<br />Thanks TS, interesting tweets I_deed !<br /><br />It seems like the next episode of the Conrad Murray trial is about to start soon. Will it be televised ? Will the media be all over it ? <br /><br />During the trial I had visions of Conrad Murray taking his mask off and everyone being shocked ! It seems like something shocking may happen at the appeal ? <br /><br />"Keep Your Head Up" because we're going "Hollywood Tonight" to reveal what's "Behind the Mask". <br /><br /> :th_bravo: <br /><br />Unless, I'm just dreaming :icon_geek:<br />
<br /><br />Interesting concept DWA. If/When we do see CM again next...nobody would think twice if he looked a bit different given all the stories in the rags about the toll his "incarceration" has taken on the poor soul. I doubted that CM was actually Michael during the lead up and the trial...but maybe for his next public appearance he will be...and will make the big reveal...lol. That kind of revelation would cause some jaws to drop now wouldn't it? It's just an odd thought that ran through my head when I read your post.<br />
<br /><br />Michael not Bamming on december 21/2012 had something to do with the Murray appeal. There is a connection for sure IMO
Some have commented on my predictions, saying that I have a “need” to prove my authenticity. But again, the reason for the predictions is not for you to merely believe everything I say; rather, it is for when I reveal my identity—to help people believe what I say about myself at that time. Some would believe me now if I revealed this, but some would not.
<br />Thanks TS, interesting tweets I_deed !<br /><br />It seems like the next episode of the Conrad Murray trial is about to start soon. Will it be televised ? Will the media be all over it ? <br /><br />During the trial I had visions of Conrad Murray taking his mask off and everyone being shocked ! It seems like something shocking may happen at the appeal ? <br /><br />"Keep Your Head Up" because we're going "Hollywood Tonight" to reveal what's "Behind the Mask". <br /><br /> :th_bravo: <br /><br />Unless, I'm just dreaming :icon_geek:<br />
<br /><br />Interesting concept DWA. If/When we do see CM again next...nobody would think twice if he looked a bit different given all the stories in the rags about the toll his "incarceration" has taken on the poor soul. I doubted that CM was actually Michael during the lead up and the trial...but maybe for his next public appearance he will be...and will make the big reveal...lol. That kind of revelation would cause some jaws to drop now wouldn't it? It's just an odd thought that ran through my head when I read your post.<br />
<br /><br />Wouldn't it be fun if the next time we see Murray he's like, oh...say, 5'10" and 135 lbs?
Wouldn't it be fun if the next time we see Murray he's like, oh...say, 5'10" and 135 lbs?
<br /> :ghsdf: 'Honey, we shrunk Conrad Murray!'<br />That's if before it was, 'Honey, we blew up MJ (if he's CM)!' <br /> :affraid:<br /><br />Sim, good eyes noticing the word, ‘extension’!<br />Your posts were brilliant!! :smiley_abuv: Your year in law is paying off already!! 8)<br />
On the other hand, maybe everything was planned to occur exactly as it occurred (extensions/delays/false BAM-dates included!). Because along these 3.5 years we could see how this hoax was planned from the very start in the slightest details, from the colors of clothes worn by the main "actors" to the dates and minutes of the hours when something occurred!<br /><br />TS taught us many things, amongst which the most important: the power of numbers, especially when they're used to leave signs & clues [decoding the hoax numerology], which to me, still remains by far the best proof of the death hoax.<br /><br />Front has taught us about the power of language/expressions/double meanings (face value), capital letters, missing letters, word-games, especially when certain words are used in specific contexts, with the exact same purpose as the numbers were used: to leave clues and signs!<br />And seeing that word EXTEND/EXTENSION repeating so many times in TS's update and he even underlined it for us! it hit me! <br /><br />The LAW texts are precise and they cannot be changed.... When Murray's trial was planned, it must have been done with some legal counseling and closely following the LAW texts!! Every major trial is bound to have some delays/extensions/postponings, especially towards the end... unexpected situations may or may not appear! and the term EXTEND/EXTENSION appears often in legal texts. therefore, I think it was purposefully used by TS when he talked about the BAM deadline, it perfectly fits with the context of this final stage in Murray's case.
