Michael Jackson - When He Was A Jehovah Witness | Excl

all4loveandbelieveall4loveandbelieve Posts: 4,455
edited January 1970 in General Hoax Investigation
I found this documentary on youtube. Look at Michael carefully. In some pictures he has a mole on his left cheek than he had a mole on his right cheek. Than in some pictures he has no mole. These pictures are when he was young. Maybe the twin theory can be possible.
enjoy the videos.


<!-- m -->http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spQE3oIi ... r_embedded<!-- m -->
<!-- m -->http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evh5W_Mc ... r_embedded<!-- m -->
<!-- m -->http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WP3dyy2d ... r_embedded<!-- m -->
<!-- m -->http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1bWCJHS ... r_embedded<!-- m -->
<!-- m -->http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQ5N7KXC ... r_embedded<!-- m -->

Comments

  • tonydubtonydub Posts: 74
    My take on the mole being on the other cheek: mirrored image. No idea why the photographer (or perhaps the publication that released the image) would mirror the image. Sometimes its done to fit a certain look the publication is going for.

    As for sometimes not having a mole: Pics could have been taken some time apart at a point where the mole might have been removed. If they were taken at the same time/same photo session (or before/near that time) then I would attribute it to when a photographer will clean up an image (airbrushing) to get rid of imperfections. Since the pics are old, not all photographers at that time would have had the technology to do this for every photo. Michael may have been self conscious about it and had the mole removed depending on the picture?
  • all4loveandbelieveall4loveandbelieve Posts: 4,455
    My take on the mole being on the other cheek: mirrored image. No idea why the photographer (or perhaps the publication that released the image) would mirror the image. Sometimes its done to fit a certain look the publication is going for.

    As for sometimes not having a mole: Pics could have been taken some time apart at a point where the mole might have been removed. If they were taken at the same time/same photo session (or before/near that time) then I would attribute it to when a photographer will clean up an image (airbrushing) to get rid of imperfections. Since the pics are old, not all photographers at that time would have had the technology to do this for every photo. Michael may have been self conscious about it and had the mole removed depending on the picture?


    I know he had his mole removed, but I don't know what age. I guess you must know alot on photography. Great. I hope you enjoyed the videos. I have never seen them. Blessings.
  • SweetnessSweetness Posts: 39
    Hello. It's interesting that you brought this up because I started a topic over on another board about the twin theory. For those who are interested.

    note: this tread was lightning rod for debate because of the nature of what I presented.
    <!-- m -->http://thedeathofmj.forumotion.com/t554 ... ini-theory<!-- m -->
Sign In or Register to comment.

© 2024 Michael Jackson Death Hoax Investigators | All Rights Reserved