Anybody wondered why today's date was chosen?
Why not a Saturday?
Why the last launch of Endeavour today (now postponed due to "technical issues") with Mrs. Gabrielle Giffords present and her hubby being commander of that flight? Koinkidance?
Just asking.
real weddings will be held one day 29. If we add 2 + 9, the result of this internal sum will be = 11, and we must also see the moon phase for this day.
Diana married Charles on July 29, 1981.
Anybody wondered why today's date was chosen?
Why not a Saturday?
Why the last launch of Endeavour today (now postponed due to "technical issues") with Mrs. Gabrielle Giffords present and her hubby being commander of that flight? Koinkidance?
Just asking.
real weddings will be held one day 29. If we add 2 + 9, the result of this internal sum will be = 11, and we must also see the moon phase for this day.
Diana married Charles on July 29, 1981.
Yes, I wanted out of my mother's womb that day, but she insisted on watching the wedding before giving birth so I had to wait a day so she could see the dress... <!-- s --><!-- s -->
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
Anybody wondered why today's date was chosen?
Why not a Saturday?
Why the last launch of Endeavour today (now postponed due to "technical issues") with Mrs. Gabrielle Giffords present and her hubby being commander of that flight? Koinkidance?
Just asking.
real weddings will be held one day 29. If we add 2 + 9, the result of this internal sum will be = 11, and we must also see the moon phase for this day.
Diana married Charles on July 29, 1981.
Yes, I wanted out of my mother's womb that day, but she insisted on watching the wedding before giving birth so I had to wait a day so she could see the dress...
This page is very interesting, several months ago I am following it
This is very sad and simultaneously it gives great anger... as it notifies this one:
AGENCIES / MADRID
Day 01/05/2011 - 02.16 h
comments
Saif al Arab, the youngest son of Muammar Qadhafi, as well as three of the grandchildren of the Libyan leader have died because of a NATO bombing, according to the spokesman for the Libyan Government, Musa Ibrahim said tonight.
<!-- m -->http://www.abc.es/20110501/internaciona ... 02358.html<!-- m -->
I'm not supporting the royal family, in fact I have no feelings for them or against them, I just don't see why they would be treated different just because they were born in a certain family, without any personal merits or something.
I could say I am not for monarchy. I think it is for another century anyway.
In fact I believe in one royalty and this is the King of Pop <!-- s --><!-- s -->
I guess I don't get why people would be so offended by the TMZ post--just a little fun. The general feeling is still love for the happy couple. Most weddings I've been to had lots of funny things that could be considered disrespectful.
Maybe this well-done you-tube parody shows what the opposite of the traditional royal wedding would be like.
[youtube:dstjb2kj]
In my local city newspaper the big thing was a poll of how long people thought they would stay together. Just over 50% of the slightly older age group thought they would, and this went down as the age group went down. Myself I'm happy for Will and Kate, and wish them the best. It's nice to have a modern "fairy-story" when reality is so different. To me as a Canadian the only purpose of having the royal family is tourism and entertainment, but perhaps the NWO has another purpose.
This picture is right, the world is stopping to celebrate the royal wedding while thousands of people are starving to death and dying. But would be also right if instead of the happy couple there was a image of Obama, a World Cup soccer match, SuperBowl, a new Apple release, Michael performing, and I could go on.
finfin what has been posted may be off topic but this thread won't be locked for that, at least I won't do it.
My opinion is, it's not because they are part of the royal family that they shouldn't celebrate THEIR wedding (while people die etc), but also it's not because THEY are part of the royal family that it must be censored either. And for those who say they support it, i think they don't have much of a power, they are more of a symbol (imo) and we don't know what's behind the scene maybe they help more than we all do.
And this pic TMZ posted was funny.
finfin what has been posted may be off topic but this thread won't be locked for that, at least I won't do it.
My opinion is, it's not because they are part of the royal family that they shouldn't celebrate THEIR wedding (while people die etc), but also it's not because THEY are part of the royal family that it must be censored either. And for those who say they support it, i think they don't have much of a power, they are more of a symbol (imo) and we don't know what's behind the scene maybe they help more than we all do.
