sign In or Register to comment.