Oh deaders will do back flips to explain away the obvious. That's nothing new. They had all sorts of logical explanations for "alleged victim" on "alleged date" too. All BS and we knew it.<br /><br />I'll go ahead n get carried away.<br /><br />It's going to get more n more obvious. In the end, MJ himself might just moonwalk across the courtroom.<br /><br />Deaders will say he's just an impersonator. Lol!
<br /><br />Just what I was thinking, bec. I mean it's just so out there and up in your face. But it hasn't been as blatant and major news like this one yet....
True that, Thriller, but until then it's going to be fun to watch them make everything fit in line with their brand of reality. We've been accused of it for long enough.
I don't think this is necessarily about deaders v hoaxers - it might simply be a case of legal procedure. If AEG want to bring up the circumstances around MJ's 'death', not stipulating that MJ is dead allows them to do so. This is a good thing! And I agree it is an incredibly hoaxy way of phrasing it!
<br />I don't think this is necessarily about deaders v hoaxers - it might simply be a case of legal procedure. If AEG want to bring up the circumstances around MJ's 'death', not stipulating that MJ is dead allows them to do so. This is a good thing! And I agree it is an incredibly hoaxy way of phrasing it!<br />
<br /><br /><br />both the parties have to agree to it. It has not been mentioned what the KJ attornies have to say about this.
KJ and AEG...<br /><br />edit: by 'stipulation' both parties have to agree upon certain conditions. In this case Putnam is not ready to agree upon Mj was dead.
Isn't that the whole point? They don't agree. They don't have to. Isn't that what stipulation is all about? If both parties agree/stipulate on a 'fact' then they don't waste time with it in court.<br /><br />Edit: ...and if they don't agree, as in this case, then the subject in question will be thrashed out in court. Putnam obviously wants to examine MJ's 'death'.
well, we haven't heard anything from the Jackson lawyers...we can't really say what they are agreeing upon. The whole point is that the statement made by Putnam is hoaxy.
[size=12pt]I would think that the Defendants (AEG) would stipulate to the death itself... but not to the manner or method if they are still playing the MJ blame game. It's interesting if this is a ploy to force the Plaintiffs to PROVE death itself. Kinda scary actually as this doesn't feel like a BAM that Michael would have envisioned. Being busted as a faker at the hand of AEG isn't likely to leave a good vibe with the general populous. I doubt that would be his plan.<br /><br />We may be getting riled up for nothing too. Misquotes...accidentally & intentionally...happen all the time. Putnam may have said they weren't stipulating to the ABC's of the death and the reporter just chopped it up a bit. Ain't editing grand...SMDH...but that sentence had my eyebrows pinned high too for a bit. As with all other things these past years it's become standard protocol...if you can't witness the lips moving and hear the words coming out of them...nothing to do but wait and see where it fits or falls on the truth scale. [/size]
I'm dumb-founded! I always felt the CM trial seemed scripted... and now I believe the AEG trial is [probably] scripted as well. Maybe the AEG trial will bring light to all the inconsistencies in Michael's death; the inconsistencies we have recognized years ago, but the general public ignores. Maybe it will shed light to all the non-believers and cause their eyes to open every so slightly.<br /><br />Looking forward to the ride!
ok, so wait a second here, AEG lawyer wont say he's legally dead? am I understanding correctly?<br />the nonbelievers already jumped on this statement, saying: lawyer has lost his marbles!!!!<br /><br />wow............
