Sorry it might be a dumb question, but reports of whose death? <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
The original is : Reports of my death - By Howard Swains |17 June 2009 |Categories: Culture
But the question is, why reprint the old article?
What is the reason?
Remind people about something (or someone), or what?
I think this is connected with Michael ....
I see a direct analogy with his "death"...
And take a look at the interesting comments below the article....
I think they meant for us to read the entire article:
It comes from THE DEATH BLOGGERS <!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: --> "In two investigations between 2007 and 2009, I encountered countless examples of fake deaths in all corners of the online world. "
Interesting article: <!-- m -->http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/200 ... death.aspx<!-- m -->
Why would they put this on LKL Blog... <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: -->
Sorry it might be a dumb question, but reports of whose death? <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
The original is : Reports of my death - By Howard Swains |17 June 2009 |Categories: Culture
But the question is, why reprint the old article?
What is the reason?
Remind people about something (or someone), or what?
I think this is connected with Michael ....
I see a direct analogy with his "death"...
And take a look at the interesting comments below the article....
Hmm well, it's difinitely not a coincidence anymore IMO. <!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: -->
Reading the other blogs on LKL, there is one on the doctor in the Anna Nicole case that the judge won't suspend his licence.......I'm not familiar with her case but there were things discussed on the forum about similaraties on what happened.
hah, kinda OT but it's funny because i went to the livejournal community this article refers to and I saw someone from a MJ community faking their death. Her name was Wendy.
I'm not really familiar with the LKL blog.
CNN/Larry posted this 5 months old article as a blog post? Who chooses what to post?
That's very interesting.
The comments show, that either only beLIEvers read he LKL blog, or that most people think that Michael is still alive.
Nice one <!-- s:-) -->:-)<!-- s:-) -->
Invincible7
Posts: 62
Comments
But the question is, why reprint the old article?
What is the reason?
Remind people about something (or someone), or what?
I think this is connected with Michael ....
I see a direct analogy with his "death"...
And take a look at the interesting comments below the article....
It comes from THE DEATH BLOGGERS <!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: --> "In two investigations between 2007 and 2009, I encountered countless examples of fake deaths in all corners of the online world. "
Interesting article: <!-- m -->http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/200 ... death.aspx<!-- m -->
Why would they put this on LKL Blog... <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: -->
Hmm well, it's difinitely not a coincidence anymore IMO. <!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: -->
"Please Michael, don't take her to Neverland yet"
CNN/Larry posted this 5 months old article as a blog post? Who chooses what to post?
That's very interesting.
The comments show, that either only beLIEvers read he LKL blog, or that most people think that Michael is still alive.
Nice one <!-- s:-) -->:-)<!-- s:-) -->