This is to show you what a crook Branca is!!
2good2btrue
Posts: 4,210
Things are really heating up now...Hopefully, the FAKE WILL will be exposed soon...and the corruption behind the scenes by the FAKE excutives....I know for a fact, this is unfolding as it should...even though these fans are fighting for Justice and believe MJ was murdered..
TeamMichael777
A mutual settlement has not been reached by Estate and HTWF. Branca is fully aware HTWF are NOT going to settle!! Estate have requested the court enforce the settlement, Hearing scheduled for mid June.. BUT WAIT, Meanwhile Branca has transferred the company entity HTWF out of Melissa Johnson's name???? Its obvious he has certain contacts in the right places!! AND Branca has also began to transfer trademarks out of MelJ name???
This is to show you what a crook Branca is!! Thug!!! HE WILL HAVE TO TRANSFER THESE BACK!! THIS IS CRIMINAL!!!! SEEMS BRANCA IS VERY CONFIDENT, AFTER ALL HE DID GET AWAY WITH THE FAKE WILL!!!
Whatever Branca did to Michael, WE do not have first hand accounts of, BUT THIS IS HAPPENING RIGHT BEFORE YOU EYES,,, C.O.R.R.U.P.T.I.O.N AT ITS BEST
<!-- m -->http://xltweet.com/show/?id=55565A5D53<!-- m -->
<!-- m -->http://twitter.com/#!/TeamMichael777<!-- m -->
TeamMichael777
A mutual settlement has not been reached by Estate and HTWF. Branca is fully aware HTWF are NOT going to settle!! Estate have requested the court enforce the settlement, Hearing scheduled for mid June.. BUT WAIT, Meanwhile Branca has transferred the company entity HTWF out of Melissa Johnson's name???? Its obvious he has certain contacts in the right places!! AND Branca has also began to transfer trademarks out of MelJ name???
This is to show you what a crook Branca is!! Thug!!! HE WILL HAVE TO TRANSFER THESE BACK!! THIS IS CRIMINAL!!!! SEEMS BRANCA IS VERY CONFIDENT, AFTER ALL HE DID GET AWAY WITH THE FAKE WILL!!!
Whatever Branca did to Michael, WE do not have first hand accounts of, BUT THIS IS HAPPENING RIGHT BEFORE YOU EYES,,, C.O.R.R.U.P.T.I.O.N AT ITS BEST
<!-- m -->http://xltweet.com/show/?id=55565A5D53<!-- m -->
<!-- m -->http://twitter.com/#!/TeamMichael777<!-- m -->
Comments
A lot has been said about the Cascio tracks. The truth is three of these tracks are on the "MICHAEL" album, released around December 10th, and 9 others could pop up on future albums. A lot has been said about who the singer is, with fans having taken a stance on who they think it is. Something we lack is background info on the controversy. Cartman, myself and a few others have been looking into this and we've come across something that hasn't been mentioned before and is definitely significant to this controversy.
We've all seen Eddie Cascio and Teddy Riley on Oprah. We've also seen a statement from Howard Weitzman in name of a lot of people. This statement is known to leave out certain information on certain subjects, like not mentioning that Cory Rooney and Taryll Jackson were also at the listening session and did not agree it was Michael singing. But there's one inconsistency that hasn't been mentioned. Let's take a look at two parts of this statement:
After the tracks were submitted to Sony, three of these Cascio songs were selected to be on the album, and “Breaking News” was one of the three. The day after the submission and selection of the album tracks, for the very first time, the authenticity of Michael’s vocals on the Cascio tracks was questioned.
Because of these questions, I was immediately asked by co-Executors John Branca and John McClain to conduct an investigation regarding the authenticity of the lead vocals on the Cascio tracks.
Just to be absolutely certain, I also contacted Jason Malachi, a young singer who some persons had wrongfully alleged was a “soundalike” singer that was hired to sing on the Cascio tracks, and I confirmed that he had no involvement with this project whatsoever.
