That site has been around for a while..It seems that the owner has put in an offer to buy MJHD...They seem to be very aggressive in the way the write...They are a bit too hostile for me..
That site has been around for a while..It seems that the owner has put in an offer to buy MJHD...They seem to be very aggressive in the way the write...They are a bit too hostile for me..
<!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: -->
i'll read it better..but i what i wanna get are the informations
Wow... just read that first blog about Amy and her other forum.. I am flabbergasted and might need a little more time to consume the rest of the blog.. <!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: --> Really?? Is that for real??
I wouldn't take any of that mess as gospel. This is clearly a blogger scorned. There's a whole lot of judgment and a whole lot of unforgiveness going on there and I'm staying out of it. Yeesh <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
I'm reading this now..well, not right now as I am typing LOL. but all I can say is ..huh? This is a lot to take in and I must now get another pot of coffee on to help my sleepy mind digest it all. BTW off topic..Gevalia's Blueberry Cream coffee rocks <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D --> Sorry for going off topic..
That blog has been around for a while. In fact I'm going to go out on a limb and say this is the person Amy was referring to when she kept mentioning her info being released. The person, from what I've read, is/was a member of MJHD. They clearly stated that they were a member but they voiced their own opinions on how MJHD was ran by the Admin and the others on their own separate blog. I noticed they said they didn't discuss it in the forums itself. They even posted a topic where they said they were one of the many members who offered their IT help with the whole "database being corrupt and lost" thing.
Although they are very hostile in their wording I don't think they were scorned so much as they actually were upset at the fact the forum (MJHD) made money of of Michael Jackson's "death." I do remember when I found MJHD back in July reading the who we are link and it stated that they were not a MJ fan rather they wanted to know the truth about what happened 6/25/09.
As far as the Diaper Fetish thing goes I appalled but people have their like, dislikes, and fetishes but that is not for me. I can't believe I even clicked on it in the first place. I was confused on what the people were writing about but the pic should have said it all!! SMH. Not sure if that is the same Amy but the blogger seems to believe it is. To each his own I guess.
What mjfanforever said is accurate. The MJHDConspiracy blogger was an active member of all versions of MJHD and probably participates in other similar forums, too.
I'm not convinced the diaper-fetish Amy is the MJHD Admin Amy, though, just like I'm not convinced the second Amy is actually the person responsible for MJHD and all of the site's fiascos.
Personally, I think MJHD was intentionally set up to play mind games with members while gathering as much of their hard-earned investigative information as possible. Too bad, we'll probably never know for sure, at least until the book with everyone else's research comes out.
What bothers me is the school yard bully tactics. So you know how to use the F word and call people all kinds of stupid. Does that actually mean you're right and another person is wrong. Does ability to form the F word excuse you from having to research and form good sentences in debate? Or is it trying to use braun over brain. Sometimes I get the f eeling people who are cursing up and down over another's stupidity are actually scared they might be wrong and it's their only defense. It's related to the media, who use their massive power to persuade the majority that something is true when their story is a bold-faced lie. What does it take for most people to believe something, is it that it has to be in print, on TV, an authoritative person stating it, making the source of information appear stupid, what does it take? Do we take all our gospel truth now from foul-mouthed bloggers, our trustworthy dispensers of wisdom and understanding?
That site has been around for a while..It seems that the owner has put in an offer to buy MJHD...They seem to be very aggressive in the way the write...They are a bit too hostile for me..
There are not as hostile as me <!-- s --><!-- s --> Wendy, do you really like me? <!-- s:?: -->:?:<!-- s:?: -->
Comments
mhm?
i cant undestand you..
i mean..it doest explain everithing..but it shows MJHD cache on june 23nd
<!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: -->
i'll read it better..but i what i wanna get are the informations
I wouldn't take any of that mess as gospel. This is clearly a blogger scorned. There's a whole lot of judgment and a whole lot of unforgiveness going on there and I'm staying out of it. Yeesh <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
Although they are very hostile in their wording I don't think they were scorned so much as they actually were upset at the fact the forum (MJHD) made money of of Michael Jackson's "death." I do remember when I found MJHD back in July reading the who we are link and it stated that they were not a MJ fan rather they wanted to know the truth about what happened 6/25/09.
As far as the Diaper Fetish thing goes I appalled but people have their like, dislikes, and fetishes but that is not for me. I can't believe I even clicked on it in the first place. I was confused on what the people were writing about but the pic should have said it all!! SMH. Not sure if that is the same Amy but the blogger seems to believe it is. To each his own I guess.
I'm not convinced the diaper-fetish Amy is the MJHD Admin Amy, though, just like I'm not convinced the second Amy is actually the person responsible for MJHD and all of the site's fiascos.
Personally, I think MJHD was intentionally set up to play mind games with members while gathering as much of their hard-earned investigative information as possible. Too bad, we'll probably never know for sure, at least until the book with everyone else's research comes out.
There are not as hostile as me <!-- s