Oh and even if Dr. Brown was on the list of witnesses, it was NOWHERE, NEVER mentioned that his testimony was gonna focus on PROPOFOL.<br /><br />But Front knew! [his magic 8ball actually :icon_geek: MOO :icon_lol:]<br /><br /> :icon_e_biggrin:<br /><br /><br /><br />
<br />LOL, I had been wondering for a while about the 'Mr Brown can moo' tweet. Moo = cow speak. Cows make milk, propofol was MJ's "milk". Dr Brown is a propofol expert, knows the "milk" speak (can 'moo') better than anyone. That help Snoopy?
<br />Susie, I agree Front's statement about absurdity def also alludes to MJ having the time for twitter. :beerchug:<br /><br />I would like to give what for me personally is one great proof Front is MJ.<br />Hoaxbook is down, and unfortunately I only tweeted the link to my careful collecting of several of Front's poetry there & on the forum, RWE poetry, and the Bookseller's story.<br /><br />Anyway, I accidently happened upon this story from a bookseller who attended a booksellers convention, and discussion of MJ at a table.<br />MJ apparently visited many bookstores in the LA vicinity mostly at night. This person said in a chat with MJ that his favorite poet was Ralph Waldo Emerson. So I looked up a little on his poetry, and realized many of Front's poetry had a VERY similar ring to them, more than coincidental. So I put out the comparisons and asked Front if he also loved RWE, and told him I was so glad he could just be himself with all his love for poetry & lit. But because people were still having trouble getting on Hoaxbook, I tweeted the link on my homepage. Front picked it up and rather shocked me with his response. Then later he tweeted 2 more bits of RWE poetry--I'm hoping was a subtle shoutout to me. :bowdown: :icon_lol: So for all your doubters out there, what are the chances that a faker would know obscure details of who his favorite poet was. I only came across this story while searching for other details unrelated. There are literally thousands of obscure little stories about people who once met MJ out there. For an impersonator or even an insider to include these kinds of details to his fakery would be astronomically impossible. So here's our exchange (sorry I can't show the poetry clips, but Front did read them before Hoaxbook went down for good). These plus thousands of other subtle nuances of Michaelisms show up in Front's posts, tweets, and between the lines--never mind his hoax forknowledge and connections to the family, etc, collected by Sarahli & Sim. I included Sim's tweet since I tweeted her asking her how I should read what Front answered me. :icon_lol:<br /><br />
<br /><br />You are awesone MJonline, I do remember those tweets but I didn't know what to make of them :icon_lol: thanks for clarifying, ah and of course that our Front is Michael no doubt of it :icon_geek:<br /><br />Ps: I have just tweeted Front one of RWE most famous quotes that match with one of his last tweets.
<br />Oh and even if Dr. Brown was on the list of witnesses, it was NOWHERE, NEVER mentioned that his testimony was gonna focus on PROPOFOL.<br /><br />But Front knew! [his magic 8ball actually :icon_geek: MOO :icon_lol:]<br /><br /> :icon_e_biggrin:<br /><br /><br />
<br /><br />He's a specialist in anesthesiology. It would be professionally negligent of him NOT to focus on the most common anesthetic in the world and the one that killed Michael.
<br /> LOL, I had been wondering for a while about the 'Mr Brown can moo' tweet. Moo = cow speak. Cows make milk, propofol was MJ's "milk". Dr Brown is a propofol expert, knows the "milk" speak (can 'moo') better than anyone. That help Snoopy?<br />
<br /><br />Thanks Andrea.<br /><br />I guess if I followed the trial and twitter more closely it would connect or make more sense to me. Looking at it from the outside it just looks like random chatter tied together.<br /><br /><br />I guess I'm late to the party trying to figure it all out. :Crash:
<br />Oh and even if Dr. Brown was on the list of witnesses, it was NOWHERE, NEVER mentioned that his testimony was gonna focus on PROPOFOL.<br /><br />But Front knew! [his magic 8ball actually :icon_geek: MOO :icon_lol:]<br /><br /> :icon_e_biggrin:<br /><br /><br />
<br /><br />He's a specialist in anesthesiology. It would be professionally negligent of him NOT to focus on the most common anesthetic in the world and the one that killed Michael.<br />
<br />Oh and even if Dr. Brown was on the list of witnesses, it was NOWHERE, NEVER mentioned that his testimony was gonna focus on PROPOFOL.<br /><br />But Front knew! [his magic 8ball actually :icon_geek: MOO :icon_lol:]<br /><br /> :icon_e_biggrin:<br /><br /><br />
<br /><br />He's a specialist in anesthesiology. It would be professionally negligent of him NOT to focus on the most common anesthetic in the world and the one that killed Michael.<br />
<br /><br />+1<br />
<br /><br />I think it's easy to notice that Front was hinting the fact that MJ called propofol after "Milk" and the conexion to the cow + Moo and not to propofol itself.
