TIAI January 26
GodhaschosenMJ
Posts: 177
<!-- m -->http://www.probatelawyerblog.com/2011/0 ... .html#more<!-- m -->
Comments
Ok, so it has not been dismissed because it was not founded, but because of a legal technicality. Interesting.
Thank you, TS for shedding light on this matter. After Eliza's blog entry the other day, I had a feeling that this was where things were headed.
Also, interesting ending statement: "She never got her day in court."
Hm...Makes me think. Michael did not get his day in court in 1994 when he settled on Jan 25th. He was forever "found guilty"- just like maybe Eliza will be forever discredited if she does not push forward.
Of course, he did get his day in court in 2005- and, thanks to the press and media coverage, was still not "fully vinidcated." Of course, I know, he was legally, however, public opinion stayed murkey.
But something about Eliza's post on her blog, 'Call Me Naive' and the fact that this court declined to hear her case because of some sort of change in what they will hear, doesn't seem to fit with how devastated she is. It also seems unfair that she was caught in the cross hairs because of a change of focus of the court in the middle of her case. Seems like she would have been grandfathered in... Gotta be more to it... Maybe the power of Scientology does have a stronghold... Strange. I'd like to know precedent for this sort of thing when a court is legally changed in the middle of someone's case.
So someone found a way out by having the court change their paternity case ruling back in Aug 2010? Sounds suspicious!!
We should of made a better effort in getting the media's attention so this could not be so easily swept under the rug!!
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 12, 2011
The opposing attorney, in the court case which is scheduled for Friday 14th, has filed an affidavit this afternoon...a stumbling block to the case hopefully
SUNDAY, JANUARY 23, 2011
I have learned this afternoon that the plaintiff in the court case involving Elvis's/Jesse's DNA has announced (in the form of a poem) that she did lose the case. This is a wonderful result for Elvis's/Jesse's wishes and for his sake and for my own wishes too.
She should have listened on October 28, 2009, when Elvis/Jesse asked me to phone her and tell her to "STOP"...which I did immediately. Jesse has not been supporting her and she has not been told by him that he was going to come out.
I do know 100% that the DNA is from Elvis Presley himself. I am just so thankful that he has not been exposed through this court case.
Also, I would like to clear up one false statement that has been out there since the summer of 2008: Elvis/Jesse did not "give" the DNA to the plaintiff. She lifted it off of an envelope which he had licked in which he sent her a note. He has lick sealed all of my envelopes for the past (almost) 19 years and I would never have done such a thing.
Here is a link to the plaintiff's blog in order that everyone may visit and read her announcement:
elizapresley.blogspot.com/
MONDAY, JANUARY 24, 2011 --- UPDATE ON THE ABOVE COURT CASE
As anyone who has followed my web site will recall, I denounced the plaintiff's efforts to continue this case months ago and stated at that time that Elvis did not support her in this case. So, it should not come as a shock to anyone that the case was defeated. This is how it should have culminated. What goes around comes around.
I can tell the details of what took place on the day of the hearing in the court room. My dear friend Betty, who lives in Memphis, kept me posted on the events of the day. The following is exactly how things unfolded in the open court room:
This was scheduled to be an open court hearing with no cameras nor recorders allowed.
The plaintiff herself was not present. The only parties in attendance were the two opposing attorneys. Oddly enough the two attorneys appeared to be good friends, sitting together, visiting, laughing and talking. When the case was finally called, the attorneys asked the judge for the case to be heard in the judges private chambers. With that the judge, the two attorneys and the court recorder retired to the judges chambers. This alone should indicate that something which was not to be known to the public was to be discussed and decided.
Also, something else of interest is that the Court Docket has not yet been updated to show the outcome of the case. Normally, in the past, all events have been posted to the court docket very soon after taking place. It has now been 7 business days and still there is nothing added on the docket indicating what took place on the 14th.
I have heard rumors about why the case was dismissed but I will report nothing until it is confirmed officially. I will say, though, that if the reason I have heard is true then there would have been absolutely no reason for the case being heard in the judges chambers, there would be no reason for the delay in posting it to the court docket, and there would be no reason for the plaintiff to have worded her announcement of defeat in such a final way as she would have had other recourses of continued action.
