I thought the American president is not elected but chosen by the elite! I thought they choose the one who suites them. What about the blood line issue? If the elite want war not peace, then there will be war, not matter who the president is. It's them who decide, not the president.
<br />I thought the American president is not elected but [size=12pt]chosen by the elite[/size]! I thought they choose the one who suites them. What about the [size=12pt]blood line issue[/size]? If the elite want war not peace, then there will be war, not matter who the president is. It's them who decide, not the president.<br />
<br /><br />Exactly! Mitt and Barack are one in the same, Romney might just be a wolf but so is Obama, he's just in sheep's clothing.<br />These two are politicians, that's what they act like, they don't act like Presidents or candidates who will or want to genuinely help the country (in the context of the quote that JFK made). This is the very reason I don't understand why P&P are getting behind Obama if these politicians are all the same, do you think that has to do with MJ's upcoming BAM?<br /><br />Anyway when you vote for a President or you think one potential candidate is better than the other, just ask yourself:<br /><br />Are the elite controlling the world? If your answer is yes, then yes should also be your answer to whether the President is the elite's elect. <br />Because to tell you straight now, it's definitely not yours.
JFK was apparently assassinated for not going along with TPTB plans. Obama is not a robot, although he may be fully prepared by them to do his assigned role. Who knows what rebellion lurks within him yet... I would still vote for him if I had the choice but I'm Canadian. Race runs deep, and Obama knows that full well. I'm guessing he will win again, and somehow be a positive influence for good change.<br /><br />Marumjj<br />
"I am not different from you who is reading this my dad is black and my mom white with a bunch of other races" is speaking in present tense!
I do think Obama is the lesser of two evils, as it were.
<br />
<br /><br />I agree with this statement, that the President is chosen by the elite, for the rest of America it's voter suppression. Watched an interesting show about media Fox, msnbc, the billionaire$$$ pouring money into both parties http://angerinamerica.cbc.ca/#1-hope ... the oil Koch brothers are behind Romney. :icon_e_confused:
It's a two party system in the U.S. A third party independent isn't going to get in. The President is a figurehead and the real power lies hidden behind him so I guess the Prez is their PR guy. The thing about Romney...I just feel that he's so far removed from the "common man" and he just plays the political game, flip-flopping his opinions to suit whatever level of the game he's at. I don't get the impression from him that he has compassion for the average American or has their best interests at heart. I don't like judging people but that's honestly how he makes me feel and that's why I feel he's a greater threat to Americans (and the world) because he's more than willing to play their (TPTB) game. That is why I feel Obama is the lesser of two evils. Obama is likeable as well and while he may be, to a certain degree, a puppet, he still has a voice.<br /><br />MJ said it best - "The whole system sucks".<br /><br />
This means that the elite might choose Romney even if the Americans like Obama more. Somehow i feel that Romney will be the next President because of what you just said, Andrea. I'm not so optimistic anymore. The world is in real danger.
Bush,Obama or whoever, you come memories of 9/11 and thinks God if this people is capable of attacking their own people, so what can we expect us the other inhabitants of this planet.
Perspective.....<br /><br />hate to break it to ya' but the USA does not rule the world......there are many more countries on Planet Earth besides America.
<br />Perspective.....<br /><br />hate to break it to ya' but the USA does not rule the world......there are many more countries on Planet Earth besides America.<br />
<br /><br />Indeed, I live in one of those other countries...and I do not trust the Prime Minister here one bit - he does what he wants and his bottom line is $$$ and it's NOT for the country. He goes by TPTB's agenda as well.