Dr. Brown was not physically present in court as this tweet from ABC7 Court News suggests:<br /><br />ABC7 Court News @ABC7Courts 19h<br />Plaintiffs called Dr. Emery Brown by way of video deposition. Dr. Brown is an anesthesiologist and practices in Boston, Massachusetts.<br /><br />Now, if we know when Dr. Brown was deposed................<br /><br />Anyone know what date his deposition was?????
<br />True the list was posted but a lot of people still didn't get it. I think that's why Front said [size=12pt]"hindsight is 20/20."[/size] <br /><br />Take into consideration Front also tweeted about the color Mother K was going to wear before she appeared in court that day. He also tweeted about Mark Lester's name coming up. And Tom M's name and the fireplace mentioned in court, also the black and red. I can't even list them all, [size=12pt]there are WAY too many[/size] that are NOT on any list for the public.<br /><br />Just one further point -- the list says [size=12pt]"POSSIBLE witnesses"[/size] -- so no one knew for sure who would be called to testify, but [size=12pt]HE DID[/size]. :icon_e_wink:<br />
<br /><br />Messereau has always been a staunch defender of Michael. As his former attorney who defended him successfully against identical allegations, it would only be logical that he appear and speak about the current allegations, particularly since they related directly to things testified of in the '05 trial. I would've been shocked if he hadn't made some appearances. I do disagree that he appeared in a big way. He did a couple of interviews. That's it. <br /><br />Another thing to consider is front's time zone. He/she would be aware of some things before others, or would be able to report on some things before others gathered their notes and began tweeting their synopsis - depending upon where he/she is. IMO.<br />
<br /><br />Charissa, I think you are missing the point and it seems you are trying only to focus on selective irrelevance here. Look at the bigger picture. Open your eyes a little more. That witness list was only a POSSIBLE list -- no one KNEW that Brown would testify for sure -- But Front DID know. Plus like so many others have already pointed out here, you have to take into consideration ALL his predictions INCLUDING the entire hundreds and pages of validations and clues over the YEARS. It's not just about ONE little thing.<br /><br />Also, Front predicted what Mother K was going to wear, the FIREPLACE court happenings, the black or red. Front gave us THREE clues in ONE tweet. <br /><br />You also mentioned the time zones, BUT Front tweeted about Brown WEEKS in advance -- not hours.<br /><br />Charrisa let me ask you a neutral question: Do you consider every single clue/link/connection on this thread, literally hundreds of them.....a concidence? :suspect:<br />http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/forum/index.php/topic,22635.0.html<br /><br />BIGGER picture. :icon_albino:
I think, realistically, there are going to be both random coincidences and deliberate connections in all this. It may seem obvious, but surely it isn't entirely one or the other. JMO
<br />True the list was posted but a lot of people still didn't get it. I think that's why Front said [size=12pt]"hindsight is 20/20."[/size] <br /><br />Take into consideration Front also tweeted about the color Mother K was going to wear before she appeared in court that day. He also tweeted about Mark Lester's name coming up. And Tom M's name and the fireplace mentioned in court, also the black and red. I can't even list them all, [size=12pt]there are WAY too many[/size] that are NOT on any list for the public.<br /><br />Just one further point -- the list says [size=12pt]"POSSIBLE witnesses"[/size] -- so no one knew for sure who would be called to testify, but [size=12pt]HE DID[/size]. :icon_e_wink:<br />
<br /><br />Messereau has always been a staunch defender of Michael. As his former attorney who defended him successfully against identical allegations, it would only be logical that he appear and speak about the current allegations, particularly since they related directly to things testified of in the '05 trial. I would've been shocked if he hadn't made some appearances. I do disagree that he appeared in a big way. He did a couple of interviews. That's it. <br /><br />Another thing to consider is front's time zone. He/she would be aware of some things before others, or would be able to report on some things before others gathered their notes and began tweeting their synopsis - depending upon where he/she is. IMO.<br />
<br /><br />Charissa, I think you are missing the point and it seems you are trying only to focus on selective irrelevance here. Look at the bigger picture. Open your eyes a little more. That witness list was only a POSSIBLE list -- no one KNEW that Brown would testify for sure -- But Front DID know. Plus like so many others have already pointed out here, you have to take into consideration ALL his predictions INCLUDING the entire hundreds and pages of validations and clues over the YEARS. It's not just about ONE little thing.<br /><br />Also, Front predicted what Mother K was going to wear, the FIREPLACE court happenings, the black or red. Front gave us THREE clues in ONE tweet. <br /><br />You also mentioned the time zones, BUT Front tweeted about Brown WEEKS in advance -- not hours.<br /><br />Charrisa let me ask you a neutral question: Do you consider every single clue/link/connection on this thread, literally hundreds of them.....a concidence? :suspect:<br />http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/forum/index.php/topic,22635.0.html<br /><br />BIGGER picture. :icon_albino:<br />
