Defense is helping Michael more then we think ( Fleak)
Mish1981
Posts: 538
Right now in court Fleak (Coroners Investigator) is on the stand and the Defense (Ed) is cross examining her. So far these are the things that just aren't adding up (thanks to the help from everyone in the chat right now /bravo/): <br /><br />-She has said that she destroys her original notes after she makes her report. Why? Ed asked her why her response "I always destroy them after I write the report". Ed then asked her (along the lines of) - "Is your report correct"? Her response "It was at the time".... What professional does this? <br />-She moved evidence prior to taking photos of their original placement? <br />-Finger (thumb) print is found on the syringe on the table? How is that possible if she was wearing gloves? Oh that's right at some point and time she took them off for one reason or another she can't remember. <br />- Ed asked her if she remembered having a particular conversation with him at the Coroners office, she can't remember Flanagan being there along with another attorney but she can remember others being there. She also can't remember questions that we asked. Etc. BUT she can remember exactly where a propofol bottle was on the floor? Is that because maybe she put it there? Hmm who knows? <br />- Regarding what was said above: She corrected her notes after the said conversation with Ed and other attorneys regarding evidence. <br />-Ed showed her photos that the DA had showed her yesterday, then showed her another photo of the same scene with objects moved, of course she can't remember if she took the photo or if it was the LAPD Investigator. <br />- She was on the ball yesterday when the DA asked her questions regarding photos and evidence. Today, well not so much. Of course she could go back to her notes if she had them. Again remember those were destroyed because "she does this with all of the cases". <br /><br />Here is how this helps Michael - <br /><br />As we know Murray is Michael at least metaphorically during this entire hoax. From the very beginning he has been playing his part of being the bad guy and the media has eaten it up like it was a sweet. Now, we also know that they did the same to Michael. Murray has claimed his innocence from day one (remember the youtube video: the troot will prevail). Furthermore as we all know and get sick over is the DA tried to convict Michael by any means necessary and we unsuccessful (of course), the DA is trying to do the same to Murray now. Do I agree with their claim that Michael did it? No but I'll explain why I think they are in a different post. <br /><br />With the DA putting out all of this evidence it looks damning against Murray. It puts a sour image in everyones's mind. The same way the DA did with Michael. What the DA is doing now is with Fleak is proving that the prosecution is able to paint a picture any way they want and present evidence to their needs and liking. It is also proving that the "experts" aren't as professional as they are suppose to be. Of course this all helps out with the 'hoax/sting' debate. The sting in this court is becoming clearer as each witness comes to the stand and proves that what we hear at first is not what it really is and because we have been watching everything in intricate details for the past two years we are noticing. <br /><br />*I will probably add more as her testimony continues. <br />**If I have missed anything PLEASE add!
Comments