I state the above in order that you may all understand how enormous the challenge of going against Elvis's own wishes was. Thus, the bitterness expressed by the plaintiff toward him in her announcement of her loss of the case.
http://lindahoodsigmontruth.com/page57
(in addition to ongoing cases and potential concerns there):
If you don't want to handle the case, change the rules.
Again the system is not serving the people.
I am so sorry for Eliza.
Let's not lose hope here.
If it is important for Elvis and some other influencial persons to show that he's alive and for which reasons he did go undercover, there will be a pouring rain of money to support Eliza.
If it is not important however, case is closed.
TS wrote:
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
I thought the same. Probably Elvis wanted it to stop, I don't know. But if it is not about Elvis, then this is so sad. I feel so sorry for Eliza. This is so unfair.
I do realize that LMP does not have much interest or stock left in the Estate. I did read somewhere that she had sold alot of her shares off. I do know about Scientology and their auditing ways and yes I believe that would be enough to blackmail LMP and her mom into not going against them.
Peace
<!-- m -->http://www.latimes.com/sns-ap-michael-j ... 7226.story<!-- m --> <!-- l -->viewtopic.php?f=78&t=17554<!-- l -->
2. No Jesse showed up in court. Where is the Jesse that Eliza talks about? All of Eliza's case was based on the "DNA Sample Evidence" from the supposed licked envelope of Jesse ... however NO JESSE showed up in court (by the way Eliza did not match the Elvis DNA ... this should be a tip to everyone that Eliza is not a Presley). I'm certain that the judge saw that since NO JESSE showed up in court there was no case (as this whole paternity court case is based on Jesse's DNA). This completely destroyed the credibility of the DNA evidence in court. Looks like Eliza was fooled by a fake Jesse.
3. Then there's all of the criminal records that Eliza has .... she has convictions for Identity Theft, Forgery, Extortion as well as numerous driving offences. I'm sorry but when original court documents have been provided that PROVES Eliza was found guilty of crimes, it does cast some negative light into her character. No judge in his right mind would believe her story due to her many criminal convictions.
Due to the above reasons ... no wonder her case was dismissed.
Perhaps now Eliza should go back to her original name Eliza Tiffin (as it was not proven in court that she is the daughter of Vernon Presley or the half-sister of Elvis).
Well hello Troll!! 2 post since Nov 2010! I don't think you will infuence any one here with your garbage!
1. The case was not IMMEDIATELY dismissed, it went on for a long while!
2. I don't think anyone was expecting Jesse to show up at the trial!!
3.Can you provide a link to see the original court documents that PROVE Eliza's charges??!!
I'm confident she will be vindicated in some other way!! She will always be Eliza Presley!!
Not to mention that Jesse and Eliza matched, so if he fooled her, her own brother fooled her. Now that's pretty something for 2 people who do not even know each other. Jesse didn't match Elvis' DNA, Elvis DNA (liver biopsy) didn't match Elvis DNA (autopsy), 'nuff said.
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
The Elvis Alive stories started in September 1977 with the coffin photo of Elvis in the National Enquirer. I have the tapes of a fan club president and a member of Elvis's MM talking about turning Graceland into a tourist industry, and they were trying to run down who took the coffin photo.
The Elvis Alive book stories started in 1978, with the Orion book. Mae Axton, and Colonel Tom Parker were behind the Orion book that Gail had published.
How do I know Parker and Axton were involved? Letters, and court documents which I have had published in books, and on the internet. Axton and Parker are mentioned in the lawsuit that Gail Brewer Giorgio filed against Arthur for having his name put on the book. The contact stipulated only Gail's name was to be on the book.
Gene Arthur was the front money man for the book. Gene Arthur, Neil Boortz, Charles Searle, and Gail Brewer Giorgio were on the copyright.
Enter: Jimmy Ellis Orion who was to help promote the book. He was named after Gail's fictional character: Orion Eckly Darnell. I have all the interview tapes with Gail, Jimmy, Gene Arthur, and Shelby Singleton who owns the trademark on the Orion Mask. Jimmy was known as the masked singer Orion. Shelby was to do the promotion on the Orion book with the masked singer Orion.
