INCONSISTENCIES w/ INVINCIBLE SHOOTS

m8ighty

Supposably both these photoshoots where for invincible........ but for some reason he looks quite different to me in each set. You be the judge......


From <!-- m -->http://allforloveblog.com/?p=4422<!-- m -->

and



from <!-- m -->http://shavarross.com/2010/10/26/rare-a ... arno-bani/<!-- m -->


and then i look at these pics and things start to make sense

XxThisIsItxX

... i also noticed this with the actual invincible album cover.. the arno bani pics do not look like the invincible era but more like 2009 pictures.. didnt they say the arno bani pictures were taken in 1999? he couldnt have looked much different for the next photoshoot (invincible album cover ones) .. despite being airbrushed etc ...

and i LOVE his makeup in both pics you posted <!-- s --><!-- s --> <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D -->

chappie

Datroot

The bottom one is horriby airbrushed and the top one is more natural and with an obvious long-haired wig.

MFFreedom

I don't claim the Arno Bani pictures are recent, since I don't know of course. But I have to agree that they look more recent than 1999. Besides: Karen Faye claims, he didn't like the pictures:

Question: Can you imagine Michael going into a photo shoot that he payed out of his own pocket for his own project - NOT KNOWING THE OUTCOME ??? <!-- s:!: -->:!:<!-- s:!: --> <!-- s:o -->:o<!-- s:o --> <!-- s --><!-- s -->

I can't, since I don't <!-- s --><!-- s -->

He destroyed the negatives? Another thing I cannot believe, however I twist and turn it.