New Maura Vid -100-
LoveNeedsExpression
Posts: 543
<!-- m -->http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1PgkdRNY48&feature=sub<!-- m -->
LoveNeedsExpression
Posts: 543
Comments
agreed! but i think its a pretty good vid!
Could for example Joe Jackson also be a part of "it"???? (I remember him laughing after MJ's death with Jessie...)
Maybe therefore Michael-Dave-Dave said at LKL - I did this "to liberate from my father's criminality..."
Just guessing... <!-- s:oops: -->:oops:<!-- s:oops: -->
I would see this message to be a warning to us that the Illuminati are Freemasons, who worship Bamophet, and they are developing artificial intelligence to control us. The integration of computer technology into the human body is one of their goals, after all.
As for lightman, Michael comes out of him and this could very well represent Michael symbolically freeing himself from any robotics. That instead of robots or A.I. controlling us, we are the humans behind and in control of the machines. That we can break away from this. Though these technological advances may be beneficial, in the wrong hands they can also be very harmful.
But that`s just my opinion and since Maura and I are not on speaking terms, I won`t be sharing that with her. <!-- s8-) -->8-)<!-- s8-) -->
I just want to add that this is like a war between Michael and the "Powers that be", Michael's weapon is Love, theirs is fear and control. But as in any war, "Know thy enemy" and "knowledge is power". So educate your troops, keep your friends close and your enemies closer... <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
I second that.
I
Me three!
There are only 2 real emotions in the world, Love and Fear. Good and Evil. Good always triumphs over evil.
Love will not let us down.
I agree as well. Mike has broken free and was in no way a 33rd degree mason when he recorded the Dangerous album, hence the allegations that followed, they wanted to take him down. That album is a warning, not a clue of him being a mason. The Dangerous album shows how the illuminati creates puppets in their own factory, children enter, corpses without a soul come out, and so forth. She definitely misinterpreted. In Holland we say: "Ze heeft de klok horen luiden maar weet niet waar de klepel hangt".
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."Just like TIalmostI said here and many other tweets:
"People better start looking back: dates, times, names,better see those coincidence ,it's all there for you to see,if your eyes are open."
11:51 AM Aug 16th via web
Reply Retweet Law of time
7:03 AM Aug 12th via web
Reply Retweet Ready for a new paradigm?
4:07 PM Aug 8th via web
Reply Retweet "What if half the things ever said turned out 2 B a lie, how will you know the truth?"
4:43 PM Aug 5th via web
Reply Retweet Let us dream of tomorrow where we can truly love from the soul, and know love as the ultimate truth at the heart of all creation.
2:44 PM Aug 3rd via web
Reply Retweet "To dismiss something without an investigation of the evidence is the height of ignorance."
12:18 PM Aug 1st via web
Just commenting on Maura saying at 6:07 "Now...before all of you 'Michael is Jesus' type fans start freaking out...". Where are they "all"? Are they just keeping their thoughts to themselves, because of negative pressure? I've stuck my neck out on other posts. I wish with all my heart there could be frank and open discussion on that subject because there are books that could be written on it, but it's taboo. So truth may remain hidden beneath tradition/locked vault. Jesus also walked alone, surrounded by religious leaders with their own adendas, and even his own 12 misunderstood him and one of them betrayed him.
I watched the movie Artificial Intelligence awhile back. In the end it is aliens (kindly ones) who were watching and controlling things on earth. Huge huge subject but uncomfortable to many. And I agree that Light Man may refer partially to some type of AI. Michael's attention to detail blows me away, and I love him.
MJonmind I love your posts and agree with you completely.
Light
5 a : spiritual illumination
b : inner light
c : enlightenment
d : truth
6 a : public knowledge <facts brought to light>
b : a particular aspect or appearance presented to view <saw the matter in a different light>
8: something that enlightens or informs <shed some light on the problem>
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/light
Light Man - illuminating man; enlightening man
.
He definitely knew what was going on... <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
Yep....I'm stupid too
The problem with this video is she never actually states what she is trying to say. No conclusion and things are stated as questions etc. This leaves each of us to try and understand what she is implying and also creates the controversy that is apparent in the comments on the video.
She also claims to have researched but she is incorrect when she says that Aleister Crowley "coined and defined" Baphomet.
