the family of the double child. he can be used for various versions. don't be so quick to Judge.......k?
Jacksonology, tell me...why did Michael's children wear masks all the time?
probably to PROTECT there Identities. But who knows, those could of been doubles too. while the kids were at home SAFE and SOUND.
Ok, like you've said...to protect their identities. Every parent wishes safety for their children, just like Michael wanted to protect little Blanket. Do you seriously think a sane parent would have an agreement to let their son serve as a double, when they know the risks this may have, like kidnapping? As much as I love Michael, and as much I would need the money...one thing is sure...I wouldn't risk my child!
Maybe this child is a look-a-like, yes, though he looks like Blanket to me, but if its not Blanket, then its just a kid fooling around over the internet? Someone told him, hey you look like Blanket, and he decided to fool around with people around the internet. There isnt a conspiracy behind everything.
And to your question....do you think Michael wants other kids in those kinds of situations? at risk of getting injured and all that it may take to be a Blanket double?
Ever heard of Child Actors? or Maculay Culkin at that fact? His parents had him work all his Childhood. Non-stop. and he had to deal with the Media at a very young age.....
But he didnt have to serve as a double for anyone. He was making mad money out of his own identity. He wasnt at risk of being kidnapped, mobbed, pulled, or whatever Michael was trying to protect his children from. See the difference?
true, but he was in a WHOLE different situation then Michael's kids are.............
these pics were taken less then a year apart: obviously two different ears. real Paris ears are lower, and more Oval, Dynamic. Sort of like a elf (No Pun Intended) the fake one Paris ear is more Circular. The inner ear is more detailed, and dynamic then real paris' ear. unless Paris had ear surgery <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: -->
Im not comfortable with picking apart the looks of the children. Its just not right.
Ofcourse your right. and i'm not trying to Bash them. Just broadening my view on the hoax. and looking deeper into it. Michael used doubles IMO. so why not the kids? In certain situations. IM NOT SAYING that we never seen the Real Paris and Blanket. I'm just saying i'm sure that some doubles were used. IMO. i'm not trying to enforce my belief's onto anyone. Michael even said ''people have a voice, there own opinions'' and it's just my humble opinion. i would never or intend to bash these sweet, kind hearted kids, and debunk them as fakes in this post. just looking into POSSIBILITIES Sorry, if i offended anyone...
:roll: come on so if I look different in various pictures that means that I have a double ok it is your point of view and this is just my opinion but what does it have to be with the hoax
well the use of doubles with Michael has been major in THE HOAX ok? So why not doubles used for his Kids? Ok????????? <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: --> <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: --> <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: --> <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: -->
I dont know if michael would like that we talk about his kids and less about having doubles <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: --> but again it is just my opinion...
Im not comfortable with picking apart the looks of the children. Its just not right.
Ofcourse your right. and i'm not trying to Bash them. Just broadening my view on the hoax. and looking deeper into it. Michael used doubles IMO. so why not the kids? In certain situations. IM NOT SAYING that we never seen the Real Paris and Blanket. I'm just saying i'm sure that some doubles were used. IMO. i'm not trying to enforce my belief's onto anyone. Michael even said ''people have a voice, there own opinions'' and it's just my humble opinion. i would never or intend to bash these sweet, kind hearted kids, and debunk them as fakes in this post. just looking into POSSIBILITIES Sorry, if i offended anyone...
Of course i understand your intentions of this thread... i know you arent bashing their looks and are investigating the possibility of doubles.
You havent offended me.. this is a free forum where we can discuss anything. Thats what i like about being here. <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D -->
I think recently there have been MANY photos of the children released and leaked onto the net since June 2009. Before then we NEVER saw the children.. i guess that makes me a bit uncomfortable because Michael protected those children so fiercely... and now their images are everywhere
I just dont know what to make of it all... i guess what im trying to say, is that i feel Michaels protection seems to be ebbing away. <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
Im not comfortable with picking apart the looks of the children. Its just not right.
Ofcourse your right. and i'm not trying to Bash them. Just broadening my view on the hoax. and looking deeper into it. Michael used doubles IMO. so why not the kids? In certain situations. IM NOT SAYING that we never seen the Real Paris and Blanket. I'm just saying i'm sure that some doubles were used. IMO. i'm not trying to enforce my belief's onto anyone. Michael even said ''people have a voice, there own opinions'' and it's just my humble opinion. i would never or intend to bash these sweet, kind hearted kids, and debunk them as fakes in this post. just looking into POSSIBILITIES Sorry, if i offended anyone...
Of course i understand your intentions of this thread... i know you arent bashing their looks and are investigating the possibility of doubles.
