19 aliases/"drug-shopping"/Freaky invention to ...
MJ_Facts
Posts: 183
... support the theory of the so called freak who went drug shopping.
If this has already been discussed please apologize … but up to now I could not find a thread where we discussed the so called “aliases”:
Josephine Baker, Paul Farance, Bryan Singleton, Jimmy Nicholas, Blanca Nicholas, Roselyn Muhammad, Faheem Muhammad, Frank Tyson, Fernand Diaz, Peter Madonie, Kai Chase, Michael Armstrong, Jack London, Peter Midani and his personal favorite, Omar Arnold. The name of the late singer’s son Prince was also listed.
<!-- m -->http://www.buzzpatrol.com/2009/07/29/mi ... ore-drugs/<!-- m -->
1. Did Michael really use these names to score “drugs”?
2. If yes, why were there no huge amounts of drugs found in this system (which drugs did he get from Arnie for example? Besides they said that there were huge amounts (a whole bag full of prescription drugs) found in his home.
3. Does it even make sense using names of dead persons like Josephine Baker? Wouldn’t that be too obvious if someone would check the doctor’s documents?
IMO this has been invented by someone else.
It is
a) just another tabloid story in order to convince the public of the so-called “freak”
b) like a story made up by the LAPD in order to make the whole drug story believable: a) for the media and b) for the majority of the public. I imagine them thinking “Ok the public and the media consider him a freak so we need some freakish “evidence” to prove his drug dependency”
I personally cannot imagine and refuse to accept or even think for one minute that Michael would have chosen these ridiculous names including the name of his own son!
A man who always protected his children uses their names in order to score drugs?
c) The media (and the LAPD?) said the did “drug shopping”. So why did we never heard about the other “millions” of docs (names!) who provided him with drugs? Who are they or have they never existed at all?
The whole alias story doesn’t make for me.
What do you think?
If this has already been discussed please apologize … but up to now I could not find a thread where we discussed the so called “aliases”:
Josephine Baker, Paul Farance, Bryan Singleton, Jimmy Nicholas, Blanca Nicholas, Roselyn Muhammad, Faheem Muhammad, Frank Tyson, Fernand Diaz, Peter Madonie, Kai Chase, Michael Armstrong, Jack London, Peter Midani and his personal favorite, Omar Arnold. The name of the late singer’s son Prince was also listed.
<!-- m -->http://www.buzzpatrol.com/2009/07/29/mi ... ore-drugs/<!-- m -->
1. Did Michael really use these names to score “drugs”?
2. If yes, why were there no huge amounts of drugs found in this system (which drugs did he get from Arnie for example? Besides they said that there were huge amounts (a whole bag full of prescription drugs) found in his home.
3. Does it even make sense using names of dead persons like Josephine Baker? Wouldn’t that be too obvious if someone would check the doctor’s documents?
IMO this has been invented by someone else.
It is
a) just another tabloid story in order to convince the public of the so-called “freak”
b) like a story made up by the LAPD in order to make the whole drug story believable: a) for the media and b) for the majority of the public. I imagine them thinking “Ok the public and the media consider him a freak so we need some freakish “evidence” to prove his drug dependency”
I personally cannot imagine and refuse to accept or even think for one minute that Michael would have chosen these ridiculous names including the name of his own son!
A man who always protected his children uses their names in order to score drugs?
c) The media (and the LAPD?) said the did “drug shopping”. So why did we never heard about the other “millions” of docs (names!) who provided him with drugs? Who are they or have they never existed at all?
The whole alias story doesn’t make for me.
What do you think?
Comments
P.S. Actually, never mind...because those photos are from 2003 Neverland raid, when DA searched for evedence.
I don't think that photos of prescriptions from June 2009 search are made public yet. We just have to wait if they'll realise them to the public.
<!-- m -->http://photos.tmz.com/galleries/michael ... ost_recent<!-- m -->
Look again, they are creating the illusion that Michael took multiple drugs, thus supporting the "drug addict" theory. He was not.
Yep. I saw that too. The extent these people go to.. <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: -->
Yeah I know! The drug story I think was originally created by the media however it has served it's purpose in the hoax. The world in general found Michael dying of drugs as almost an expected thing. Whatever they used to create this sensationalism, Michael (in my opinion) has now used it to his advantage. People believe he's dead and his "supposed" need for drugs did it.