OMG!!!!<br /><br />“@ABC7Courts: Before defense's motions were discussed, the attorneys for both sides had a heated discussion about whether Michael Jackson is indeed dead”
“@ABC7Courts: Jacksons attorney said "MJ is still alive, according to AEG." This was a jab at AEG's attorney who didn't stipulate to dismiss a juror yest”<br />
Wow! this is exciting, the declaration of Putman surprisingly "not stipulate That Michael Jackson was dead" if not specified then this is the trial?<br />why not say it and now? MJ is alive
<br />I just really hope this is part of MICHAEL's plan. <br />If it's not, this is not good news at all. What if he's not ready to come back yet.<br />
<br /><br /><br />I think this has to be part of Michael's plan and I think his return (and the lead up to it) is the reason for this trial going ahead. But if you mean that AEG might be trying to smoke Michael out prematurely by doing this, then I admit the thought has crossed my mind as well. IF AEG is or represents the "bad guys" then it might make sense that they would do this as they would undoubtedly be aware of the hoax, even if they are not on the inside. But if they're just trying to expose Michael then it won't work because of everyone who will say otherwise (for now) - the Jackson family, people on the scene that day, etc., they know their script and won't deviate until Michael says so. I believe Michael will come back when he is ready and not before. This "not dead" thing could be a toe-in-the-water type of test or something.
<br />I just really hope this is part of MICHAEL's plan. <br />If it's not, this is not good news at all. What if he's not ready to come back yet.<br />
<br /><br /><br />I think this has to be part of Michael's plan and I think his return (and the lead up to it) is the reason for this trial going ahead. But if you mean that AEG might be trying to smoke Michael out prematurely by doing this, then I admit the thought has crossed my mind as well. IF AEG is or represents the "bad guys" then it might make sense that they would do this as they would undoubtedly be aware of the hoax, even if they are not on the inside. But if they're just trying to expose Michael then it won't work because of everyone who will say otherwise (for now) - the Jackson family, people on the scene that day, etc., they know their script and won't deviate until Michael says so. I believe Michael will come back when he is ready and not before. This "not dead" thing could be a toe-in-the-water type of test or something. <br />
<br /><br /><br />I totally agree with you Andrea!! The "Reveal" has to start sometime, and I think...This Is It!! :penguin:<br /><br />Sending all of you Beautiful souls...LOVE!!!!! :bearhug:...<br /><br />We miss and LOVE you Michael!!!!!!!!! :bearhug: Keepin the Faith, always!!!!! xox
<br />I just really hope this is part of MICHAEL's plan. <br />If it's not, this is not good news at all. What if he's not ready to come back yet.<br />
<br /><br /><br />I think this has to be part of Michael's plan and I think his return (and the lead up to it) is the reason for this trial going ahead. But if you mean that AEG might be trying to smoke Michael out prematurely by doing this, then I admit the thought has crossed my mind as well. IF AEG is or represents the "bad guys" then it might make sense that they would do this as they would undoubtedly be aware of the hoax, even if they are not on the inside. But if they're just trying to expose Michael then it won't work because of everyone who will say otherwise (for now) - the Jackson family, people on the scene that day, etc., they know their script and won't deviate until Michael says so. I believe Michael will come back when he is ready and not before. This "not dead" thing could be a toe-in-the-water type of test or something. <br />
<br /><br />I hope you're right. It would be horrible if this is not Michael's plan at all and we're just cheering here because the truth is coming out.
It's not because Michael has a plan that AEG is just sitting, waiting for things to fall on their heads... they surely read about us and consider hoax as a possibility<br /><br />I agree that they must "disagree" so that the thing is discussed BUT : if you do consider what is written here, they plan to discuss the fact that MJ is dead, or not. It's different than disagreeing about how, why, who etc. THE DEATH itself is a point they wish to have words about ?<br /><br />If Michael actually faked his death, i think AEG will surely try to move first and ruin his plans by taking him out and proove him a faker. <br />Maybe they really feel something is wrong about this death and they take all space possible to defend themselves in case this option was real. <br /><br />If they admit the fact that he is dead, they will have to justify what happened and everything they did to MJ. Now if they stop at the first step "Is MJ really dead ?" and actually proove it, MJ will be back BUT they will managed to avoid talk about everything else by ending the trial : "no death = no wrongful death case" and so MJ will have no fair explanation from AEG in front of court. <br /><br />I think they protect themselves with every sides possible.
Comments