<br />[size=14pt]Michael Jackson spent $35 million to cover up molestations of 24 boys: report<br />[/size] The King of Pop hired a private investigator to collect all the skeletons in his closet and bury them, according to an explosive report in London's Sunday People. But now a former associate of the investigator is talking.<br /><br /><br />Michael Jackson spent nearly $35 million in a desperate bid to cover up his crimes after he molested at least 24 boys, according to an explosive report published Saturday.<br /><br />London’s Sunday People tabloid says it obtained “secret FBI files” full of stomach-churning details about the late King of Pop’s seamy past.<br />[size=18pt]Jackson allegedly was once caught groping a famous child star and watching pornographic films while molesting another boy.[/size]<br />He allegedly fondled a third boy in his private theater as the victim’s clueless mother sat only a few rows away, according to the purported FBI files.<br /><br />The documents – identified as case numbers CADCE MJ-02463 and CR 01046 — were apparently never turned over to prosecutors in the sensational 2005 trial that cleared Jackson of molestation charges.<br /><br />In a twist, the bombshell files dating to 1989 were assembled by private eye Anthony Pellicano, who Jackson hired to make sure the skeletons in his closet stayed out of the spotlight.<br /><br />Pellicano is now in prison, serving a 15-year sentence for racketeering and wiretapping in an unrelated case — but one of his ex-associates opened up to Sunday People.<br /><br />“I was hired by him to find out where the fires needed putting out and, in this case, where allegations would be coming from,” the unidentified sleuth said.<br /><br />“But I have never worked on a case with as many potential claimants as the Jackson case.”<br /><br />The Daily News obtained FBI files on Jackson in 2009 under the Freedom of Information Act. Those files contained no mention of the sordid documents obtained by Sunday People.<br /><br />Calls to the FBI on Saturday went unreturned.<br /><br />The Pellicano files identify a total of 17 boys — including five child actors and two dancers — that Jackson is said to have preyed upon.<br /><br />Jackson’s other alleged victims include a European boy and the sons of a screenwriter.<br /><br />At least three boys got hush money, the Pellicano investigator said.<br />The family of one of them, a well-known young actor, received nearly $600,000 “to refrain from any and all contact with media and communications, newspapers, television, radio, film and books,” the newspaper reported.<br />The files also include interviews with former Jackson aides who claim the pop king was obsessed with child porn.<br /><br /><br />“Our reports painted the picture that Jackson was a serial child predator,” the Pellicano associate said.<br /><br />The $35 million payout includes a nearly $20 million settlement to the family of Jordan Chandler, a 13-year-old boy the singer had befriended.<br />Word of the massive payout comes days after one of Jackson’s longtime defenders, Wade Robson, filed a lawsuit against the singer’s estate that claims he was molested as well.<br /><br />A former child pal of Jackson’s and now a choreographer to the stars, the 30-year-old Robson says he was repeatedly abused during visits to the Neverland Ranch during the 1990s.<br /><br />The abuse started when Robson was 7 and continued until he was 14, the paper reported.<br /><br />The fresh accusations have emerged during a dark period for the Jackson clan.<br /><br />Michael’s 15-year-old daughter, Paris, was hospitalized early this month after a botched suicide attempt.<br />And a wrongful-death trial in Los Angeles pitting Jackson’s mother, Katherine, against concert giant AEG Live has forced Jacko’s family to relive the day he was found dead of a drug overdose in June 2009.<br />http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/michael-jackson-spent-35-million-cover-molestations-report-article-1.1386325<br /><br />More Links: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2351783/Michael-Jackson-spent-35-million-silence-dozen-boys-abused.html<br /> http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/michael-jackson-enticed-lost-boys-2011607<br /><br />i]I'm sorry if this has been posted before. I have been very busy, so if I've repeated the post, please delete it[/i<br />
<br /><br />[size=24pt]while doing a vodoo dance at midnight and eating the heads off of live chickens !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br />[/size]<br /><br /><br />[move] :screaming-7365:[/move]
<br />they were at the same time wanting/trying to control Michael, treating him like a "circus animal", "slapping" him and so on......<br />
<br /><br />I do not believe for one minute that MJ would tolerate such treatment. MJ is not a victim nor is he a pathetic wimp.<br />
<br /><br />I wasn't at all implying that he is, bec. I was saying AEG WANTED to control him. From what we have heard so far during the trial, in order to control their advances, AEG wanted to control all aspects of Michael's life. It was TMZ who used the words "circus animal" and that's how AEG's treatment towards Michael was (again from witnesses who testified in court). In my opinion, this is one of the reasons of the trial. To show people how these promoters treat the artists, even though without the artists they would not be in business to begin with.
