Jackson Kids: No Supervision, Says Source
adventureland
Posts: 104
By: Roger Friedman // Wednesday March 3, 2010
It’s no surprise to some insiders that Michael Jackson’s kids are being investigated by the Los Angeles Department of Family Services.
Remember the YouTube video I showed you a couple months ago? It showed the Jackson kids romping around a luxurious suite at the Palms Hotel in Las Vegas on Thanksgiving.
Sources tell me that this latest adventure at Katherine Jackson’s Encino home is no surprise. Mrs. Jackson’s lawyer, Adam Streisand, has issued several denials. But TMZ reported that Jermaine Jackson’s son, 13-year-old Jaafar, ordered a pair of stun guns online. One of the guns may have been used on Blanket, Prince Michael II, and Prince, aka Michael Jackson Jr.
What I’m told is that Michael’s kids have little to no supervision. Nanny Grace Rwaramba is not living at the Hayvenhurst Avenue home, but making occasional appearances. Katherine Jackson, who’s 80, is simply not up to the task of watching all the kids who’ve been dumped in her home.
“Randy Jackson and Jermaine Jackson’s kids are running wild in the house,” says a source.
Indeed, Michael’s kids are now photographed with bodyguards or cousins their own age. But they are suffering, my sources say, from not having any parental figure.
Over Christmas and New Year’s, the kids spent the holiday with a New Jersey family whom Michael befriended years ago. That family has been the closest thing to normal for the Jackson kids.
“Paris especially needs a mother figure,” says a source. Many thought that Janet Jackson or her sister Rebbie would step up and take responsibilty for the kids. But so far that hasn’t happened. Janet, they say, is busy with her career. Rebbie has her own family. And with no Jacksons but Katherine left anything in Michael’s will, it’s unlikely that anyone in the extended family has an interest in dealing with Michael’s kids.
<!-- m -->http://showbiz411.blogs.thr.com/2010/03 ... #more-6088<!-- m -->
It’s no surprise to some insiders that Michael Jackson’s kids are being investigated by the Los Angeles Department of Family Services.
Remember the YouTube video I showed you a couple months ago? It showed the Jackson kids romping around a luxurious suite at the Palms Hotel in Las Vegas on Thanksgiving.
Sources tell me that this latest adventure at Katherine Jackson’s Encino home is no surprise. Mrs. Jackson’s lawyer, Adam Streisand, has issued several denials. But TMZ reported that Jermaine Jackson’s son, 13-year-old Jaafar, ordered a pair of stun guns online. One of the guns may have been used on Blanket, Prince Michael II, and Prince, aka Michael Jackson Jr.
What I’m told is that Michael’s kids have little to no supervision. Nanny Grace Rwaramba is not living at the Hayvenhurst Avenue home, but making occasional appearances. Katherine Jackson, who’s 80, is simply not up to the task of watching all the kids who’ve been dumped in her home.
“Randy Jackson and Jermaine Jackson’s kids are running wild in the house,” says a source.
Indeed, Michael’s kids are now photographed with bodyguards or cousins their own age. But they are suffering, my sources say, from not having any parental figure.
Over Christmas and New Year’s, the kids spent the holiday with a New Jersey family whom Michael befriended years ago. That family has been the closest thing to normal for the Jackson kids.
“Paris especially needs a mother figure,” says a source. Many thought that Janet Jackson or her sister Rebbie would step up and take responsibilty for the kids. But so far that hasn’t happened. Janet, they say, is busy with her career. Rebbie has her own family. And with no Jacksons but Katherine left anything in Michael’s will, it’s unlikely that anyone in the extended family has an interest in dealing with Michael’s kids.
<!-- m -->http://showbiz411.blogs.thr.com/2010/03 ... #more-6088<!-- m -->
Comments
For the most part, MOST of the Jacksons children/grandchildren have remained out of tabloid news and scandalous stories during their lives (not talking about the brothers & sisters but their kids). They seem like well adjusted children & young adults. Only a small number have had trouble with the law, but that is very little.
Look at the state of Hollywoods young tweens and starlets! You don't see that with the Jackson Offspring. They ain't boozy, druggie, party animal kids!!!! A 13 year old boy did a stupid thing like many 13 year old boys do, and now the Jacksons become unfit parents/carers. Give me a freakin break!!!
Once again the Jackson Family become fair game for media. This makes me sick.
If thats true.. and i actually feel it is with all the other Jackson jetting around the World and making a living off Michaels name.. i hope and pray that when those kids grow up and inherit it all, then they turn around and stick two big fingers up to the rest of the family and tell them where to stick it!
YOU WISH THEY'LL GET IT ALL BUT NO! IF YOU THINK YOU KNOW MICHAEL THEN YOU AIN'T SEEN NOTHING YET.
LIKE MICHAEL IS GOING TO WRITE A WILL AND LEAVE HIS WHOLE FAMILY OUT.
YOU JUST PUT YOUR FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH.
CAUSE THIS ENTIRE WILL IS FAKE AND WAS WRITTEN FOR A REASON.
I'm trying to say now he's still a little boy but when he becomes older he probably would want to know who his mother is. I hope someone in that family knows the answer to that one (if MJ really is gone). A mother is very important for a child. I really feel sorry for Blanket not knowing his mother and seeing her sometimes. A father can't replace a mother and vice versa. I feel it with my children when I'm at work at night they sometimes cry and say they miss me to their father...but when their father is at work they never say such things about him, although they also love him. If you understand what I'm trying to say.
I did say "if this is true".... <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
The very same one who makes a living out of dissing MJ
Remember him during the trial??? He came up with BS every single day... he s worth nothing more than Diane Dimond and the other blonde witch (forgot her name)
Back then, roger friedman was king of "sources". He never gives a name to prove his facts. Looks like he didn't get better with the years
That makes no sense. Grace would not have custody of the children... she is not a relative or named in the will.
The will is valid for custody as long as the current custodian still has rights or the current forfeits that rights voluntarily. Diana Ross will not raise these kids. IF DCFS gain legal guardianship of the children, will or not, they determine where the kids go. Not the family, not Grace and definitely not Michael.
Relative or not, the children could very well end up with Grace since she has a long standing relationship with them. If the family (any family member) is not found as suitable to care for the children, then they do seek a placement with people the children have an existing relationship. The children to some degree will have a say, but ultimately the decision rests with DCF.
I don't think they will take the kids away from Katherine. I don't think there is evidence enough that the kids are not being cared for.