<br />THIS is twisting words to suit an agenda because NO ONE told you to RESPECT these things, YOU invented that sentiment and then proceeded to become outraged by it.<br />
<br /><br />
on 1337916039:
<br />All people experience things from their perspective, and you cannot deny people what they feel or experience.<br />
<br /><br /><br /><br />
on 1337934505:
<br />Sometimes these things are just funny to read, that people are so sensetive to these stuff stunnes me.<br />Who cares if a person is a anti semite, that is their problem, who cares if someone is a racist, that is their problem.<br /><br />Society have done a good job so that people always offend eachother without even knowing it and then be called names.<br />If I would say something to offend a jew, then I am a anti semite.<br />If I say something offensive to a black person then I am a racist.<br />If I say something offensive to an overweight person, then I am a bully.<br /><br />Please stop this childish behavior, no wait, not even children do these things because they know better.<br /><br />Stop judging people, calling them names and say that they are this and that when u don't even know the person.<br />
<br /><br />Who cares if Hitler was an anti-Semite, that was his problem.<br />Who cares if Neo-Nazis are anti-Semites and xenophobic, that's their problem, even when they kill migrants in the streets of Germany.<br />Who cares if Neo-Nazis are anti-Semites, that's their problem, even if they desecrate Jewish graves.<br />Who cares if Mottola is racist, that's his problem.
Oh good Scream, I'm glad you located the accurate quote. Read carefully what MJonmind wrote and then compare it to your interpretation. She is right. Your interpretation of her words was incorrect. These misunderstandings can be prevented by reading the words that are typed. You CANNOT deny those things. You DO NOT HAVE TO RESPECT them, but you cannot deny them.<br /><br />Feel free to discuss your own feelings, perspective, and experience. Just stop putting words in people's mouths.
@_Scream_....you are doing many of the members of this forum a real injustice by insinuating that we do not speak out against genocides and racism. If you set aside your outrage and really read what has been said, you will find the majority here are against all violence aimed at any ethnic group, and not solely just the Jewish people. I am ashamed of what happened to the aborigines here where I live in Australia and my husband is a Serbian who is deeply ashamed of what happened in his home country. We do not recognize labels in my household... our ideology is that there is only one race...the human race. We all deserve to be treated with honour and respect.
People on here are interested in Michael Jackson and the symbolism in his music and short films, right? He definitely doesn't like racism and he doesn't like Hitler, he also doesn't think no one should care if people are racist or anti-Semitic, he said it best in his music and short films, if you still feel it's ok to link to websites that for example promote the anti-Semitic Protocols of the Elders of Zion, then I am powerless, if even Michael Jackson can't convince you, you won't listen to me. Michael's message in his music and short films and in his interviews and speeches is also the reason why I know if Front is Michael, he would address this and not look away:<br /><br />Michael Jackson - Black Or White (Complete Version) - YouTube<br /><br />Pay close attention from 8:40 to 8:55, look at the car windows.
Antisemitism (also spelled anti-semitism or anti-Semitism) is suspicion of, hatred toward, or discrimination against Jews for reasons connected to their Jewish heritage. In a 2005 U.S. governmental report, antisemitism is defined as "hatred toward Jews—individually and as a group—that can be attributed to the Jewish religion and/or ethnicity."[1] A person who holds such views is called an "antisemite". Antisemitism may be manifested in many ways, ranging from expressions of hatred of or discrimination against individual Jews to organized violent attacks by mobs, state police, or even military attacks on entire Jewish communities. Extreme instances of persecution include the pogroms which preceded the First Crusade in 1096, the expulsion from England in 1290, the massacres of Spanish Jews in 1391, the persecutions of the Spanish Inquisition, the expulsion from Spain in 1492, the expulsion from Portugal in 1497, various Russian pogroms, the Dreyfus Affair, and the Final Solution by Hitler's Germany and official Soviet anti-Jewish policies. While the term's etymology might suggest that antisemitism is directed against all Semitic peoples, the term was coined in the late 19th century in Germany as a more scientific-sounding term for Judenhass ("Jew-hatred"),[2] and that has been its normal use since then.[3]
