TIAI December 10
BlackOrWhite
Posts: 75
<br /><br /><br />http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/forum/index.php/topic,20261.msg351417.html#msg351417on 1314707783:<br />I think that yes it's a pretty big clue. First because of the meaning and because if we add all the "coincidences" together it makes this re-tweet something important. The fact that LaToya conveniently authenticated Paris' account just before looks like she paved the way for us to take the RT seriously... because if LaToya had not done that, no one would really believe it's Paris' account and many would have even more doubts as to the validity of this RT and its significance.<br /><br />Now I understand the objection in regards to this being just a RT from another account. It's not really possible to know if the person behind this account was asked to tweet this specifically but one has to wonder given the meaning of this tweet and how well it fits the hoax. It seems to me the fact that it's "only" a RT by Paris makes it also a little less obvious because if Paris tweeted that herself ... well I find that it would maybe be too big of a clue and people would ask her what she means and maybe harass her on twitter for that, so I see it like a little protection and I keep in mind that this is a clue for us the hoaxers, so we should understand the "subtlety", JMO of course. <br /><br />Of course the mention of BAM and 2012 ... I think it cannot be clearer than that. At this point we cannot believe in coincidences.<br />
Comments