You havent offended me.. this is a free forum where we can discuss anything. Thats what i like about being here. <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D -->
I think recently there have been MANY photos of the children released and leaked onto the net since June 2009. Before then we NEVER saw the children.. i guess that makes me a bit uncomfortable because Michael protected those children so fiercely... and now their images are everywhere
I just dont know what to make of it all... i guess what im trying to say, is that i feel Michaels protection seems to be ebbing away. <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
Makes me worry about those kids.
thank you, i have good intentions with this post. just looking at possibilities. the kids could of had doubles. IN CERTAIN situations. the doubles could of been Child Actors. and Michael could of picked them out himself. If ANYONE is going to be a double/decoy for his children. He has to feel comfortable with them.
ok.... right...... ummm.....yeah.... the thought of michael having a double isnt that far-fetched and can be taken....but isnt this going a bit too far?? like really the only way that blanket would have a double is is he was a twin... which he isnt....cant we just leave the kids alone and leave them out of this....
I agree. i am here to gain info about the hoax and i can handle opinions and respect opinions. i also can accept all the mj double talk, but some things are getting way to far fetched to the point were some things being dicussed are just plain stupid. Can we just stick to the main topics and leave the children out of this. Why would he need a double at this age. plz.
Well, in some of those pictures he was younger. When kids are little their faces tend to be rounder, their cheeks are bigger, etc. Plus, he's growing & he's gotten a bit skinnier, causing his face to change a little, his features (chin, jawline, cheekbones, etc.) are becoming more pronounced. It's normal. The thing that never changes in those pictures are the eyes. <!-- s:shock: -->:shock:<!-- s:shock: --> It's in the EYES. Those are MJ's eyes, they are unmistakable.[/quote how younger can he be!? he's under 10 lmao unless he was 6 or 5 in one of these pics <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: -->
My little cousin looks different now than he did last year. He is 8. His jawline is getting more pronounced, as well as his cheekbones, chin, etc. Just as I said Blanket's are. He's also taller & getting more slender. It happens. Kids grow up & change too, that's just common knowledge. I don't see why that's hard to believe. Also, as far as Blanket being on the computer, I have little cousins younger than 8, 6 & 7 who know how to use the computer & it could have been someone else's computer/webcam, they set it up for him & showed him how to take a picture. Are you saying he's too stupid to figure out how to take a picture of himself? <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: --> Has anyone seen the commercial with the little 5 year old girl who takeds pictures & uploads them on the computer & makes slideshows. Then she says "my name is ____ & I'm a PC". If she can be taught what to do & figure it out, why wouldn't Blanket be able to? He's a kid but he's not a baby. Also, Paris, Prince & Blanket are growing up. They can't be sheltered forever. They are now around their cousins, having fun being regular kids. If they want to mess around on the webcam like their cousins do & take pictures, they can. The person at fault is whoever is leaking these pictures, not the kids. I don't think MJ would put someone else's kids in danger either. He has body guards to protect himself & his kids. Besides he didn't show them to the world for the longest time to prevent that from happening. If MJ hoaxed his death, I believe he did it because he had to, he trusts his mom to take care of them & he trusts them around their cousins. It's very important for them to have their cousins who are their age around them. Like I said they are growing up. So what? IMO they don't have doubles, the pictures you posted look like the same kids to me. <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: -->
Correct me if i'm wrong, you say that MJ used doubles of his kids to protect the real ones from dangerous situations, so please tell me, why couldn't he goes alone? anyway the real ones are at home, so wouldn't it be easier to go without children?
i didnt read the post but i can assure you this IS BLANKET!
stop saying they have dobles...
ias true that there are posers but this is BLANKET.
the screencap is from a video of him.
ok this is F***K disturbing...
the pics with paris are real.they were leaked on the internet by someone that heaked grace's email.
first is a big difference between a poser and the real paris.
i can show you posers if you want to.
i can even make a topic with the pics of the kids that are leaked to see that the pics are real.
second in that pic with paris and the cat the other girl is spencer malnik.you can google "spencer malnik" and you see that is the same girl from the pic.
and 3rd the pics with blanket "screaming" are real.they are like i said screencaps from a video that he made at the webcam.
the video is in the internet on a private photobucket account of one of his counsins(i think is randy Jr).
one day photobucket had a service problem and allowed all the users to have acces at the private albums.
a girl had the luck to enter in randy's photobucket album and took the video (well are 2 videos).
she was about to realise them on the internet,but she thought that is not nice to do that and stoped.
she insted gave us some screencaps and told us the story about the "scream" pic. the story is that blanket is a big fan of "star war" and in some of the part one of the caracters are yelling "liarrrrr" .he screamed"liaaarrr" too.lol
thats the story.
so stop being paranoid about dobles of the kids.
and btw the videos with mj and so called kids doble...is not true.they are the kids.mike would never go out without the kids.
so like i said IS THE REAL BLANKET.
and THE REAL PARIS .
ans THE REAL PRINCE.
and if you want evidence of what i said tell me and i'll post some pics.