The trial and execution of Ethel and Julius Rosenberg took place in an atmosphere of continuing and intense antisemitism in the United States. At the time of their arrest, and as the trial progressed, the case appeared open and shut: according to the steady stream of news reports the Rosenbergs had provided atomic secrets to the Soviet Union resulting in that country, according to Judge Kaufman, having the bomb years before the Russians otherwise would have. More recently government files revealed that, while espionage had provided “atomic” secrets to Russia, the spy involved was not Julius Rosenberg but a scientist working on the top secret “Manhattan Project” and secondarily by a 19 year old Harvard student also working on the project. The Russians tested their first bomb in 1949. Those recently released government documents also disclosed that, not only were the real sources of those atomic secrets known before the Rosenbergs went to trial, but that the FBI and government prosecutors were aware also that Julius Rosenberg had provided the Russians information on radar, not the bomb. Regarding Ethel Rosenberg, “declassified documents now show that decrypted information reporting that Ethelwas NOT involved in Soviet spy work was passed to the FBI… the government knew she did not commit [the crime].” The FBI had implicated Ethel in order to coerce her husband to cooperate in other on-going investigations. “The Rosenbergs were convicted on March 29, 1951, and on April 5 were sentenced to death.”<br />Antisemitism in American politics, part 2: the Rosenberg Show Trial | Jerusalem Post - Blogs<br />
<br /><br /><br /><br />Extremism.<br /><br />
A Knights of the Ku Klux Klan event, held in Fairdale, Kentucky, in August 2006, was a joint event with the neo-Nazi National Socialist Movement (NSM), billed as a “Unity Rally.” This was just one of many recent attempts by a variety of Ku Klux Klan groups to coordinate their activities with the Minneapolis-based NSM, which became the largest neo-Nazi group in the United States in 2006.
<br />Ku Klux Klan -- Extremism in America<br /><br /><br /><br />Minneapolis, MO - where Propofol is discussed to be introduced for executing death penalty.<br />Propofol -- Now Used to Kill People ... On Purpose | TMZ.com<br /><br /><br /><br />I think this needs no further comment.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Michael never looked away.<br /><br />We remember well the smear campaigns of the British tabloids concerning Michael and Hitler.<br />It's about time the truth is being said about this as well.
<br />Sigh! I'm all for finding out everyone's honest opinions but it shouldn't apply with certain subjects. There are 3 subjects that should never be discussed in the office...and in this case, on the forum: Race, Religion and Politics. There will only be hurt feelings and misunderstandings. <br />
<br /><br />We have to discuss race,religion,and politics because those are some of the main things that are keeping us divided. I think you're right about there being a lot of misunderstandings. This is the reason that we have to work it all out but we have to do it respectfully. Most of the time there is fear and lack of information. We all have to share our ideas,thoughts,perspectives and information so we can get closer to the truth. There's propoganda,media control,education control everywhere. There are different views and perspectives about everything and no one knows everything. We don't know the truth about history, science,etc.etc. We are just trying to get closer to the truth. There are people from all around the world here so that is good. TPTB don't want us to unite. <br />We have to get "smart" and stop the attacking and the name calling. That's what they want. Our enemies are not people just like us in a foreign country or of a different religion or race. We're all the same and we want the same things.<br />We're all one. Spread information and truth so that we can come together. <br /><br />
<br />I think this needs no further comment.<br /><br /><br /><br />Michael never looked away.
<br /><br />Thank you for the screenshot, Grace .... if you look at the first car window he smashes, it says "Hitler lives", you might have to watch it full screen and pause the video shortly before he smashes it.<br /><br />P.S. I want to add that this is not meant literal (although there are those Nazis and Neo-Nazis who think Hitler is alive and escaped to Atlantis - Michael doesn't believe that obviously, maybe in this context it is meant literal), "Hitler lives" means Nazism/Neo-Nazism lives (see "I like Hitler").