I don't believe MJ would get himself in that kind of situation in the first place. I think he's too smart n too good of a businessman to be bamboozled like that. He's been in the entertainment business for 40 years; he knows who to work with and who not, he knows a good deal from a bad one and he has great lawyers on his side to make sure the contracts are fair, legal, and adhered to.<br /> <br />But who knows. Some parts are real, some staged. Picking n choosing which is which is a challenge.
Seems like the same higher powers that wanted to destroy MJ in 90s and early 00s, have now been roused from their lairs and want to try again. But on the other hand there could be different strategy this time, knowing they lost last time, and the reception to Wade's story has not been good for them. They also know Tom Mesereau is still about, and would again prove them liars. They're going to have to try something quite different this time. Either that or MJ has something to do with this new blitz, in the clear "righting of wrongs".
This time around you're making me sick<br />Though you really wanna get me<br />Somebody's out<br />Somebody's out to get me<br />They really wanna fix me, hit me<br />But this time around I'm taking no shit<br />Though you really wanna get me<br />You really wanna get me.
<br /> written by Michael Jackson.<br /><br /><br />Shit is about to get real guys :icon_rolleyes: ......<br /><br /><br />But in the end we will know that sticking by Michael was the right thing to do.<br /><br /><br /><br />The Mirror is lying. These are not Michael's FBI files. Here are his real files:<br />http://vault.fbi.gov/Michael%20Jackson<br /><br />It's laughable even to think Sneddon would not have brought that evidence to court if they existed .
<br /><br />Anthony Pellicano at the Mic and Howard Weitzman to his right <br />EVER SINCE ANTHONY PELLICANO HAS GONE<br />TO FEDERAL PRISON HE ISN'T TALKING.. <br />IS THAT ALL ABOUT TO CHANGE??<br />WAS MICHAEL JACKSON FRAMED? <br /><br /><br />STOP TAPE .32 MICHAEL JACKSON'S INNOCENCE <br />Anthony Pellicano 95 claims it was all set up It was an Extortion <br />Attempt<br /><br />THE UNTOLD STORY. By Mary A. Fisher GQ, October 1994<br />(portions of interview)<br />On November 23, the friction peaked. Based on information he <br />says he got from Weitzman, Fields told a courtroom full<br />of reporters that a criminal indictment against Jackson<br />seemed imminent. Fields had a reason for making the statement:<br />He was trying to delay the boy's civil suit by establishing<br />that there was an impending criminal case that should be tried<br />first. Outside the courtroom, reporters asked why Fields had<br />made the announcement, to which Weitzman replied essentially<br />that Fields "misspoke himself." The comment infuriated Fields,<br />"because it wasn't true," he says. "It was just an outrage.<br />I was very upset with Howard."<br /><br />Fields sent a letter of resignation to Jackson the<br />following week."There was this vast group of people<br />all wanting to do a differentthing, and it was like<br />moving through molasses to get a decision,"says Fields.<br />"It was a nightmare, and I wanted to get the hell out of it."<br />Pellicano, who had received his share of flak for his<br />aggressive manner, resigned at the same time. <br />With Fields and Pellicano gone, Weitzman brought in<br />Johnnie Cochran Jr., a well-known civil attorney who<br />is now helping defend O.J.Simpson. And John Branca,<br />whom Fields had replaced as Jackson's general counsel<br />in 1990, was back on board.<br /><br />Pellicano's words: <br />The Federal government has purposely tried to make<br />this thing larger than life — like a Hollywood movie. <br /><br />To me, these are the acts of overzealous FBI agent<br />and prosecutors who have never really accomplished <br />anything in their careers. They are trying to use my <br />name and reputation to build something better for <br />themselves. <br /> <br />I think they had it in their minds that this is <br />some big case where I’m purportedly wiretapping <br />all kinds of celebrities<br /><br />and there are all these tapes.<br />By the way, where are all these recordings <br />that they are talking about? <br />The government said they have a bunch. <br /><br />But they have never provided them to us in discovery. <br />And they never will. Because they don’t exist!!<br /><br /> <br />Anthony Pellicano<br /><br />http://mjhoaxlive.blogspot.com/2010/02/something-has-gone-terribly-wrong.html?spref=tw<br />http://www.mjnewsonline.com/mj.txt<br />Interview-with-Geraldine-Hughes
<br />SUNDAY, 30 JUNE 2013 by Charles Thomson<br /><br />The Mirror, the People, and the settlement that never was...<br />It's a funny thing. Ever since the high-profile Michael Jackson death trial started going pear-shaped for promoter AEG Live, a lot of newspapers which carry prominent and lucrative advertising for its events have become more intent on smearing Michael Jackson than ever.<br /><br />Leading the way has been The Mirror in the UK. A few weeks ago, contemporaneous emails presented at trial showed that AEG boss Randy Phillips had 'slapped' Michael Jackson because he was scared about attending a press conference. Slapped him and screamed at him 'so loud the walls shook'.<br /><br />The shocking revelation was widely ignored by the press. Several days after the evidence was heard in open court, only one outlet had summoned the courage to publish the evidence. AP did not include the testimony in its daily missive from the courtroom. The wire's reporter claimed on twitter he had been out of the courtroom sending emails when the testimony occurred.