A white Fiat Uno and James Andanson<br /><br />Analysis of the wreckage of the Mercedes revealed it had glancing contact with a white Fiat Uno car which left traces of paint on the Mercedes bodywork but extensive attempts by the French police to find the vehicle involved failed.[29]<br /><br />The essence of the allegations made by Mohammed Fayed were the white Fiat Uno was used by the "security services" to block the road in front of the Mercedes, causing it to swerve and thereby crash into the side of the tunnel. Fayed further alleged that the Fiat Uno involved was owned by a French photojournalist named Jean-Paul James Andanson who had photographed Diana while she was at his villa in St. Tropez in July 1997. Andanson's death in May 2000, Fayed claimed, was either due to guilt over what he had done or because he was assassinated by the French or British security services to silence him.<br /><br />Operation Paget found Andanson had a solid alibi for the night of the accident placing him at his home some 175 miles (282 km) south of Paris. This alibi was supported by documents related to travel he made from his home on the morning after the accident and statements from his widow and son. The white Fiat Uno he owned was in an unroadworthy condition, being nine years old at the time with 370,000 km on the clock and had not been maintained for several years before the death of Diana. He traded it in part exchange with a Fiat dealership near his home in November 1997 for a new car. Operation Paget concluded it extremely unlikely because of the car's condition and the fact Andanson had so openly disposed of it that it was the one at the scene of the accident in Paris.<br /><br />French police examined James Andanson's car as part of their effort to trace the one that had come into contact with the Mercedes with a view to prosecuting the driver for failing to render assistance. They reached the same conclusion Operation Paget investigators were to, seven years later. The French police spent a year after the accident searching for the vehicle and eliminated over 4000 white Fiat Unos from their inquiry. Operation Paget decided it would be unlikely renewed enquiries would identify the vehicle involved as such a long period of time had elapsed since the accident. It concluded the threat of prosecution for an imprisonable offence probably deterred the driver from coming forward at the time.<br />Possible suicide<br /><br />James Andanson died in May 2000. The official verdict was suicide. His body was found in a black, burnt-out BMW in a forest in the south of France, the doors were locked with no sign of the car keys. Andanson's death was attributed to problems in his private life and evidence was uncovered from his friends and associates that he had talked of suicide long before the death of Diana and he had even mentioned details of the social circumstances in which he would take his life and the method by which he would do it. Their testimony was consistent with the way Andanson actually took his life.<br /><br />The Paget report states that when the car was found, Andanson's body was in the driver's seat of the car, his head was detached and lay between the front seats. There was also a hole in his left temple. The French pathologist concluded this was caused by the intense heat of the fire.[30]<br /><br />Operation Paget found no evidence Andanson was known to any security service and, contrary to Fayed's claims, his death was thoroughly investigated by French police. A break-in at his former workplace in June 2000 alleged to have been carried out by security services was found to be unconnected to his death as no items related to him were stolen. The break-in was investigated by French police who to this day have not found the criminals responsible.
Jul 17, 2007<br />Murder of Princess Diana and refusal of Prince William to be King - Historic Page<br /><br />Diana car crash<br />Dr. Mailliez supplies with oxygen Princess Diana, slightly injured, while CNN & Co. "seriously" set the stage for the murder, while allowing a glimpse at the horrible truth.<br /><br />July 2007<br /><br />This historic page was the first, in 1999, two years after her death, to place the key pieces in the puzzle of the "accident" of Princess Diana:<br /><br /> - use of secret service agents in the inner circle of Diana, to get her at the right moment at the right place;<br /> - use of a strobe light in the tunnel to cause the crash;<br /> - use of the media to divert attention as required. In the most important moment, the first days, using the french photographers; after using MI6 agent Henri Paul, the official scapegoat as "drunk" driver.<br /><br />It was also the first page to put the piece of her murder together with the refusal of Prince William to be King, immediately after he announced it, October 2001. (1)<br /><br />In the last years, those who murdered Diana revealed also how they did it. After 10 years, in June 2007, the illuminati media broadcasted for the first time "Diana: The Witnesses In The Tunnel", where the illuminati went as far as telling the public:<br />- the plan to use the "evil paparazzi" as the perfect scapegoat for the public, in the first days after the murder (2);<br />- the satanic ritual murder of slightly injured Princess of Wales, AFTER the crash, during the more than one hour she was kept in the ambulance, parked in the street, just meters away from a hospital. (3)<br />Notes<br /><br />(1) The articles below - "Prince William refuses to be King", "The puzzle of Princess Diana's death", "Princess Diana death vs. John Kennedy Jr. death - the media" - were archived first time 2001 by webarchive.<br /><br />(2) The french photographers can finally tell what happened in the tunnel, as they were arrested and terrorized, immediately after the crash, as planned by the conspirators. This documentary marks the end of the process where the murders of Diana openly revealed EVERYTHING about how good their plot worked.<br /><br />(3) To let everyone understand that Diana, on the back right seat, was only slightly injured and that in fact she was murdered AFTER the crash, that TV documentary also includes the testimony of french doctor Frederic Mailliez, who arrived by chance to the scene before the murderers supposed to finish the job. Dr. Mailliez started to treat Diana the best he could. He supplied Princess Diana with oxygen, before the "emergency rescuers" got her in the ambulance. He states that Diana was under shock, but had no visible injuries. (4)<br /><br />(4) What was the only thing they did not openly show in the documentary, besides the satanic ritual murder in the ambulance? Explained in "The story of the photos of Diana after the crash, from August 1997 to July 2007 ".<br /><br />(5) Why did the illuminati use the last ten years to gradually reveal the details about how they did it? Explained in "The plot of the assassination of Princess Diana vs. the 9/11 plot "<br /><br /><br />Prince William refuses to be King<br />October 18, 2001<br />All the elite in the government and the royal houses of western Europe belong to secret organisations (Bilderberg, illuminati, masonary). Like in criminal sects, the rule of these organisations is total obedience or death. In the case of Diana, the very same people who murdered the mother of William, are demanding him to play the role of King. Today William couldn't continue any longer this most horrible game. In an interview with the Star Magazine, "Prince William has stunned his father Prince Charles by vowing he'll never be king -- because he can't forgive the royal family for the way they mistreated his beloved mom, Princess Diana." (1)<br />It seems that once again, like in the case of Elian, the love between parents and children was stronger than TOTAL evil. Will William pay with his life for this ?<br /><br />In Forums<br /><!-- m -->http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/552187/posts<!-- m --> October 19, 2001 (since the murder of Terri Schindler, aka Schiavo, freerepublic.com is reduced to the last bunker of the official supportes of nuclear Hitler).<br /><br />Notes added<br />(1) Still possible to read the Star magazine article as archived, January 2002<br />(2) May 2007: Illuminati Supreme Court sentences Prince William to death in public - at the White House<br /><!-- m -->http://satanic-celebrations.blogspot.co ... photo.html<!-- m --><br />(3) July 2007: Illuminati Media - coverage of concert for Princess Diana vs. coverage of Illuminati Icon Paris Hilton<br /><!-- m -->http://illuminati-media.blogspot.com/20 ... lliam.html<!-- m --><br /><br /><br />Mohamed Al Fayed accuses the american and bristish intelligence of murder<br />August 31, 2001<br />The security chief of Mohamed Al Fayed, gave a press conference in Washington, on the fourth anniversary of the death of Princess Diana. He presented some videos. In one, the egyptian businessman, who owns the Ritz Hotel in Paris and Harrods store in London, accused the CIA/NSA/MI6 of murdering his son Dodi and Princess Diana. In another video, Richard Tomlinson explicitly details the connection between the plan to assassinate Milosevic in Geneva in 1992 and the death of Diana in Paris. By the way, the same day, the Hague Court charges him with genocide, while making sure that he has no chance to use the microphone.<br /><br />This is how AP reported it, at the end of a August 30 news wire :<br />Al Fayed, Egyptian-born owner of Harrods department store, put together a video presentation for the press in Washington on Thursday, saying he was "in no doubt that the deaths were a result of murder with racism at the core" and setting out his allegations in more detail.<br />Much old ground was covered, but he added that Diana's body had been embalmed within hours of her death and that this was to prevent proper forensic tests in Britain.