UNITED WE STAND - divided we fall. It's what we must do, to help each other.<br /><br />I'm not surprised to find out that so many of us have had older relatives beaten on, murdered during WW2 - and I'm sure it goes back to WW1 (as in my family's case - my own grandmama). We had to pay to get her back, from the Bolshevics...if you all noticed, it all revolves around the have/have nots. My family paid, paid, paid - until we had nothing left - after we got as many people out, between two world wars. I regret nothing. At least in the 1990s, the TRUTH was restored!<br /><br />Bayer is one of the main culprits, in WW2; what was being held over their heads? Hugo Boss? <br /><br />Dr. Porsche was held under threat of his entire family being exterminated, if he didn't design tanks. There is a human element, when you look close enough.<br /><br />The arrogance of the Nazi party, fortunately, was their downfall. They thought they were unsinkable - just like the titanic. Even when his generals were telling him otherwise, Hitler couldn't comprehend they were losing. He'd kill those who told him anything negative, from what I understand.<br /><br />60,000,000 people, in total, sounds correct to me - those starved all over, not just in Germany and Poland. This was a Global Catastrophe.<br /><br />In the end? WE BETTER LEARN from WW2, Korean war. The Vietnam War was a border war - so of course, it was doomed. Which is why it was foolhardy to invade Iraq, under any circumstances. If you can't close the borders, it just doesn't work.<br /><br />You then have to look at WHO benefits from war: the suppliers of weaponry, etc.<br /><br />Right now, Afghanistan is suffering a HUGE Polio outbreak, which is listed on the BBC - it's heartbreaking! Kids who'll never be able to walk right, without braces - all because daddies thought the vaccine would render kids infertile. My entire family is a bunch of "Fertile Myrtles," and everyone's had that one, along with all the other vaccines. Hasn't stopped the babies from coming.<br /><br />As for the B&W video? That graphitti was ALL added, after the initial airing - to make the violence acceptable. I thoroughly enjoyed it the way it was aired - UNALTERED - here's a COMPARISON: <br /><br />It's from here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_or_White<br /><br />So, do the research first, when it comes to Michael. I love it when he messes with people's heads, and does things his way.
@scream...I'm not sure if you've (mis)interpreted someone here as saying or thinking that Mike 'liked' Hitler or condoned any of his actions, but I've yet to see anyone express that. And if anyone did, they'd be wrong based on what we do know about Mike. We are all very aware of Mike's messages and what he stood for....which did ALSO include tolerance, compassion, understanding and love. Yes, Mike never looked away...but he also never approached with hate. He didn't wish he could've spoken with Hitler so he could've blasted his ass...he wanted to bring love to evil. In fact, no matter the injustice that Mike spoke against...he always premised it with a message of love first and foremost, even for people who harbor evil at their core, like Hitler.<br /><br />I also don't get your whole 'Front isn't Mike if he doesn't speak up' argument. Out of ALL the criteria/evidence we have at our disposal to make an educated guess as to Front's authenticity (regardless of whether or not he's Mike)....that argument or point, IMO, is weak. I completely agree that Mike would NOT approve of nor partake in an anti-semitic forum, or one run by someone who expressed those views. As far as I know, Souza is the one who runs it with bec's help. Are you accusing them of being anti-semitic? If so, where's your proof? If you are not accusing them, then what exactly would Front need to speak out about? One comment posted by one member out of 5000+ members? I could probably see some logic in your argument if Souza and/or bec were condoning Aktoni's post or the hate-filled sentiments...but they have both been clear on where they stand with that. As admin and mod, they have also both warned Aktoni, you and every other member about being offensive to other members. <br /><br />But that doesn't seem like it's 'good enough' for you...it's like you want or need Front to come out and rip a strip off Aktoni. But if Mike wouldn't have done that with Hitler....what makes you think he would with Aktoni? If it's just a matter of wanting/needing Front to speak up to appease you...so that you know where he stands....well, then that shouldn't be necessary either, since you've stated that you know where Mike stands on the topic. And if it's about you wanting/needing him to address/manage the forum as a whole, well, that's what the admin and mod are here for...and they have, and are, maintaining the integrity of the forum that he has chosen to post on. <br /><br />So, ya....IMO, your 'Front isn't Mike' argument is weak. Is there some other agenda going on?<br /><br />With L.O.V.E. always.<br /><br />
<br />@scream...I'm not sure if you've (mis)interpreted someone here as saying or thinking that Mike 'liked' Hitler or condoned any of his actions, but I've yet to see anyone express that.
<br /><br />When a Michael Jackson fan says "I like Hitler" and "the Jews killed each other and blamed Hitler" and in a second post makes it very clear that he or she meant every word, when Michael Jackson fans post links to anti-Semitic websites run by Holocaust deniers, they didn't get anything, they don't get Michael's message and they also don't get that Michael as a black man would have been murdered, his entire family would have been murdered in Nazi Germany. So how can any Michael Jackson fan go totally against his message and not realize that they are even offending Michael as a black man?<br /><br />
on 1337973373:
Yes, Mike never looked away...but he also never approached with hate. He didn't wish he could've spoken with Hitler so he could've blasted his ass...he wanted to bring love to evil. In fact, no matter the injustice that Mike spoke against...he always premised it with a message of love first and foremost, even for people who harbor evil at their core, like Hitler.