<br /><br />It was only when fans started making noise about the 'cover-up' on sites like Twitter that other media companies grudgingly published the comments. AEG-sponsored newspapers like the Mirror, though, bizarrely tried to paint Michael Jackson as the bad guy. According to the first line of the Mirror's story, Jackson 'needed to be slapped'. Interestingly, the Mirror was a lot faster to publish a story last year accusing Janet Jackson of slapping a minor. A story which turned out to be a lie. <br /><br />This weekend - days after Jackson's son took the stand and testified that he saw Phillips in his home while his father was not there, behaving 'aggressively' towards Jackson's doctor - the Mirror's Sunday edition, called the People, is at it again. It has published a highly misleading story about some 'FBI files' which allegedly show Michael Jackson was witnessed molesting children by multiple Neverland employees. The 'FBI files' also detail a supposed settlement with a young accuser in 1992 - before the Jordy Chandler case.<br /><br />In reality, the story is a nonsense; a birds nest of mangled and misstated accusations which are neither 'new' nor 'exclusive', despite the People's repeated claims that they are. In fact, the documents are not 'FBI files' at all. This is a flat-out lie. Moreover, the claims have all been in the public domain for a very long time, some having been discredited two decades ago.<br /><br />Of course, most readers won't bother to fact-check the story. Why would they? The newspaper is supposed to do that before publishing it. Sadly, it seems other media outlets can't be bothered either. Britain's Mail newspaper has already rehashed the story, evidently making no attempt to investigate its veracity before doing so.<br /><br />I could go into a whole lot of detail about the claims made by the People - and the various lazy journalists who will copy and paste its story hundreds, or perhaps thousands of times onto their own websites and into their own newspapers in the coming days. But what is the point? The info is already in the public domain.<br /><br />Those who hate Jackson will adopt the People's story as evidence for their case. Those with an interest in hearing both sides of Jackson's case will already know that these claims were debunked a long time ago. Nobody else will even bother to research the story. The People's readers buy the newspaper because they like and trust it. They, as intended, will believe this story and will not question it.<br /><br />Briefly, however, for the record: <br /><br />1) The 'FBI files' are not FBI files. They are transcripts of interviews compiled by a tabloid journalist who paid his sources - including one who turned out not to exist.They were acquired by a PI who worked for Jackson's defence team. A decade later, he was prosecuted for tapping phones. The FBI seized all of his files, of which these tabloid interviews formed a miniscule part. <br /><br />2) The allegations of Jackson being caught by multiple employees do not, as the People infers, come from a host of different documents. They all come from one document - a transcript of an interview with a couple called the LeMarques, who worked at Neverland in the late 80s and early 90s. The People intentionally does not state that all of these uncorroborated accusations come from just one of the documents, instead purposely misleading readers and suggesting that they're taken from a cache of evidence.<br /><br />The LeMarques never contacted police about the abuse they claimed to have witnessed, instead opting to negotiate deals with tabloid newspapers - including the Mirror. Their claims were investigated by cops probing Jackson, who found the couple had agreed to add increasingly graphic details to their interviews for more and more money. Investigators concluded in the 90s that the pair had no credibility and possessed no evidence of any genuine abuse. They were called on out of desperation to testify in Jackson's 2005 trial after prosecutors watched their case begin to disintegrate, but were destroyed under cross-examination. Jurors rejected their testimony and acquitted Jackson, unanimously.<br /><br />3) The supposed 'settlement' in 1992 was detailed to a tabloid reporter, for money, by a female source who claimed to work for Jordan Chandler's legal firm. She never showed the reporter a document - she simply 'read it out' over the phone. A police investigation into the claim found that the boy named in the settlement did not exist, there was no record of any settlement ever being paid, and the female source had never worked for the legal firm and in fact did not exist. She was never heard of again.<br /><br />This leaves one element of the People's story standing; that Jackson 'allegedly' - what a convenient little word that is - paid $35million to two-dozen young accusers. The newspaper presents no evidence to corroborate this claim. Just a note in the tabloid reporter's documents, which the People intentionally misrepresents as an 'FBI file'.<br /><br />Contrary to the People's claim, investigators knew about and investigated these tapes as part of their probe into Jackson in 2003/4, in which they were assisted by the FBI. Despite all of their resources, neither the Californian police nor the FBI was ever able to locate any evidence that any child besides Jordan Chandler or Jason Francia ever received a settlement.<br />POSTED BY CHARLES THOMSON AT 13:43<br />LABELS: ABUSE, AEG, ALLEGATIONS, JACKSON, LEMARQUE, LEMARQUES, MICHAEL, MIRROR, PEOPLE, TABLOID, TRIAL<br />
<br /><br />According to Charles Thomson one of the biggest sponsors of the Mirror is AEG :icon_e_surprised:. Is that true? <br />If that is true ,something is definitely wrong here :animal0017:,cause and in my opinion, they (AEG) are part of the hoax :icon_cool: :michael_jackson-1135: !!!<br />Now I guess I understand why Michael was always smiling, while talking about tabloids<br /><br />starting 1:26<br /><br />
They write this stories to mislead you.........BELIEVE what I tell you :suspect: :icon_geek: :LolLolLolLol: !!!!!