<br />A French magistrate's investigation blamed the accident on driver Henri Paul, saying he was drunk. Al Fayed has alleged -- and repeated Thursday -- that the driver, who also died, had ties to British intelligence. Former British agent Richard Tomlinson, whose book about the intelligence service was blocked in Britain, supported Al Fayed's allegations in a video presentations. But French investigators long ago concluded that Henri Paul had no ties to British or any other intelligence agency.<br /><br /><br />The puzzle of Princess Diana's death<br />31 August 1997- immediately after the car crash in the tunnel, the media stages the death of the Princess of Wales as a major event.<br />"Lady Di", a woman in disarray, that happened to be the mother of the future king, posed a major threat to the monarchy (an institution that is very helpful in keeping control of the british sheeple), with her plans to marry Dodi Al Fayed.<br />The media presented her as a major personality (land mines, etc), and planted the paparazzi (photographs) false track to divert the attention, immediately after her murder.<br /><br />After, the mountain of evidence hinting at a murder was either ignored or served as broken pieces. Just enough to terrorize the people posing questions by letting them understand what really happened. In particular her body is embalmed just a few hours after her death, to prevent an autopsy.<br /><br /><br />Tomlinson<br />Richard Tomlinson was employed by MI6 British (Secret Intelligence Service) in September 1991. In April 1995, he was dismissed without warning, and without reason. He dares to fight the abuses of power and is jailed. Released in 1998, he fled Britain because he realised that MI6 were determined to re-arrest him for any reason they could find. He published the list of 116 British spies. Among them the brother of Diana's self-confessed best friend, the Hon Rosa Monckton.<br /><br />11 September 1998 - Tomlinson writes a letter to John Wadham, detailing a UK MI6 plan of 1992 that would have used a bright blinding light, inside a tunnel, to cause President Slobodan Milosevic of Serbia to be killed in a car crash : "Fishwick’s third proposal was to kill Milosevic in a staged car crash, possibly during one of his visits to the ICFY (International Conference on the Former Yugoslavia) in Geneva, Switzerland. Fishwick even provided a suggestion about how this could be done, such as by disorientating Milosevic’s chauffeur using a blinding strobe light as the cavalcade passed through one of Geneva’s motorway tunnels."<br /><br />12 May 1999 - About a sworn and testified statement that Tomlinson made to the enquiry into the deaths of the Princess of Wales, Dodi al Fayed, and Henri Paul to the French Magistrate, he comments : "I firmly believe that MI6 have information in their files that would assist Judge Stephan's enquiry. Why don't they yield up this information ? They should not be entitled to use the Official Secrets Act to protect themselves from investigation into the deaths of three people, particularly in the case of an incident of this magnitude and historical importance." ... "Whatever MI6's role in the events leading to the death of the princess of Wales, ... "<br /><br />One of the few journalists to try to put some of these threads together was Jane Tawbase, in the Eurobusiness magazine : " The Moncktons are a British "spy" family. Did MI6 ask Rosa Monckton to do the key job, of moving into the Princess's inner circle and becoming her confidante, just as her grand-father had become the confidante of Edward VIII ? ... As for the man who started it all, Richard Tomlinson, is now based in Geneva. Tomlinson is angry about his treatment at he hands of MI6 and is motivated by revenge. But he is a sane, rational man, not the sort to irrationally fabricate a story."<br />The next line might explain why her article was published : "Interestingly Tomlinson does not believe that MI6 had any hand of part in the princess's death. He says clearly and simply, that a number of MI6 informants were connected with the event because of the surveillance ...". Compare "does not believe" with Tomlison's "whatever role" above.<br />Princess Diana death vs. John Kennedy Jr. death - the media<br />The same script two years later in the case of John Kennedy Jr, concerning the evidence. His body (that nobody was able to see) was cremated (even if this was against his catholic faith).<br />Of course in the case of Kennedy, the REALLY huge political implications were handled the opposite way. The media censored that he planned to candidate to the Senate, the first step to become the president. For a good reason. He was definitely the man that would have exposed the "democracy" staged as Bush vs. Gore.<br />But the terrified Kennedys kept silent. So ever since his death the media had a free hand to spread the lies that shall erase his memory (his marriage was about to break, etc ).<br />Al Fayed didn't keep the silence. So in the case of the "Queen of Hearts" the media just censors it.<br /><br /><br />the BIG LIE technique<br />Posted by MattMarriott at 11:45 AM 0 comments<br />Labels: Al Fayed, CIA, illuminati, Kennedys, King, MI6, Mohamed, Murder, Prince Charles, Prince William, Princess Diana, refusal<br />Jul 16, 2007<br />The story of the photos of Diana after the crash, from August 1997 to July 2007<br />Why one of the photos of Diana in the car was published 2006 in Italy<br />Diana car crash<br />Body guard Trevor Rees-Jones on front seat survived, Diana on rear right seat was under shock but only slightly injured.<br /><br />In 2006 the illuminati staged the publishing for the first and only time of one of the photos of Diana in the car, in Italy. This took place in an italian magazine, for a restricted audience.<br />One of the reasons to allow it was to give serial liar and mass murderer "Tony" Blair and the rest of the illuminati media the opportunity to play the "respect for human life" role, screaming about how "shocked" the photos of a "horribly injured, dying Diana" were ... while the photos showed no injuries. The "cry foul" mind control technique (a).<br /><br /><br />The images that were not shown 2007 in the Channel 4 documentary<br />Later in 2006, The Sun published one photo with Diana’s face obscured, and that was it. One year later, the images of Diana in the car continue to be the limit to the usage of the Contents vs. Package technique, i.e. the last thing the illuminati will not show to the public. The documentary "Diana: The Witnesses In The Tunnel" "just" allowed people to hear doctor Frederic Mailliez testifying that Diana was only slightly injured. (b)
<br />[rem.: see video below]<br />
Note how the illuminati suggested that the images would be shown: "The programme was preceded by hyped-up accusations that it would show gruesome photos. The press secretary for Diana’s sons, Princes William and Harry, wrote to Channel 4 demanding that certain images be removed. Jamie Lowther-Pinkerton told the channel: ‘I must ask you not to broadcast those photographs that depict the crashed car whilst the princes’ mother lies dying in its wreckage. These photographs, regardless of the fact that they do not actually show the princess’s features, are redolent with the atmosphere and tragedy of the closing moments of her life. As such, they will cause the princes acute distress if they are shown to a public audience, not just for themselves, but also on their mother’s behalf, in the sense of intruding upon the privacy and dignity of her last minutes.’ (1) (2)<br /><br />What was in fact shown: "The hype was unjustified. The images included several of the crashed car while Princess Diana was still in the wreckage, but she could not be seen. There was also an image of a medic administering emergency treatment to Diana where Channel 4 had obscured her face. Many of the black-and-white images came from the ‘French Investigation Dossier’ but they were so dark that they looked like bad photocopies. The programme makers went out of their way to offer a documentary that acknowledged some images were too sensitive to be shown and, unusually, even showed the princes a version of the programme before transmission ".<br /><br /><br />Prince William and the "defense lawyer" mind control technique<br />Note in the above how the "press secretary for Prince William" is used by the illuminati to suggest that these were words of Prince William. The "defense lawyer" mind control technique pushed to the utter limits. This time it is not applied to an innocent waiting to be executed in the death row of a prison. This time the technique is applied to the crown prince... (c)<br /><br />Added August 26, 2007: today, during a 45 minutes documentary about Prince William, for the very first time the public watching the the illuminati media (in this case ZDF, the second channel of the german state TV) had the chance to hear about the fact that Prince William refused to be king, in 2001, and he has never changed his mind ever since. The film was a masterpiece of how to escape the illuminati censorship. The author was... Guido Knopp, of course. Worldwide, the only Historian of Illuminati End Times in the illuminati mass media (3).<br /><br />See more: "The puzzle of Diana's death solved and Prince William refusal to accept the mark of the beast".<br />See more about the the documentary "Diana: The Witnesses In The Tunnel" and the answer to why the illuminati used the last ten years to gradually reveal the details about how they did it in "Murder of Princess Diana vs. the 9/11 plot and what was truly genious" .