When Gail sued Arthur, the William Morris Agency dropped Gail. It had been representing her, but pulled out after the suit was filed. The Orion book didn't get off the ground.
In 1981, Steven Chanzes came out with his book, "Elvis Where Are You?" He sold the tape with his book, the same tape Gail later sold with her book in 1988. It was the "Sivle Nora" scam. J.D. Sumner was involved with it. Kathy Westmoreland states in her book that J.D.Sumner was involved in the Silve Nora scam, and that he asked her to be part of it. She refused. J.D. mentions on a radio show from around that period that it was a "wax dummy" in the casket.
That tape is Elivs Presley. He was talking to Ellen Marie Foster. Ellen Marie looked like Glady Presley, and Elvis gave Ellen his mother's ring. The film "Heartbrak Hotel" is about Ellen Foster. Ellen's voice was brushed out of the tape.
Elvis called Elllen many times, and the calls are on the tape. How did Steve Chanzes get ahold of the tape with Ellen and Elvis? Ellen gave the tape to Tom Sanocki, who ran a fan club out of Chicago, and the tape was given to Chanzes.
In Chanzes book, he mentions a "terminally ill double" was to take Elvis's place in the casket. Ellen said she got the information about the double from Billy Smith, and Marty Lacker. In the newsletter For The Record, dated 1981, Billy and Marty called Ellen a "liar," said they never told Ellen anything about a double replacing Elvis. These two said she was "mentally ill" and in serious need of medical attention! Well, guess what? In Revelations From The Memphis Mafia, published in the the 1990's, Billy and Marty talked about the "terminally ill double" who was to replace Elvis in the casket!!! Billy said the double called him in the wee hours of the morning and told him that he was terminally ill and was to replace Elvis in the casket! Who are the liars here? Not Ellen.
Charlie Hodge sued Steve Chanzes for mentioning his name in connection with pulling the plug on the double. I have the court records, and Charlie won a small settlement. He sued for a million and it was settled for twenty-five hundred, which was to be paid to Charlie in monthly increments till it was paid off.
Steve authorized the "Do You Know Who I Am" Album. I have the album. In the grove it says "Elvis, Inc."
Colonel Parker was behind the Chanzes scam. When Charlie filed the lawsuit, Steve Chanzes was dropped and the Elvis Alive stories didn't get of the ground.
Steve later came out with the book under a different name, and it was entered into evidence.
In 1988, Gail came out with the Is Elvis Alive book, and the Elvis alive rumors got off the ground and turned Graceland into a multimillion dollar industry.
Graceland and Colonel Parker were behind the Gail Brewer Giorgio book. In fact, all the scams out there Graceland is behind.
The name of the game is deny and imply. Graceland denies, and Gail Giorgio implies.
Does that mean Elvis is dead? NO! I knew Elvis Presley. Will I prove it to anyone: No. Not out of loyality. I owe Elvis nothing. He owes me nothing. I knew him, and nobody has to believe it.
Will I show my documents on all of this. No. They have been published in books, newletters, and any information I give can be obtained by writing Courthouses where the suits were filed. If you want the information I will tell you where it can be obtained.
You want evidence and documentation of who was behind the Elvis alive rumors? Transcripts can be obtained from the Superior Court in Marietta, GA, from Broward County in Floridia. Graceland, and Col Parker were behind all the lies out there.
My facts have spoke for themselves thru court documents, letters, newsletters, and interview tapes with Mae Axton, Shelby Singleton, Jimmy Ellis Orion, Gene Arthur, and all the people involved in these scams! My documents are in several books, and in newsletters.
If you want answers, do research, and run down documents in courthouses.
I am not going to expend energy posting documentation on this board. For one it is in storage, and for another it can be obtained by research. I am here on this board because I was asked to give information on some of the scams, the same information I have given in books along with the documentation.
Elvis did go into a como. He suffered from septic shock. He was in a wheel chair for a time. He was severely handicapped.
As to him being handicapped, Larry King mentioned it on his show with Priscilla Presley as a guest. I don't recall what year on LKL, but it was approximately 3 years ago. You can look up the transcripts for his show.
I don't know who was in the coffin. What I do know is Gene Smith, Elvis's cousin, told me it was a "wax dummy."
The name of the "terminally ill" is Scott Enos. He lived in the north.