Fingerprints?
Bee Bee
Posts: 391
As we know, they supposedly used Michael's driver's license to identify the corpse. It is clearly stated in the autopsy report that this was the identification method...
There's also a part on the first page that says "Fingerprints? Yes", and I was just wondering if somebody knows what that means. They probably fingerprinted the corpse. Is that it? Or does it mean fingerprints were compared to other existing fingerprints? Or does it mean that they already had fingerprints of the deceased person? I don't know, and I don't know if this has already been discussed. I couldn't find anything about it. But if they compared fingerprints, then wouldn't this have been mentioned in the report? Wouldn't it be mentioned under ID method, after all, it's a little more reliable than checking someone's driver's license...
There's also a part on the first page that says "Fingerprints? Yes", and I was just wondering if somebody knows what that means. They probably fingerprinted the corpse. Is that it? Or does it mean fingerprints were compared to other existing fingerprints? Or does it mean that they already had fingerprints of the deceased person? I don't know, and I don't know if this has already been discussed. I couldn't find anything about it. But if they compared fingerprints, then wouldn't this have been mentioned in the report? Wouldn't it be mentioned under ID method, after all, it's a little more reliable than checking someone's driver's license...
Comments
So, I'm really in the dark when it comes to this. I'd like to know what it means.