<br />Notes about mind control techniques used<br /><br />(a) Another example of the illuminati using the "cry foul" mind control technique: the doping conspiracy, where athletes are falsely accused of taking drugs to improve performance. One of the secondary goals of the doping conspiracy is to give the satanic illuminati the opportunity to play the "fair" role, screaming about the athletes who "play foul". http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=MattMarriott+"doping+conspiracy"<br /><br />Using this technique is in fact, in the illuminati religion, a goal itself. The more people will buy it, the closer to satanic perfection, in the sense of total deception, will the illuminati be. That is one of the reasons why the illuminati staged the begin of World War III, the aerial bombing of Serbia which begun March 1999, as "humanitarian war".<br /> <!-- m -->http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Ma ... ch+1999%22<!-- m --><br /><br />(b) This is reverse case for the normal usage of the illuminati technique of "Package vs. Contents" (cognitive dissonance), which most of the times consists of revealing the truth through images, in dissonance with the words served together with those images.<br /><!-- m -->http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Ma ... ntents%22+<!-- m --><br /><br />(c) The "defense lawyer" is a particular case of a suggestion technique. It was heavily used in the last years to advance the "new justice" agenda, i.e. the destruction of justice. It consists of using a representative to make people believe that a third person did actually say the words. It was used in the process of the Oklahoma City Bombings to set a milestone as the first case where the public was mislead to believe that the accused (Timothy McVeigh) confessed to be guilty.<br /><!-- m -->http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Ma ... hy+McVeigh<!-- m --><br /><br /><br />Other Notes<br />(1) In the words of Tessa Mayes in <!-- m -->http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php? ... icle/3466/<!-- m --><br />(2) Channel 4 bosses defy princes’ pleas over Diana crash photos, This is London, 5 June 2007<br />(3) History of Final Descent into Hell: <!-- m -->http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Ma ... +Knopp%22+<!-- m --><br />(4) The illuminati and their religion, explained in five minutes, the day of fate, 24 March 1999: <!-- m -->http://who-are-the-illuminati.blogspot.com/<!-- m --><br /><br />So that you will no longer waste your time with the millions of pages using the illuminati word, produced by their Web of Disinformation:<br /><!-- m -->http://illuminati-web-of-disinformation.blogspot.com/<!-- m --><br /><br />Note about the Illuminati End Times puzzle and the End Times Prophet (Note from September 2006)<br /><br />The murder of Princess Diana, the refusal of Prince William to accept the mark of the beast, two pieces in the Illuminati End Times Puzzle, together in the web ever since 1999 resp. 2001. Yet echoed after by nobody else, now resp. 9 and 6 years later.<br /><br />The same with many other illuminati scripts which were completely revealed first also by End Times Prophet, from the 9/11 2001 script, in 2004 to Clinton-Lewinsky 1998 or the OKC bombings 1995, both totally revealed first in 1999; Glory of the Olive or Natzinger, the last chapter in the script of the destruction of the catholic church and the destruction of Israel, totally revealed as it begun, April 2005.<br />Again the same with the illuminati "science" hoaxes, from plate tectonics to stellar parallax.<br /><br />Again the same with the illuminati hoaxes staged on a regular basis, from the NASA hoaxes like the ISS/Space Shuttle to SOHO to the state lottery drawings, which were completely revealed first also by End Times Prophet in 2004 to 2007.<br /><br />All the way to the ultimate script, the begin of World War III, October 1998 to March 1999... revealed the very same days it was unfolding.<br />And this fact is yet again another piece in the Illuminati End Times puzzle.<br />Posted by MattMarriott at 2:20 AM 0 comments<br />Labels: CIA, conspiracy, illuminati, King, MI6, Murder, plot, Prince Charles, Prince William, Princess Diana, refusal, scapegoat, terror
PRINCE WILLIAM: I DON'T WANT TO BE KING!<br />Prince William has stunned his father Prince Charles by vowing he'll never be king -- because he can't forgive the royal family for the way they mistreated his beloved mom, Princess Diana.<br /><br />And the defiant Wills, 19, has even insisted he wants to quit public life completely, reveals royal expert Nicholas Davies in the blockbuster new book that all of Britain is eagerly awaiting: William, The Rebel Prince.<br /><br />Now the furious queen believes her grandson has inherited Di's stubborn, unconventional nature. And she's ordered Charles to get the headstrong William to toe the royal line.<br /><br />But William has dug his heels in -- and says he wants to hand over the throne to his brother Harry, 17. Now, in the second installment form Davies' book, Star takes an exclusive look at the boy who doesn't want to be king.<br /><br />After months of deliberation, Prince William has informed his father that he aims to drop the title prince and continue the tradition he initiated some years ago of being called simply by his first name.<br /><br />Far more importantly, however, William has also told his father that he does not wish to remain heir to the throne and wants to renounce formally all claim to the throne.<br /><br />William has insisted that his rejection of his title and his claim to the crown is no teenage rebellion, something that will pass with time, but a decision that he has been mulling over for a couple of years.<br /><br />In Straight-talking discussions, William has insisted: "I don't want to be king, I don't want the job."<br /><br />William first discussed this with his father in the fall of 2000. Understandably, Charles was deeply concerned, realizing full well that if William did indeed go through with his intentions, his decision would have disastrous consequences for both the House of Windsor and, perhaps, for the very survival of the monarchy in Britain.<br /><br />Charles finally decided to inform the queen. Her first reaction was to instruct Charles to get a grip on his wayward son and instill in him the meaning of the word "duty". She told Charles to pass on her message to William, telling him in no uncertain terms that there could be no rejection of his role as heir to the throne and that he should banish all such thoughts from his mind.<br /><br />She instructed Charles to inform William that his role in life had been predetermined by birth. He had been born into the royal family and, as the eldest child of Prince Charles, he is the future king -- and nothing will change that state of affairs.<br /><br />The queen then turned on Charles, blaming him for not bringing up William to understand that he has never had a choice as to whether he does or doesn't want to be king.<br /><br />Charles prefers to take a much less heavy-handed approach to the whole affair, still hoping that William can be persuaded to accept his lot in life.<br /><br />Charles also asked William whether he would be happy to take part in the celebrations planned for the queen's Golden Jubilee in 2002, marking her 50 years on the throne.<br /><br />However, in a dramatic gesture of open defiance, William told his father that he wants nothing to do with the celebrations. He doesn't want to tour the country with the queen because that would show the nation that he was happy with his role as heir to the throne, a prince of the realm.<br /><br />Those close to Charles believe that William is acting out in his own life what he had learned from his beloved mother when he would listen to her launching into an attack on the royal family, the queen and particularly Prince Philip.<br /><br />There are others who feel that William is a "chip off the old block" and that, in his heart, he feels the smae way toward the royal family and the monarchy as his mother did.<br /><br />Princess Diana was unable to accept the tough discipline of royal life and needed to escape from the strict confines and rigid rules. Headstrong and determined, Diana finally did break away and began to lead her own life. In doing so, she won the love and devotion of the nation and the respect of people around the world.<br /><br />William may simply be following in her footsteps.<br /><br />Diana wanted to show William a facet of life that virtually no other members of the royal family had ever experienced.<br /><br />She would explain to William that although he would have to conform to royal tradition and carry out the necessary duties throughout his life, he didn't always have to conform to protocol, convention and tradition.<br /><br />She wanted William to think independently, make his own decisions and not be bound solely by the strictures of life within the royal family.<br /><br />She would tell William how she had fought against some of the petty restrictions members of the royal household and Prince Philip had tried to impose on her.<br /><br />Diana had frequently bucked the system to try to do her own thing. Sometimes she had protested to such a degree that she had been permitted to deviate from royal traditions and go her own way. But that wasn't the case very often.<br /><br />Published on: October 18, 2001
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
This is interesting. The documentary below was the first to examine the murder plot in less than a year after the crash. This docu though, desperately tries to 'prove' it was not a murder plot and that the blame lies with Henri Paul and Mohamed Al Fayed's security. It is a manipulating documentary which does not answer ANY of the hundreds of questions that make people certain, or at least open to the murder plot against Diana and Dodi. Instead, it is discrediting and ridiculing Mohamed Al Fayed and pointing fingers to him for taking the wrong decisions for the security that night. Now let's say that he DID make the wrong security decisions, what does that have to do with the crash itself? What does that change to the following facts?
