Katherine J. vs AEG lawsuit continues

scorpionchikscorpionchik Posts: 2,669
edited January 1970 in General Hoax Investigation
The lawsuit
JACKSON KATHERINE - Plaintiff/Petitioner
JACKSON MICHAEL JOSEPH JR. - Minor Plaintiff
JACKSON PARIS-MICHAEL KATHERINE - Minor Plaintiff
JACKSON PRINCE MICHAEL II - Minor Plaintiff
vs.
AEG LIVE LLC continues. here are recent documents filed with court

04/14/2011 Opposition Document
Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr

04/12/2011 Notice (TO COURT RE: PROOR OF SERVICE )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

03/23/2011 Notice (of order in stipulation and order to reschedule case management conference )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

03/21/2011 Stipulation and Order (TO CONT. CMC )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

03/21/2011 Answer to Complaint ( on behalf of AEG LIVE LLC, ANSCHUTZ ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC; BRANDON PHILLIPS,; PAUL GONGAWARE; AND TIMOTHY LEIWEKE )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

03/21/2011 Notice of Lien
Filed by Attorney for Creditor

03/15/2011 Notice of Lien
Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr

02/23/2011 Order
Filed by Court

02/22/2011 Notice (PLTFFS NOTICE OF INTENT NOT TO AMEND COMPLAINT )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner


Filing Date: 09/15/2010
Case Type: Other Contract (General Jurisdiction)Status: Pending

THE CASE TYPE IS NOT NAMED "WRONGFUL DEATH". Interesting

Future Hearings
04/27/2011 at 08:47 am in department 28 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012

************************************
And Joseph Jackson also continues his lawsuit against Murray for some reason, while Murray can be convicted in manslaughter in summer, before Joe's lawsuit can get resolved. This is interesting too.
JOSEPH JACKSON ET AL VS CONRAD MURRAY

Filing Date: 11/30/2010
Case Type: Other PI/PD/WD (General Jurisdiction)
Status: Pending

Future Hearings
07/07/2011 at 08:30 am in department 56 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Conference-Case Management

Documents Filed (Filing dates listed in descending order)

04/07/2011 Miscellaneous-Other (SUPPLEMENT TO POST-HEARING BRIEF ISO DEMURRER )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

04/06/2011 Opposition Document
Filed by Attorney for Objector/Contentant

04/06/2011 Brief (POST-HEARING BRIEF ISO DEMURRER )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant/Respondent

04/01/2011 Opposition Document
Filed by Attorney for Pltf/Petnr

03/23/2011 Statement-Case Management
Filed by Attorney for Deft/Respnt

Comments

  • becbec Posts: 6,387
    Considering no one is suing the paramedics, and they stated they thought MJ was long dead and wanted to take him to the morgue instead of try and save his life, I think we can safely say that these lawsuits are bogus and if they exist, will be dropped following the reveal.
  • scorpionchikscorpionchik Posts: 2,669
    bec what do you mean saying "lawsuit is bogus".

    What I was glad to see is that Katherine's lawsuit vs. AEG is NOT defined "wrongful death", it says "Other Contract".
  • PureLovePureLove Posts: 5,891
    I do not believe there's a lawsuit btw Katherine and AEG or even if there is it is bogus like Bec says.
  • scorpionchikscorpionchik Posts: 2,669
    I do not believe there's a lawsuit btw Katherine and AEG or even if there is it is bogus like Bec says.

    there is a lawsuit. Infomation I got from la superior court. I still don't get the answer what you guys mean by bogus. Back up your statement.
  • becbec Posts: 6,387
    I do not believe there's a lawsuit btw Katherine and AEG or even if there is it is bogus like Bec says.

    there is a lawsuit. Infomation I got from la superior court. I still don't get the answer what you guys mean by bogus. Back up your statement.

    Back up yours.

    I said IF it's not bogus it will be dropped shortly after the reveal.

    Do you have doubts?
  • PureLovePureLove Posts: 5,891
    I do not believe there's a lawsuit btw Katherine and AEG or even if there is it is bogus like Bec says.

    there is a lawsuit. Infomation I got from la superior court. I still don't get the answer what you guys mean by bogus. Back up your statement.

