Lloyds of London - Medical exam NEVER DONE
hesouttamylife
Posts: 5,393
Don’t know how reputable the source, but this is very interesting <!-- srespect/ -->respect/<!-- srespect/ -->
http://www.theolympian.com/2011/06/06/1677969/insurer-seeks-to-void-policy-for.html
Insurer seeks to void policy for Jackson shows
By ANTHONY McCARTNEY | AP Entertainment Writer • Published June 06, 2011
0 COMMENTS
LOS ANGELES – The insurer of Michael Jackson's planned series of comeback concerts is asking a Los Angeles judge to nullify a non-appearance policy issued to concert promoters.
Underwriters at Lloyd's of London sued AEG Live and Jackson's company on Monday, claiming the concert promoter has failed to provide necessary medical information and details about the physician charged with the singer's death.
The suit states Lloyd's issued a non-appearance and concert cancellation policy in April 2009 - roughly two months before the pop superstar died.
The insurer states a medical exam of Jackson required by the policy was never conducted, and that they should not have to pay out for the 50 canceled shows scheduled for London's O2 arena.
An email message seeking comment from AEG was not immediately returned.
Read more: <!-- m -->http://www.theolympian.com/2011/06/06/1 ... z1OXYJxg7M<!-- m -->
http://www.theolympian.com/2011/06/06/1677969/insurer-seeks-to-void-policy-for.html
Insurer seeks to void policy for Jackson shows
By ANTHONY McCARTNEY | AP Entertainment Writer • Published June 06, 2011
0 COMMENTS
LOS ANGELES – The insurer of Michael Jackson's planned series of comeback concerts is asking a Los Angeles judge to nullify a non-appearance policy issued to concert promoters.
Underwriters at Lloyd's of London sued AEG Live and Jackson's company on Monday, claiming the concert promoter has failed to provide necessary medical information and details about the physician charged with the singer's death.
The suit states Lloyd's issued a non-appearance and concert cancellation policy in April 2009 - roughly two months before the pop superstar died.
The insurer states a medical exam of Jackson required by the policy was never conducted, and that they should not have to pay out for the 50 canceled shows scheduled for London's O2 arena.
An email message seeking comment from AEG was not immediately returned.
Read more: <!-- m -->http://www.theolympian.com/2011/06/06/1 ... z1OXYJxg7M<!-- m -->
Comments
Thank you for your post, very interesting ideed... So Michael did not pass a medical exam for his concerts! I am wondering if AEG is in the hoax??
Lloyd's of London: MJ Lied, So We Won't Pay
6/6/2011 3:19 PM PDT by TMZ Staff
Lloyd's of London has gone to court ... asking a judge to let the company off the financial hook, claiming it doesn't owe the Michael Jackson Estate $17.5 million on grounds MJ was a fraud.
The company issued the muilti-million dollar policy to cover the doomed "This Is It" tour for losses.
But Lloyd's claims it doesn't have to honor the policy for 2 primary reasons:
1. Michael Jackson and AEG allegedly lied about Michael's medical history -- specifically, MJ said he had not seen a doctor other than a cosmetic MD since June, 2005.
2. Michael did not disclose he was taking prescription drugs prior to and at the time of his death -- including Propofol.
Lloyd's is asking the court for a declaration that the policy is null and void as a result of the alleged fraud.
Howard Weitzman, the lawyer for the Estate, tells TMZ, "This legal action is nothing more than an insurance company trying to avoid paying a legitimate claim by the insured."
See also
Lloyd's of London -- Overdose Clause?
Jackson Insurance Policy May Be Worthless
Michael Jackson Dies
Filed under: Michael Jackson, Celebrity Justice
We must read between the lines of this news too? That is, Michael did not have a doctor because Murray is not a doctor. And Michael has omitted the use of drugs, because it just was not an addict! <!-- serrrr -->errrr<!-- serrrr --> <!-- sconfused/ -->confused/<!-- sconfused/ --> <!-- serrrr -->errrr<!-- serrrr -->
2. "Michael did not disclose he was taking prescription drugs prior to and at the time of his death -- including Propofol."