- Henri Paul never drank according to his friends/family, passed a physical just days before the crash to renew his plane licence.
- Henri Paul's blood samples showed, besides alcohol, 20% carbon monoxide. Where did that come from? Not the airbags and a heavy smoker wouldn't even have that amount of carbon monoxide in his blood.
- In contrary to what this documentary suggests, there is NO evidence that Henri Paul was drunk, except for the statement of the bartender.
- There WAS evidence of a white Fiat Uno and there WAS evidence that the Uno crashed with the Mercedes.
- All the camera's on the road were defect or turned off.
- Eye witnesses saw a very bright flash in the tunnel right before the crash.
- Diana's body was partially embalmed right after her death, including the CHEST area, while she died of a cardiac arrest.
- Etc. etc. etc. etc.
All these unanswered questions have NOTHING to do with Al Fayed's decision on the security that night. It has nothing to do with his alleged paranoia, it has nothing to do with whether or not he was the one that introduced Diana to Dodi. Those issues are unimportant in the investigation. This documentary seems to have the sole purpose to discredit Al Fayed before any documentary would investigate the real important questions. Whatever security decision was made that night, will change nothing to the fact that the crash itself was highly questionable, but even more the cover-up after the crash. I think this is a classic attempt to manipulate the public and control the damage that future unbiased documentaries would cause. Very lame attempt if you ask me. Those who use their common sense and pay attention will see that this documentary does not answer any of the questions, but instead raises a new one: why discredit Al Fayed in this way after he spoke out about the murder plot.
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
Michael blamed the paparazzi for following the car and causing the accident.<br />I wonder if Michael suspected there was a murder and not a car accident by ...accident.<br /><br />Anyway...what is interesting to me is how Michael says he found out about her death: I woke up and a doctor tells me the news...<br /><br />He woke up with a doctor - so he was under medication to sleep?<br /><br />That interview always makes me feel very very bad.<br /><br />
GINAFELICIA
Michael blamed the paparazzi for following the car and causing the accident.
I wonder if Michael suspected there was a murder and not a car accident by ...accident.
Anyway...what is interesting to me is how Michael says he found out about her death: I woke up and a doctor tells me the news...
He woke up with a doctor - so he was under medication to sleep?
That interview always makes me feel very very bad.
<!-- spale/ -->pale/<!-- spale/ --> That's amazing you noticed that! Great find! I've listened to it so many times and didn't catch it. It sounds just like the June 09 scenario where a doctor nightly puts him to sleep with propofol and wakes him at the precise time. I wonder though, if typically major media interviews let him know questions before hand. Also Arthur Jafa tells of how Michael often acted a certain way for public only for his caricature he wanted to portray, and actually like to feed the media with things.
<!-- m -->http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlZ6FL_f ... r_embedded<!-- m --> In other words he was stringing her along in some ways and yet still telling the truth in other ways. That boy has amazing story-telling abilities!!
So please don't feel bad or sad! This is our Michael--- <!-- smj_bad/ -->mj_bad/<!-- smj_bad/ -->
Grace
- the satanic ritual murder of slightly injured Princess of Wales, AFTER the crash, during the more than one hour she was kept in the ambulance, parked in the street, just meters away from a hospital.
I've posted this before that about 8-10 years ago when I was going down rabbit holes online and read the above about her ritual murder somewhere dark and quiet before the hospital, that I found this picture of Lady Diana wearing a black floor-length big-skirted dress with clearly illuminati satanic symbols plastered all over it (don't remember which symbol). It was a studio pose and very perfect, and she was stunning, apparantly taken shortly before her death. Yet it was horrifying. If anyone can find it that would be great. She would obviously have known from that sitting that she was destined to be a "holy" sacrifice for them.
Michael blamed the paparazzi for following the car and causing the accident.
I wonder if Michael suspected there was a murder and not a car accident by ...accident.
Anyway...what is interesting to me is how Michael says he found out about her death: I woke up and a doctor tells me the news...
He woke up with a doctor - so he was under medication to sleep?
That interview always makes me feel very very bad.
[youtube:22sx4p1q]
If I recall it right, during that time Michael was addicted to medicins.Later he admitted this and was send to a rehab, well sort of, arranged by his friend Liz Taylor.So its not strange a doctor was there.
Michael blamed the paparazzi for following the car and causing the accident.
I wonder if Michael suspected there was a murder and not a car accident by ...accident.
Anyway...what is interesting to me is how Michael says he found out about her death: I woke up and a doctor tells me the news...
He woke up with a doctor - so he was under medication to sleep?
That interview always makes me feel very very bad.
[youtube:h6mqnejb]
If I recall it right, during that time Michael was addicted to medicins.Later he admitted this and was send to a rehab, well sort of, arranged by his friend Liz Taylor.So its not strange a doctor was there.
No I think that what you say happened to the end of Dangerous tour, after the accusations about Jordie Chandler.
I don't recall the same in 1997, but I might be wrong.
A white Fiat Uno and James Andanson<br /><br />Analysis of the wreckage of the Mercedes revealed it had glancing contact with a white Fiat Uno car which left traces of paint on the Mercedes bodywork but extensive attempts by the French police to find the vehicle involved failed.[29]<br /><br />The essence of the allegations made by Mohammed Fayed were the white Fiat Uno was used by the "security services" to block the road in front of the Mercedes, causing it to swerve and thereby crash into the side of the tunnel. Fayed further alleged that the Fiat Uno involved was owned by a French photojournalist named Jean-Paul James Andanson who had photographed Diana while she was at his villa in St. Tropez in July 1997. Andanson's death in May 2000, Fayed claimed, was either due to guilt over what he had done or because he was assassinated by the French or British security services to silence him.<br /><br />Operation Paget found Andanson had a solid alibi for the night of the accident placing him at his home some 175 miles (282 km) south of Paris. This alibi was supported by documents related to travel he made from his home on the morning after the accident and statements from his widow and son. The white Fiat Uno he owned was in an unroadworthy condition, being nine years old at the time with 370,000 km on the clock and had not been maintained for several years before the death of Diana. He traded it in part exchange with a Fiat dealership near his home in November 1997 for a new car. Operation Paget concluded it extremely unlikely because of the car's condition and the fact Andanson had so openly disposed of it that it was the one at the scene of the accident in Paris.<br /><br />French police examined James Andanson's car as part of their effort to trace the one that had come into contact with the Mercedes with a view to prosecuting the driver for failing to render assistance. They reached the same conclusion Operation Paget investigators were to, seven years later. The French police spent a year after the accident searching for the vehicle and eliminated over 4000 white Fiat Unos from their inquiry. Operation Paget decided it would be unlikely renewed enquiries would identify the vehicle involved as such a long period of time had elapsed since the accident. It concluded the threat of prosecution for an imprisonable offence probably deterred the driver from coming forward at the time.<br />Possible suicide<br /><br />James Andanson died in May 2000. The official verdict was suicide. His body was found in a black, burnt-out BMW in a forest in the south of France, the doors were locked with no sign of the car keys. Andanson's death was attributed to problems in his private life and evidence was uncovered from his friends and associates that he had talked of suicide long before the death of Diana and he had even mentioned details of the social circumstances in which he would take his life and the method by which he would do it. Their testimony was consistent with the way Andanson actually took his life.<br /><br />The Paget report states that when the car was found, Andanson's body was in the driver's seat of the car, his head was detached and lay between the front seats. There was also a hole in his left temple. The French pathologist concluded this was caused by the intense heat of the fire.[30]<br /><br />Operation Paget found no evidence Andanson was known to any security service and, contrary to Fayed's claims, his death was thoroughly investigated by French police. A break-in at his former workplace in June 2000 alleged to have been carried out by security services was found to be unconnected to his death as no items related to him were stolen. The break-in was investigated by French police who to this day have not found the criminals responsible.