<br /><br />According to Matt Fiddes :icon_e_wink: :<br /><br />
[size=14pt]''Obviously he had two sides, he used to say to me 'Matt, I want my life to be the biggest mystery on earth'... but behind the scenes he was the nicest person I have ever known.''[/size]
Wade has been rocked by the reaction to his claims.
<br /><br />Shocked only one person believes your lying ass, Wade? Really? :icon_lol: :thjajaja121: <br /><br />
"He knows if he stands shoulder to shoulder with another accuser he might be viewed sympathetically."
<br /><br />Yeah, he's desperately hoping one of the hundreds of victims pedophiles typically have comes forward. Too bad it's not gonna happen here. <br /><br />Here's a list for Wade:<br /><br />Macaulay Culkin<br />Brandon Adams<br />Brett Barnes<br />Frank, Eddie, Aldo Cascio<br />Omet Bhatti<br />Aaron Carter<br />Mark Ronsen<br />Gotham Chopra<br />Sean Lennon<br />James McCartney<br />Emmanuel Lewis<br />Alfonso Ribiero<br />Anton Schleiter<br />Jonathan Spence<br />James Safechuck<br />Michael Jacobshagen<br />Ricky Bell<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Intresting what Frank Cascio tweeted about this shit story :<br /><br />Michael Jackson Slimed By British Press: Here’s the REAL Story from 2005<br />06/30/13 1:33am Roger Friedman<br /><br /><br /><br />I’ve been alerted to a story in the British press about Michael Jackson paying off 24 families of children he supposedly molested. Readers of this column must know that I have almost a PhD in Michael Jackson. The story is not true. It’s based on files left behind by a National Enquirer reporter, now dead, called Jim Mitteager. In 2005 I went through tons of Mitteager’s files, re-reporting them. A lot of it was just poppycock. Read this whole column I published back then. I did a lot of work on it. As devil’s advocate, I tried to find someone who would say they were molested by Michael Jackson. No one would because, I think, no one had been.<br /><br />From March 2005, c2013 Showbiz411.com<br /><br />Was there a kid who made a deal with Michael Jackson before his first accuser settled with the pop star for $20 million in 1993?<br /><br />Tape recordings left behind by a deceased National Enquirer reporter would suggest there was, but on closer inspection, it turns out there probably wasn’t.<br /><br />In fact, the tapes show that there was a zealous push on the part of the supermarket tabloids 12 years ago to find any boy who might have been abused by Jackson.<br /><br />This will be a disappointment for Santa Barbara County District Attorney Tom Sneddon, who has not been able to produce any other Jackson “victims” so far.<br /><br />On Monday, Judge Rodney Melville will hold a hearing to determine whether or not Jackson’s “prior” acts can be brought into this trial.<br /><br />If they are allowed, what could they be and where did they come from? And are they real?<br /><br />Sneddon is prepared to subpoena every ex-Jackson employee and cop who was involved in the first case, even those who’ve since sold their stories to the tabloids. The result could be a veritable list of the supermarket tabs’ sources and leakers from a dozen years ago.<br /><br />Like a tabloid Richard Nixon, National Enquirer and Globe writer Jim Mitteager taped most of his conversations about Jackson when he covered the story in 1993-94.<br /><br />Mitteager, who was later dismissed from the papers for sexual harassment, talks to his sources and his editors very candidly.<br /><br />The result is a revealing look at how the tabs salivated to get the most salacious story about Jackson, often disregarding the exact truth for kernels of plausible items that could be inflated into screaming front-page headlines.<br /><br />Mitteager bequeathed the tapes to Paul Barresi, a self-styled investigator, trusting him to “do the right thing with them.” Barresi thought the tapes had value, but could not have guessed what historical importance they would acquire.<br /><br />Mitteager inadvertently kept a record of much of what is in the news today concerning Hollywood’s underbelly. The tapes include anecdotes about many celebrities and lawyers, as well as incarcerated private eye Anthony Pellicano, who once worked for Jackson.<br /><br />Barresi has a long history of involvement with the Jackson story.<br /><br />In 1993, the pop star’s former cook and housekeeper, Philip and Stella LeMarque, asked him to sell their story about sexual abuse at Neverland.