Who is involved?
son
Posts: 182
After watching the interview with Oprah I'm starting to believe that she wasn't involved in the hoax. I believe she and Michael loved each other deeply but Michael couldn't involve her in the hoax because she didn't (or he felt she didn't) trust him. She said "Michael's nose looked like a tooth pick", and he had more than two (cosmetic) surgeries and "he was embarrassed" so he didn't tell the truth. She also didn't believe him about the drugs and she allegedly didn't believe him about his life being in danger. If Michael did tell the truth (which I believe) I would imagine that his mother's doubt probably offended him deeply "my own mother don't believe me". Remember that one article a few months back about Michael saying "devastating" things about his family. One thing was that he was "disappointed" in his mother. However if Katherine is indeed uninvolved who else can we rule in/out in this?
Comments
What article from a few months back are your referring to? I missed that one. Do you have a link?
1 - This is a hoax and his mother is involved (can someone imagine Michael hinding from his mother? Sorry but it's too much)
2 - this is not a hoax
And that article was a huge bullshit, if it's the one I know too. It was a stupid phantom site that released an article where Michael would say he is dissapointed by the family, that his brothers were always envious on him and all that kind of shit. TABLOID TRASH or not even that, it was just a hater's site for sure. Not even a shitty tabloid. garbage plain and simple. WHY on earth people still take for factual everything they find on the inetrnet? Sometimes it seems this hell will never end
<!-- m -->http://www.celebuzz.com/michael-jackson ... e-s136221/<!-- m -->
On mother Katherine:
"She disappointed me. She did an interview (about him). I don't like her to talk. It's none of those people's business." ....
He may have been disappointed about other things since then.
- It depends on his reasons for doing it [the hoax], if he felt it was that urgent nothing could stand in his way. I know I'm saying this at the risk of being "not a real fan" but I don't see him allowing certain people be involved if they could hinder what he has planned. With all this being said I also doubt he's coming back so he is "dead" for all intents and purposes.
-I don't trust it per se however in conjunction with other information...
yes, this is the shit. oh come on... You don't have to read it and you don't have to eat it, to buy is just to feed it!
@ Tarja
That source really isn't the foundation of my theory it just conveniently supports it. <!-- s:| -->:|<!-- s:| -->
Its mostly based on the recent interview.
Lets stay on topic though please (much of the reason why I'm a hoax follower is because of my lack of trust in the tabloids) believe me when I say it conveniently agreed with my theory.