Prince and Paris choke up
<!-- m -->http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/20 ... test=faces<!-- m -->
I don't know what to make of this. I did not see them choke up to me they looked nervous after all they were on stage in front of how many people I would be nervous to
I don't know what to make of this. I did not see them choke up to me they looked nervous after all they were on stage in front of how many people I would be nervous to
Comments
Look the transcription...
"We would also like to thank the fans. Our father loved you so much because you were always there for him."
Did he really said that?
I don´t think so.
He did say that.. he always said he loved his fans because they always supported him and loved him.
I mean I hear:
"We would also like to thank the fans. Our father loves? you so much because you are (clearly) always there for him."
But not sure.
What do you hear?
Oh sorry.. i misunderstood you. <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D -->
I watched it here: <!-- m -->http://www.tmz.com/videos?autoplay=true ... f31e4a48e4<!-- m -->
I hear "loved" in the past tense.. <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
He said:
" We would also like to thank your f..the fans. Our father loved you so much because You ARE always there for him"
I can clearly hear him say " you ARE"
yes, right. But I don't know. Is it grammatically right if you say first "loved" in the past and then "are" in the present?
Or could this mean something? (maybe a slip up, because he was so nervous??)
I guess it is grammatically right because he would be saying:
Dad "loved" his fans.
His fans "are" always there.
It doesn´t seem a clue that way.
Only if Michael is alive, this is not a clue, but a message, saying he knows we are here and has always loved us.
I can say I always loved you (meaning I have always loved you) and still be alive, and still loving you. That is the same every time some of them say "Michael used to... has always done this or that... My father´s message has always been..." Ok and it can still be <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
And, yes, they were really nervous, that´s normal, no?
Thanks for explaining this <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) --> That really helped me.
And yes of course it's normal to be that nervous <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
i think that just proves that pp should not judge. the children seem to be great kids, mike and his family and friends did a good job. he obviously made the right decisions for them and its totally understandable why he wanted to spend so much time with his babies, they are a credit to themselves and to their family.
but i do think they now need to get back to being kids and not being centre stage
but if we look at Paris little speach... maybe this was not what she meant to say or maybe she messed up the order she was going to say it... but anyway...
she said:
Dad...daddy was suppose to be here...daddy was gonna perform this year, but he couldn't.....performe last year.....thank you.....we love you daddy!
ok.... the big part in this is. " daddy was gonna performe this year, but he couldn't"
Q= why couldnt he? (well some would say because he is dead) but look at this some more. why coudlnt he performe... i get he was not fysically able to, as for the same reason he could not do the O2 gigs and why he staged his death. So the big Q is then: what was wrong with mj??