I asked Ed Winter and Craig Harvey about Joe/Joseph
sunrise
Posts: 89
I sent it to both to see if they write the same...
That`s what I wrote:
I have a question about the DC and the Autopsy Report of Michael Jackson. Why is it always "Michael JOSEPH Jackon", when his real name was "Michael JOE Jackson" ? Schouldn`t there be the correct name on official documents??
Thanks for reading and I`m looking forward to your answer.
Ed:
The original information received from the hospital along with information provided by a family member was Joseph so the original report did list that name along with a AKA of Joe.
Ed Winter, Asst. Chief
Craig:
We were given the name early on in the investigation. By the time we were at a point where we could have made some adjustments to the report, the pressure we were under to protect the integrity of our investigation became a great concern so the decision was made to remove the case from our database, making further alterations or additions possible. For whatever reason, the mortuary prepared the death certificate with that name and we went ahead and signed it. It could have been because that was the name we had in our system or that was the name they were given when they prepared the certificate or it was a clerical error to formalize a name. We (funeral directors and coroners) have a tendency to want to do that out of habit.
Sent from my iPhone
That`s what I wrote:
I have a question about the DC and the Autopsy Report of Michael Jackson. Why is it always "Michael JOSEPH Jackon", when his real name was "Michael JOE Jackson" ? Schouldn`t there be the correct name on official documents??
Thanks for reading and I`m looking forward to your answer.
Ed:
The original information received from the hospital along with information provided by a family member was Joseph so the original report did list that name along with a AKA of Joe.
Ed Winter, Asst. Chief
Craig:
We were given the name early on in the investigation. By the time we were at a point where we could have made some adjustments to the report, the pressure we were under to protect the integrity of our investigation became a great concern so the decision was made to remove the case from our database, making further alterations or additions possible. For whatever reason, the mortuary prepared the death certificate with that name and we went ahead and signed it. It could have been because that was the name we had in our system or that was the name they were given when they prepared the certificate or it was a clerical error to formalize a name. We (funeral directors and coroners) have a tendency to want to do that out of habit.
Sent from my iPhone
Comments
I mean we have a back log of bodies at the morgue in this town and yet this guy has time to FB, email, text people all day.
Like I said, I'm glad he's so open with the info, but doesn't he have work to do?
Btw... "The original information received from the hospital"
which would be form 18 of the autopsy report... but form 18 apparently doesnt exist. And without form 18 the Coroner will not remove a body from a hospital.....
I THINK THAT WAS THE CORONER... <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."