And this pic TMZ posted was funny.
@ROFL I have sent you a PM because I do not like drama
Thanks for you response
I am very offended about what has been posted on here today and please can this thread be locked
You of course have every right to be offended but the Royal family has always been controversial. People either support them or don't think there should be a royal family at all. I admit that I got caught up in the royal wedding fever. I enjoyed watching it and I hope they make their marriage work. I did however, notice a complete lack of any protesting which I thought was very odd. After watching the video of that political activist Charlie Veitch getting arrested it makes sense to me why we didn't see anybody protesting. He was arrested for conspiracy to cause a public nuisance to the royal wedding. That doesn't seem right as a basic foundation for freedom is freedom of speech and the right to peacefully protest. But the Royal family was having none of that, they wanted to present a picture-perfect wedding to the world. I highly doubt some protesters would've ruined anything at all, they would far be outnumbered by the well-wishers but it is still their right to be there and protest peacefully. And one does really have to question the royal family's history, especially after watching the Alex Jones video as well. I know that I'm a conspiracy theorist and so I therefore look at things differently than most. It just does seem to me that there has been some brain-washing going on with the wedding, a total image makeover for the royal family...while suppressing and muzzling some of their own subjects. Doesn't seem right.
I couldn't care less about this royal wedding but the picture is mean and manipulative. It's like showing Michael living in a big beautiful house and some children dying photoshopped in the same picture. One has nothing to do with another and it's disturbing. It's everyone's right to live up to their possibilities and to celebrate their important moments in their own traditional way. We can't blame others because they're rich or put on their shoulders all the misery in the world just because they can make a difference and expect something from them. This is a free act. And just like some of us don't give food to poor people even if that food means nothing to us, it's also their right to have the attitude they want.
At this wedding i know the guests had to donate, instead of wedding gifts, money to charity, that makes the picture even more unfair.
We live in 2011 and we still have the mentality of slave-master/group-leader. What i mean is we all pretend equalty but when it's about saving this world we still act like one is "more equal" than other and has more power to change something than me. But i really believe it's us all, little by little, piece by piece, individiaul by individual.We can all make difference and not wait for leaders or masters to give the tone. Before poiting fingers to popular or rich families we should take a look in the mirror and start with us.
Aahh,.. i i have not yet taken the view of the photo you public TMZ, i don't see anything wrong with it, the thoughts of people are those who do see things in a way morbid
Thank you @heartphantom for your reasonable response and @Andrea I think you are a very good
hoax investigator.
It is obviously bash the British day, I am sure some others from UK would also feel the same as I do, as I have seen posted elsewhere on the thread. I also made a comment on the thread about President Obama, things said on there were not appropriate either.
All this is in my opinion, of course, nothing to do with Michael Jackson's hoax death investigation and is just a distraction
I couldn't care less about this royal wedding but the picture is mean and manipulative. It's like showing Michael living in a big beautiful house and some children dying photoshopped in the same picture. One has nothing to do with another and it's disturbing. It's everyone's right to live up to their possibilities and to celebrate their important moments in their own traditional way. We can't blame others because they're rich or put on their shoulders all the misery in the world just because they can make a difference and expect something from them. This is a free act. And just like some of us don't give food to poor people even if that food means nothing to us, it's also their right to have the attitude they want.
At this wedding i know the guests had to donate, instead of wedding gifts, money to charity, that makes the picture even more unfair.
We live in 2011 and we still have the mentality of slave-master/group-leader. What i mean is we all pretend equalty but when it's about saving this world we still act like one is "more equal" than other and has more power to change something than me. But i really believe it's us all, little by little, piece by piece, individiaul by individual.We can all make difference and not wait for leaders or masters to give the tone. Before poiting fingers to popular or rich families we should take a look in the mirror and start with us.
The rich one have more power than us. Their opinions and their actions count much more than ours.
They have the power to "give" more not necessarily in terms of money, but in terms of influencing political decisions to make the moral changes the world needs.
When God first guided men to have kings or leaders, those kings and leaders had not only privileges, but first of all they had duties to their people.
I wish we could remember this now.
I know Michael said he felt it was his duty to do more for the world because he received more than others. He had a conscience, that's why I love this gentle soul.
