TMZ article, was 7 now 6?

BoreasBoreas Posts: 119
edited January 1970 in News
in this post by TMZ: <!-- m -->http://www.tmz.com/2010/04/12/michael-j ... urt-wacky/<!-- m -->

they originally said 7 claims rejected, but now they edited it to 6 claims?....any thoughts on if they did that on purpose? or noted a mistake?

I read it the day it came out, and they said 7 and I remember it....there is proof in the comments, anyone else here read it and remember it being 7?

Comments

  • Yes, I remember very well that there were 7 on the 12th of April, now 6. Of course I remember because of this famous number 7 that is everywhere since the 25th of June. We should print it as a proof. And ask TMZ why they have changed it suddenly.
  • 2good2btrue2good2btrue Posts: 4,210
    Maybe because one claim, was "not so wacky" after all. <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D --> <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D --> <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D --> Our mission is to find out which one <!-- s:!: -->:!:<!-- s:!: --> <!-- s:!: -->:!:<!-- s:!: --> <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) --> <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) --> <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) --> <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) --> <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) --> As always, with L.O.V.E xox
  • Hm. <!-- s8-) -->8-)<!-- s8-) -->
Sign In or Register to comment.