These two statements are presented separated in the statement, when they should've been put together. You see, that last statement is intentionally vague when it comes to the word "persons". Is he talking about the fans after hearing the "Breaking News" stream or people from inside the Estate? I personally thought he always meant the fans, but let me tell you right here, right now: it means people inside the Estate. We have confirmation that the name "Jason Malachi" was connected with these tracks before the day "Breaking News" premiered.
When Jason Malachi's Facebook page was hacked to display a message saying he confessed, someone called Thaddeus Nauden denied it being posted by Jason. He is Jason's manager. He is the president of "Stage Recordings & Publishing, LLC" and is also Jason's manager. He also blogs. He likes to blog about things that would make him look cool, like being contacted by powerful or important people.
First, just so we're clear it's Nauden that's posting. The profile page:
<!-- m -->http://www.blogger.com/profile/10781089282365237302<!-- m -->
It clearly says "President of Stage Recordings & Publishing.", which is him. Then, here's one statement of his regarding Jason Malachi that should already raise some eyebrows, from November 22nd called "No statement needed.":
<!-- m -->[url=http://stagerecordingspublishing.blo...nt-needed.html]http://stagerecordingspublishing.blo...nt-needed.html[/url]<!-- m -->[url=http://stagerecordingspublishing.blo...hn-branca.html]http://stagerecordingspublishing.blo...hn-branca.html[/url]<!-- m -->
On that day, Jason Malachi's manager received a call from John Branca. Not Howard Weitzman as the statement above seems to claim, but John Branca, one of the two MJ Estate executors. At least 3 weeks before the release of "Breaking News", Jason Malachi was known as the possible singer of the Cascio tracks within the Estate. Some people think it's ridiculous to think Jason Malachi is on these songs, but the Estate had thought it themselves! The day after that, October 19th, he makes another post, called "Michael Jackson's Estate Part 2.":
<!-- m -->[url=http://stagerecordingspublishing.blo...te-part-2.htm]http://stagerecordingspublishing.blo...te-part-2.htm[/url]<!-- m -->http://www.showbiz411.com/2010/10/19...songs-in-limbo<!-- m -->
<!-- m -->http://www.maximum-jackson.com/discussi ... W-EVIDENCE<!-- m -->
You seem to be unsure if Michael is alive? What makes you say If Michael is alive? How about if ths is why Michael hoaxed his death so he can throw everyone in the garbage? Maybe he knew what they were doing and so he will put them all to jail.. so please Le papillon Bleu do not say IF.. thanks and blessings.
The Eliminatorhttp://www.showbiz411.com/2010/10/19...songs-in-limbo<!-- m -->
That album of Michael Jackson‘s unreleased material?
I’ll tell you what: it’s in limbo.
Later this week we may get a sharper picture of what’s going on. But this much I’ve surmised from talks with various sources.
The best material available really comes from those sessions with Eddie Cascio in New Jersey circa summer 2007. Some of the songs were already written by Eddie’s brother Frank Cascio and recorded as demos with a local singer named Bobby Ewing. Michael put his vocals on them during that time he stayed with the Cascios in New Jersey.
At first there was a lot of skepticism about the tracks. I’m told that co-executor John McClain questioned whether the vocals were really Michael’s, or faked. But they are Michael’s. And they will be needed to round out the selections.
Teddy Riley and a couple of other producers have worked to fix up the Cascio tracks for release.
McClain was also working on tracks. It’s unclear how these have gone. I’m told, not so well. Many of them are outtakes from “Invincible,” an album that wasn’t so good in the first place. And no one’s bothered to approach Michael’s engineer, Bruce Swedien, about tracks from “Thriller” or “Bad” he might have in his archives.
There’s truly confusion now in the inner circle about how to proceed. Sony is waiting for delivery but there’s no album art or concept.
As for a cover: I am told McClain commissioned one a la “Sgt. Pepper” with a montage of drawings or caricatures of people in Michael’s life whom he admired. Funny: several lawyers were jammed in among Martin Luther King and Marvin Gaye. McClain’s picture, sources say, was larger than most of the others.
Needless to say, that’s been scrapped.