And what happened to Diana - was an accident? Who knows 100% what it was?
Just to show how you could see it as well, which makes more sense since her head is CLEARLY way too low for that people are assuming with this picture.
Viewers are making something of it it's clearly not. If a newspaper would have published this picture 100 years ago, people might have assumed he did this:
But the world has been made into a real life porn movie tha last couple of decades and that is why peoples minds will assume that first.
My point: who's fault is it REALLY that something is assumed after looking at this picture? He might just have blessed her, and they live happily ever after.
I would have never guessed in a million years, from looking at that picture, that he was "blessing" her. Especially when it comes from TMZ. But ehh -- the picture is posted. It is what it is. I thought it was funny anyway, but probably wasn't the most appropriate picture to pick. They [TMZ] know what they're doing.
I couldn't care less about this royal wedding but the picture is mean and manipulative. It's like showing Michael living in a big beautiful house and some children dying photoshopped in the same picture. One has nothing to do with another and it's disturbing. It's everyone's right to live up to their possibilities and to celebrate their important moments in their own traditional way. We can't blame others because they're rich or put on their shoulders all the misery in the world just because they can make a difference and expect something from them. This is a free act. And just like some of us don't give food to poor people even if that food means nothing to us, it's also their right to have the attitude they want.
At this wedding i know the guests had to donate, instead of wedding gifts, money to charity, that makes the picture even more unfair.
We live in 2011 and we still have the mentality of slave-master/group-leader. What i mean is we all pretend equalty but when it's about saving this world we still act like one is "more equal" than other and has more power to change something than me. But i really believe it's us all, little by little, piece by piece, individiaul by individual.We can all make difference and not wait for leaders or masters to give the tone. Before poiting fingers to popular or rich families we should take a look in the mirror and start with us.
I do not like this picture, Does it mean that they shouldn't get married and have a wonderful wedding reception because this world is falling apart? Because this world is full of descrimination, full of hatred and wars? This has been part of our lives for centuries, it did not start today. If you would get married wouldn't you like to have a great wedding and a wonderful reception r? So why not them? They are still human beings and in love they deserve happiness. Who ever did this is full of crap.. People like that makes this world be even worse. They cannot let things be. Live and let live..
Comments
real weddings will be held one day 29. If we add 2 + 9, the result of this internal sum will be = 11, and we must also see the moon phase for this day.
Diana married Charles on July 29, 1981.
Yes, I wanted out of my mother's womb that day, but she insisted on watching the wedding before giving birth so I had to wait a day so she could see the dress... <!-- s
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."This page is very interesting, several months ago I am following it
<!-- m -->http://www.goroadachi.com/etemenanki/<!-- m -->
This is very sad and simultaneously it gives great anger... as it notifies this one:
AGENCIES / MADRID
Day 01/05/2011 - 02.16 h
comments
Saif al Arab, the youngest son of Muammar Qadhafi, as well as three of the grandchildren of the Libyan leader have died because of a NATO bombing, according to the spokesman for the Libyan Government, Musa Ibrahim said tonight.
<!-- m -->http://www.abc.es/20110501/internaciona ... 02358.html<!-- m -->
Humanitarian bombardments....
This is something...don't we all go on with our lives while people are dying?
It is up to us or up to the ones who have the power to make the change?
[youtube:3bpxut21]
Yes GINAFELICIA of course that we all have to move forward with our lives, but supporting that ....
I could say I am not for monarchy. I think it is for another century anyway.
In fact I believe in one royalty and this is the King of Pop <!-- s
Maybe this well-done you-tube parody shows what the opposite of the traditional royal wedding would be like.
[youtube:dstjb2kj]
In my local city newspaper the big thing was a poll of how long people thought they would stay together. Just over 50% of the slightly older age group thought they would, and this went down as the age group went down. Myself I'm happy for Will and Kate, and wish them the best. It's nice to have a modern "fairy-story" when reality is so different. To me as a Canadian the only purpose of having the royal family is tourism and entertainment, but perhaps the NWO has another purpose.