Jul 17, 2007<br />Murder of Princess Diana and refusal of Prince William to be King - Historic Page<br /><br />Diana car crash<br />Dr. Mailliez supplies with oxygen Princess Diana, slightly injured, while CNN & Co. "seriously" set the stage for the murder, while allowing a glimpse at the horrible truth.<br /><br />July 2007<br /><br />This historic page was the first, in 1999, two years after her death, to place the key pieces in the puzzle of the "accident" of Princess Diana:<br /><br /> - use of secret service agents in the inner circle of Diana, to get her at the right moment at the right place;<br /> - use of a strobe light in the tunnel to cause the crash;<br /> - use of the media to divert attention as required. In the most important moment, the first days, using the french photographers; after using MI6 agent Henri Paul, the official scapegoat as "drunk" driver.<br /><br />It was also the first page to put the piece of her murder together with the refusal of Prince William to be King, immediately after he announced it, October 2001. (1)<br /><br />In the last years, those who murdered Diana revealed also how they did it. After 10 years, in June 2007, the illuminati media broadcasted for the first time "Diana: The Witnesses In The Tunnel", where the illuminati went as far as telling the public:<br />- the plan to use the "evil paparazzi" as the perfect scapegoat for the public, in the first days after the murder (2);<br />- the satanic ritual murder of slightly injured Princess of Wales, AFTER the crash, during the more than one hour she was kept in the ambulance, parked in the street, just meters away from a hospital. (3)<br />Notes<br /><br />(1) The articles below - "Prince William refuses to be King", "The puzzle of Princess Diana's death", "Princess Diana death vs. John Kennedy Jr. death - the media" - were archived first time 2001 by webarchive.<br /><br />(2) The french photographers can finally tell what happened in the tunnel, as they were arrested and terrorized, immediately after the crash, as planned by the conspirators. This documentary marks the end of the process where the murders of Diana openly revealed EVERYTHING about how good their plot worked.<br /><br />(3) To let everyone understand that Diana, on the back right seat, was only slightly injured and that in fact she was murdered AFTER the crash, that TV documentary also includes the testimony of french doctor Frederic Mailliez, who arrived by chance to the scene before the murderers supposed to finish the job. Dr. Mailliez started to treat Diana the best he could. He supplied Princess Diana with oxygen, before the "emergency rescuers" got her in the ambulance. He states that Diana was under shock, but had no visible injuries. (4)<br /><br />(4) What was the only thing they did not openly show in the documentary, besides the satanic ritual murder in the ambulance? Explained in "The story of the photos of Diana after the crash, from August 1997 to July 2007 ".<br /><br />(5) Why did the illuminati use the last ten years to gradually reveal the details about how they did it? Explained in "The plot of the assassination of Princess Diana vs. the 9/11 plot "<br /><br /><br />Prince William refuses to be King<br />October 18, 2001<br />All the elite in the government and the royal houses of western Europe belong to secret organisations (Bilderberg, illuminati, masonary). Like in criminal sects, the rule of these organisations is total obedience or death. In the case of Diana, the very same people who murdered the mother of William, are demanding him to play the role of King. Today William couldn't continue any longer this most horrible game. In an interview with the Star Magazine, "Prince William has stunned his father Prince Charles by vowing he'll never be king -- because he can't forgive the royal family for the way they mistreated his beloved mom, Princess Diana." (1)<br />It seems that once again, like in the case of Elian, the love between parents and children was stronger than TOTAL evil. Will William pay with his life for this ?<br /><br />In Forums<br /><!-- m -->http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/552187/posts<!-- m --> October 19, 2001 (since the murder of Terri Schindler, aka Schiavo, freerepublic.com is reduced to the last bunker of the official supportes of nuclear Hitler).<br /><br />Notes added<br />(1) Still possible to read the Star magazine article as archived, January 2002<br />(2) May 2007: Illuminati Supreme Court sentences Prince William to death in public - at the White House<br /><!-- m -->http://satanic-celebrations.blogspot.co ... photo.html<!-- m --><br />(3) July 2007: Illuminati Media - coverage of concert for Princess Diana vs. coverage of Illuminati Icon Paris Hilton<br /><!-- m -->http://illuminati-media.blogspot.com/20 ... lliam.html<!-- m --><br /><br /><br />Mohamed Al Fayed accuses the american and bristish intelligence of murder<br />August 31, 2001<br />The security chief of Mohamed Al Fayed, gave a press conference in Washington, on the fourth anniversary of the death of Princess Diana. He presented some videos. In one, the egyptian businessman, who owns the Ritz Hotel in Paris and Harrods store in London, accused the CIA/NSA/MI6 of murdering his son Dodi and Princess Diana. In another video, Richard Tomlinson explicitly details the connection between the plan to assassinate Milosevic in Geneva in 1992 and the death of Diana in Paris. By the way, the same day, the Hague Court charges him with genocide, while making sure that he has no chance to use the microphone.<br /><br />This is how AP reported it, at the end of a August 30 news wire :<br />Al Fayed, Egyptian-born owner of Harrods department store, put together a video presentation for the press in Washington on Thursday, saying he was "in no doubt that the deaths were a result of murder with racism at the core" and setting out his allegations in more detail.<br />Much old ground was covered, but he added that Diana's body had been embalmed within hours of her death and that this was to prevent proper forensic tests in Britain.<br />A French magistrate's investigation blamed the accident on driver Henri Paul, saying he was drunk. Al Fayed has alleged -- and repeated Thursday -- that the driver, who also died, had ties to British intelligence. Former British agent Richard Tomlinson, whose book about the intelligence service was blocked in Britain, supported Al Fayed's allegations in a video presentations. But French investigators long ago concluded that Henri Paul had no ties to British or any other intelligence agency.<br /><br /><br />The puzzle of Princess Diana's death<br />31 August 1997- immediately after the car crash in the tunnel, the media stages the death of the Princess of Wales as a major event.<br />"Lady Di", a woman in disarray, that happened to be the mother of the future king, posed a major threat to the monarchy (an institution that is very helpful in keeping control of the british sheeple), with her plans to marry Dodi Al Fayed.<br />The media presented her as a major personality (land mines, etc), and planted the paparazzi (photographs) false track to divert the attention, immediately after her murder.<br /><br />After, the mountain of evidence hinting at a murder was either ignored or served as broken pieces. Just enough to terrorize the people posing questions by letting them understand what really happened. In particular her body is embalmed just a few hours after her death, to prevent an autopsy.<br /><br /><br />Tomlinson<br />Richard Tomlinson was employed by MI6 British (Secret Intelligence Service) in September 1991. In April 1995, he was dismissed without warning, and without reason. He dares to fight the abuses of power and is jailed. Released in 1998, he fled Britain because he realised that MI6 were determined to re-arrest him for any reason they could find. He published the list of 116 British spies. Among them the brother of Diana's self-confessed best friend, the Hon Rosa Monckton.<br /><br />11 September 1998 - Tomlinson writes a letter to John Wadham, detailing a UK MI6 plan of 1992 that would have used a bright blinding light, inside a tunnel, to cause President Slobodan Milosevic of Serbia to be killed in a car crash : "Fishwick’s third proposal was to kill Milosevic in a staged car crash, possibly during one of his visits to the ICFY (International Conference on the Former Yugoslavia) in Geneva, Switzerland. Fishwick even provided a suggestion about how this could be done, such as by disorientating Milosevic’s chauffeur using a blinding strobe light as the cavalcade passed through one of Geneva’s motorway tunnels."