<br /><br />The LeMarques, who were slight acquaintances of Barresi, had only worked at Neverland for about 10 months and left after the first molestation case broke in 1991.<br /><br />Like many disgruntled former Jackson employees, the LeMarques are now on Sneddon’s witness list. The Quindoys, another couple who also sold their story, are ready to testify as well.<br /><br />But Barresi realized early on that the LeMarques were probably not telling the truth.<br /><br />“I concluded that it was all about the money and not about protecting a child from a predator,” he told me.<br /><br />The couple, he said, began embellishing their story when they came to believe they could get $500,000 for it. In the end, they received nothing.<br /><br />Barresi wound up turning over his taped interviews with the couple to then-Los Angeles District Attorney Gil Garcetti. They are now in the hands of Jackson’s prosecutor.<br /><br />The coup de grace, Barresi says, happened later, when he listened to Mitteager’s tapes. On one of them, it’s noted that the LeMarques had tried to sell their story of child molestation at Neverland long before the first case broke in 1991.<br /><br />“They couldn’t get any takers,” recalls Barresi. “But why didn’t they just go to the police?”<br /><br />Often the Globe printed stories, written by Mitteager, that were based on the flimsiest of evidence.<br /><br />Mitteager, at least in the case of Jackson, relied heavily on a sketchy stringer named Taylea Shea. Her veracity consequently became integral to a lot of tabloid reporting at the time.<br /><br />Shea, who seems to have gone by a number of aliases and had a long list of addresses and phone numbers, could not be contacted for this story, despite many tries.<br /><br />Neighbors at the Los Angeles address at which she lived the longest do not remember her fondly. They recall a hustler and con woman who was always on the take.<br /><br />“She should be in jail, if she hasn’t been already,” one former friend and neighbor said.<br /><br />On one tape, Shea reads what sounds convincingly like a legal document drawn up between Jackson and a 12-year-old boy named Brandon P. Richmond, who is represented by his mother, Eva Richmond.<br /><br />Brandon, according to the document, received $600,000 from Jackson. He and Jackson would no longer have any contact with each other.<br /><br />Shea read the document, which is dated July 1992, to Mitteager the following year.<br /><br />This would have been a blockbuster, if true, because it would make Brandon, not the differently-named boy who settled with Jackson in 1993, the first of Jackson’s accusers.<br /><br />Shea also says on the tape that the legal document came from the offices of famed Hollywood lawyer Bert Fields, Jackson’s attorney at the time.<br /><br />No reason is given why Jackson and Brandon Richmond should be separated. The implication, however, is clear.<br /><br />The Globe published the story without using names. Over time, it was assumed that Brandon P. Richmond was in fact Brandon Adams, a boy who had appeared in Jackson’s “Moonwalker” video.<br /><br />Discussions on the tapes indicate that the tabloids also believed the two Brandons were one and the same. But there’s a problem with Shea’s story: Nothing adds up.<br /><br />For one thing, a source close to Fields says the document uses language uncommon to their usual agreements.<br /><br />Then there’s the actual family.<br /><br />According to the Adamses, whom I met in January, they don’t know an Eva Richmond.<br /><br />Brandon Adams’ mother is named Marquita Woods. And Brandon’s grandmother assures me she knows nothing of a $600,000 payment. The family has lived in a modest home in Baldwin Hills, Calif., for 30 years.<br /><br />Brandon Adams, who is now 25, is a struggling actor. He appeared in “D2: The Mighty Ducks” and the indie film “MacArthur Park,” and is currently working on building a music career.<br /><br />“I wish I had $600,000,” he said. “I’m broke.”<br /><br />The Adamses pointed out that Brandon never visited Neverland, just the Jackson family home in Encino.<br /><br />For a short time they were friendly not only with the Jacksons, but with Sean Lennon and his mother Yoko Ono, who were also part of “Moonwalker.” But the relationship seems to have ended well before Taylea Shea’s big scoop.<br /><br />Was Shea simply lying to Mitteager to collect a big fee? It would seem so.