This picture is right, the world is stopping to celebrate the royal wedding while thousands of people are starving to death and dying. But would be also right if instead of the happy couple there was a image of Obama, a World Cup soccer match, SuperBowl, a new Apple release, Michael performing, and I could go on.
My opinion is, it's not because they are part of the royal family that they shouldn't celebrate THEIR wedding (while people die etc), but also it's not because THEY are part of the royal family that it must be censored either. And for those who say they support it, i think they don't have much of a power, they are more of a symbol (imo) and we don't know what's behind the scene maybe they help more than we all do.
And this pic TMZ posted was funny.
Thanks for you response
You of course have every right to be offended but the Royal family has always been controversial. People either support them or don't think there should be a royal family at all. I admit that I got caught up in the royal wedding fever. I enjoyed watching it and I hope they make their marriage work. I did however, notice a complete lack of any protesting which I thought was very odd. After watching the video of that political activist Charlie Veitch getting arrested it makes sense to me why we didn't see anybody protesting. He was arrested for conspiracy to cause a public nuisance to the royal wedding. That doesn't seem right as a basic foundation for freedom is freedom of speech and the right to peacefully protest. But the Royal family was having none of that, they wanted to present a picture-perfect wedding to the world. I highly doubt some protesters would've ruined anything at all, they would far be outnumbered by the well-wishers but it is still their right to be there and protest peacefully. And one does really have to question the royal family's history, especially after watching the Alex Jones video as well. I know that I'm a conspiracy theorist and so I therefore look at things differently than most. It just does seem to me that there has been some brain-washing going on with the wedding, a total image makeover for the royal family...while suppressing and muzzling some of their own subjects. Doesn't seem right.
I couldn't care less about this royal wedding but the picture is mean and manipulative. It's like showing Michael living in a big beautiful house and some children dying photoshopped in the same picture. One has nothing to do with another and it's disturbing. It's everyone's right to live up to their possibilities and to celebrate their important moments in their own traditional way. We can't blame others because they're rich or put on their shoulders all the misery in the world just because they can make a difference and expect something from them. This is a free act. And just like some of us don't give food to poor people even if that food means nothing to us, it's also their right to have the attitude they want.
At this wedding i know the guests had to donate, instead of wedding gifts, money to charity, that makes the picture even more unfair.
We live in 2011 and we still have the mentality of slave-master/group-leader. What i mean is we all pretend equalty but when it's about saving this world we still act like one is "more equal" than other and has more power to change something than me. But i really believe it's us all, little by little, piece by piece, individiaul by individual.We can all make difference and not wait for leaders or masters to give the tone. Before poiting fingers to popular or rich families we should take a look in the mirror and start with us.
hoax investigator.
It is obviously bash the British day, I am sure some others from UK would also feel the same as I do, as I have seen posted elsewhere on the thread. I also made a comment on the thread about President Obama, things said on there were not appropriate either.
All this is in my opinion, of course, nothing to do with Michael Jackson's hoax death investigation and is just a distraction
The rich one have more power than us. Their opinions and their actions count much more than ours.
They have the power to "give" more not necessarily in terms of money, but in terms of influencing political decisions to make the moral changes the world needs.
When God first guided men to have kings or leaders, those kings and leaders had not only privileges, but first of all they had duties to their people.
I wish we could remember this now.
I know Michael said he felt it was his duty to do more for the world because he received more than others. He had a conscience, that's why I love this gentle soul.
And what happened to Diana - was an accident? Who knows 100% what it was?
I would have never guessed in a million years, from looking at that picture, that he was "blessing" her. Especially when it comes from TMZ. But ehh -- the picture is posted. It is what it is. I thought it was funny anyway, but probably wasn't the most appropriate picture to pick. They [TMZ] know what they're doing.
I do not like this picture, Does it mean that they shouldn't get married and have a wonderful wedding reception because this world is falling apart? Because this world is full of descrimination, full of hatred and wars? This has been part of our lives for centuries, it did not start today. If you would get married wouldn't you like to have a great wedding and a wonderful reception r? So why not them? They are still human beings and in love they deserve happiness. Who ever did this is full of crap.. People like that makes this world be even worse. They cannot let things be. Live and let live..