The day after Jason Malachi's manager gets a call from the Estate, the very first article about the vocal controversy appears. The very first article mentioning John McClain, the other Estate executor, having doubts about the vocal tracks on the Cascio songs. Is this date a coincidence or did John McClain realise that it was Jason Malachi singing at this point in time? Jackie Jackson confirmed that he and John McClain wanted to have certain tracks removed from the album for weeks on November 9th, three weeks after this date:
<!-- m -->https://twitter.com/#!/JackieJackson5/s ... 4249017344<!-- m -->http://www.showbiz411.com/2010/11/04...nd-album-cover<!-- m -->
Michael Jackson: Deal For New Album Cut Late Last Night[url=http://stagerecordingspublishing.blo...l-jackson.htm]http://stagerecordingspublishing.blo...l-jackson.htm[/url]<!-- m -->
This “Breaking News”–also the title of the first single from Michael Jackson‘s new album, written and produced by Eddie Cascio.
Sony Music just sent out a cover picture for Michael Jackson‘s album — called “Michael”– set for December 14th.
Yesterday I was told there was no deal brokered yet between all the fractious parties in the Jackson camp. Co executor John McClain was still claiming that the vocals on some of the tracks weren’t Michael’s.
Sony seems to disagree. They’ve made their move.
MORE: The album will include at least four or five of the “Cascio” tracks, produced mostly by Teddy Riley, including the single. Apparently the estate settled all internal political issues, as outlined here first and exclusively (thanks TMZ for mucking around in our area).
The decision was made by all parties finally at 11pm last night.
And so it goes.
More to come, of course…
If Michael fired him, how comes Michael hired him again a few weeks before his death?
I have a strange feeling about John Branca. And he looks really old now in those pictures.
I wonder what's Branca's position regarding Michael's death and the hoax. The Estate has to be in the hoax. I can't imagine Michael left everything in their hands and they know nothing about the hoax.
Is it possible Branca to not be in the hoax?
They made money for Michael after death, they paid the creditors and so on.
I don't understand what happened to Michael's money from before TII, he lost his money or he "lost" his money to appear broke at the time of death?
ahhhhhhhh <!-- scrash/ -->crash/<!-- scrash/ --> <!-- scrash/ -->crash/<!-- scrash/ --> <!-- scrash/ -->crash/<!-- scrash/ -->
Ok guys, let's clear things up forever. Wasn't there a theory that Michael did know what he was doing by hiring back Branca 2 weeks before his "death"? So, now there is controversial theory against first theory. What happened to the first one?
If the will was fake, why Jacksons have started to challenge it, then they stopped and withdraw complaint filed to the court?Do you really believe if will is fake, made up by Branca or whoever tried to kill Michael, Jacksons would calm down and let it go? I don't think so. What I think is Michael did know that Branca would run his business well and hired him back, put him in the will he drafted right before his "death", and now watching what and how he is running his estate until he returns or maybe not.
If you stick with new theory posted here, then it looks like you agree that Michael is dead and whoever killed him drafted fake will and lives happily fooling Jacksons and MJ. Again, I don't think so.
I want to understand what is the final theory about will and Branca.
It seems that the target (if there is one, or more) would need to be ignorant of the death hoax in order to feel free to show his or her true colors.
Sounds plausible.
Interesting thoughts. Branca could be a target. After all he dissapointed Michael when playing in 2 opposite teams at the same time.
I simply don’t believe that Branca was in on the hoax initially and Michael’s will was his claim to fame and had he turned over all of Michael’s important documents years ago, he would not even be in possession of it. Some what evident to me early on in the way he tried to handle Mrs. Jackson. <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: --> However, through some turn of events, I think Branca was probably clued in for his own sake and he is trying to make good of the situation before Michael returns and puts his ass on front street. This is surely not the concensus of the group, but that’s my feelings on it because as I said, I never trusted Branca or McClain. It’s a gut feeling.
…John Branca… <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: -->
I see 3 options with will:
1. Michael is alive, hired Branca before "death", put Branca involuntarily in the will to run his Estate while he is in hoax.
2. Michael is dead. Will is forged by killers and put Branca's name for pupose.
3. Michael is dead and the will is real, sritten by him.
Option 2 does not sound meaningful because Jacksons started challenge the will, then they gave up. Why?