<br /><br />On the tapes, Mitteager tells an editor that Shea also has “shocking” material about David Geffen and Keanu Reeves, among others. None of it would turn out to be true, but all of it was tabloid fodder that spread to more mainstream publications for a short time.<br /><br />Curiously, nobody I spoke with who worked at the tabloids could remember Shea. And her own alleged main source — an attorney then associated with the office of Larry Feldman, the first accuser’s lawyer — insists vehemently that she did not know Shea and had little knowledge of the case anyway.<br /><br />Suddenly, the value of the Mitteager tapes takes on a new meaning.<br /><br />Barresi, a sometime investigator and tabloid source in the past, is aware that he’s in possession of materials that demonstrate how the supermarket tabloids operated in their heyday — the era of O.J. Simpson, Jackson and other scandals.<br /><br />But one tabloid editor still in the business cautioned, “Don’t paint all of us with the same brush. We did a lot of excellent work on Simpson.”<br /><br />Indeed, though it’s hard to separate them in our minds, the Globe — then under a different owner — had a much lower standard of proof than did the Enquirer in the early 1990s. And Mitteager came from the Globe’s mentality, according to sources with whom I have spoken.<br /><br />At one point, in running down lists of kids who’d spent time with Jackson, Mitteager rattles off the name of a boy with the conviction that Jackson, who had befriended him, must have also acted inappropriately with him.<br /><br />But it was only wishful thinking on the part of a tabloid reporter.<br /><br />It turns out that the boy was 9 years old in 1993 and died shortly thereafter from leukemia. He’d met Jackson through the Make-A-Wish Foundation.<br /><br />Even Jackson’s staunchest critics would agree that it is hard to fathom how this boy could have been the object of the singer’s romantic interests.<br /><br />Read also: http://www.foxnews.com/story/2005/04/11/jacko-major-domo-lied-about-cashing-in/<br /><br />and this: http://www.foxnews.com/story/2005/04/07/former-proteacutegeacute-vouches-for-jacko/<br /><br />
(MJ) They write this stories to mislead you.........BELIEVE what I tell you !!!!!
<br /><br />Yeah Applehead, isn't that a killer statement filled with irony, and doesn't his smirks and giggles at certain times remind you of when he giggles after saying in the TII speech why these will be his last performances.
Ever since the high-profile Michael Jackson death trial started going pear-shaped for promoter AEG Live, a lot of newspapers which carry prominent and lucrative advertising for its events have become more intent on smearing Michael Jackson than ever. Leading the way has been
<br /><br /><br /><br />
Quote from: RK on June 30, 2013, 05:30:44 PM<br />Why is all this bullshit being thrown now? Is it to keep MJ from coming back.....intimidate him into staying 'dead'? <br /> Are AEG behind this as well as Wade's claim? <br />It makes me feel like throwing up. <br />Just vile and nasty .
Several persons had interest to slander Michael over the years... has always been an awkward because telling the truth...and slanders that these days fill the tabloids could be an attempt to get out of the closet Michael because the voices that he is alive are insistant...Who knows :icon_razz: :suspect: :moonwalk_:
Satan knows his time is short so he is trying his best to destroy God's work. This will get very ugly before the end I'm certain. When one Demon rares it's ugly head, more will follow.<br /><br />Remember<br />Ephesians 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
<br />Satan knows his time is short so he is trying his best to destroy God's work. This will get very ugly before the end I'm certain. When one Demon rares it's ugly head, more will follow.<br /><br />Remember<br />Ephesians 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. <br />
<br /><br />This Bible passage applies so much to the times we are living now. It's our governments, people in high places and with a lot of power who are the ones that abuse their power for evil instead of good. Like Michael said in his song "They don't really care about us".
Ever since the high-profile Michael Jackson death trial started going pear-shaped for promoter AEG Live, a lot of newspapers which carry prominent and lucrative advertising for its events have become more intent on smearing Michael Jackson than ever.
