A call for action!!!
mjselfsweet
Posts: 146
This seems a good place to put this!!!
good day my lovely friends.
I am writing to you today to ask you to join me, as a group to email someone and stop her big mouth!!
Many of you may know about the Casey Anthony trial, here in the U.S.,, some of you may not,, its a young woman on trial for murdering her 2 1/2 yr old daughter. The defense is going for an acquittal,,the prosecution mainly only has circumstantial evidence. Anyway this isnt my topic.. my topic is,, a newswoman on Headline News JANE VELEZ-MITCHELL,, every time she is on,, she has a show on in the evenings, but she's been on day and night because of this trial,, anyway every time she talks about this girls defense going for an acquittal,, she brings up michaels acquittal,, or OJ's acquittal,, saying,, well you know this girl could get acquitted,, look at OJ, or look at michael jackson,,, she MUST stop bringing up michaels IMO,, he was INNOCENT!!
I think we should all mass email her and tell her to STOP bring michael's into this,, and say he was INNOCENT, thats why he was acquitted!!!!,, i'm very pissed off about this.
Here is the link <!-- m -->http://www.cnn.com/HLN/?hpt=hp_tv<!-- m --> scroll down till you see ISSUES with Jane velez-mitchell, and it has an email link and subject title to use!!!! Michaels Fans need to do this!!!!!
Thanks!
good day my lovely friends.
I am writing to you today to ask you to join me, as a group to email someone and stop her big mouth!!
Many of you may know about the Casey Anthony trial, here in the U.S.,, some of you may not,, its a young woman on trial for murdering her 2 1/2 yr old daughter. The defense is going for an acquittal,,the prosecution mainly only has circumstantial evidence. Anyway this isnt my topic.. my topic is,, a newswoman on Headline News JANE VELEZ-MITCHELL,, every time she is on,, she has a show on in the evenings, but she's been on day and night because of this trial,, anyway every time she talks about this girls defense going for an acquittal,, she brings up michaels acquittal,, or OJ's acquittal,, saying,, well you know this girl could get acquitted,, look at OJ, or look at michael jackson,,, she MUST stop bringing up michaels IMO,, he was INNOCENT!!
I think we should all mass email her and tell her to STOP bring michael's into this,, and say he was INNOCENT, thats why he was acquitted!!!!,, i'm very pissed off about this.
Here is the link <!-- m -->http://www.cnn.com/HLN/?hpt=hp_tv<!-- m --> scroll down till you see ISSUES with Jane velez-mitchell, and it has an email link and subject title to use!!!! Michaels Fans need to do this!!!!!
Thanks!
Comments
Nancy Grace, JANE VELEZ-MITCHELL, and those other women on CNN are extremely biased and judgmental. I don't give them my time or money. However, I will take the time to help your call for action. It's ridiculous that they continue to drag Michael's name in the mud. Thank you.
and to the other poster, yes the baby girl was found 6 months after her disappearance,and only bout 1 mile or so, from the mother/grandmothers home. The evidence, although circumstantial, points to the girl being guilty. she didnt report her baby being missing for a month! she lied and said she was kidnapped by the "babysitter" and had been looking for her by herself, but there are pictures, of her out in bars, partying, she also got a tattoo "bella vita" which they say means beautiful life, all while her baby was missing. Her car smelled like a decomposing body had in the trunk, etc etc. The trial is currently going on,,its on Headline News, being shown all day. maybe the website shows recaps of it. not sure. HTH,,
Thanks again for bringing this to our attention. <!-- sbearhug -->bearhug<!-- sbearhug -->
Blessings and Love to all!
Just so you know, I don't know about OJ's case, so I can't tell if he was guilty or not. But I know for sure that in Michael Jackson's case, he was innocent! I read all the transcriptions and I assure you, if you read them all, you'll change your mind! You can't just pretend the American Justice is corrupted, without even reading what really happened there. I can assure you that in Michael Jackson's case, the juges juged it right. He really was innocent. As I told you, find the transcriptions and see by yourself.
I kinda feel like this on here, on this topic right now, I mean out of the hundreds/thousands of us on here and the other forum that alot of us go to,, i've not had very many reviews or replies,, i'm shocked really....and sad.
she is saying it in the vein of he was guilty but got out of it,, and thats just not the case. how anyone that watched any part of michael before the trial,, and then after the trial,, cannot see a different person, is beyond me,,he was very hurt, very very sad after that, although i think he learned once and for all,, how mean and vicious people could be, although he had tried before to always give people the benefit of the doubt....