....
I don't believe the idea that MJ would use doubles for his kids ..I don't even think there's a possibility for that ..I mean he had doubles only b/c they MADE themselves look like MJ by going in surgery... How could he find kids that looked like them so much ..And whats the idea of going shopping and trips with doubles instead of his REAL children <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? --> Despite the fact that it is pretty risky and dangerous to do that ....Thats why MJ showed his kids b4 the hoax so people and the media won't make rumors saying that those aren't his children or they're "doubles" ..I think this is pretty similar to what your saying or what you believe ..........JMO
I don't believe the idea that MJ would use doubles for his kids ..I don't even think there's a possibility for that ..I mean he had doubles only b/c they MADE themselves look like MJ by going in surgery... How could he find kids that looked like them so much ..And whats the idea of going shopping and trips with doubles instead of his REAL children <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? --> Despite the fact that it is pretty risky and dangerous to do that ....Thats why MJ showed his kids b4 the hoax so people and the media won't make rumors saying that those aren't his children or they're "doubles" ..I think this is pretty similar to what your saying or what you believe ..........JMO
I'm not denying prince paris or blanket aren't his children.... i'm just possibly pointing out the use of doubles in there lifes.....
Guys, I didn't mean to start this topic to get bashed, or hated. I know this is a sensitive topic to some memembers, because out of all people the kids are suffering from the absense of there father. I just thought this topic needed to be made and discussed. About doubles used POSSIBLYin there early years, for chaotic enviorments, noise, and dangers. THAT'S ALL. i'm not claiming Prince Paris and Blanket aren't his children. I'm not saying they are hired child actors
Correct me if i'm wrong, you say that MJ used doubles of his kids to protect the real ones from dangerous situations, so please tell me, why couldn't he goes alone? anyway the real ones are at home, so wouldn't it be easier to go without children?
Exactly, I thought te same thing.
It simply doesn't make any sense at all to use doubles for the children.
There is a possibility that Michael used doubles from time to time to destract the media's attention and to be left alone but kids....i dont think so. Blanket in all pictures-just from different angles,just my opinion <!-- s;) -->;)<!-- s;) -->
Like Mo and I posted back on good ol' MJHD, everything and everyone in this hoax seems to be double:
Another theory within the Movie Theory: The Double Theory
Lots and lots in this hoax is double!
O2
2 MJ’s at O2 press conference in London (stage-mike and curtain-mike)
Dr. Tohme Tohme
2 MJ’s at Ed Hardy
2 video’s of the coroner’s van
2 different video’s from helicopters transporting the body to the coroner
2 Death Certificates
2 passports from MJ leaked
2 different middle names: Joe and Joseph
2 alledged son’s (Omer Bhatti and Jett Jackson)
2 ‘wives’ (Claire Cruise and Billie Jean Jackson)
2 Memorials (private and public)
Mike’s posessions removed out of 2 houses
2 tribute’s (Jermaine & Frank Dileo)
2 Last Will’s (1997 & 2002)
Murray video was place twice at Youtube (was taken off once ant put back)
Mike signed the AEG contract twice
Rumor has it that Mike has 2 ss#
2 autopsies
2 different MJ hairstyles (straight and curly)
2 strange guys showing up in front of the camera at the livestream of TMZ (PT Barnum circusguy and Afro-head-Elvis)
2 Harvey’s (Harvey Levin – TMZ & Craig Harvey – Coroner’s Office)
2 tourist busses at Carolwood Drive making footage of Ambulance
2 names for fatal medicin (Promofol/Diprivan)
2 trucks to empty Carolwood Drive
2 guardians appointed by Mike in his will (Katherine and Diana Ross)
2 former business partners appointed executers of the estate
2 versions of 911-call (one with and one without address mentioned)
Michael’s 2 tigers in the news due to the California fires
2 raids at Carolwood Drive
Rehearsal footage from 2 days (performance + chewing gum guy)
2 opinions about Mike’s Health/General appearance)
2 different ways to preserve the body (embalming and deep freeze)
2 locations for public memorial (Staples and Nokia)
2 UPS guys during the raids
2 nurses involved (Cherilyn Lee and Debbie Rowe)
2 doctors interrogated (Arnie Klein and Conrad Murray)
2 female employees of Murray picking up boxes at storage morning of MJ’s ‘Death’ (lalagirls)
2 ‘Deathbeds’ (MJ bed and Doc’s bed)
2 memorial programs (one for invited, one for fans)
Burial postponed twice
2 sisters to take care of the kids (Janet and Rebbie)
2 familymembers talking about foul play (LaToya and Joe)
2 raids on pharmacies (Vegas and LA)
2 persons calling cops for protection (Arnold Klein & Debbie Rowe)
2 stories concerning time of death (one death at arrival EMT’s, other death at hospital)
This Is It 2 weeks in theaters
2 final resting places (Grand Mausoleum and Freedom Mausoluem)
Brother carry casket twice (memorial and burial)
2 books to be released about MJ (Moonwalker and ‘Coffeetable Book’)
2 Singers announced to perfom on MJ’s funeral (Gladys Knight and Aretha Franklin)
2 memorial dates (it was delayed)
2 Hatmans at memorial
2 This is It teaser trailers
Dave Dave at Larry King Live
What if the This Is It movie is truly rehearsal footage, and Mike releases a second one, explaining the hoax? So the last double:
2 movies?