<br /><br />12 May 1999 - About a sworn and testified statement that Tomlinson made to the enquiry into the deaths of the Princess of Wales, Dodi al Fayed, and Henri Paul to the French Magistrate, he comments : "I firmly believe that MI6 have information in their files that would assist Judge Stephan's enquiry. Why don't they yield up this information ? They should not be entitled to use the Official Secrets Act to protect themselves from investigation into the deaths of three people, particularly in the case of an incident of this magnitude and historical importance." ... "Whatever MI6's role in the events leading to the death of the princess of Wales, ... "<br /><br />One of the few journalists to try to put some of these threads together was Jane Tawbase, in the Eurobusiness magazine : " The Moncktons are a British "spy" family. Did MI6 ask Rosa Monckton to do the key job, of moving into the Princess's inner circle and becoming her confidante, just as her grand-father had become the confidante of Edward VIII ? ... As for the man who started it all, Richard Tomlinson, is now based in Geneva. Tomlinson is angry about his treatment at he hands of MI6 and is motivated by revenge. But he is a sane, rational man, not the sort to irrationally fabricate a story."<br />The next line might explain why her article was published : "Interestingly Tomlinson does not believe that MI6 had any hand of part in the princess's death. He says clearly and simply, that a number of MI6 informants were connected with the event because of the surveillance ...". Compare "does not believe" with Tomlison's "whatever role" above.<br />Princess Diana death vs. John Kennedy Jr. death - the media<br />The same script two years later in the case of John Kennedy Jr, concerning the evidence. His body (that nobody was able to see) was cremated (even if this was against his catholic faith).<br />Of course in the case of Kennedy, the REALLY huge political implications were handled the opposite way. The media censored that he planned to candidate to the Senate, the first step to become the president. For a good reason. He was definitely the man that would have exposed the "democracy" staged as Bush vs. Gore.<br />But the terrified Kennedys kept silent. So ever since his death the media had a free hand to spread the lies that shall erase his memory (his marriage was about to break, etc ).<br />Al Fayed didn't keep the silence. So in the case of the "Queen of Hearts" the media just censors it.<br /><br /><br />the BIG LIE technique<br />Posted by MattMarriott at 11:45 AM 0 comments<br />Labels: Al Fayed, CIA, illuminati, Kennedys, King, MI6, Mohamed, Murder, Prince Charles, Prince William, Princess Diana, refusal<br />Jul 16, 2007<br />The story of the photos of Diana after the crash, from August 1997 to July 2007<br />Why one of the photos of Diana in the car was published 2006 in Italy<br />Diana car crash<br />Body guard Trevor Rees-Jones on front seat survived, Diana on rear right seat was under shock but only slightly injured.<br /><br />In 2006 the illuminati staged the publishing for the first and only time of one of the photos of Diana in the car, in Italy. This took place in an italian magazine, for a restricted audience.<br />One of the reasons to allow it was to give serial liar and mass murderer "Tony" Blair and the rest of the illuminati media the opportunity to play the "respect for human life" role, screaming about how "shocked" the photos of a "horribly injured, dying Diana" were ... while the photos showed no injuries. The "cry foul" mind control technique (a).<br /><br /><br />The images that were not shown 2007 in the Channel 4 documentary<br />Later in 2006, The Sun published one photo with Diana’s face obscured, and that was it. One year later, the images of Diana in the car continue to be the limit to the usage of the Contents vs. Package technique, i.e. the last thing the illuminati will not show to the public. The documentary "Diana: The Witnesses In The Tunnel" "just" allowed people to hear doctor Frederic Mailliez testifying that Diana was only slightly injured. (b)
<br />[rem.: see video below]<br />
Note how the illuminati suggested that the images would be shown: "The programme was preceded by hyped-up accusations that it would show gruesome photos. The press secretary for Diana’s sons, Princes William and Harry, wrote to Channel 4 demanding that certain images be removed. Jamie Lowther-Pinkerton told the channel: ‘I must ask you not to broadcast those photographs that depict the crashed car whilst the princes’ mother lies dying in its wreckage. These photographs, regardless of the fact that they do not actually show the princess’s features, are redolent with the atmosphere and tragedy of the closing moments of her life. As such, they will cause the princes acute distress if they are shown to a public audience, not just for themselves, but also on their mother’s behalf, in the sense of intruding upon the privacy and dignity of her last minutes.’ (1) (2)<br /><br />What was in fact shown: "The hype was unjustified. The images included several of the crashed car while Princess Diana was still in the wreckage, but she could not be seen. There was also an image of a medic administering emergency treatment to Diana where Channel 4 had obscured her face. Many of the black-and-white images came from the ‘French Investigation Dossier’ but they were so dark that they looked like bad photocopies. The programme makers went out of their way to offer a documentary that acknowledged some images were too sensitive to be shown and, unusually, even showed the princes a version of the programme before transmission ".<br /><br /><br />Prince William and the "defense lawyer" mind control technique<br />Note in the above how the "press secretary for Prince William" is used by the illuminati to suggest that these were words of Prince William. The "defense lawyer" mind control technique pushed to the utter limits. This time it is not applied to an innocent waiting to be executed in the death row of a prison. This time the technique is applied to the crown prince... (c)<br /><br />Added August 26, 2007: today, during a 45 minutes documentary about Prince William, for the very first time the public watching the the illuminati media (in this case ZDF, the second channel of the german state TV) had the chance to hear about the fact that Prince William refused to be king, in 2001, and he has never changed his mind ever since. The film was a masterpiece of how to escape the illuminati censorship. The author was... Guido Knopp, of course. Worldwide, the only Historian of Illuminati End Times in the illuminati mass media (3).<br /><br />See more: "The puzzle of Diana's death solved and Prince William refusal to accept the mark of the beast".<br />See more about the the documentary "Diana: The Witnesses In The Tunnel" and the answer to why the illuminati used the last ten years to gradually reveal the details about how they did it in "Murder of Princess Diana vs. the 9/11 plot and what was truly genious" .<br />Notes about mind control techniques used<br /><br />(a) Another example of the illuminati using the "cry foul" mind control technique: the doping conspiracy, where athletes are falsely accused of taking drugs to improve performance. One of the secondary goals of the doping conspiracy is to give the satanic illuminati the opportunity to play the "fair" role, screaming about the athletes who "play foul". http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=MattMarriott+"doping+conspiracy"<br /><br />Using this technique is in fact, in the illuminati religion, a goal itself. The more people will buy it, the closer to satanic perfection, in the sense of total deception, will the illuminati be. That is one of the reasons why the illuminati staged the begin of World War III, the aerial bombing of Serbia which begun March 1999, as "humanitarian war".<br /> <!-- m -->http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Ma ... ch+1999%22<!-- m --><br /><br />(b) This is reverse case for the normal usage of the illuminati technique of "Package vs. Contents" (cognitive dissonance), which most of the times consists of revealing the truth through images, in dissonance with the words served together with those images.<br /><!-- m -->http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Ma ... ntents%22+<!-- m --><br /><br />(c) The "defense lawyer" is a particular case of a suggestion technique. It was heavily used in the last years to advance the "new justice" agenda, i.e. the destruction of justice. It consists of using a representative to make people believe that a third person did actually say the words. It was used in the process of the Oklahoma City Bombings to set a milestone as the first case where the public was mislead to believe that the accused (Timothy McVeigh) confessed to be guilty.<br /><!-- m -->http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Ma ... hy+McVeigh<!-- m --><br /><br /><br />Other Notes<br />(1) In the words of Tessa Mayes in <!-- m -->http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php? ... icle/3466/<!-- m --><br />(2) Channel 4 bosses defy princes’ pleas over Diana crash photos, This is London, 5 June 2007<br />(3) History of Final Descent into Hell: <!-- m -->http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Ma ... +Knopp%22+<!-- m --><br />(4) The illuminati and their religion, explained in five minutes, the day of fate, 24 March 1999: <!-- m -->http://who-are-the-illuminati.blogspot.com/<!-- m --><br /><br />So that you will no longer waste your time with the millions of pages using the illuminati word, produced by their Web of Disinformation:<br /><!