<br /><br />So, are they suggesting that tabloid articles coming out now are going to influence the trial in AEG's favour? Hmmm - the jury hold all the cards in that respect, NOT every Tom, Dick and Harry - and isn't the jury not meant to access and be influenced by the media during the trial? (Though how you police that one I don't know - perhaps that's the point.)<br /><br />You know, I'm getting sick of all this - I've read more trashy tabloid articles in the last 4 years (well, 3 in my case) than in my entire life before. I NEVER read them, had never even heard of TMZ and now they seem to form a part of my every day. YUCK! I don't give a damn what 'celebrities' get up to in their PRIVATE lives. And if it's illegal let the authorities deal with it, NOT the damn media. They should be there to REPORT the news NOT make it (up).<br /><br />Sorry for shouting - I just needed to get that out.<br /><br />
[size=12pt]Michael Jackson's Ex-Attorney Slams Reports of an Alleged MJ Cover-Up[/size]<br />Add CommentJuly 02, 2013 09:06:37 GMT<br /><br />Lawyer Tom Mesereau rejects tabloid reports that his client paid millions of dollars to cover up molestation charges.<br /><br />Photo credit: /WENN<br /><br />It's been eight years since lawyer Tom Mesereau represented the late King of Pop Michael Jackson during the latter's molestation trial, but the Los Angeles-based attorney is speaking up once again to defend the iconic pop superstar. Mesereau rejected a recent tabloid report alleging that Jackson spent nearly $35 million to cover up the molestation crimes he allegedly committed mainly to silence the 24 boys he had been accused of sexually abusing, including their families. <br /><br />"It's sickening that people are still trying to profit and exploit Michael Jackson in death," Mesereau told Radar Online, slamming choreographer Wade Robinson who has filed a lawsuit against Jackson's estate. He argued, "The FBI never had any files alleging that Michael Jackson had sexually abused 24 young boys, because it never happened. Believe me, if they had such information, it would have been presented at the trial." <br /><br />Mesereau insisted that the County of Santa Barbara District Attorney, working with the FBI and the Interpol, found no evidence of sexual abuse against his client that even the FBI's files relating to Jackson showed no findings of any wrongdoing. In like manner, Jackson was cleared by the Los Angeles Department of Children & Family Services, after it conducted its own investigation. <br /><br />Robson hopes that by getting other supposed molestation victims to testify, he will be able to boost his case against Jackson. His motivation comes from reports of secret documents compiled by Anthony Pellicano, a private investigator who was reportedly hired by Jackson to track down the victims to arrange payments for their silence. <br />
This all is all the Pains MJ has been dealing with,as they continue to try and bury him with all their pain.Hes probably laughing right now and will be surfacing soon and so many will not believe it.They will continue to pile on all the garbage they can come up with,but a supposed "dead" man is untouchable and when they find out that he is not dead. The truth will destroy all the lies!
Ever since the high-profile Michael Jackson death trial started going pear-shaped for promoter AEG Live, a lot of newspapers which carry prominent and lucrative advertising for its events have become more intent on smearing Michael Jackson than ever.
<br /><br />So, are they suggesting that tabloid articles coming out now are going to influence the trial in AEG's favour? Hmmm - the jury hold all the cards in that respect, NOT every Tom, Dick and Harry - and isn't the jury not meant to access and be influenced by the media during the trial? (Though how you police that one I don't know - perhaps that's the point.)<br /><br />You know, I'm getting sick of all this - I've read more trashy tabloid articles in the last 4 years (well, 3 in my case) than in my entire life before. I NEVER read them, had never even heard of TMZ and now they seem to form a part of my every day. YUCK! I don't give a damn what 'celebrities' get up to in their PRIVATE lives. And if it's illegal let the authorities deal with it, NOT the damn media. They should be there to REPORT the news NOT make it (up).<br /><br />Sorry for shouting - I just needed to get that out.<br /><br /><br />
<br /><br />I'm with you curls. It all goes back to money and greed once again and the need to destroy people like Michael, Kennedy, Martin Luther King, and the list goes on, who are all about love, honesty, kindness, truth, equality among people of all races and colors, and helping others in need and less fortunate. That's what this is all about.......... It's been going on for decades now........
Ever since the high-profile Michael Jackson death trial started going pear-shaped for promoter AEG Live, a lot of newspapers which carry prominent and lucrative advertising for its events have become more intent on smearing Michael Jackson than ever.
<br /><br />So, are they suggesting that tabloid articles coming out now are going to influence the trial in AEG's favour? Hmmm - the jury hold all the cards in that respect, NOT every Tom, Dick and Harry - and isn't the jury not meant to access and be influenced by the media during the trial? (Though how you police that one I don't know - perhaps that's the point.)<br /><br />You know, I'm getting sick of all this - I've read more trashy tabloid articles in the last 4 years (well, 3 in my case) than in my entire life before. I NEVER read them, had never even heard of TMZ and now they seem to form a part of my every day. YUCK! I don't give a damn what 'celebrities' get up to in their PRIVATE lives. And if it's illegal let the authorities deal with it, NOT the damn media. They should be there to REPORT the news NOT make it (up).<br /><br />Sorry for shouting - I just needed to get that out.<br /><br /><br />
<br /><br />I'm with you curls. It all goes back to money and greed once again and the need to destroy people like Michael, Kennedy, Martin Luther King, and the list goes on, who are all about love, honesty, kindness, truth, equality among people of all races and colors, and helping others in need and less fortunate. That's what this is all about.......... It's been going on for decades now........<br /><br /><br /><br />+1 <br /><br />Unfortunately this is the fate of the great men in this sick world >:(<br /><br /><br />
(MJ) They write this stories to mislead you.........BELIEVE what I tell you !!!!!
