CNN Topic on Autopsy Report
MeandMyShadow
Posts: 385
Here is the link to CNN news article in regards to autopsy report.
<!-- m -->http://edition.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/02/09 ... n.autopsy/<!-- m -->
Look at what they supposedly used to identify it as really MJ's body.
Coroner investigators first examined Jackson's body at UCLA Medical Center less than three hours after he was pronounced dead. They used the picture on his California driver's license to confirm it was the singer.
I am not in the medical field, or anything like that, but doesn't it seem odd to confirm it was him by a picture on a drivers license? Seems like dental records or something along that line would be used, not just a picture.
<!-- m -->http://edition.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/02/09 ... n.autopsy/<!-- m -->
Look at what they supposedly used to identify it as really MJ's body.
Coroner investigators first examined Jackson's body at UCLA Medical Center less than three hours after he was pronounced dead. They used the picture on his California driver's license to confirm it was the singer.
I am not in the medical field, or anything like that, but doesn't it seem odd to confirm it was him by a picture on a drivers license? Seems like dental records or something along that line would be used, not just a picture.
Comments
Yes, this is quite odd because generally if the identity was unknown a family member would make the identification. If that was impossible (due to trauma/injury) to do, they would use dental records.
I think that a family member would have confirm that it was MJ, or dental record, or even a DNA test. This statement made on the autopsy report that I read last night was a real tip off that something with the report is not right. Smelly very fishy to me. Thank you for very informative post. God bless you,MeandMyShadow! I so appreciate everyone's contributions and research on the site. I know that we will find the truth together! God bless everyone here!
Something like that was discussed here...
White Orchid made a great job in this post.
<!-- l -->viewtopic.php?f=48&t=5275<!-- l -->
I know he is a regular human being like everybody else, but I just can't picture a major celeb carrying around a wallet with the regular stuff, such as a license.
My husband seems to think that maybe they used the i.d. initially, but used finger prints or a family member came and identified him later, and they just didn't elaborate on it in the news article.
Still ... makes me wonder.