The Conrad Murray Case/ Search Warrant at 24 the June 2009 ?
underthemoon
Posts: 418
I only wanna surch a little bit about the Case and found this :
<!-- m -->http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org/courtnew ... 2010:54:51<!-- m -->
If you click on the first date, it is the 24.June 2009 <!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: -->
There go on the 43 side and you find this date.
Much more i never saw...i have to read more....
I don't know if it's interesting....it's so difficult to understand rearly with my bad english, but maybee you can faster see what it is !
Big hugs <!-- sbearhug -->bearhug<!-- sbearhug -->
<!-- m -->http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org/courtnew ... 2010:54:51<!-- m -->
If you click on the first date, it is the 24.June 2009 <!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: -->
There go on the 43 side and you find this date.
Much more i never saw...i have to read more....
I don't know if it's interesting....it's so difficult to understand rearly with my bad english, but maybee you can faster see what it is !
Big hugs <!-- sbearhug -->bearhug<!-- sbearhug -->
Comments
They are written in textform, not in clearly facts. No seal or stamp. The adress can everybody write on the top.
Much sides of the autopsy report are looking the same like here. <!-- s:o -->:o<!-- s:o -->
<!-- m -->http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org/courtnew ... 2010:54:51<!-- m -->
It looks weird for me ! I never have seen such official documents...like make at home on a old typewriter where sometimes the ribbon has to renew.
But i noticed it since 2009....strange or not ?
Hello Tink.I.Am, 2 times a typo ? In the list with the "documents" and in the document ? There must be someone very sleepy to do that !
On the document itself it doesn't even look like 24 to me, it looks like 21, i don't know, i guess i'm crazy. <!-- s --><!-- s -->
o_O
It's not strange to me... All of my legal papers are typed that way. I have a boatload of them. Also if you go back and look for transcripts from the Arvizo case they are typed the same as well.