<br /><br />Perhaps this lawyer, McParland, is an honest, straight-forward person, much like Mesereau, telling it like it is in a fair unbiased manner, which is the way all media should report events as well, and didn't and don't.<br /><br />Adi<br />
“one dose of extra time”<br /><br />which reminded me of the "extra day of simmering"
Conrad Murray<br /><br />Time and time again the tabloids will fabricate stories during a trial.<br /><br />Born – February 19, 1953<br />St. Andrews, Grenada<br /><br />Catch Phrases: "Don't worry" and "I swear I didn't kill Michael Jackson."<br /><br />Was hired to be Michael Jackson’s personal physician for his 2009 concert tour, did a great job … with one exception.<br /><br />Found guilty of involuntarily manslaughtering MJ, sentenced to four years in prison, sleeps in a cell near one of the guys from Debarge.<br /><br />Has a fondness for snazzy ties, enjoys going to Disneyland, is the father of at least seven children from six different women, isn't nuts about paying child support.<br /><br />Helped put Propofol on the map … and by “map” … we mean “a list of painkillers people are now deathly afraid of.”
<br /><br />We also know he was an irresponsible father for one son, having missed to pay his child support due to MJ.<br />http://www.tmz.com/2009/10/20/conrad-murray-mj-is-the-reason-i-cant-pay/<br /><br />The child support trial was indeed an excellent rehearsal for the big one.<br />
“@ParisJackson: “…and then he greeted Death as an old friend and went with him gladly , and , as equals , they departed this life .” #TaleOfTheThreeBrothers”
<br />“@ParisJackson: “…and then he greeted Death as an old friend and went with him gladly , and , as equals , they departed this life .” #TaleOfTheThreeBrothers”<br />
<br /><br />That's interesting, the Tale of the Three Brothers tell a story about three brothers who, travelling together, reach a treacherous river. They make a magical bridge over the river. Halfway across the bridge, they meet the personification of Death who is angry for losing three potential victims. He pretends to be impressed by them and grants each a wish as a reward. The eldest brother asks for an unbeatable dueling wand, so Death gives him the Elder Wand. The middle brother asks for the ability to resurrect the dead, so Death gives him the Resurrection Stone. The youngest brother doesn't trust Death and asks for a way to stop Death from following him, so Death reluctantly gives him his Cloak of Invisibility. Afterwards, the brothers go their separate ways.<br />The eldest brother, bragging about his powerful wand, is robbed of it and murdered while he is asleep. The middle brother uses his ability to bring back the woman he loved, who died before he could marry her. However, she is not fully alive and is full of sorrow. He kills himself to join her. As for the youngest brother, Death never manages to find him, as he stays hidden under his Cloak. Many years later, the brother removes his cloak and gives it to his son. Pleased with his achievements, he greets Death as an old friend and chooses to leave with him as equals.<br /><br />Is it a hint that MJ is still under his "Cloak of Invisibility"?
And now he tweeted THIIIIS :affraid:<br /><br />----> https://twitter.com/MMcParland<br /><br /><br /><br /> :omg: OK, that does it for me!! :icon_lol:<br /> Mr. McParland, you ROCKKKKKKKKK :elvis-1405: :icon_lol:
<br />And now he tweeted THIIIIS :affraid:<br /><br />----> https://twitter.com/MMcParland<br /><br /><br /><br /> :omg: OK, that does it for me!! :icon_lol:<br /> Mr. McParland, you ROCKKKKKKKKK :elvis-1405: :icon_lol:<br />
<br /><br /><br />!!!! he must be in on this! :elvis-1405:
<br />And now he tweeted THIIIIS :affraid:<br /><br />----> https://twitter.com/MMcParland<br /><br /><br /><br /> :omg: OK, that does it for me!! :icon_lol:<br /> Mr. McParland, you ROCKKKKKKKKK :elvis-1405: :icon_lol:<br />
<br /><br />wow! I like seeing Elvis / Michael in one tweet, Elvis is amazing is that picture, dedicated to Sim
Some have commented on my predictions, saying that I have a “need” to prove my authenticity. But again, the reason for the predictions is not for you to merely believe everything I say; rather, it is for when I reveal my identity—to help people believe what I say about myself at that time. Some would believe me now if I revealed this, but some would not.