<br /><br />Yeah Applehead, isn't that a killer statement filled with irony, and doesn't his smirks and giggles at certain times remind you of when he giggles after saying in the TII speech why these will be his last performances.<br />
<br /><br />MJonmind I have a hunch that The Mirror newspaper will have the same fate like News of the world one ,lol !!!<br />I know it's weird cause it's linked to the Mirror's website but although both newspapers are owned by the same company, they are separate papers :animal0017: :suspect: :WTF:.<br /><br />http://www.mirror.co.uk/all-about/the%20people<br /><br />
So after being exposed as liars last week, The Mirror is once again attempting to lie about MJ and the FBI files this week, this time they quote the actual FBI files BUT wildly out of context :icon_eek::<br /><br /><br />[size=12pt]Michael Jackson child abuse probe halted because he was to receive White House honour from President [/size]<br />7 Jul 2013 00:00<br /><br /> FBI scrapped investigation into abuse of young boys to save President Ronald Reagan from embarrassment<br /><br /><br /><br />An FBI probe into Michael Jackson’s sex abuse of young boys was shelved because he’d been invited to the White House, official records show.<br />The Thriller megastar was to be honoured with an award by Ronald Reagan in 1984 for his work with drug and alcohol charities.<br />And federal agents decided to save the President and wife Nancy embarrassment by scrapping their investigation into a tip-off that Jackson had molested two Mexican boys.<br />The disclosure – in papers released under America’s Freedom of Information Act – comes a week after the Sunday People revealed Jackson spent £23million in 15 years to buy the silence of at least 24 youngsters who had visited his Neverland ranch in California.<br />The Reagan document is part of a 333-page file made public by the FBI which show there were suspicions the singer had been abusing kids since at least 1978, when he was 20??Say what :icon_eek: :icon_eek: :WTF: :WTF: :WTF: :WTF: :WTF:??<br />FBI agents found a home-movie titled Michael Jackson’s Neverland Favorites An All Boy Video Anthology.<br />And in a separate FBI file obtained *exclusively by the Sunday People – and not included in the Freedom of Information papers – a costume designer said the singer ordered paedo magazines while touring Europe 35 years ago with the Jackson 5.<br />The revelations underline the huge influence wielded by Jackson, who died of an overdose in 2009 aged 50.<br />The FBI openly admits in the dossier it did not follow up the tip about the Mexican kids being abused “because Jackson was to receive an honour at the White House from the President”.<br />He was back at the White House in 1990 to meet President George Bush Snr, wife Barbara and their daughter Dorothy.<br />There was no mention of any abuse probe at that stage.<br />But other FBI files detail a late-night phone call from Jackson to Terry George, a boy of 13 in Leeds, with the singer describing how he was fondling himself during their chat. The young Brit had been befriended by the star in 1979 after asking for his autograph.<br />A 1992 file tells how a couple complained Jackson and a boy of 12 shared a sleeper train compartment next to theirs – and kept them awake with “questionable noises”.<br />But no official action was taken in any of the cases spelt out in the documents.<br />‘Abused’ boy: Files show I told truth<br /><br /><br />A dancer who claims Michael Jackson sexually abused him said our *revelations about the FBI files last week “shows I was telling the truth”.<br />Wade Robson, 30, suing the King of Pop’s estate, has asked his legal team to get hold of the files on the hush money Jackson paid boys.<br />Lawyer Maryann R. Marzano is hoping the FBI will turn over boxes of information on the allegations and wants to contact other victims, cops, Neverland staff, and *investigators.<br />Choreographer Wade claims he was molested over seven years. A source close to him said: “He feels this could become a key part of his case, that he is not the only child who may have suffered at Jackson’s hands.”<br />Jackson’s estate says Robson’s allegations are “completely false, outrageous and sad”.<br />http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/jackson-child-abuse-probe-halted-2033688<br /><br />Boy this MFs keep trying :icon_evil: :images: .<br />What's the Sunday People up to for next week? An interview with Terry George? More about Terry George :icon_rolleyes:.Right, how do you "order" pedophile magazines? :icon_lol: :icon_rolleyes: And is this costume designer in the child porn business? I mean, the fuck?<br />I'm guessing this goes back to Baressi's exclusive with them, as how and why would the FBI release docs like that to them and nobody else?<br />I'll also assume it's going to be something butchered like how they chose to relay the Mexican boys story, as though the FBI said it, and not some crazy person who'd turn out to be Victor Gutierrez.<br />
so are we in possession of a link to these fbi pages? it would be nice to be able to post this on facebook pages and twitters. people have this stuff shoved in their faces as they wait in line at groceries. would be nice to help them to be able to see for themselves this stuff for what it is.
Comments