Alleged Murray interview

paula-cpaula-c Posts: 7,221
edited January 1970 in News
Make the title "claimed" that the journalist who published it said that was almost 2 hours with Murray, and what it publishes is a narrative, I would say it has nothing to do with an actual interview. If I were a journalist and I have the opportunity to interview Murray, rest assured it would not publish a thing. <!-- s8-) -->8-)<!-- s8-) -->


This is the link:

<!-- m -->http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and- ... pegoat-me/<!-- m -->

Comments

  • Dr Murray insists he isnt "money orientated".. pffff <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: -->
  • MURRAY IS A SCAPEGOAT N THERE IS NO DOUBT IT..... INSTEAD OF PROVING HIS INNOCENCE N GOING TROUGH ROUGH TIMES CANT HE SAY THAT THIS IS A HOAX N MJ IS ALIVE.
  • Make the title "claimed" that the journalist who published it said that was almost 2 hours with Murray, and what it publishes is a narrative, I would say it has nothing to do with an actual interview. If I were a journalist and I have the opportunity to interview Murray, rest assured it would not publish a thing


    well it is an interview, only not presented on the question-answer form. Writing it that way gives him opportunity to describe the person, the place and add personal comments. Maybe he chose that narrative form also cause the answers of murray werent that interesting...

    But it s dated from 19th august...anyway thx for sharing, didnt see it b4
  • Make the title "claimed" that the journalist who published it said that was almost 2 hours with Murray, and what it publishes is a narrative, I would say it has nothing to do with an actual interview. If I were a journalist and I have the opportunity to interview Murray, rest assured it would not publish a thing. <!-- s8-) -->8-)<!-- s8-) -->


    This is the link:

    <!-- m -->http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and- ... pegoat-me/<!-- m -->

    If you were a journalist and had an opportunity to interview Murray and then you chose not to publish it.. you wouldnt be a very good journalist. <!-- s:lol: -->:lol:<!-- s:lol: -->
  • paula-cpaula-c Posts: 7,221
    DancingTheDream No, I mean that in 2 hours they said the journalist who was with Murray, I instead published an interview with many questions and answers. <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
  • mjssoulmatemjssoulmate Posts: 820
    Horrible attempt at making Murray look "human". Why on earth would his attorney allow any interview at all? Only interesting quote: "The press is mostly interested in bad news and gossip".
  • DancingTheDream No, I mean that in 2 hours they said the journalist who was with Murray, I instead published an interview with many questions and answers. <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->

    Ah ok.. i understand now ((hugs))
  • QuirkyDianaQuirkyDiana Posts: 386
    I saw this interview ages ago and used a comment from the bottom of the article that an anaesthetist wrote. All i have to say is that everyone knows Murray has lied already! It doesn't matter if his account to police turns out to be true (although we know he is confused about the timeline of events), he lied to paramedics and medical staff - that is a red flag. Here he is trying to lie again. Amazing.
Sign In or Register to comment.