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
I think we should just leave the kids alone. I know from my own experience of being a parent...you can say anything you like about me, but touch my kids and I turn into a lioness. I don't believe MJ would feel any less protective.
Comments
I dont know if michael would like that we talk about his kids and less about having doubles <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: --> but again it is just my opinion...
I feel the same...
Of course i understand your intentions of this thread... i know you arent bashing their looks and are investigating the possibility of doubles.
You havent offended me.. this is a free forum where we can discuss anything. Thats what i like about being here. <!-- s:D -->:D<!-- s:D -->
I think recently there have been MANY photos of the children released and leaked onto the net since June 2009. Before then we NEVER saw the children.. i guess that makes me a bit uncomfortable because Michael protected those children so fiercely... and now their images are everywhere
I just dont know what to make of it all... i guess what im trying to say, is that i feel Michaels protection seems to be ebbing away. <!-- s:? -->:?<!-- s:? -->
Makes me worry about those kids.
Sorry homie. it just doesn't add up for me.
It IS possible, but idk.
My little cousin looks different now than he did last year. He is 8. His jawline is getting more pronounced, as well as his cheekbones, chin, etc. Just as I said Blanket's are. He's also taller & getting more slender. It happens. Kids grow up & change too, that's just common knowledge. I don't see why that's hard to believe. Also, as far as Blanket being on the computer, I have little cousins younger than 8, 6 & 7 who know how to use the computer & it could have been someone else's computer/webcam, they set it up for him & showed him how to take a picture. Are you saying he's too stupid to figure out how to take a picture of himself? <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: --> Has anyone seen the commercial with the little 5 year old girl who takeds pictures & uploads them on the computer & makes slideshows. Then she says "my name is ____ & I'm a PC". If she can be taught what to do & figure it out, why wouldn't Blanket be able to? He's a kid but he's not a baby. Also, Paris, Prince & Blanket are growing up. They can't be sheltered forever. They are now around their cousins, having fun being regular kids. If they want to mess around on the webcam like their cousins do & take pictures, they can. The person at fault is whoever is leaking these pictures, not the kids. I don't think MJ would put someone else's kids in danger either. He has body guards to protect himself & his kids. Besides he didn't show them to the world for the longest time to prevent that from happening. If MJ hoaxed his death, I believe he did it because he had to, he trusts his mom to take care of them & he trusts them around their cousins. It's very important for them to have their cousins who are their age around them. Like I said they are growing up. So what? IMO they don't have doubles, the pictures you posted look like the same kids to me. <!-- s:roll: -->:roll:<!-- s:roll: -->
+1
stop saying they have dobles...
ias true that there are posers but this is BLANKET.
the screencap is from a video of him.
the pics with paris are real.they were leaked on the internet by someone that heaked grace's email.
first is a big difference between a poser and the real paris.
i can show you posers if you want to.
i can even make a topic with the pics of the kids that are leaked to see that the pics are real.
second in that pic with paris and the cat the other girl is spencer malnik.you can google "spencer malnik" and you see that is the same girl from the pic.
and 3rd the pics with blanket "screaming" are real.they are like i said screencaps from a video that he made at the webcam.
the video is in the internet on a private photobucket account of one of his counsins(i think is randy Jr).
one day photobucket had a service problem and allowed all the users to have acces at the private albums.
a girl had the luck to enter in randy's photobucket album and took the video (well are 2 videos).
she was about to realise them on the internet,but she thought that is not nice to do that and stoped.
she insted gave us some screencaps and told us the story about the "scream" pic. the story is that blanket is a big fan of "star war" and in some of the part one of the caracters are yelling "liarrrrr" .he screamed"liaaarrr" too.lol
thats the story.
so stop being paranoid about dobles of the kids.
and btw the videos with mj and so called kids doble...is not true.they are the kids.mike would never go out without the kids.
so like i said IS THE REAL BLANKET.
and THE REAL PARIS .
ans THE REAL PRINCE.
and if you want evidence of what i said tell me and i'll post some pics.
....
Exactly, I thought te same thing.
It simply doesn't make any sense at all to use doubles for the children.
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."