Murray Trial -- Jury Shouldn't Watch Nancy Grace
[size=14pt]Murray Trial -- Jury Shouldn't Watch Nancy Grace[/size]<br />7/20/2011 10:30 AM PDT by TMZ Staff <br /><br />Lawyers for Conrad Murray told the trial judge they don't want Nancy Grace to pull a "Casey Anthony" on the jury -- so they asked the judge to prohibit jurors from watching her.<br /><br /><br /><br />Attorney Michael Flanagan argued that it was impractical to tell jurors they can't watch TV - because they simply will. So Flanagan asked Judge Michael Pastor to sequester the jury, O.J. style. The judge told Flanagan to file a motion and he'd consider it, although the judge did say he thought sequestering was both unnecessary and too expensive.<br /><br />Flanagan pressed his claim for outtakes from the "This Is It" rehearsals -- something Sony doesn't want to cough up. Sources tell us ... Flanagan wants the outtakes to show there were periods where Michael Jackson appeared to be on drugs. <br /><br />In a telling comment, Judge Pastor said, "This case is going to focus on the charge, not personal lifestyle."
Comments
My opinion is that they should tell the whole world that they should NEVER watch Nancy Grace - regardless of the trial. She is as biased and nasty as Diane Dimond, if not worse. She is so slanted that she displays poor judgment in her journalistic views. She is a disgrace and should be taken off the air. Just my opinion, of course.
Blessings <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
The judge is right about focusing on the charge and not on personal lifestyle.
Totally agreed. And yep, it looks like this is taking a different turn than the 2005 trial. This time they are on MJ's side. <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
http://www.raief.com/5642/what-do-these-share-casey-anthony-news-of-the-world-hln-nancy-grace-fox-news/
I love Murray's "b*tch, don't even!" face and Michael looks like he's giving her the kiss-off while laughing.
And Nancy covering her ears is perfect - she won't listen to reason, like "LA LA LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU!"
"Lawyers for Conrad Murray told the trial judge they don't want Nancy Grace to pull a "Casey Anthony" on the jury -- so they asked the judge to prohibit jurors from watching her."
But Casey Anthony was found not guilty so if the jurors watched her, they weren't swayed when they made their decision.
I find it interesting that just a few days ago, Harvey attacked Nancy Grace on TMZ Live and now this article. I think Nancy Grace is on Michael's "list".
I'm glad the judge has some common sense and isn't putting the victim on trial. He is right. We are dealing with a "doctor" here. He took the oath and then decided to administer propofol without necessary equipment and knowledge for money. Even if Michael begged for it, a doctor concerned for his patient never would have done what Murray allegedly did.
Excellent articles, Grace. Thanks for sharing.
This reminded me so much of what happened to Michael.
You are right Purelove, they are taking a different approach it is about time <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
Perhaps your brain is connected to your large intestine.. <!-- ssuspicious// -->suspicious//<!-- ssuspicious// -->
Anyway I though Jurors are banned from watching the media when any of it has to do with the case that they are deliberating for.
<!-- m -->http://news.yahoo.com/prosecutor-miscon ... 13907.html<!-- m -->
This is deep shit... why does everything point to Michael? I'm losing my mind.
And yes, Nancy Grace was one of the WORST reporters during Michael's case. No doubt she's on his shit list.
From wikipedia:
<!-- m -->http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Caylee_Anthony<!-- m -->
"in the United States, the case was called "one of the biggest ratings draws in recent memory" and "the social media trial of the century".[6][7] Defense counsel charged that Anthony was being tried in the media to her great detriment while she was facing the death penalty.[8] The case has been cited as an example of the unfairness of prejudicial pretrial publicity with the potential for impacting the rights of defendants in the United States"
To be honest, I had no idea about this case and imo, it can´t be compared with Michael´s case at all. Michael was known by the media and the whole world to start with. Also, when Michael´s case, they put more police to work than they do with serial killers.
As far as I understood, this woman did not report that her child was gone after one month. She may be did not kill her child, but surely neglegted the child.
I noticed that too. Michaels everywhere!...especially behind the scenes I'm sure