-- m -->http://illuminati-web-of-disinformation.blogspot.com/<!-- m --><br /><br />Note about the Illuminati End Times puzzle and the End Times Prophet (Note from September 2006)<br /><br />The murder of Princess Diana, the refusal of Prince William to accept the mark of the beast, two pieces in the Illuminati End Times Puzzle, together in the web ever since 1999 resp. 2001. Yet echoed after by nobody else, now resp. 9 and 6 years later.<br /><br />The same with many other illuminati scripts which were completely revealed first also by End Times Prophet, from the 9/11 2001 script, in 2004 to Clinton-Lewinsky 1998 or the OKC bombings 1995, both totally revealed first in 1999; Glory of the Olive or Natzinger, the last chapter in the script of the destruction of the catholic church and the destruction of Israel, totally revealed as it begun, April 2005.<br />Again the same with the illuminati "science" hoaxes, from plate tectonics to stellar parallax.<br /><br />Again the same with the illuminati hoaxes staged on a regular basis, from the NASA hoaxes like the ISS/Space Shuttle to SOHO to the state lottery drawings, which were completely revealed first also by End Times Prophet in 2004 to 2007.<br /><br />All the way to the ultimate script, the begin of World War III, October 1998 to March 1999... revealed the very same days it was unfolding.<br />And this fact is yet again another piece in the Illuminati End Times puzzle.<br />Posted by MattMarriott at 2:20 AM 0 comments<br />Labels: CIA, conspiracy, illuminati, King, MI6, Murder, plot, Prince Charles, Prince William, Princess Diana, refusal, scapegoat, terror
PRINCE WILLIAM: I DON'T WANT TO BE KING!<br />Prince William has stunned his father Prince Charles by vowing he'll never be king -- because he can't forgive the royal family for the way they mistreated his beloved mom, Princess Diana.<br /><br />And the defiant Wills, 19, has even insisted he wants to quit public life completely, reveals royal expert Nicholas Davies in the blockbuster new book that all of Britain is eagerly awaiting: William, The Rebel Prince.<br /><br />Now the furious queen believes her grandson has inherited Di's stubborn, unconventional nature. And she's ordered Charles to get the headstrong William to toe the royal line.<br /><br />But William has dug his heels in -- and says he wants to hand over the throne to his brother Harry, 17. Now, in the second installment form Davies' book, Star takes an exclusive look at the boy who doesn't want to be king.<br /><br />After months of deliberation, Prince William has informed his father that he aims to drop the title prince and continue the tradition he initiated some years ago of being called simply by his first name.<br /><br />Far more importantly, however, William has also told his father that he does not wish to remain heir to the throne and wants to renounce formally all claim to the throne.<br /><br />William has insisted that his rejection of his title and his claim to the crown is no teenage rebellion, something that will pass with time, but a decision that he has been mulling over for a couple of years.<br /><br />In Straight-talking discussions, William has insisted: "I don't want to be king, I don't want the job."<br /><br />William first discussed this with his father in the fall of 2000. Understandably, Charles was deeply concerned, realizing full well that if William did indeed go through with his intentions, his decision would have disastrous consequences for both the House of Windsor and, perhaps, for the very survival of the monarchy in Britain.<br /><br />Charles finally decided to inform the queen. Her first reaction was to instruct Charles to get a grip on his wayward son and instill in him the meaning of the word "duty". She told Charles to pass on her message to William, telling him in no uncertain terms that there could be no rejection of his role as heir to the throne and that he should banish all such thoughts from his mind.<br /><br />She instructed Charles to inform William that his role in life had been predetermined by birth. He had been born into the royal family and, as the eldest child of Prince Charles, he is the future king -- and nothing will change that state of affairs.<br /><br />The queen then turned on Charles, blaming him for not bringing up William to understand that he has never had a choice as to whether he does or doesn't want to be king.<br /><br />Charles prefers to take a much less heavy-handed approach to the whole affair, still hoping that William can be persuaded to accept his lot in life.<br /><br />Charles also asked William whether he would be happy to take part in the celebrations planned for the queen's Golden Jubilee in 2002, marking her 50 years on the throne.<br /><br />However, in a dramatic gesture of open defiance, William told his father that he wants nothing to do with the celebrations. He doesn't want to tour the country with the queen because that would show the nation that he was happy with his role as heir to the throne, a prince of the realm.<br /><br />Those close to Charles believe that William is acting out in his own life what he had learned from his beloved mother when he would listen to her launching into an attack on the royal family, the queen and particularly Prince Philip.<br /><br />There are others who feel that William is a "chip off the old block" and that, in his heart, he feels the smae way toward the royal family and the monarchy as his mother did.<br /><br />Princess Diana was unable to accept the tough discipline of royal life and needed to escape from the strict confines and rigid rules. Headstrong and determined, Diana finally did break away and began to lead her own life. In doing so, she won the love and devotion of the nation and the respect of people around the world.<br /><br />William may simply be following in her footsteps.<br /><br />Diana wanted to show William a facet of life that virtually no other members of the royal family had ever experienced.<br /><br />She would explain to William that although he would have to conform to royal tradition and carry out the necessary duties throughout his life, he didn't always have to conform to protocol, convention and tradition.<br /><br />She wanted William to think independently, make his own decisions and not be bound solely by the strictures of life within the royal family.<br /><br />She would tell William how she had fought against some of the petty restrictions members of the royal household and Prince Philip had tried to impose on her.<br /><br />Diana had frequently bucked the system to try to do her own thing. Sometimes she had protested to such a degree that she had been permitted to deviate from royal traditions and go her own way. But that wasn't the case very often.<br /><br />Published on: October 18, 2001
<br /><br /><br />Thank you for this posting. Now I understand why Katie and Will want to do everything themselves. I saw a picture of Katie doing groceries after she came back from her honeymoon. I understand William he is protecting his mother. If being a King is to be like the queen he better just be a normal human being. I agree 100% with WIlliam. He is a good son, Diana must be very proud of him, she is looking out for him from heaven.
Michael blamed the paparazzi for following the car and causing the accident.
I wonder if Michael suspected there was a murder and not a car accident by ...accident.
Anyway...what is interesting to me is how Michael says he found out about her death: I woke up and a doctor tells me the news...
He woke up with a doctor - so he was under medication to sleep?
That interview always makes me feel very very bad.
[youtube:o6jep76i]
If I recall it right, during that time Michael was addicted to medicins.Later he admitted this and was send to a rehab, well sort of, arranged by his friend Liz Taylor.So its not strange a doctor was there.
No I think that what you say happened to the end of Dangerous tour, after the accusations about Jordie Chandler.
I don't recall the same in 1997, but I might be wrong.
You are right. Michael was married to Debbie Rowe at this time and Prince Michael I was born. He states this in the interview. That always puzzled me that his doctor informed him that Princess Diana was dead. I always felt that Michael knew what happened. He and Princess Diana were close friends. She would call anytime day or night. This makes me think that she informed Michael that her life was threatened. I always felt that she is in a safe place. The story of the accident didn't add up. Just IMO.
Well I was hoping to be wrong <!-- s:( -->:(<!-- s:( --> .
His relationship with Diana....I don't get it. I don't understand what made them feel they have so much in common.
Anyway, after reading about her more- because quite frankly I was never interesting in her story before - I start to wonder how many celebreties faked their deaths. And not only celebrities but common people too.
Maybe it's not even that difficult after all. maybe somtimes the circumstances are helping some to fake their death.