<br /><br /><br />It's already been established the witness list was available long before front tweeted Brown's name. Yes, the plaintiff and defendant knew who the witnesses were. It's called disclosure. <br /><br />My reference to time zones was more about the more immediate - what people were wearing, what they testified to, etc...<br /><br />I simply do NOT believe that Michael Jackson had or has the power, authority and ability to orchestrate government agencies, to manipulate entire court proceedings and trials (the latest being the Zimmerman trial which is ludicrous), natural events and so on...<br /><br />I doubt a single word tweeted yesterday has an overwhelming meaning if the same word is used today. I doubt believe a single word found in lyrics written years ago hint at anything relevant today. If that's the case, nearly every song can be made into hoax clues. I doubt that. I believe that's reaching into thin air while hoping to make some sort of connection that will appease curiosities and hopes. <br /><br />I find some of the collaborative and collective information in your thread extremely interesting. It's the best laid out I've seen yet. I still doubt it explains or confirms the identity of front and I still find things I feel are coincidental within the contents. <br /><br />ETA: Let me change "I don't believe" to "I doubt" where appropriate.<br /><br />
<br /><br /><br />The “impossible” = The Hoax<br /><br />It’s absurd because no one believed it except a few “crazy” people like us, lol.<br /><br />Hence the “safety” -- pure genius. :icon_e_wink:<br /><br /><br />p.s.: @ Patty, nice catch. :icon_e_smile:<br />
<br /><br />Yes, pure GENIUS :icon_e_wink:<br /><br />
Quote from: Front on July 09, 2011, 11:35:07 PM<br />A purely hypothetical presentation…….<br /><br />Let's say, for a moment, that MJ was on this very board. Let's also say, for the sake of this hypothetical discussion, that MJ has "associates" that have a specific job to do directly related to the hoax--- IF, in fact, there is one. Now, let's say these "associates" were "planted" by MJ himself (whether or not MJ has planted them as himself, or planted them "behind the mask"/screen names---- it's irrelevant!) in the vast spectrum of the electronic world----better known as the Internet--- in order to sew the "seeds" from which fruition will fervently blossom when the TIME and "environment" have acquired specifically adept protocol to allow these "forces" to ripen. <br /><br />In theory….. IF there is a hoax, let me assure every eye that's reading this and let me be very clear…..MJ has constructed the Plan of GENIUS. This is not some kiddie play in a tabloid arena that touts headlines about some blonde lady with big tits giving birth to a two-headed alien baby, now 1 year old and 98 pounds. Mmmm…..got milk? albino/ <br /><br />Furthermore, this is not some half-assed, half-witted plan that was hastily thrown together because "MJ had to make a quick escape" <----I'm quite sure yours truly is not the only one who has grown weary of hearing that particular theory. Moreover, this is not an arrangement executed by slack-jawed mouth-breathers walking around trying to find their nuts because somewhere along the way they lost the INTEGRITY and balls to carry out the Plan as MJ SEES FIT. <br /><br />NOW……..would anyone be so damn selfish as to even inquire about that person's (or persons) identity :?: Absolutely!--- but for very good reasons. Believing every character that steps into the "hoax spotlight" would be most DEFINITELY a precursor to a catastrophic situation. As I have stated many times, do not take my words as Truth….for it cannot be altered, regardless! Careful consideration and illuminous observations will lead one to that Truth; gulping down spoon-fed words will not. <br /><br />That said, I have nothing to lose and nothing to prove. My intention and purpose here is not to prove/win/lose or satisfy anyone or feel "accepted". Do not let curiosity & wishful thinking hinder perception. Do not become utterly transfixed on the future. Instead, focus on the moment…WHEN it arrives. Do not let curiosities create barriers to logic. You are in the forest……..what do you SEE? 1 tree? 2 trees? 1,000 trees? some animals? flowers? Unless FACTS become the focal point of logic, one will forever be inebriated with irrelevant technicalities and become lost in TIME trying to find that "magic potion" to satiate their curiosities. When the TIME comes, embrace the moment(s). The moment is HERE…..the moment is NOW…..the moment of "tomorrow" will be "today". <br /><br />I suggest a cool, calm and caring approach to all things/people related to the hoax. Meticulous minds, scrutinizing eyes & understanding hearts <----those are HIGHLY under-rated assets. <br /><br />Patience & perseverance are KEY. Why? Because he says so! 8-) <br /><br /><br />p.s.s. suspicious mind--- thanx for the hug. Right back at ya. Don't worry about Front…he will be fine. T-r-u-s-t M-e!<br /><br />
