Lindsay Lohan as Liz Taylor

MJonmindMJonmind Posts: 7,290
edited January 1970 in General Hoax Investigation
I'm guessing MJ is pleased at LiLo's match for Liz Taylor!<br /><br />Lindsay Lohan -- Don't I Look Like Elizabeth Taylor? [PHOTO] | TMZ.com<br /><br />[size=12pt]LINDSAY LOHAN<br />Don't I Look <br />JUST Like Liz Taylor?[/size]<br /><br />0603-lilo-tmz-3-wm-2.jpg<br /><br />Lindsay Lohan is all dressed up and ready to take on the role of a lifetime -- and TMZ has obtained the first of photo of LiLo in full Liz Taylor wardrobe ... as she gets set to start filming her new movie.<br /><br />0603-lilo-liz-taylor-tmz-getty-6.jpg<br /><br />As TMZ first reported, Lindsay had her hair and cut and dyed to look just like Taylor's classic 'do. The photo is all Lindsay ... no wig, no nothing. <br /><br />Shooting on the movie starts this week with Grant Bowler from "True Blood" co-starring as Richard Burton.<br />

Comments

  • MJFAN7MJFAN7 Posts: 3,063
    I love them both.. beautiful :icon_e_smile:
  • AndreaAndrea Posts: 3,787
    Another pic of Lindsay as Liz.<br /><br />yhrz9__oPt.jpg
  • AdiAdi Posts: 1,834
    She looks pretty good I think. That pic posted by Andrea is very similar to Liz Taylor.
  • GraceGrace Posts: 2,864
    TM is behind LL so I don't think it's too much fun but a nice try of hiding true motivation.
  • Personally I think Lilo doesn't have the same class...and what I mean by that is, Hollywood actors/actresses were and are so different to the actors/actresses we have now, it doesn't seem the same, back then you had amazing entertainers, it's just not the same 'glam' as it used to be.
  • LoveunitedLoveunited Posts: 370
    I agree use_your_illusion. Elizabeth emenated something from within, can't see LiLo manufacturing THAT!
  • Its herIts her Posts: 1,137
    on 1338883736:
    <br />Personally I think Lilo doesn't have the same class...and what I mean by that is, Hollywood actors/actresses were and are so different to the actors/actresses we have now, it doesn't seem the same, back then you had amazing entertainers, it's just not the same 'glam' as it used to be.<br />
    <br /><br />[size=14pt]I think so, too. And, not only 'glam' but the mysteriously regal "air" they had about them when they were in public. It may have been all top-secret PR-illusion, or the way "Stars" were psychologically groomed as special commodities which studios OWNED, or actually that women just carried themselves differently then, with or without being dolled up in jewels and furs. No one has "it" now, from this generation.  :-\ I don't know what changed; it's just less sparkly to me. :icon_e_confused: [/size]
Sign In or Register to comment.