frikken hilarious re: 7 kids... where were all the other baby momma visits???<br /><br />hugest LOL ever!<br /><br /><br />meanwhile, Jono and Sim, loved ur posts on the previous page :smiley_abuv:
[size=18pt][/size] This question is for TS, I have read all your posts, they are amazing and very educational, especially the one of DWD. One thing you said Michael would be back in 2012 I do feel you know something what could have happened to him since he did not BAM. So many people relied on your word, and now some are deceived, some don't believe in you anymore. Can you give us a clue as of why Michael did not Bam as you stated in your previous posts?<br /><br />Wish you Happy New Year, hope you can answer my question.<br />Much love to you.
Hang in there guys! :bearhug: <br /><br />I stick to my belief: truth will prevail and truth conquers all, including time.<br /><br />TS wrote:<br />
<br />TIai update #6.5: Michael & Elvis, DOUBle-scam from TS??<br />« on: December 01, 2010, 04:30:15 PM »<br /><br /><br />2. Truth Will Prevail<br /><br />Although I did mention the concept of being tested, I never said that the test would be intentionally false information (to see if anyone would catch it). That is of course a possibility; but it’s also possible that the only test is whether people will reject true information, without checking it out for themselves.<br /><br />It is good to see people doing their own research, on some of the subjects that I have previously written (as well as other subjects); I have no complaints about this. If what I have written is wrong, in time that will become obvious; and if what I have written is truth, in time the “truth will prevail”.<br /><br />However, just because someone questions or challenges what I have written, don’t expect me to respond impulsively. In time I will usually answer, especially if nobody else does; but don’t expect any knee-jerk reactions from me, I’ve never operated that way and never will. Quick reactions are usually emotionally charged, and not well thought out; I like to give time for the dust to settle, and also time for others to find answers—that way people are thinking for themselves, rather than just letting me spoon feed them. Furthermore, I normally post on key dates and times; and this case is no exception (see section 11, below).<br /><br />Some have thought that my “return” and “bam” predictions were for the purpose of testing people. Again, this is possible; but there is another reason, which I won’t reveal until after the bam. And as I have said before, the “return” did have a double-meaning: one meaning was a possible bam, and the other meaning was “piece by piece” information about the hoax coming together, and especially things about the hoax hitting the media. This process is still going on, including recently (see section 3, next); although it was rather quiet there for a few months. Did anybody notice that things suddenly picked up recently?<br />
And as I have said before, the “return” did have a double-meaning: one meaning was a possible bam, and the other meaning was “piece by piece” information about the hoax coming together, and especially things about the hoax hitting the media. This process is still going on, including recently (see section 3, next); although it was rather quiet there for a few months. Did anybody notice that things suddenly picked up recently?<br />
<br /><br />http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/forum/index.php/topic,23520.msg434050.html#msg434050<br /><br /><br />I have faith that there must be sufficient reasons that 'nothing happened what most of us have expected' based on TS' words. I tend to believe that in this hoax time isn't as important as truth, though now I think that time and truth go hand in hand and are interwoven more than ever and they might be considered as crucial. <br /><br />TS:<br />
Let me make it clear that I do not expect people to gullibly believe anything and everything I say, merely because of the predictions. Please accept or reject what I say based on the reliability of the information itself; this is what I have always said. If I signed up with various usernames—and posted information using various writing styles, so that people would not recognize me—the information should be assessed on the exact same basis as my posts under the username TS.<br /><br />Some have commented on my predictions, saying that I have a “need” to prove my authenticity. But again, the reason for the predictions is not for you to merely believe everything I say; rather, it is for when I reveal my identity—to help people believe what I say about myself at that time. Some would believe me now if I revealed this, but some would not. <br />