<br /><br />Well, that's what he said, but did you see his anger and aggression in the video? Fact is, yes, I also wish I could just speak to evil people and love them and then they'd turn into good people. But Hitler was a sociopath, anti-Semite and racist, Michael as a black man would have never gotten close to him, he would have been killed instead. You can have your wishes and hopes, but you still have to see reality. Maybe talking about Hitler in this context makes things look too far away .... do you think just talking to Saddam and loving him would have stopped him from killing people? Would have turned him into a nice and caring guy? Yes, we can dream, we can have visions, but you can't take them literal. Sociopaths are a fact of life, they exist, Michael had a lot of them in his life as well and couldn't change them or stop them from doing evil things to him.<br /><br />
on 1337973373:
I also don't get your whole 'Front isn't Mike if he doesn't speak up' argument. Out of ALL the criteria/evidence we have at our disposal to make an educated guess as to Front's authenticity (regardless of whether or not he's Mike)....that argument or point, IMO, is weak.
<br /><br />It's not weak. He chose this forum to post on and there are things posted on here that go totally against what Michael stands for, what he voiced in every interview and speech and in a lot of his songs and short films, he can rip people like Frenchbraid a new one for posting things that are completely harmless and didn't have any impact on the world as such compared to what some people posted in this thread, but he looks away when hate speech is posted? That doesn't make any sense. Of course I still don't know if he even saw this thread yet, so I'm still waiting, I never said he has to react within minutes. But if there won't be a reaction soon or in his next few posts, then for me that means he is fake. Nobody has to agree with me, but if he doesn't address the important things in this world that need to change, especially now that all this was posted on the forum that is his home, he can't be Michael. back stopped posting on MJJC because people posted negative things about Michael's family after addressing it first, but there was no change, so he left. If Front is back is Michael, this is just as important or even more important for the world as a whole.
The original meaning of the BoW video was about breaking free from the industry, letting them know he can't be fucked with anymore. After all the complaints about the violence, he added the grafitti. Two birds -> one stone.
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
Scream has left us for at least a week or two, I warned her more than once.
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
Also called my attention That in the years of the 2nd World War the Jews controlled Many half in North America and Europe and Were owners of industry propaganda of U.S. cinematic. States and if you do not believe I invite you to see a documentary Called That HOLLYWOODISM talks about the history of the founders of Hollywood. Also there are Many Jews linked to insdutria But this does not anymore mean there is no other That ethnic group That Makes This Kind of movies, But MOST of the largest Producers of This type of film is of Jewish origin Mainly Which Have An aberrant sexual content of sadomasochism. Also called the attention the origin of large banking positions in the world of finance Such as the IMF, the World Bank, and the federal reserve of the United States. UU.Aunque this does not want to say That They Have the guilt of all evil in the world Because she exists in Any race or group But nobody is favorite of God, or we are all or none the we are, no one is exclusive of evil But there is CHOSEN race for me nor are all children of God. About the neo-Nazi sources very careful Must Be Because They Are much extremism and the source is without Credibility That fanaticism is bad WHERE it comes. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />
Hollywoodism: Jews, Movies, and the American Dream<br /><br /> Credit writer-director Simcha Jacobovici with ambition: to convert Neal Gabler's 420-page book study, An Empire of Their Own: How The Jews Invented Hollywood, into a coherent documentary. Hollywoodism: Jews, Movies, and the American Dream, playing at the Coolidge Corner,is quite a film story, of how a group of impoverished Jews immigrants from Eastern European shtetls eventually became czars of the studio system: Carl Laemmle and Adolph Zukor at Universal, Louis B. Mayer at MGM, Harry Cohn at Columbia, and the three Warner Brothers. The movies they green-lighted were thematic affirmations of their own rags-to-unbelievable riches sagas: asserting that anyone with chutzpah can make it in the USA, including little guys and outsiders, that there's an inevitable happy ending at the end of the rainbow. Since everybody went to Hollywood movies, and breathed the utopian cant of studio product, these Jewish moguls could be said to have invented "the American Dream."