How Michael would disclose who used prescription drugs at the time of his death? If he was died, usually has no way to disclose any information about "the moment of his death. "
TMZ is kidding or I did not understand this English very well? <!-- serrrr -->errrr<!-- serrrr -->
This is about the TII concert insurance policy....not life insurance.
That is, if the concert doesn't go ahead, Lloyds insurance will pay for loss of damages...refunds of tickets etc.
There was a doctor that did the 4hr medical on MJ, but that report is MISSING.!! AEG promised the insurers, that a new medical exam would be done as the concerts in London started. But that never happened, did it.
So Michael told Lloyds that he hadn't seen a dr for 4yrs, other than a cosmetic surgeon...well well well...the truth comes to light......Dr Klein was the last dr to see michael then, not Murray ??
The argument is that MJ lied about his propofol addiction as well.....
So why did Lloyds go ahead if they didnt have a medical report ????????????? This is the article:
<!-- m -->http://www.list.co.uk/article/19461-mic ... t-missing/<!-- m -->
August 6, 2009
The physician who declared Michael Jackson was fit for a 50-date concert tour has come under the spotlight as investigators probe his sudden death.
Acting for insurers Robertson Taylor, David Slavit declared Jackson was fit to undertake the gruelling tour in the UK.
But officials now say they are surprised Jackson passed the medical. According to a UK Mirror exclusive, Slavit's exam report left finance officers joking it must have been based on the "body of a Nasa astronaut".
The promoter of Jackson's tour, AEG Live, is locked in a million-dollar fight with the insurer. Robertson Taylor says it ordered its own tests after seeing the results of Slavit's exam. The London firm sent a doctor to Los Angeles but Jackson was unable to see him. A deal was made with AEG on condition Jackson had further tests in the UK.
AEG, however, claims it never saw the Slavit report. A spokesman for AEG said: "AEG did not hire any doctor at any time in connection with securing insurance. Dr David Slavit performed the medical exam which was submitted to the insurers as part of their underwriting. AEG has never received a copy of Dr Slavit's medical exam. A second medical examination was scheduled in the UK when the tour arrived. The policy was issued in a fictitious name."
<!-- m -->http://www.metrolyrics.com/2009-michael ... -news.html<!-- m -->
So who stuffed up then..???? Michael or the Insurance company?? My thought is that the insurance company stuffed up and are trying to make excuses.
We all know that Michael was as fit as ever, and he never had a drug problem....and that he is very much alive.
If an insurance claim is put in, that will warrant possible legal action against MJ when he comes back...so I'm hoping this will not go through....Peace
First of all, Michael is NOT a fraud. If there is a fraud, that issue is with a AEG or/and broker Robertson Taylor through who policy was issued. Second, this policy issue itself is bizarre because, I've explained this before, there is no LOSS for Lloyds to pay to Estate what so ever. The policy issued as in case something happened during the concert.. Since concert never took place, Lloyds is not entitled to pay Estate anything. EXCEPT for loss for event cancellation payable to AEG only, the concert organizer, IF there is a special provision or separate policy for that.
I remember the article I put here in the past, where clearly explains everything. It was not clear if that provision was added to the policy at the beginning. As for doctor David Slavit otolaryngologist from New York <!-- m -->http://www.healthgrades.com/directory_s ... BE20AF.cfm<!-- m --> , it is suspicious that he could write report about overall health of Michael as he is specialized in limited med. practice area- ear, nose,throat. In this case, if it is true, then Lloyds is right, but the blame the broker and AEG, not Michael. Robertson Taylor has an office location in New York. So, it is clear how they could get med. report from David Slavit to deceive insurance company.
Finally, there is a "life inurance policy" so called Key Man Life Insurance. I am sure AEG purchase this insurance for Michael as a key person of the event. Indeed, if there was a lie about his health, Lloyds can make policy void and not pay anything.
and thanks for the explanation scorpionchik <!-- sbounce/ -->bounce/<!-- sbounce/ -->
dear lords of london
if you get any more details about murray drop on by and we can compare notes. <!-- s:idea: -->:idea:<!-- s:idea: --> <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
I think that in terms of their dimension Linguistics fraud is based on hoax. <!-- smj_bad/ -->mj_bad/<!-- smj_bad/ --> <!-- s
LOL - you are funny <!-- s:) -->:)<!-- s:) -->
Okay...first of all, it's been said over and over that Michael passed the tests with flying colors. So, someone is lying.