    Well, as I'm SURE that Michael is alive, I do not care much about these lawsuits and I believe that it will be dropped and nothing will happen btw AEG and Katherine. I do believe that AEG is in on the hoax, Randy Phillips at least.
  • fordtocarrfordtocarr Posts: 1,547
    I'm also thinking bogus.. because, I think we've pretty much agreed that Michael's real name is with Joe for the middle name and that Joseph is the professional name. Well, in order to become a Jr. there has to be a Sr. and if Michael is Joe in private life, then Prince and Blanket would not be Jr. or II. So, I'm figuring, Not real.
  • scorpionchikscorpionchik Posts: 2,669
    I have expressed my back up many times. Here it is again:
    to me it is either Michael is dead or Michael is not coming back. I don't see a point to pay attorneys and keep busy judges for bogus lawsuits, and 80 years old adults made themselves caricature and be subject of counter lawsuit in the future.
  • becbec Posts: 6,387
    I have expressed my back up many times. Here it is again:
    to me it is either Michael is dead or Michael is not coming back. I don't see a point to pay attorneys and keep busy judges for bogus lawsuits, and 80 years old adults made themselves caricature and be subject of counter lawsuit in the future.

    Keep watching.
  • voiceforthesilentvoiceforthesilent Posts: 5,485
    I was looking at this lawsuit today. Interesting that it was filed 9/15/2010. The date is interesting to me.

    However, I was reading on the website of the lawyers supposedly representing Katherine and the kids. At the very bottom is this "disclaimer"

    <!-- m -->http://www.psandb.com/news-mj-statement.html<!-- m -->

    Copyright © 2011 Panish Shea & Boyle, LLP - Los Angeles Wrongful Death Lawyers - Los Angeles Wrongful Death Attorneys - All rights reserved.

    Michael Jackson Wrongful Death Lawyer Disclaimer: The wrongful death or other legal information presented at this site should not be considered formal legal advice, nor the formation of a lawyer or attorney client relationship. Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. Please note that you are not considered a client until you have signed a retainer agreement and your case has been accepted by us.

    Offtopice: Souza...you remind me of my ex-husband. He is an IT person and whenever I would get used to one program on our home computer he'd decide to upgrade our software or change our system passwords. Ughhh - forever learning! LOL.
  • scorpionchikscorpionchik Posts: 2,669
    "voiceforthesilent&quot wrote:
    I was looking at this lawsuit today. Interesting that it was filed 9/15/2010. The date is interesting to me.
    However, I was reading on the website of the lawyers supposedly representing Katherine and the kids. At the very bottom is this "disclaimer"
    <!-- m -->http://www.psandb.com/news-mj-statement.html<!-- m -->
    Copyright © 2011 Panish Shea & Boyle, LLP - Los Angeles Wrongful Death Lawyers - Los Angeles Wrongful Death Attorneys - All rights reserved.
    Michael Jackson Wrongful Death Lawyer Disclaimer: The wrongful death or other legal information presented at this site should not be considered formal legal advice, nor the formation of a lawyer or attorney client relationship. Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter. Please note that you are not considered a client until you have signed a retainer agreement and your case has been accepted by us.

    It is a usual disclaimer that legally have to be on this type of blogsand websites as a reminder that it is not meant to be a legal advise and that every case is unique and does not guarantee winning. I have to say this lawsuit is not a good sign hoaxwise.
  • voiceforthesilentvoiceforthesilent Posts: 5,485
    Scorpionchik - I see now. I should have looked at other lawsuits as they all apparently have similar wording. Thank you for the explanation.

    I guess time will tell about this lawsuit, right? Blessings.
  • scorpionchikscorpionchik Posts: 2,669
    Scorpionchik - I see now. I should have looked at other lawsuits as they all apparently have similar wording. Thank you for the explanation.

    I guess time will tell about this lawsuit, right? Blessings.


    [dropshadow=blue:37f8ybld] You are welcome.Yep, time will clarify lot's of things, it's just annoying. I personally follow up with this lawsuit and Lloyd vs. AEG cause lawsuits are NOT a joke nor could be in Michael's hoax plan. Again, it is NOT a good sign no matter how we feel.[/dropshadow:37f8ybld]
Sign In or Register to comment.

© 2024 Michael Jackson Death Hoax Investigators | All Rights Reserved