<br /><br />I can not post the video but that the link .. another parallel or "coincidence"<br /><br /><br />Lady Diana was in the tunnel of 81 minutes without being taken to the hospital, a doctor and an ambulance took her slowly to the hospital. Also cameras in the tunnel where Diana died were off that night, as there are no videos in the House of Michael.<br />Time Murray says that Michael fell asleep after Murray has given 25 mg of propofol: 11: 00 am<br />Time of call to 911: 24: 21<br />A little math, 81 minutes<br />ambulance leaving the House little by little, without siren and going to UCLA, they say that the ambulance where moved to Diana was very slow<br /><br /><br /><br />
Other inconsistencies:<br /><br />1) First news reports on the night of her death said she was fine and was standing outside the car watching the emergency services - that news report disappeared never to be herad again, and I HEARD that report myself.<br />2) The ambulance took 1 hour 20 minutes to get to the hospital in the middle of the night (a journalist retraced the journey in 11 minutes in a RUSH HOUR)<br />3) The ambulance driver was told to stop less than 500 yards from the hospital entrance for the doctor on board to perform "surgery". Wouldn't it have been better to go the extra 500 yards and have a full medical team and equipment?<br />4) They would never have been able to settle down together under the public spotlight, and would never have been left alone by the media.<br />5) Diana said just before her death "what I will do next will shock the world".<br />Mohammed Al Fayed either doesn't know the truth or has built a wonderful smokescreen of disinformation to throw the world off the scent! <br />SOURCE: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread385336/pg1<br /><br /><br />Diana and Dodi are still alive! <br />- 5th richest man in the world: Dodi Fayed's father Mohamed Al Fayed; <br />- Richest woman in the world: Queen Elizabeth<br /><br />1. Do they have enough money to make two willing people disappear?<br />2. How did princess Di's body guard get so rich?<br />3. Where do Prince Henry and William go for a month of the year?<br />4. Did you know that the producer of the movies "FX" and "FXII" is Dodi Fayed? Yes it's true! FX= SPECIAL EFFECTS for those that don't know.<br />5. Closed casket funeral...the body was never seen...<br />6. The driver of the paparatzzi car chasing the limo was a professional stunt driver!<br />a crash site surrounded by "PROFESSIONAL PHOTOGRAPHERS" and not a single clear picture of the accident. <br />SOURCE: https://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2246956422&v=wall<br /><br /><br />Montage created by Mona Osman - https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151000297200545&set=o.166081402401&type=3&theater<br /><br />
We have come to Diana faking her death? O_o<br /><br />I am glad she is being discussed though, I noted her connection to MJ in the BACK thread aswell as to 2012. Mohammed Al-Fayed obviously MJ's good friend, also believes Dodi and Diana were murdered.<br />Something I'm sure MJ wanted to draw attention to by exposing The Illuminati.
Oh boy! I just discovered something weird... <br /><br />Did you know that Lady Di was often compared to the moon Goddess Diana and that The Pont D’Alma Tunnel was a sacred site dedicated to the Moon Goddess Diana, where they used to practice ritual sacrifices (Illu). During those ceremonies, it was of an utmost importance that the sacrificed victim died inside the underground temple. The assassination of Diana was a reenactment of this ancient pagan tradition.<br /><br />http://stream.adamdodson.org/items/view/1768<br /><br />On august 31st 2012, on her 15th anniversary year of death, we will have a blue moon! http://earthsky.org/astronomy-essentials/when-is-the-next-blue-moon<br /><br />(Blue moons once every 2-3 years)<br /><br />Talk about a symbolic mother nature coicidence! afraid/
I'm not saying I believe she hoaxed her death, but after studying MJ's hoax, I just have this funny feeling about the B. Walters interview. She asks where he was when he heard the news. He says, "When the doctor woke me up, he told me the news." The most basic part of this hoax is that Murray was giving MJ propofol to sleep. So this little nugget was extremely well placed. But if we believe as Front/Back says, that MJ planned it for 20+ years, we can be sure this was meant to be found after he "died" to confirm that he was put to sleep by a doctor. Now if this is feeding his future hoax scenario, and it is butted to hearing the death of Princess Diana, it begs the question if she also hoaxed her death... :? smiley_spider
^^ I was thinking about the same thing @MjonMind<br />I believe that Lady Diana might still be alive ..let's say 50% chances from what I could find out until now... I don't know if these sources are credible or not, but I wouldn't dismiss anything yet!<br /><br />Here's a long and interesting article on this subject: "What if Diana had faked her own death and is living under a false identity in small-town America?" - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1367451/What-Diana-faked-death-living-false-identity-small-town-America.html#ixzz1fYY8VLX9<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />There was another discussion about Lady Diana which started from the subject of the Shroud of Turin on this topic: http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/smf2.0/index.php?topic=18805.125<br /><br />The thing is that there are many connections between Michael, his hoax and Diana. And everything I had found about her so far, was while I was searching for information about ELvis & Mj hoax! I have never specifically searched info about Diana, because I have always been convinced that she was actually murdered by the Illuminati [read Royal family]. But now, after all these infos that are surfacing after Michael's "death", I start having some serious doubts about her death too!<br /><br />
[size=12pt]I think her words are very subtle, hinting to ... well you know what! <br />"The press is ferocious. It forgives nothing, it only hunts for mistakes…<br />In my position anyone sane would have left a long time ago." [Princess Diana][/size]
Comments
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.""For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."This is interesting. The documentary below was the first to examine the murder plot in less than a year after the crash. This docu though, desperately tries to 'prove' it was not a murder plot and that the blame lies with Henri Paul and Mohamed Al Fayed's security. It is a manipulating documentary which does not answer ANY of the hundreds of questions that make people certain, or at least open to the murder plot against Diana and Dodi. Instead, it is discrediting and ridiculing Mohamed Al Fayed and pointing fingers to him for taking the wrong decisions for the security that night. Now let's say that he DID make the wrong security decisions, what does that have to do with the crash itself? What does that change to the following facts?
- Henri Paul never drank according to his friends/family, passed a physical just days before the crash to renew his plane licence.
- Henri Paul's blood samples showed, besides alcohol, 20% carbon monoxide. Where did that come from? Not the airbags and a heavy smoker wouldn't even have that amount of carbon monoxide in his blood.
- In contrary to what this documentary suggests, there is NO evidence that Henri Paul was drunk, except for the statement of the bartender.
- There WAS evidence of a white Fiat Uno and there WAS evidence that the Uno crashed with the Mercedes.
- All the camera's on the road were defect or turned off.
- Eye witnesses saw a very bright flash in the tunnel right before the crash.
- Diana's body was partially embalmed right after her death, including the CHEST area, while she died of a cardiac arrest.
- Etc. etc. etc. etc.
All these unanswered questions have NOTHING to do with Al Fayed's decision on the security that night. It has nothing to do with his alleged paranoia, it has nothing to do with whether or not he was the one that introduced Diana to Dodi. Those issues are unimportant in the investigation. This documentary seems to have the sole purpose to discredit Al Fayed before any documentary would investigate the real important questions. Whatever security decision was made that night, will change nothing to the fact that the crash itself was highly questionable, but even more the cover-up after the crash. I think this is a classic attempt to manipulate the public and control the damage that future unbiased documentaries would cause. Very lame attempt if you ask me. Those who use their common sense and pay attention will see that this documentary does not answer any of the questions, but instead raises a new one: why discredit Al Fayed in this way after he spoke out about the murder plot.
[youtube:1bv4i10c]
[youtube:1bv4i10c]
[youtube:1bv4i10c]
[youtube:1bv4i10c]
[youtube:1bv4i10c]
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."<!-- m -->http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlZ6FL_f ... r_embedded<!-- m --> In other words he was stringing her along in some ways and yet still telling the truth in other ways. That boy has amazing story-telling abilities!!
So please don't feel bad or sad! This is our Michael--- <!-- smj_bad/ -->mj_bad/<!-- smj_bad/ -->
I've posted this before that about 8-10 years ago when I was going down rabbit holes online and read the above about her ritual murder somewhere dark and quiet before the hospital, that I found this picture of Lady Diana wearing a black floor-length big-skirted dress with clearly illuminati satanic symbols plastered all over it (don't remember which symbol). It was a studio pose and very perfect, and she was stunning, apparantly taken shortly before her death. Yet it was horrifying. If anyone can find it that would be great. She would obviously have known from that sitting that she was destined to be a "holy" sacrifice for them.
Let's hope he was just selling another false story...
If I recall it right, during that time Michael was addicted to medicins.Later he admitted this and was send to a rehab, well sort of, arranged by his friend Liz Taylor.So its not strange a doctor was there.
No I think that what you say happened to the end of Dangerous tour, after the accusations about Jordie Chandler.
I don't recall the same in 1997, but I might be wrong.
His relationship with Diana....I don't get it. I don't understand what made them feel they have so much in common.
Anyway, after reading about her more- because quite frankly I was never interesting in her story before - I start to wonder how many celebreties faked their deaths. And not only celebrities but common people too.
Maybe it's not even that difficult after all. maybe somtimes the circumstances are helping some to fake their death.