An answer for WHY option 1 or 3 more appropriate. But since we know, that will itself has suspicious data, then option 1 is the one.
As for HOW Branca runs Michael's Estate, has nothing to do with whether MJ is dead or alive, will is legit or not. I think Branca may suspect that Michael is not dead.
To me, Branca runs MJ's estate very well.
So who is telling the truth.
There are TWO WILLS...from what I read.
If Branca was doing no good, of course MJ would have hired him back before his death. Its a set up in my opinion.
Catch them in the act...
Watch this video ... posted earlier......Comment from Joe about Branca in Cannes and saying that Dieter Wiesner IS the manager of Michael ... <!-- m -->http://www.twitvid.com/H7NO4mac5k<!-- m -->
To me the MichaelTeam777 is non-believer. Thus, they interpret facts from that perspective, that is, MJ is dead and it was set up, will is not legit, etc, etc. ? THERE WILL NEVER BE CLEAR BLACK OR WHITE STORY ever, ESPECIALLY in MICHAEL'S.The source of info is the problem. MEDIA is a controvesring source of lot's of bullshit & not 100% trustworthy. DO NOT BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU READ, REMEMBER? But one thing is clear, if Michael is alive, then option 1 I said above is the one. Otherwise, Michael is dead. If it is set up and MJ did not hire back Branca, then MJ was killed, will was drafted by killer and put in his house. I don't see another explanation. What is the confusion here? If Michael is alive or not, or will is legit or not? I think either way will is not real; if this is a hoax, then will drafted by Michael & it's not real; if Michael is dead, then will drafted by murderer and will is not valid.
I don't remember 2 wills, only one that has a compromising wrong signed date. Jacksons were fighting that Michael was in New York he could not sign the will that day.But then they stopped talking and fighting about that. Why?
I don't see you unsure he is alive, i see you just asking yourself. A very logical question. An opinion to it- maybe Michael simply escaped without directing further all things. See "Michael" album story and how the kids clearly stated it was not "daddy's voice". I am sure the kids had not reason to lie, but to stand for their father's truth. Yet, we all heard the album. So maybe he can't pull all strings as we imagine. Probably this "hero" image distorts many of our assumptions. Or not.
How can we ask people here what not to say? It's inappropriate and disregarding to each person's freedom of BEING.
heart I agree with you.
Why is it forbiden to express one's honest opinion?
Its normal behaviour considering we are speculating with mis-information, and media attention.
Only MJ knows the truth.
We see things the way they are, and not all human beings are forgiving. If MJ comes back and the fans have paid alot of money for these books etc, are they going to get angry and request their money back?? Or is this MJ's way of helping the family or compensating them, for participating in the hoax??? They get their careers back, with him out the way. And make money doing it.
I don't believe Michael would do anything so drastic like this, unless he didn't have a choice. !!!
<!-- l -->viewtopic.php?f=253&t=3945&hilit=trash+cans#p61018<!-- l -->
I’m trying to connect dots now: remember Latoya saying: “just follow the money trail”
[youtube:1v790rmj]
<!-- m -->http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0_TpI5W00A<!-- m -->
Katherine Jackson hired a new lawyer Perry Sanders. I think he’s also hired to put money trails under the microscope. He’s a sort of investigator as well, I suppose. May be to collect "garbage".
<!-- l -->viewtopic.php?f=172&t=18748#p323705<!-- l -->
Some things are puzzling me in this case. Why is TMZ, possibly hoax connected, posting bits and pieces of news about The Estate frequently, as if they give us intentionally pieces of a puzzle? There are contradicting motives.
Is it because they expect us to investigate, searching for the truth and bring it out in the open as “speculations” though make people think? If so, why would TMZ do this, because if “the garbage” would know about the speculations that they are under suspicion. TMZ news and our investigation might be obstructive to the hoax, because the “garbage” can’t be catched in the act so to speak. Of course there must be a reason for it, though I can’t figure it out at the moment. Hoax wise I hope things are developing according to plan and that the truth will prevail. Quote 2good2btrue: “Only MJ knows the truth.”.