<br /><br /><br />The “impossible” = The Hoax<br /><br />It’s absurd because no one believed it except a few “crazy” people like us, lol.<br /><br />Hence the “safety” -- pure genius. :icon_e_wink:<br /><br /><br />All this is simply magnificent :icon_razz:<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />p.s.: @ Patty, nice catch. :icon_e_smile:<br />
<br /><br />Yes, pure GENIUS :icon_e_wink:<br /><br />
Quote from: Front on July 09, 2011, 11:35:07 PM<br />A purely hypothetical presentation…….<br /><br />Let's say, for a moment, that MJ was on this very board. Let's also say, for the sake of this hypothetical discussion, that MJ has "associates" that have a specific job to do directly related to the hoax--- IF, in fact, there is one. Now, let's say these "associates" were "planted" by MJ himself (whether or not MJ has planted them as himself, or planted them "behind the mask"/screen names---- it's irrelevant!) in the vast spectrum of the electronic world----better known as the Internet--- in order to sew the "seeds" from which fruition will fervently blossom when the TIME and "environment" have acquired specifically adept protocol to allow these "forces" to ripen. <br /><br />In theory….. IF there is a hoax, let me assure every eye that's reading this and let me be very clear…..MJ has constructed the Plan of GENIUS. This is not some kiddie play in a tabloid arena that touts headlines about some blonde lady with big tits giving birth to a two-headed alien baby, now 1 year old and 98 pounds. Mmmm…..got milk? albino/ <br /><br />Furthermore, this is not some half-assed, half-witted plan that was hastily thrown together because "MJ had to make a quick escape" <----I'm quite sure yours truly is not the only one who has grown weary of hearing that particular theory. Moreover, this is not an arrangement executed by slack-jawed mouth-breathers walking around trying to find their nuts because somewhere along the way they lost the INTEGRITY and balls to carry out the Plan as MJ SEES FIT. <br /><br />NOW……..would anyone be so damn selfish as to even inquire about that person's (or persons) identity :?: Absolutely!--- but for very good reasons. Believing every character that steps into the "hoax spotlight" would be most DEFINITELY a precursor to a catastrophic situation. As I have stated many times, do not take my words as Truth….for it cannot be altered, regardless! Careful consideration and illuminous observations will lead one to that Truth; gulping down spoon-fed words will not. <br /><br />That said, I have nothing to lose and nothing to prove. My intention and purpose here is not to prove/win/lose or satisfy anyone or feel "accepted". Do not let curiosity & wishful thinking hinder perception. Do not become utterly transfixed on the future. Instead, focus on the moment…WHEN it arrives. Do not let curiosities create barriers to logic. You are in the forest……..what do you SEE? 1 tree? 2 trees? 1,000 trees? some animals? flowers? Unless FACTS become the focal point of logic, one will forever be inebriated with irrelevant technicalities and become lost in TIME trying to find that "magic potion" to satiate their curiosities. When the TIME comes, embrace the moment(s). The moment is HERE…..the moment is NOW…..the moment of "tomorrow" will be "today". <br /><br />I suggest a cool, calm and caring approach to all things/people related to the hoax. Meticulous minds, scrutinizing eyes & understanding hearts <----those are HIGHLY under-rated assets. <br /><br />Patience & perseverance are KEY. Why? Because he says so! 8-) <br /><br /><br />p.s.s. suspicious mind--- thanx for the hug. Right back at ya. Don't worry about Front…he will be fine. T-r-u-s-t M-e!<br /><br />
« Reply #1275 on: June 16, 2011, 03:16:12 PM »<br /><br />p.s.s. 777th day from "Lights Out"... dates/numbers will shed tremendous "BACK" light, and he who seeks understanding shall receive it.
<br /><br />p.s.s. 777th day from "Lights Out"... dates/numbers will shed tremendous "BACK" light, and he who seeks understanding shall receive it.
<br /><br />I wonder "Lights Out" ➜ Jun 25, 09 + 777 days = ?? I thought it meant when Front appeared to shed us light = whispers = clues but it doesn't match or am I wrong here, can you guys help??
Okay, this is just again another Front thread and I am going to close it and put it in the archive section. I would like to have this forum about the hoax and not some old webcam pictures and clues that aren't even there. I don't care who gets mad, it is my decision. This forum is a circus. HOAX please, not another Front ass kissing thread. Front is very capable of kissing his own ass.
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
Comments
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."