Secondly, why would Lords of London even need to see the medical information if Michael didn't complete the exam? Why would it matter to them anyway...if he wasn't insured he wasn't insured and there would be no need to see any medical information.
Once again we have two different stories. And better yet - why is it now just coming out and not sooner?
Blessings.
Ya I think the big thing that MJ "lied" about was dying. I think the insurance company Lloyd's of London has interesting initials...LOL. "LOL: MJ Lied".
What I don't understand is how any of us can actually state that Michael never had a drug problem in the past.Who are we to say he didn't?Think about it,if he never had a drug problem then why did Elizabeth Taylor personally fly with him to take him to a rehab center?Sounds like a past drug problem to me IMO.Why would she lie about it,she had absolutely nothing to gain from lying about it and you could tell in the way she always talked about Michael that she loved him very much and he was a very close friend of hers.No matter what we want to believe about what Michael did or didn't do we need to remember that he was a human being and had his own faults just like everyone else...
MJ-Lloyds document
Lloyd's of London is suing the Michael Jackson Company and AEG over an insurance policy that was taken out for Michael Jackson's performances in London, which never happened due to the superstar’s sudden death.
LLoyd's accuses AEG, the concert promoter, of withholding witness statements, and "other information necessary to determine AEG's entitlement to coverage under the policy," according to the lawsuit.
The insurance policy that was taken out on behalf of the former King of Pop for $17.5 million dollars, which Lloyd's doesn't think it should have to pay because it was never revealed to them that Jackson was taking prescription drugs and Propofol.
Lloyd's contends it shouldn't have to pay the insurance policy because: "AEG and/or Jackson, knew but did not disclose that Jackson was taking prescription drugs and/or drugs prior to and at the time of his death, including Propofol," the court docs state.
The insurance company asserts that they have the right to rescind the policy because of Jackson's alleged drug use.
Lloyds wants the judge to issue an order declaring the insurance policy canceled and that AEG and the Michael Jackson Company are only entitled to a refund of the premium of the policy.
Michael Jackson died on June 25, 2009 of an acute Propofol intoxication. Jackson's personal physician, Dr Conrad Murray, who admitted to administering Propofol to Michael, has been charged with involuntary manslaughter. Dr. Murray's trial is expected to begin in September.
<!-- m -->http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2 ... -documents<!-- m -->
Very good finding. Plus the policy venue is London (p.5 of complaint), not LA, i.e. if MJ died in London and AEG did not lie about his health, loss will be paid. AEG is in violation of almost all sections of policy provisions, AEG will get nothing. Lloyds is right. It will be good hoaxwise.
Do any of you remember from 2009 that it was said that the policy had an exemption where it would not pay and that exemption was death by drug overdose? I remember. I don't know if I bookmarked that one and if I did I have so much on Michael bookmarked that it would take me forever to find it but here is another one from an August 2009 article. In that article it says:
"Lloyd's of London would cover any losses sustained by the promotion company AEG Live if Jackson suffered any mishaps leading to the cancellation of his shows, which were due to begin July 13.
The LA Time stated that the policy read:
"This insurance does not cover any loss directly or indirectly arising out of, contributed to, by or resulting from . . . the illegal possession or illicit taking of drugs and their effects."
Here is the link to the entire article: <!-- m -->http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/10935<!-- m -->
So why almost 2 years later is this in the news? In my opinion it's a lot of baloney, intended to keep the non-believers, just that, in a state of non-belief! There are more of them than of us! And for that reason I really feel that the "BAM" is for them and not us. They are the ones, news media and all, who are going to be shocked, trying to get to Michael, running around all excited and looking big-eyed, <!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: --> but the true believers won't be. I know I won't!
Blessings!
OnTheWingsOfLove
Sorry, i'm so confused with all this <!-- s:oops: -->:oops:<!-- s:oops: --> Could you please explain why is it good hoaxwise?