<br /><br /> Hollywoodism provides sagacious observations from Jewish film critics and studio historians, including Gabler, J. Hoberman, and Jonathan Rosenbaum, and prime footage of the Jewish bosses: i.e., Mayer pontificating before the American Legion, Laemmle lecturing his employees, "I will not have quitters or lazy men working for Universal," and with the thickest of Yiddish accents. But Jacobovici's film is weirdly schizophrenic. The first half is Jewish boosterism, proud crowing about how these lowly Jews ascended in Hollywood. Only one historian mentions that these studio heads "were ruthless, badly mistreated women." The second half (more credible) is often a finger-wagging at these same bosses for hiding their Jewishness, for forcing Jewish actors to change their names to gentile ones, for doing movies which always pushed assimilation, for being totally cowardly before World War II about making anti-Nazi movies, for being gutless a second time in cooperating with HUAC in purging Hollywood of supposed Communists.<br /><br /> A couple of problems: (a) the film bunches 20th Century Fox with the Jewish-run studios, but William Fox was a gentile. In actuality, Fox was known as "the goyisher studio." Including the final scene from Fox's The Grapes of Wrath to illustrate a "root for the underdog" Jewish point of view is simply an untruth: the filmmaker, John Ford, and the producer, Darryl F. Zanuck, are likewise Christian.<br /><br /> (b) It's certainly stretching film history to describe the era of the Jewish bosses as being an enlightened time for blacks on screen, as opposed to, earlier, when WASPs were in control and the pro-Klan The Birth of a Nation was the par. Yes, there were several all-black musicals made in '30s Hollywood, but otherwise blacks were stereotyped as maids, eye-rolling porters, and shuffling, muddle-headed servants in countless films made by Zucker, Mayer, the Warners, and Harry Cohn. Curiously, Jacobovici shows a flagrant example of Jewish racism without criticizing it in his voiceover: Al Jolson switching from singing in the synagogue to doing "Mammy" in blackface in the Warner Brothers' The Jazz Singer.<br /><br />GERALD PEARY<br />Boston Phoenix, September, 1998<br /><br /><br />
<br />Also called my attention That in the years of the 2nd World War the Jews controlled Many half in North America and Europe and Were owners of industry propaganda of U.S. cinematic. States and if you do not believe I invite you to see a documentary Called That HOLLYWOODISM talks about the history of the founders of Hollywood. Also there are Many Jews linked to insdutria But this does not anymore mean there is no other That ethnic group That Makes This Kind of movies, But MOST of the largest Producers of This type of film is of Jewish origin Mainly Which Have An aberrant sexual content of sadomasochism. Also called the attention the origin of large banking positions in the world of finance Such as the IMF, the World Bank, and the federal reserve of the United States. UU.Aunque this does not want to say That They Have the guilt of all evil in the world Because she exists in Any race or group But nobody is favorite of God, or we are all or none the we are, no one is exclusive of evil But there is CHOSEN race for me nor are all children of God. About the neo-Nazi sources very careful Must Be Because They Are much extremism and the source is without Credibility That fanaticism is bad WHERE it comes. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />
Hollywoodism: Jews, Movies, and the American Dream<br /><br /> Credit writer-director Simcha Jacobovici with ambition: to convert Neal Gabler's 420-page book study, An Empire of Their Own: How The Jews Invented Hollywood, into a coherent documentary. Hollywoodism: Jews, Movies, and the American Dream, playing at the Coolidge Corner,is quite a film story, of how a group of impoverished Jews immigrants from Eastern European shtetls eventually became czars of the studio system: Carl Laemmle and Adolph Zukor at Universal, Louis B. Mayer at MGM, Harry Cohn at Columbia, and the three Warner Brothers. The movies they green-lighted were thematic affirmations of their own rags-to-unbelievable riches sagas: asserting that anyone with chutzpah can make it in the USA, including little guys and outsiders, that there's an inevitable happy ending at the end of the rainbow. Since everybody went to Hollywood movies, and breathed the utopian cant of studio product, these Jewish moguls could be said to have invented "the American Dream."