Since we all are wondering is TS is a fake informer I found 2 contradictions in 2 different TS threads:<br /><br />1-Recruiting soldiers for Michael's Army of L.O.V.E:<br /><br />PLEASE NOTE: This is not a phishing scam; so please do not post your personal information. We want a quantity of people to show their support; but we are not asking for name, address, phone number, or other private info. Beware of anyone trying to get you to give out your personal information!<br /><br />http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/forum/index.php/topic,1934.msg27595.html#msg27595<br /><br />AND<br /><br />2-Silencing the Critics, And $999 REwarD??? You bET (that some thought he meant: SCARED YET?)<br /><br />If you can defend your calculations and statistics by answering my questions/challenges: then PM your mailing address to me, and I will send you $999 (U.S. dollars) via Western Union!<br /><br />http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/forum/index.php/topic,14058.msg234443.html#msg234443<br /><br />How could we give him our mailing address to send us the reward if we didn't know for sure who was him? Isn't it odd that somebody is asking for your mailing address?<br /><br />What do you guys think? and was there any member that was finally rewarded by TS?
<br />Since we all are wondering is TS is a fake informer I found 2 contradictions in 2 different TS threads:<br /><br />1-Recruiting soldiers for Michael's Army of L.O.V.E:<br /><br />PLEASE NOTE: This is not a phishing scam; so please do not post your personal information. We want a quantity of people to show their support; but we are not asking for name, address, phone number, or other private info. Beware of anyone trying to get you to give out your personal information!<br /><br />http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/forum/index.php/topic,1934.msg27595.html#msg27595<br /><br />AND<br /><br />2-Silencing the Critics, And $999 REwarD??? You bET (that some thought he meant: SCARED YET?)<br /><br />If you can defend your calculations and statistics by answering my questions/challenges: then PM your mailing address to me, and I will send you $999 (U.S. dollars) via Western Union!<br /><br />http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/forum/index.php/topic,14058.msg234443.html#msg234443<br /><br />How could we give him our mailing address to send us the reward if we didn't know for sure who was him? Isn't it odd that somebody is asking for your mailing address?<br /><br />What do you guys think? and was there any member that was finally rewarded by TS?<br />
<br /><br />I think he asked for the mailing address just to sound legit...but IMO he knew that nobody will answer the challenge and prove his calculations were false, so i guess he knew right away that nobody will give him their address, so it's rather insignificant... The fact is nobody ever won the prize and had to send their mail address
<br />Since we all are wondering is TS is a fake informer I found 2 contradictions in 2 different TS threads:<br /><br />1-Recruiting soldiers for Michael's Army of L.O.V.E:<br /><br />PLEASE NOTE: This is not a phishing scam; so please do not post your personal information. We want a quantity of people to show their support; but we are not asking for name, address, phone number, or other private info. Beware of anyone trying to get you to give out your personal information!<br /><br />http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/forum/index.php/topic,1934.msg27595.html#msg27595<br /><br />AND<br /><br />2-Silencing the Critics, And $999 REwarD??? You bET (that some thought he meant: SCARED YET?)<br /><br />If you can defend your calculations and statistics by answering my questions/challenges: then PM your mailing address to me, and I will send you $999 (U.S. dollars) via Western Union!<br /><br />http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/forum/index.php/topic,14058.msg234443.html#msg234443<br /><br />How could we give him our mailing address to send us the reward if we didn't know for sure who was him? Isn't it odd that somebody is asking for your mailing address?<br /><br />What do you guys think? and was there any member that was finally rewarded by TS?<br />
<br /><br />I think he asked for the mailing address just to sound legit...but IMO he knew that nobody will answer the challenge and prove his calculations were false, so i guess he knew right away that nobody will give him their address, so it's rather insignificant... The fact is nobody ever won the prize and had to send their mail address <br />
<br /><br />But I find it very brave from his side to have asked for the mailing address after the statement made to the members about not giving our personal data to anyone.<br />Thank you susieMJ.