The important matter on this twitlonger is not what President is better but what he has said about his dad: "my dad [size=18pt]is[/size] black" :th_bravo: Prince you are my hero! :woohoo2: I love those present tenses guys I can't help it :icon_lol:
<br />Perspective.....<br /><br />hate to break it to ya' but the USA does not rule the world......there are many more countries on Planet Earth besides America.<br />
<br />I thought the American president is not elected but [size=12pt]chosen by the elite[/size]! I thought they choose the one who suites them. What about the [size=12pt]blood line issue[/size]? If the elite want war not peace, then there will be war, not matter who the president is. It's them who decide, not the president.<br />
<br /><br />Exactly! Mitt and Barack are one in the same, Romney might just be a wolf but so is Obama, he's just in sheep's clothing.<br />These two are politicians, that's what they act like, they don't act like Presidents or candidates who will or want to genuinely help the country (in the context of the quote that JFK made). This is the very reason I don't understand why P&P are getting behind Obama if these politicians are all the same, do you think that has to do with MJ's upcoming BAM?<br /><br />Anyway when you vote for a President or you think one potential candidate is better than the other, just ask yourself:<br /><br />Are the elite controlling the world? If your answer is yes, then yes should also be your answer to whether the President is the elite's elect. <br />Because to tell you straight now, it's definitely not yours.<br />
<br /><br />what i don't get is why they are putting this out there anyway . it seems to me michael had a bit of a shall we say old fashion perspective on some things like it is none of your business who i sleep with or who i am going to vote for. that is what is throwing me off here. they are kids why do they feel they need to be so vocal and at the same time claim to not be political. also remembering the american dream were not the boys coached not to express their opininons on such matters? seems some of the celebrity of late are facing some fall out by becoming so political , hurting their carreers. that is why this seems odd to me. just sayin ( need a shoulder shrug smiley lol)
<br />I thought the American president is not elected but [size=12pt]chosen by the elite[/size]! I thought they choose the one who suites them. What about the [size=12pt]blood line issue[/size]? If the elite want war not peace, then there will be war, not matter who the president is. It's them who decide, not the president.<br />
<br /><br />Exactly! Mitt and Barack are one in the same, Romney might just be a wolf but so is Obama, he's just in sheep's clothing.<br />These two are politicians, that's what they act like, they don't act like Presidents or candidates who will or want to genuinely help the country (in the context of the quote that JFK made). This is the very reason I don't understand why P&P are getting behind Obama if these politicians are all the same, do you think that has to do with MJ's upcoming BAM?<br /><br />Anyway when you vote for a President or you think one potential candidate is better than the other, just ask yourself:<br /><br />Are the elite controlling the world? If your answer is yes, then yes should also be your answer to whether the President is the elite's elect. <br />Because to tell you straight now, it's definitely not yours.<br />
<br /><br />what i don't get is why they are putting this out there anyway . it seems to me michael had a bit of a shall we say old fashion perspective on some things like it is none of your business who i sleep with or who i am going to vote for. that is what is throwing me off here. they are kids why do they feel they need to be so vocal and at the same time claim to not be political. also remembering the american dream were not the boys coached not to express their opininons on such matters? seems some of the celebrity of late are facing some fall out by becoming so political , hurting their carreers. that is why this seems odd to me. just sayin ( need a shoulder shrug smiley lol)<br />
<br /><br />LOL...good question, but I have no idea (Here is a shoulder shrug emoticon :icon_razz:) <br /><br /><br />Yes of course there are many other countries in the world but America along with Britain are the 'world powers' (Look at the prophesy by Daniel on the Statue of King Nebuchadnezzar).<br /><br />They do rule the world, because they are able to control the other countries, look they have the most powerful military in the world, they control other countries with their weapons and such. America (I'm talking about the Government and the Elite, not the people of America) has as much dirty laundry as a waste disposal...this is all I'll say.<br /><br />
<br /><br />Actually those articles could be quite telling. The cbs article - it is true that Obama/the White House never issued a formal statement on MJ's death whereas they normally would for someone of Michael's stature. I know Obama commented on MJ's 'death' but I remember it was worded awkwardly or something. Obama not releasing a statement is reminiscent of UCLA not releasing a statement. Hmmm, there could be something there...
<br /><br />Actually those articles could be quite telling. The cbs article - it is true that Obama/the White House never issued a formal statement on MJ's death whereas they normally would for someone of Michael's stature. I know Obama commented on MJ's 'death' but I remember it was worded awkwardly or something. Obama not releasing a statement is reminiscent of UCLA not releasing a statement. Hmmm, there could be something there...<br />
<br /><br /><br />yeah i have looked and can't find it but it seems there was a statement made by him that michael was a " conflicted individual" . sorry but to my mind that is just a nice way of saying he was fucked up. jmo i know i could be wrong but. >:(<br /><br />edit: so i found this blog on reasons why being conflicted can be good , so i have to reason that most use it in a negative manner. but now i am conflicted :-[ :icon_rolleyes: wish i could find that video and check up on myself. :Pulling_hair:<br /><br /><br />http://8pmwarrior.com/2011/08/reasons-why-conflicted-is-good-for-your-life-and-organization/<br /><br /><br />editing myself again :LolLolLolLol: if he did mean this in a negative sense it doesn't really say that much about the allegations of the past as it might about some before hand knowledge of those resently leaked e-mails. maybe?
Comments