<br /><br /> Hollywoodism provides sagacious observations from Jewish film critics and studio historians, including Gabler, J. Hoberman, and Jonathan Rosenbaum, and prime footage of the Jewish bosses: i.e., Mayer pontificating before the American Legion, Laemmle lecturing his employees, "I will not have quitters or lazy men working for Universal," and with the thickest of Yiddish accents. But Jacobovici's film is weirdly schizophrenic. The first half is Jewish boosterism, proud crowing about how these lowly Jews ascended in Hollywood. Only one historian mentions that these studio heads "were ruthless, badly mistreated women." The second half (more credible) is often a finger-wagging at these same bosses for hiding their Jewishness, for forcing Jewish actors to change their names to gentile ones, for doing movies which always pushed assimilation, for being totally cowardly before World War II about making anti-Nazi movies, for being gutless a second time in cooperating with HUAC in purging Hollywood of supposed Communists.<br /><br /> A couple of problems: (a) the film bunches 20th Century Fox with the Jewish-run studios, but William Fox was a gentile. In actuality, Fox was known as "the goyisher studio." Including the final scene from Fox's The Grapes of Wrath to illustrate a "root for the underdog" Jewish point of view is simply an untruth: the filmmaker, John Ford, and the producer, Darryl F. Zanuck, are likewise Christian.<br /><br /> (b) It's certainly stretching film history to describe the era of the Jewish bosses as being an enlightened time for blacks on screen, as opposed to, earlier, when WASPs were in control and the pro-Klan The Birth of a Nation was the par. Yes, there were several all-black musicals made in '30s Hollywood, but otherwise blacks were stereotyped as maids, eye-rolling porters, and shuffling, muddle-headed servants in countless films made by Zucker, Mayer, the Warners, and Harry Cohn. Curiously, Jacobovici shows a flagrant example of Jewish racism without criticizing it in his voiceover: Al Jolson switching from singing in the synagogue to doing "Mammy" in blackface in the Warner Brothers' The Jazz Singer.<br /><br />GERALD PEARY<br />Boston Phoenix, September, 1998<br /><br /><br />
<br /><br />Did you see the "NO MORE WET BACKS" message, I think Michael is probably claiming the right of Mexicans to have a decent life in the States.
This is just my two cents. Discrimination and prejudice is one of the main problems. I'm not pointing fingers or blaming. I'm just talking generally. We never want to judge someone or even a group without knowing them. We can't blame a whole nationality,race, or religion for the actions of a few. There's always corrupt people within any group. We can't generalize and say horrible things about each other constantly. Such as Muslims are _____, Jews are this______, Japanese are _______ Italians are ________ and so on. I can fill in the blanks with things I heard but I don't want to spread these things any further. <br /><br />This is all RIDICULOUS. We really have to end it. United we stand and divided we fall just like Tink said. <br /><br />We lose control if we let these things divide us. Did you guys know that there were thousands of Japanese Americans detained in concentration camps in the US during WWII also. These were innocent American citizens discriminated against just because they were Japanese. <br /><br />Love <br /><br />
The bigger picture is the most powerful people in the world are Zionists and Satanists.They are not real Jews.This is where the confusion comes in,imo.I dont see Jews as being evil,but the fake ones are.The bible refers to them as the Synagogue of Satan,these people are pure evil,i think some times people forget that there is a big difference between the real Jews and the counterfeit Jews.Maybe Scream forgot to consider this fact.
<br />The bigger picture is the most powerful people in the world are Zionists and Satanists.They are not real Jews.This is where the confusion comes in,imo.I dont see Jews as being evil,but the fake ones are.The bible refers to them as the Synagogue of Satan,these people are pure evil,i think some times people forget that there is a big difference between the real Jews and the counterfeit Jews.Maybe Scream forgot to consider this fact.<br />
Totally off topic but I would expect that even if he had intentions before, Front will purposely not address this JUST BECAUSE scream made this ultimatum. Front doesn't seem real interested in convincing anyone nor accepting any challenges to "prove" his identity.<br /><br />I have a feeling that his goal is to passively do the exact opposite.<br /><br />
But if there won't be a reaction soon or in his next few posts, then for me that means he is fake.
<br />Totally off topic but I would expect that even if he had intentions before, Front will purposely not address this JUST BECAUSE scream made this ultimatum. Front doesn't seem real interested in convincing anyone nor accepting any challenges to "prove" his identity.<br /><br />I have a feeling that his goal is to passively do the exact opposite.<br /><br />
But if there won't be a reaction soon or in his next few posts, then for me that means he is fake.
<br /><br />I think that pretty much seals it.<br />
<br /><br />+1
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
Comments
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.""For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.""For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."