<br /><br />How could we give him our mailing address to send us the reward if we didn't know for sure who was him? Isn't it odd that somebody is asking for your mailing address?<br /><br />What do you guys think? and was there any member that was finally rewarded by TS?<br />
<br /><br />Mysetrious , odd , peculiar but not contradictory . His asking for the mailing adress implies that he knew that no one would ever be able to prove his theories to be wrong ( mainly the ones about numerology and the connection between MJ and Elvis ) . As he said it in his post , it was him challenging the critics . <br /><br />What I still find kind of baffling till this day is him referring to himself as " we" . I mean we know that his theories must be a work of a collective intelligence but how many people are behind TS' posts . Besides, if TS and Front know each other , does it mean that behind Front's account are a "lot " of people as well ?
<br />Since we all are wondering is TS is a fake informer I found 2 contradictions in 2 different TS threads:<br /><br />1-Recruiting soldiers for Michael's Army of L.O.V.E:<br /><br />PLEASE NOTE: This is not a phishing scam; so please do not post your personal information. We want a quantity of people to show their support; but we are not asking for name, address, phone number, or other private info. Beware of anyone trying to get you to give out your personal information!<br /><br />http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/forum/index.php/topic,1934.msg27595.html#msg27595<br /><br />AND<br /><br />2-Silencing the Critics, And $999 REwarD??? You bET (that some thought he meant: SCARED YET?)<br /><br />If you can defend your calculations and statistics by answering my questions/challenges: then PM your mailing address to me, and I will send you $999 (U.S. dollars) via Western Union!<br /><br />http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/forum/index.php/topic,14058.msg234443.html#msg234443<br /><br />How could we give him our mailing address to send us the reward if we didn't know for sure who was him? Isn't it odd that somebody is asking for your mailing address?<br /><br />What do you guys think? and was there any member that was finally rewarded by TS?<br />
<br /><br />I think he asked for the mailing address just to sound legit...but IMO he knew that nobody will answer the challenge and prove his calculations were false, so i guess he knew right away that nobody will give him their address, so it's rather insignificant... The fact is nobody ever won the prize and had to send their mail address <br />
<br /><br />But I find it very brave from his side to have asked for the mailing address after the statement made to the members about not giving our personal data to anyone.<br />Thank you susieMJ.<br />
<br /><br />I see what you mean, but if he really wanted to reward someone, he had to ask for a personal info somehow...<br />But anyway, it's true that TS is very contradictory- all those statements that he will not post under TS_comments until bam, and then he does; predicting bams that don't happen...there's a long list of all the inconsistencies... I'm not saying he's fake, bcs he's done a pretty good job here, but I find it kind of strange how he keeps "playing with words" and choosing terms that can be interpreted in various ways... I'm so curious how he'll get out of his false bam prediction....I rly hope he won't give up...
<br /><br />How could we give him our mailing address to send us the reward if we didn't know for sure who was him? Isn't it odd that somebody is asking for your mailing address?<br /><br />What do you guys think? and was there any member that was finally rewarded by TS?<br />
<br /><br />Mysetrious , odd , peculiar but not contradictory . His asking for the mailing adress implies that he knew that no one would ever be able to prove his theories to be wrong ( mainly the ones about numerology and the connection between MJ and Elvis ) . As he said it in his post , it was him challenging the critics . <br /><br />What I still find kind of baffling till this day is him referring to himself as " we" . I mean we know that his theories must be a work of a collective intelligence but how many people are behind TS' posts . Besides, if TS and Front know each other , does it mean that behind Front's account are a "lot " of people as well ?<br />
<br /><br />He says "we" because he is including us in his team I don't think there are more than a person behind TS.
Comments