Coin
make up; "coin phrases or words"
http://www.wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
Baphomet
Baphomet first became known when the Knights Templar were tried for blasphemy, homosexuality, and devil worship by the Inquisition in the 13th century. According to confessions given by members, Baphomet was an idol that took the form of either a large head or a cat. Based on the various testimonies of the Templars, no precise description of Baphomet came to light. It is even possible that Baphomet never existed at all for the Knights, or that multiple idols might have been involved.
Baphomet gained new fame with the 19th century mystic Eliphas Lévi, who drew the now infamous image that is often taken for the modern Christian version of Satan. However, Lévi did not believe that Baphomet was in any way equal to this Devil, saying this icon "cannot be confounded with fabulous images of Satan." Further, he says "But the adorers of [Baphomet] do not consider...that it is a representation of the devil; on the contrary, for them it is that of the god Pan, the god of our modern schools of philosophy...the god of the primitive Gnostic schools" (Levi, 1995, p. 308).
According to Levi, Baphomet was symbolic of what he called the Great Magical Agent, which can be defined as the universal life-force. This Astral Light is also the force that adepts use in magical operations. Common analogies are the Hindu Kundalini and the First Matter of alchemy.
In Transcendal Magic, Lévi explains the symbolism of his famous drawing:
"Moeover, the sign of occultism is made with both hands, pointing upward to the white moon of Chesed, and downward to the black moon of Geburah. This sign expresses the perfect concord between mercy and justice. One of the arms is feminine and other masculine, as in the Androgyne of Khunrath, whose attributes we have combined with those of our goat, since they are one and the same symbol. The torch of intelligence burning between the horns is the magical light of universal equilibrium; it is also the type of soul exalted above matter, as the flame cleaves to the torch. The monstrous head of the animal expresses horror of sin, for which the mateial agent, alone responsible, must alone and for ever bear the penalty, because the soul is impassible in its nature and can suffer only by materialising. The caduceus, which replaces the generative organ, represents eternal life; the scale-covered belly tyifies water; the circle above it is the atmosphere; the feathers still higher up signify the volatile; lastly, humanity is depicted by the two breasts and the androgyne arms of this sphinx of the occult sciences" (Levi, 1995, p. 309).
http://www.thelemapedia.org/index.php/Baphomet
So the idea of Baphomet had been "coined and defined" way before Crowley was even born.
My issue with this video really is that it isn't clear and concise and frankly not researched very well. There is quite a bit of drama in the comments but that is simply because the message of the video is not defined clearly. Including the statement "Now...before all of you 'Michael is Jesus' type fans start freaking out..." she has already taken a confrontational stance.
When you are trying to convey something, through a video, it is best to try to be clear, concise, respectful and research well. Otherwise, you create the drama and controversy that we see in relation to this particular video.
Well said Serenity!! it's time for people to realize that we, as "individuals" have more power then we think. You have to rid yourself of the "fear and control" and believe that we, as a "collective", have the power to bring the dark forces to their knees! Unfortunately, most people will continue allowing the "powers that be" to control them. Sad, but true...Why is it that people are so "content" with being manipulated, when they have the ability to control their own lives? I just don't get it.
people have opinions.. this is investigators forum so we investigating.. just because Maura said something that doesn't mean everyone have to believe and agree with her.. I like Maura's videos but I have my own opinion about things...
I dont see anything wrong that investigators investigating her video or saying what they think...
Michael has a way of using his music to communicate with us.
I don't think he would be involved in anything to do with the Masons or illuminati, but instead, seem to be fighting them and warning us through his music.
That's the one thing I noticed with all of his music videos....he always fights the evils of the world through his dance.....
I never said it was wrong to decipher her vids, or what she says is true. Some pple seem to have a personal problem with her (which is fine, we all dont have to get along). I'm jus asking why even bother? Her vids are hit or miss like most people. I'm jus looking for an unbiased assessment of the vid and to see if others agree with me on the meanin of the vid. But I guess I'm in the wrong place if thats what I want. I'll let others post her vid to this forum, if they choice to do so.
But its all good, thx for replying
I haven't seen anyone who said : .... I dont like Maura, and that's why I dont like her vid... or something like this.. investigators explained why they dont agree .. <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: --> <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
with a L.O.V.E, rasyte
I never said that either. I guess I'm jus bangin my head on the wall with this one. In the grand scheme of things whether one likes or dislikes maura or her vids is irrelevant.
L.O.V.E